- Research article
- Open Access
Identification of the role of C/EBP in neurite regeneration following microarray analysis of a L. stagnalisCNS injury model
© Aleksic and Feng; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012
- Received: 23 December 2010
- Accepted: 4 January 2012
- Published: 4 January 2012
Neuronal regeneration in the adult mammalian central nervous system (CNS) is severely compromised due to the presence of extrinsic inhibitory signals and a reduced intrinsic regenerative capacity. In contrast, the CNS of adult Lymnaea stagnalis (L. stagnalis), a freshwater pond snail, is capable of spontaneous regeneration following neuronal injury. Thus, L. stagnalis has served as an animal model to study the cellular mechanisms underlying neuronal regeneration. However, the usage of this model has been limited due to insufficient molecular tools. We have recently conducted a partial neuronal transcriptome sequencing project and reported over 10,000 EST sequences which allowed us to develop and perform a large-scale high throughput microarray analysis.
To identify genes that are involved in the robust regenerative capacity observed in L. stagnalis, we designed the first gene chip covering ~15, 000 L. stagnalis CNS EST sequences. We conducted microarray analysis to compare the gene expression profiles of sham-operated (control) and crush-operated (regenerative model) central ganglia of adult L. stagnalis. The expression levels of 348 genes were found to be significantly altered (p < 0.05) following nerve injury. From this pool, 67 sequences showed a greater than 2-fold change: 42 of which were up-regulated and 25 down-regulated. Our qPCR analysis confirmed that CCAAT enhancer binding protein (C/EBP) was up-regulated following nerve injury in a time-dependent manner. In order to test the role of C/EBP in regeneration, C/EBP siRNA was applied following axotomy of cultured Lymnaea PeA neurons. Knockdown of C/EBP following axotomy prevented extension of the distal, proximal and intact neurites. In vivo knockdown of C/EBP postponed recovery of locomotory activity following nerve crush. Taken together, our data suggest both somatic and local effects of C/EBP are involved in neuronal regeneration.
This is the first high-throughput microarray study in L. stagnalis, a model of axonal regeneration following CNS injury. We reported that 348 genes were regulated following central nerve injury in adult L. stagnalis and provided the first evidence for the involvement of local C/EBP in neuronal regeneration. Our study demonstrates the usefulness of the large-scale gene profiling approach in this invertebrate model to study the molecular mechanisms underlying the intrinsic regenerative capacity of adult CNS neurons.
- Neurite Outgrowth
- Central Nervous System Injury
- Neuronal Regeneration
- Central Nervous System Neuron
- Spinal Cord Injury Model
Injuries of the central nervous system (CNS) can lead to devastating and irreversible loss of function because adult mammalian CNS neurons have a limited regenerative capacity [1–5]. This is partially due to an age dependent reduction in the intrinsic regenerative potential of CNS neurons [6–9]. In contrast, some adult invertebrate neurons are capable of spontaneous regeneration following injury [10, 11]. Lymnaea stagnalis (L. stagnalis) has served as a critical model system to study nerve regeneration because of its ability to spontaneously regenerate and restore function in the adult [12–16]. Specifically, identified adult Lymnaea neurons can be isolated individually and maintained in culture, allowing for axonal outgrowth and functional synapse formation between appropriate synaptic partners [17–19]. L. stagnalis neural genes include homologues of well known transcription factors, genes involved in neurotransmission, axon guidance and signalling pathways . Taking advantage of this model system, a number of groups demonstrated the roles of neurotrophins [14, 21], and neurotransmitters [12, 22] on neurite outgrowth and regeneration. Moreover, retinoic acid (RA) isomers have been identified in adult Lymnaea neurons, and 9-cis-RA has a novel role in chemoattraction and growth cone guidance [23–25]. Since many molecular mechanisms are conserved across species, the identification of molecules involved in neuronal regeneration in L. stagnalis will aid our understanding of factors which may promote regeneration in the mammalian CNS.
One main limitation of using L. stagnalis in genetic functional studies of neuronal regeneration has been a lack of large-scale screening tools, such as microarray analysis [26, 27]. To circumvent this limitation, we have recently sequenced more than 10, 000 ESTs (expression sequence tags) from the CNS transcriptome of L. stagnalis  and established the largest neuronal EST database in Lymnaea (http://www.lymnaea.org). In combination with the availability of the microarray technology [28, 29], these gene sequences provide us with the opportunity to perform a high-throughput screening for altered gene expression levels following nerve injury in L. stagnalis. In this study, we have designed the first microarray chip covering 10, 333 known L. stagnalis genes to profile the gene expression patterns following CNS injury. We identified 348 genes that were differentially regulated following CNS crush. Using real-time PCR (qPCR) analysis we confirmed that the gene expression level of CCAAT enhancer binding protein (C/EBP), a transcription factor, is up-regulated following nerve injury. Knockdown of C/EBP following axotomy of cultured PeA cells lead to retraction of the distal, proximal and intact neurites. Our data suggest that C/EBP plays a crucial role in neuronal regeneration of Lymnaea neurons via both somatic and local mechanisms.
