Open Access

spargel, the PGC- homologue, in models of Parkinson disease in Drosophila melanogaster

BMC Neuroscience201516:70

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12868-015-0210-2

Received: 29 May 2015

Accepted: 12 October 2015

Published: 26 October 2015

Abstract

Background

Parkinson disease (PD) is a progressive neurodegenerative disorder presenting with symptoms of resting tremor, bradykinesia, rigidity, postural instability and additional severe cognitive impairment over time. These symptoms arise from a decrease of available dopamine in the striatum of the brain resulting from the breakdown and death of dopaminergic (DA) neurons. A process implicated in the destruction of these neurons is mitochondrial breakdown and impairment. Upkeep and repair of mitochondria involves a number of complex and key components including Pink1, Parkin, and the PGC family of genes. PGC- has been characterized as a regulator of mitochondria biogenesis, insulin receptor signalling and energy metabolism, mutation of this gene has been linked to early onset forms of PD. The mammalian PGC family consists of three partially redundant genes making the study of full or partial loss of function difficult. The sole Drosophila melanogaster homologue of this gene family, spargel (srl), has been shown to function in similar pathways of mitochondrial upkeep and biogenesis.

Results

Directed expression of srl-RNAi in the D. melanogaster eye causes abnormal ommatidia and bristle formation while eye specific expression of srl-EY does not produce the minor rough eye phenotype associated with high temperature GMR-Gal4 expression. Ddc-Gal4 mediated tissue specific expression of srl transgene constructs in D. melanogaster DA neurons causes altered lifespan and climbing ability. Expression of a srl-RNAi causes an increase in mean lifespan but a decrease in overall loco-motor ability while induced expression of srl-EY causes a severe decrease in mean lifespan and a decrease in loco-motor ability.

Conclusions

The reduced lifespan and climbing ability associated with a tissue specific expression of srl in DA neurons provides a new model of PD in D. melanogaster which may be used to identify novel therapeutic approaches to human disease treatment and prevention.

Keywords

spargel PGC- Neurodegeneration Parkinson disease Drosophila melanogaster

Background

Parkinson disease (PD) is a common and progressive neurological disease that is estimated to afflict 