CNS injury model of L. stagnalis
Identification of differentially expressed genes
To search for genes that may be involved in neuronal regeneration or degeneration, microarray analyses were carried out to compare the gene expression levels between the sham-operated and crush-operated CNS models (Figure 1A, inset). We used an unpaired t-test for comparison of the 15,000 array signals between two groups: sham- and crush-operated groups. This analysis resulted in the selection of 348 genes or ESTs (See Additional File 1) that were differentially regulated 3 hours following CNS injury (p < 0.05). Further screening for genes with a fold-change > 2 resulted in a final group of 67 differentially expressed genes. Figure 1B shows a heat map representing the hierarchical clustering of the 67 genes with significant differential expression levels between the control and injured groups. Overall, more genes were up-regulated (n = 42) than that of which were down-regulated (n = 25), suggesting that diverse regulatory pathways and biological processes are activated within the first 3 hours following injury (Figure 1C1). Among the 67 regulated genes, 16 have been identified with known functions related to development, survival or signal transduction; the functions of the majority of genes (51) have not yet been described (Figure 1C2).
Gene expression levels of C/EBP change in a time-dependent manner following injury
To study its temporal expression pattern, we further measured the gene level of C/EBP at 1 hour, 3 hours and 5 hours post CNS injury using qPCR analysis. The standard curves for C/EBP are shown in Figure 3B with a slope of -3.52, indicating the PCR efficiency for the primers are sufficient (Figure 3B). To visualize the gene expression level between the injured and sham groups, the threshold cycles (Ct) of C/EBP (the target gene) and GAPDH (the control gene) were plotted against each other, as described previously . Figure 3C shows the representatives of Ct-Ct correlation plots between the C/EBP and GADPH gene pair at the three different time points (1 hr, 3 hrs, 5 hrs). The slopes of the plots were consistent in all experimental samples, indicating the equality in amplification efficiencies between the primers of the gene pair. The Y-intercepts (- log(R)/log(Eg)) of these plots were smaller in the injury group (crush) than in the controls (sham) at all the times tested, indicating the relative expression level of C/EBP mRNA increased following injury. Specifically, C/EBP mRNA was initially increased by 7.36 ± 0.73, (n = 5) at 1 hr after CNS injury, but appeared to reduce to 2.35 ± 0.26 (n = 5) by 3 hrs and 1.98 ± 0.75, (n = 5) by 5 hrs, albeit at levels that are still significantly greater than in sham-operated (control) animal (Figure 3D). These results suggest that elevation of C/EBP mRNA expression may be necessary for transcriptional induction of regeneration associated genes, and thus likely to be a direct target of injury induced signalling cascades that promote neuronal repair.
The role of C/EBP in axonal elongation following axotomy
C/EBP siRNA treatment hinders locomotion recovery in vivofollowing CNS injury
In this study, we designed the first Lymnaea gene chip for microarray analysis and profiled the gene expression patterns during the early stages of the CNS repair following injury. We found that 67 genes were significantly regulated during the first three hours post injury, including the conserved gene transcription factor C/EBP. We further described the temporal gene regulation pattern of C/EBP following CNS injury using qPCR analysis. Reduction of C/EBP mRNA level by C/EBP siRNAs following axotomy suppressed outgrowth of the distal and somatic neurite in vitro at different time points, and disrupted the recovery of locomotory function of the snails following nerve injury in vivo. Our data further support the notion that C/EBP is required for nerve regeneration.
L. stagnalis has been used as a simple and reliable model to investigate genes involved in regeneration, due to its ability to functionally recover following CNS injury in vivo. For example, central ganglia cell (CGC) connections to buccal ganglia were crushed and as a result the feeding behaviour in animals was disrupted. Two weeks following the procedure the CGC regenerated, functional synapses formed between proper synaptic partners and the feeding behaviour was again observed . In vivo CNS regeneration was also observed following axotomy of innervating axons to the pneumostome and surrounding areas which prevented the occurrence of lung respiration in 69% of snails. Several weeks following surgery, axonal regeneration leading to the reformation of functional synapses was observed and pneumostome opening returned to normal . In this study, we used the modified CNS injury model in which both the right parietal (RPa) and the right cerebral nerves (RCe) were crushed (Figure 1A). We are interested in the gene regulation occurring at the early stages of CNS trauma, thus our in vivo experiments were completed within 5 hours following injury.
The ability to profile the expression of thousands of genes simultaneously makes microarrays an invaluable biomedical research tool . A previous study used microarray approach to assess the genes involved in anti-inflammatory responses in a spinal cord injury model . The anti-inflammatory response is an important component of secondary tissue damage following spinal cord injury. The microarray study allowed for identification of a conserved novel regulator of regeneration, and provided a new mechanism by which to initiate the regenerative response . However, shortcomings of microarray analysis are associated with poor reliability [35–38] and specificity . Due to the inherent sources of error in microarray technology, it is necessary to confirm the findings using an independent methodology from separate samples. Real-time quantitative PCR is a readily used technique to confirm microarray data [39–41]. In our study, we conducted qPCR analysis using different samples and verified that the expression of C/EBP was indeed up-regulated following nerve injury.
Recovery from nerve injury and neuronal regeneration are time-dependent events, from the initial inflammatory response to the development of the glial scar . Inflammation, neurotransmitter dysfunction, ionic imbalance, cytoskeletal alteration and increased transcription occur as early as 3 hrs following spinal cord injury [41, 43, 44]. Nerve outgrowth and regeneration can be enhanced by steroids during a critical window within the first 6 hrs after nerve injury . In the C. elegans, axons regenerate following axotomy in vivo and by 24 hrs fully functional synapses are formed . We have recently demonstrated that L. stagnalis regeneration post injury in vitro can be seen as early as 3 hrs, and reformation of connections between the proximal and distal axon is observed by 24 hrs . Deducing the gene regulation during the early response following neuronal injury is important in uncovering the molecular basis of neuronal regeneration. In this study, our microarray gene expression analysis identified 67 genes that were significantly regulated following CNS injury in L. stagnalis. We examined C/EBP gene expression at three different time points (1 hr, 3 hrs, 5 hrs) in order to understand how it is regulated temporally in the early stages of recovery and repair. Our results indicated that the C/EBP gene was up-regulated in a time-dependent manner following CNS injury (Figure 3). We further showed the locomotory activity of the control snails was severely disrupted immediately following nerve injury but recovered gradually over 10 days. C/EBP siRNA application prior to the nerve crush procedure disrupted the recovery of locomotory function of the snails (Figure 6), suggesting that C/EBP is required for nerve regeneration in vivo. Although our in vitro data suggest that sufficient C/EBP levels in neurons are required for axonal outgrowth, it is possible that an increased C/EBP expression in non-neuronal (phagocytic) cells involved in nerve regeneration and inflammatory responses also contributes to the observed recovery of locomotory activity in the injured snails.
C/EBPs belong to the basic leucine zipper DNA binding protein family and are transcription factors with diverse cellular roles, including regulating cell growth, differentiation, learning and memory, and apoptosis [48–50]. C/EBPs are also responsive to brain injury and ischemia [51, 52]. Six isoforms of C/EBP have been found in mammals . C/EBPβ is highly homologous to Lymnaea C/EBP (LC/EBP) . C/EBPβ was first identified as a mediator of the inflammatory response and IL-6 signalling through its binding to IL-6 response elements in the promoters of acute phase response genes TNF, IL-8, and G-CSF . C/EBP expression is enriched in neurons. It is up-regulated following brain injury in various neuronal regenerative animal models [56–58]. Its expression is regulated by transcription factors such as CREB and NFIL-3 [59–61]. Aplysia nerve injury activates axoplasmic kinase, RISK-1, which phosphorylates apC/EBPβ and initiates the binding of apC/EBPβ to the ERE enhancer site in vitro. Increases in RISK-1 and apC/EBP were detected in injured neurons . In leech, C/EBP mRNA was increased during neuronal regeneration . In this study, we show that C/EBP mRNA expression is increased following CNS injury in a time-dependent manner. The 7-fold increase in C/EBP mRNA at 1 hr following injury is likely related to the inflammatory response. The sustained 2 fold increase over the 5 hr period suggests that C/EBP may be essential for transcriptional induction of regeneration associated genes. Knockdown of C/EBP mRNA expression following axotomy by target-gene siRNA caused a reduction in neurite outgrowth in both distal and proximal axons at different time points. Due to that siRNAs were applied following axotomy, our data of C/EBP siRNAs causing suppression of distal neurites suggests that local C/EBP mRNA is likely involved in neuronal regeneration/elongation. In contrast to the distal section of neurites which may rely on local protein synthesis to grow, the cell somata may continuously provide complimentary mechanisms to sustain C/EBP levels and maintain neurite properties. The delayed effect of C/EBP siRNAs on the proximal regrowth (Figure 5B) further supports the notion that C/EBP is required for axonal regeneration.
This is the first microarray study in L. stagnalis, allowing us to identify genes that are differentially regulated following CNS injury. These genes may be involved in regeneration and provide a new database for the study of specific proteins and genes in response to CNS injury. We also identified the role of the transcription factor C/EBP in neuronal regeneration following axotomy of adult neurons in vitro, and provided new insights into the potential targets for CNS injury.
Fresh water pond snails, L. stagnalis, were obtained from culture at the Free University, Amsterdam, and maintained in the laboratory under standard conditions at the University of Toronto [31, 32]. All animals used were kept in water at 20°C under a 12 hour light: dark cycle, and fed green leaf lettuce twice a week. Two-month old animals having a shell length of ~20 mm were used for the experiment.
Surgical procedures and in vivo nerve injury
Snails were anesthetized by injecting 0.5 - 1 ml of 60 mM MgCl2 into the foot. In sterile snail saline containing (in mM): NaCl 51.3; KCl 1.7; CaCl2 4.1; MgCl2 1.5 (pH was adjusted to 7.9 with 1 mM HEPES/NaOH) a small incision was made in the dorsal head region and pinned open, exposing the cerebral and buccal ganglia. In the crush-operated animals, all right parietal and cerebral nerves were crushed using forceps . Sham-operated animals were operated in the same way as the crush-operated groups, except that the right parietal and cerebral nerves were not crushed. Following the operation, both the sham-operated and crush-operated animals were maintained under standard laboratory conditions.
RNA extraction and cDNA synthesis
Snails were anesthetized with 10% (v/v) Listerine for 10 min, following which the CNS including the buccal ganglia were dissected out for total RNA extraction at 1 hr, 3 hrs or 5 hrs post-injury. For the microarray there were 4 groups of sham-operated and 4 groups of crush-operated animals each with 2 snails per group. For RT-PCR 5 new groups of crush-operated and 5 new groups of sham-operated snails were used with 2 snails per group. We used TRIzol reagent and a modified protocol (Invitrogen, USA). 100 μl of Trizol was used per two excised CNS and buccal ganglia, and the final pellet was resuspended in 10 μl of RNase free water. RNA quality was checked on an agarose gel prior to cDNA synthesis and RNA concentration was measured using spectrophotometry. First strand synthesis of cDNA was conducted using SuperScript III reverse transcriptase (Invitrogen, USA) with random hexamer primer (Fermentas, USA) in a reaction volume of 20 μl for 1 μg of total RNA.
A microarray chip was designed based on the L. stagnalis CNS EST database http://www.Lymnaea.org/. The 15 K gene chip (cat#: G2509F) was made by Agilent Technologies (U.S.A). Briefly, the array contained a total of 15,000 spots, 10,333 probes were from unique EST/nucleotides and 4,425 probes included different sequences from the duplicate genes, and 50 technical replicates with 9 replicates per probe. The hybridization was performed by the University Health Network Microarray Centre (Toronto, Canada). One-Color Microarray-based Gene Expression Analysis (Agilent technologies) with cyanine 3-labeled targets was used to measure gene expression in experimental and control samples. Briefly, 500 μg of total RNA were amplified using a Fluorescent Linear Amplification Kit (Agilent Technologies) and labeled with Cy3-CTP and hybridized to the L. stagnalis cDNA microarray at 65°C for 17 hours. The images were scanned using a Genepix 4000B microarray scanner (Axon Instruments, Foster City, CA, USA). Image analysis, spot quality control and normalization were performed using the Feature Extraction software 9.5.3 from Agilent Technologies. The intensity files were loaded into GeneSpring GX 10.0.2 software (Agilent Technologies), a 75th percentile signal value was used to normalize Agilent one-color microarray signals for comparisons between arrays. The signals were log 2 transformed, and the median of the replicated probes was obtained. An unpaired t-test was performed and p < 0.05 was used as a cutoff; from these results we used a 2.0-fold change in signal intensity as a cutoff line to consider the differential expression of a gene as significant.
Real-time quantitative PCR (qPCR)
Real-time PCR was performed using 5 μl of SYBR Greener Reagent System (Invitrogen), added to 1 μl of the appropriate primer set, and a diluted sample of cDNA that was topped off with DEPC water to a final volume of 10 μl. For the qPCR validation and time-course a new set of RNA samples from sham and crush-operated snails was used. Glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) has been used as a common control gene for spinal cord injury models [40, 67], and its expression was unchanged following CNS injury in L. stagnalis, therefore, we used it as an internal control (Figure 3B). The cycling parameters were: 95°C/5 min, 40 cycles of 95°C/0.5 min, 55°C/1 min, followed by a melting curve protocol. The primer sequences used in the study are as follows: GAPDH 5'CTGCTGATGCCCCTATGTTTG/5'GTTGGTGGTGCAAGACTGCATT; C/EBP 5'CCTCTCATACATCTCCAAGTGC/5'GAGATGTTAGGGTGTAGGAATGG.
Changes in gene expression levels following CNS injury were determined using Ct-Ct plots , this analysis is a modification of the ΔΔCT and efficiency correction methods . As described in our recent report , the efficiency of the amplification is assumed to be independent of the sample, and the standard curves from all the samples are linear. Assuming that the PCR efficiencies are independent of the sample, a Ct-Ct plot is created by plotting the Ct (threshold cycle) values of the test gene against the control gene. This yields a linear correlation between the gene pair and the slope (m) of the plot is described as m = log(Ec)/log(Eg). The Y axis of these plots is described by Ctg = m × Ctc - log(R)/log(Eg); where R is the relative expression level between the target gene (Qg) and control gene (Qc); Eg is the amplification efficiency of the target gene; Ctg and Ctc are the threshold cycles of the target gene and control gene, respectively . The Y-intercept, a quotient of - log(R)/log(Eg), is as a measure of R, because Eg is constant. Thus, a small change in the Yint in the injury group over the control group indicates a decrease in the relative target-gene expression level.
Based on L. stagnalis C/EBP sequence, we designed a 27-mer siRNA using SciTools RNAi Design online software (IDT DNA). When choosing siRNA we selected for sequences with moderate to low G/C content, biased towards the 3'-terminus and purposely avoided sequences encoding the transmembrane domains . The selected sequences were then purchased from Shanghai GenePharma Co. Ltd. The sequences for each siRNA are as follows: C/EBP siRNA#1: 5'CUAACAUCUCCUACUCAU UCCCAAA/5'UUUGGGAAUGAGUAGGAGAUGUUAGGG; C/EBP siRNA#2: 5'GGAUUAUAGUCAACAAAC/5'CUGCCUAGUUUGUUGACU; Control siRNA: 5'UUCUCCGAACGUGUCACGUTT/5'ACGUGACACGUUCGGAGAATT. For whole animal knockdown experiments snails were anaesthetized with 10% (v/v) Listerine, following which 2 μl of 20 μM control siRNA or C/EBP siRNA was injected into the head, above the central ganglia using a microlitre syringe (Hamilton Company, Reno, NV, USA) . To confirm the siRNA knockdown using RT-PCR the ganglia were removed 48 hrs post-injection for RNA extraction (Figure 4C).
Quantification of locomotion activity
Sham or crush operations were performed 48 hrs after injection with either saline, control siRNA, or C/EBP siRNA into the central ganglia region. Individual snails were placed in a large Petri dish (10 cm diameter, 2 cm depth) in 15 ml of water from their home aquaria. The snails were given 5 minutes to acclimate to their environment, and then were recorded for 10 minutes using Virtual Dub 1.9 software. The distance that each snail has crawled in 10 min was analyzed using ImageTool 3.1 software (UTHSCSA, Texas). Locomotion was analyzed prior to the surgery, and at day 1, day 5 and day 10 post operation.
Primary cell culture
Snails were anaesthetized for 10 minutes in 10% (v/v) Listerine, and the central ring and the buccal ganglia were excised in snail saline containing (mM): NaCl 51.3, KCl 1.7, CaCl2 4.1, MgCl2 1.5, HEPES 2 (adjusted to pH 7.9 using 1 mM NaOH). The ganglia was then incubated in 3 mg/ml trypsin (Type III, Sigma, Ontario, Canada) for 24 min. PeA neurons, which are involved in locomotion , were identified and isolated from pedal ganglia with gentle suction using a Sigmacote (Sigma, Ontario, Canada)-coated fire-polished pipette (2 mm, WPI, 1B200F) as previously described [72, 73]. The neurons were then placed onto a poly-L-lysine coated culture dish and maintained in diluted conditioned medium (CM) at room temperature [72–74].
Axotomy and neurite outgrowth
PeA cells were cultured in CM at room temperature for 24 hours, allowing for sufficient neurite outgrowth. Transection of the neurite was then performed using a glass micropipette, controlled by a micromanipulator, and moving it perpendicularly across the neurite until a complete cut was observed [47, 75]. Immediately following axotomy the cells were treated with either the brain conditioned medium (CM) or a final concentration of 7 nM C/EBP siRNA#1, C/EBP siRNA#1 siRNA or control siRNA in a final volume of 2 ml of the CM. Images of neurites were collected at the time of RNAi treatment (t = 0), and over a 36 hr period at three time points (10, 24 or 36 hrs), using an inverted microscope (40× objective) (Olympus CK X41) with a digital camera (Olympus C5050). The lengths of the proximal neurite, the distal neurite and an intact neurite of the axotomized cell were measured at various time points, using ImageTool 3.1 software (UTHSCSA, Texas).
Data are presented as mean ± S.E.M. Data were imported to Microsoft Excel or OriginPro v8 (Silverdale Scientific Ltd., Bucks, HP, USA) for graphical presentation. Statistical significance between mean values of experimental groups was evaluated using a Student's t-test for two groups and ANOVA with the Holm-Sidak post hoc test for multiple comparisons, using SigmaStat 3.0 (SPSS, Chicao, IL, USA). Significance was defined by probability level of lower than p < 0.05.
This work was supported by an operating grant to ZPF from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR MOP151437). MA is the recipient of an Ontario Graduate Scholarship. ZPF holds a New Investigator Award from the Heart and Stroke Foundation of Canada. We thank Dr. Chi-Yip Ho (Microarray Laboratory, Samuel Lunenfeld Research Institute, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada) for his comments on gene chip development.
- Aguayo AJ, David S, Bray GM: Influences of the glial environment on the elongation of axons after injury: transplantation studies in adult rodents. J Exp Biol. 1981, 95: 231-240.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Fawcett JW, Asher RA: The glial scar and central nervous system repair. Brain Res Bull. 1999, 49: 377-391. 10.1016/S0361-9230(99)00072-6.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Xu XM, Guenard V, Kleitman N, Aebischer P, Bunge MB: A combination of BDNF and NT-3 promotes supraspinal axonal regeneration into Schwann cell grafts in adult rat thoracic spinal cord. Exp Neurol. 1995, 134: 261-272. 10.1006/exnr.1995.1056.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Bregman BS, McAtee M, Dai HN, Kuhn PL: Neurotrophic factors increase axonal growth after spinal cord injury and transplantation in the adult rat. Exp Neurol. 1997, 148: 475-494. 10.1006/exnr.1997.6705.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ye JH, Houle JD: Treatment of the chronically injured spinal cord with neurotrophic factors can promote axonal regeneration from supraspinal neurons. Exp Neurol. 1997, 143: 70-81. 10.1006/exnr.1996.6353.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Di Giovanni S: Molecular targets for axon regeneration: focus on the intrinsic pathways. Expert Opin Ther Targets. 2009, 13: 1387-1398. 10.1517/14728220903307517.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Bates CA, Stelzner DJ: Extension and regeneration of corticospinal axons after early spinal injury and the maintenance of corticospinal topography. Exp Neurol. 1993, 123: 106-117. 10.1006/exnr.1993.1144.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Hasan SJ, Keirstead HS, Muir GD, Steeves JD: Axonal regeneration contributes to repair of injured brainstem-spinal neurons in embryonic chick. J Neurosci. 1993, 13: 492-507.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Blackmore M, Letourneau PC: Changes within maturing neurons limit axonal regeneration in the developing spinal cord. J Neurobiol. 2006, 66: 348-360. 10.1002/neu.20224.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Brockes JP, Kumar A: Comparative aspects of animal regeneration. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol. 2008, 24: 525-549. 10.1146/annurev.cellbio.24.110707.175336.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Goss RJ: The evolution of regeneration: adaptive or inherent?. J Theor Biol. 1992, 159: 241-260. 10.1016/S0022-5193(05)80704-0.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Koert CE, Spencer GE, van MJ, Li KW, Geraerts WP, Syed NI, et al: Functional implications of neurotransmitter expression during axonal regeneration: serotonin, but not peptides, auto-regulate axon growth of an identified central neuron. J Neurosci. 2001, 21: 5597-5606.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hermann PM, Wildering WC, Bulloch AG: Functional recovery of respiratory behavior during axonal regeneration in snails (Lymnaea stagnalis) is experience dependent. Behav Neurosci. 2000, 114: 410-423.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Wildering WC, Hermann PM, Bulloch AG: Lymnaea epidermal growth factor promotes axonal regeneration in CNS organ culture. J Neurosci. 2001, 21: 9345-9354.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Janse C, Kits KS, Lever AJ: The re-formation of connections in the nervous sytem of Lymnaea stagnalis after nerve injury. Malacologia. 1979, 18: 485-488.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hermann PM, Nicol JJ, Nagle GT, Bulloch AG, Wildering WC: Epidermal growth factor-dependent enhancement of axonal regeneration in the pond snail Lymnaea stagnalis: role of phagocyte survival. J Comp Neurol. 2005, 492: 383-400. 10.1002/cne.20732.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Feng ZP, Klumperman J, Lukowiak K, Syed NI: In vitro synaptogenesis between the somata of identified Lymnaea neurons requires protein synthesis but not extrinsic growth factors or substrate adhesion molecules. J Neurosci. 1997, 17: 7839-7849.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Syed NI, Lukowiak K, Bulloch AG: Specific in vitro synaptogenesis between identified Lymnaea and Helisoma neurons. Neuroreport. 1992, 3: 793-796. 10.1097/00001756-199209000-00018.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Syed NI, Bulloch AG, Lukowiak K: The respiratory central pattern generator (CPG) of Lymnaea reconstructed in vitro. Acta Biol Hung. 1992, 43: 409-419.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Feng ZP, Zhang Z, van Kesteren RE, Straub VA, van NP, Jin K, et al: Transcriptome analysis of the central nervous system of the mollusc Lymnaea stagnalis. BMC Genomics. 2009, 10: 451-10.1186/1471-2164-10-451.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ridgway RL, Syed NI, Lukowiak K, Bulloch AG: Nerve growth factor (NGF) induces sprouting of specific neurons of the snail, Lymnaea stagnalis. J Neurobiol. 1991, 22: 377-390. 10.1002/neu.480220406.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Spencer GE, Klumperman J, Syed NI: Neurotransmitters and neurodevelopment. Role of dopamine in neurite outgrowth, target selection and specific synapse formation. Perspect Dev Neurobiol. 1998, 5: 451-467.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Dmetrichuk JM, Carlone RL, Jones TR, Vesprini ND, Spencer GE: Detection of endogenous retinoids in the molluscan CNS and characterization of the trophic and tropic actions of 9-cis retinoic acid on isolated neurons. J Neurosci. 2008, 28: 13014-13024. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3192-08.2008.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Farrar NR, Dmetrichuk JM, Carlone RL, Spencer GE: A novel, nongenomic mechanism underlies retinoic acid-induced growth cone turning. J Neurosci. 2009, 29: 14136-14142. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2921-09.2009.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Carter CJ, Farrar N, Carlone RL, Spencer GE: Developmental expression of a molluscan RXR and evidence for its novel, nongenomic role in growth cone guidance. Dev Biol. 2010, 343: 124-137. 10.1016/j.ydbio.2010.03.023.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Aimone JB, Leasure JL, Perreau VM, Thallmair M: Spatial and temporal gene expression profiling of the contused rat spinal cord. Exp Neurol. 2004, 189: 204-221. 10.1016/j.expneurol.2004.05.042.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Carmel JB, Galante A, Soteropoulos P, Tolias P, Recce M, Young W, et al: Gene expression profiling of acute spinal cord injury reveals spreading inflammatory signals and neuron loss. Physiol Genomics. 2001, 7: 201-213.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Pan JZ, Jornsten R, Hart RP: Screening anti-inflammatory compounds in injured spinal cord with microarrays: a comparison of bioinformatics analysis approaches. Physiol Genomics. 2004, 17: 201-214. 10.1152/physiolgenomics.00177.2003.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Sehm T, Sachse C, Frenzel C, Echeverri K: miR-196 is an essential early-stage regulator of tail regeneration, upstream of key spinal cord patterning events. Dev Biol. 2009, 334: 468-480. 10.1016/j.ydbio.2009.08.008.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Hui K, Senzel A, Feng ZP: Rapid assessment of real-time quantitative PCR data for relative quantification of gene expression. Frontiers in Physiology. 2009, AbstractGoogle Scholar
- Hui K, Fei GH, Saab BJ, Su J, Roder JC, Feng ZP: Neuronal calcium sensor-1 modulation of optimal calcium level for neurite outgrowth. Development. 2007, 134: 4479-4489. 10.1242/dev.008979.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Fei G, Guo C, Sun HS, Feng ZP: Chronic hypoxia stress-induced differential modulation of heat-shock protein 70 and presynaptic proteins. J Neurochem. 2007, 100: 50-61. 10.1111/j.1471-4159.2006.04194.x.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Nejatbakhsh N, Guo CH, Lu TZ, Pei L, Smit AB, Sun HS, et al: Caltubin, a novel molluscan tubulin-interacting protein, promotes axonal growth and attenuates axonal degeneration of rodent neurons. J Neurosci. 2011, 31: 15231-15244. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2516-11.2011.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Yan D, Wu Z, Chisholm AD, Jin Y: The DLK-1 kinase promotes mRNA stability and local translation in C. elegans synapses and axon regeneration. Cell. 2009, 138: 1005-1018. 10.1016/j.cell.2009.06.023.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Murphy D: Gene expression studies using microarrays: principles, problems, and prospects. Adv Physiol Educ. 2002, 26: 256-270.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Asyali MH, Alci M: Reliability analysis of microarray data using fuzzy c-means and normal mixture modeling based classification methods. Bioinformatics. 2005, 21: 644-649. 10.1093/bioinformatics/bti036.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kerr MK, Martin M, Churchill GA: Analysis of variance for gene expression microarray data. J Comput Biol. 2000, 7: 819-837. 10.1089/10665270050514954.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Duggan DJ, Bittner M, Chen Y, Meltzer P, Trent JM: Expression profiling using cDNA microarrays. Nat Genet. 1999, 21: 10-14.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Monaghan JR, Walker JA, Page RB, Putta S, Beachy CK, Voss SR: Early gene expression during natural spinal cord regeneration in the salamander Ambystoma mexicanum. J Neurochem. 2007, 101: 27-40.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- De Biase A, Knoblach SM, Di GS, Fan C, Molon A, Hoffman EP, et al: Gene expression profiling of experimental traumatic spinal cord injury as a function of distance from impact site and injury severity. Physiol Genomics. 2005, 22: 368-381. 10.1152/physiolgenomics.00081.2005.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Tachibana T, Noguchi K, Ruda MA: Analysis of gene expression following spinal cord injury in rat using complementary DNA microarray. Neurosci Lett. 2002, 327: 133-137. 10.1016/S0304-3940(02)00375-0.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Hagg T, Oudega M: Degenerative and spontaneous regenerative processes after spinal cord injury. J Neurotrauma. 2006, 23: 264-280.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Song G, Cechvala C, Resnick DK, Dempsey RJ, Rao VL: GeneChip analysis after acute spinal cord injury in rat. J Neurochem. 2001, 79: 804-815.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ruda MA, Ling QD, Hohmann AG, Peng YB, Tachibana T: Altered nociceptive neuronal circuits after neonatal peripheral inflammation. Science. 2000, 289: 628-631. 10.1126/science.289.5479.628.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Tanzer L, Jones KJ: Neurotherapeutic action of testosterone on hamster facial nerve regeneration: temporal window of effects. Horm Behav. 2004, 45: 339-344. 10.1016/j.yhbeh.2004.01.002.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Yanik MF, Cinar H, Cinar HN, Chisholm AD, Jin Y, Ben-Yakar A: Neurosurgery: functional regeneration after laser axotomy. Nature. 2004, 432: 822-10.1038/432822a.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Nejatbakhsh N, Lu TZ, Guo C, van Kesteren RE, Feng ZP: A putative calcium binding protein, LCaBP regulates neurite regeneration. 2009, Society for Neuroscience, Chicago, IL, Ref Type: AbstractGoogle Scholar
- Menard C, Hein P, Paquin A, Savelson A, Yang XM, Lederfein D, et al: An essential role for a MEK-C/EBP pathway during growth factor-regulated cortical neurogenesis. Neuron. 2002, 36: 597-610. 10.1016/S0896-6273(02)01026-7.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Marshall J, Dolan BM, Garcia EP, Sathe S, Tang X, Mao Z, et al: Calcium channel and NMDA receptor activities differentially regulate nuclear C/EBPbeta levels to control neuronal survival. Neuron. 2003, 39: 625-639. 10.1016/S0896-6273(03)00496-3.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Hatakeyama D, Sadamoto H, Watanabe T, Wagatsuma A, Kobayashi S, Fujito Y, et al: Requirement of new protein synthesis of a transcription factor for memory consolidation: paradoxical changes in mRNA and protein levels of C/EBP. J Mol Biol. 2006, 356: 569-577. 10.1016/j.jmb.2005.12.009.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ejarque-Ortiz A, Gresa-Arribas N, Straccia M, Mancera P, Sola C, Tusell JM, et al: CCAAT/enhancer binding protein delta in microglial activation. J Neurosci Res. 2010, 88: 1113-1123.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kfoury N, Kapatos G: Identification of neuronal target genes for CCAAT/enhancer binding proteins. Mol Cell Neurosci. 2009, 40: 313-327. 10.1016/j.mcn.2008.11.004.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Poli V: The role of C/EBP isoforms in the control of inflammatory and native immunity functions. J Biol Chem. 1998, 273: 29279-29282. 10.1074/jbc.273.45.29279.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Hatakeyama D, Fujito Y, Sakakibara M, Ito E: Expression and distribution of transcription factor CCAAT/enhancer-binding protein in the central nervous system of Lymnaea stagnalis. Cell Tissue Res. 2004, 318: 631-641. 10.1007/s00441-004-0965-8.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Akira S, Isshiki H, Sugita T, Tanabe O, Kinoshita S, Nishio Y, et al: A nuclear factor for IL-6 expression (NF-IL6) is a member of a C/EBP family. EMBO J. 1990, 9: 1897-1906.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Nadeau S, Hein P, Fernandes KJ, Peterson AC, Miller FD: A transcriptional role for C/EBP beta in the neuronal response to axonal injury. Mol Cell Neurosci. 2005, 29: 525-535. 10.1016/j.mcn.2005.04.004.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Cortes-Canteli M, Pignatelli M, Santos A, Perez-Castillo A: CCAAT/enhancer-binding protein beta plays a regulatory role in differentiation and apoptosis of neuroblastoma cells. J Biol Chem. 2002, 277: 5460-5467. 10.1074/jbc.M108761200.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Cortes-Canteli M, Wagner M, Ansorge W, Perez-Castillo A: Microarray analysis supports a role for ccaat/enhancer-binding protein-beta in brain injury. J Biol Chem. 2004, 279: 14409-14417. 10.1074/jbc.M313253200.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Sung YJ, Povelones M, Ambron RT: RISK-1: a novel MAPK homologue in axoplasm that is activated and retrogradely transported after nerve injury. J Neurobiol. 2001, 47: 67-79. 10.1002/neu.1016.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Korneev S, Fedorov A, Collins R, Blackshaw SE, Davies JA: A subtractive cDNA library from an identified regenerating neuron is enriched in sequences up-regulated during nerve regeneration. Invert Neurosci. 1997, 3: 185-192. 10.1007/BF02480373.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- MacGillavry HD, Cornelis J, van der Kallen LR, Sassen MM, Verhaagen J, Smit AB, et al: Genome-wide gene expression and promoter binding analysis identifies NFIL3 as a repressor of C/EBP target genes in neuronal outgrowth. Mol Cell Neurosci. 2011, 46: 460-468. 10.1016/j.mcn.2010.11.011.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Miller FD, Tetzlaff W, Bisby MA, Fawcett JW, Milner RJ: Rapid induction of the major embryonic alpha-tubulin mRNA, T alpha 1, during nerve regeneration in adult rats. J Neurosci. 1989, 9: 1452-1463.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Nakata S, Tsutsui M, Shimokawa H, Tamura M, Tasaki H, Morishita T, et al: Vascular neuronal NO synthase is selectively upregulated by platelet-derived growth factor: involvement of the MEK/ERK pathway. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2005, 25: 2502-2508. 10.1161/01.ATV.0000190663.88143.97.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Wang DO, Martin KC, Zukin RS: Spatially restricting gene expression by local translation at synapses. Trends Neurosci. 2010, 33: 173-182. 10.1016/j.tins.2010.01.005.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Wang W, van NE, Willis DE, Twiss JL: RNA transport and localized protein synthesis in neurological disorders and neural repair. Dev Neurobiol. 2007, 67: 1166-1182. 10.1002/dneu.20511.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Willis DE, Twiss JL: The evolving roles of axonally synthesized proteins in regeneration. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2006, 16: 111-118. 10.1016/j.conb.2006.01.002.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Lacroix-Fralish ML, Tawfik VL, Tanga FY, Spratt KF, DeLeo JA: Differential spinal cord gene expression in rodent models of radicular and neuropathic pain. Anesthesiology. 2006, 104: 1283-1292. 10.1097/00000542-200606000-00025.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Pfaffl MW: A new mathematical model for relative quantification in real-time RT-PCR. Nucleic Acids Res. 2001, 29: e45-10.1093/nar/29.9.e45.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Reynolds A, Leake D, Boese Q, Scaringe S, Marshall WS, Khvorova A: Rational siRNA design for RNA interference. Nat Biotechnol. 2004, 22: 326-330. 10.1038/nbt936.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- de Jong RM, Dijkstra BW: Structure and mechanism of bacterial dehalogenases: different ways to cleave a carbon-halogen bond. Curr Opin Struct Biol. 2003, 13: 722-730. 10.1016/j.sbi.2003.10.009.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Spencer GE, Syed NI, Lukowiak K, Winlow W: Halothane-induced synaptic depression at both in vivo and in vitro reconstructed synapses between identified Lymnaea neurons. J Neurophysiol. 1995, 74: 2604-2613.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Syed NI, Bulloch AG, Lukowiak K: In vitro reconstruction of the respiratory central pattern generator of the mollusk Lymnaea. Science. 1990, 250: 282-285. 10.1126/science.2218532.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Feng ZP, Hasan SU, Lukowiak K, Syed NI: Target cell contact suppresses neurite outgrowth from soma-soma paired Lymnaea neurons. J Neurobiol. 2000, 42: 357-369. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4695(20000215)42:3<357::AID-NEU7>3.0.CO;2-F.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Spencer GE, Lukowiak K, Syed NI: Dopamine regulation of neurite outgrowth from identified Lymnaea neurons in culture. Cell Mol Neurobiol. 1996, 16: 577-589. 10.1007/BF02152058.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Erez H, Malkinson G, Prager-Khoutorsky M, De Zeeuw CI, Hoogenraad CC, Spira ME: Formation of microtubule-based traps controls the sorting and concentration of vesicles to restricted sites of regenerating neurons after axotomy. J Cell Biol. 2007, 176: 497-507. 10.1083/jcb.200607098.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.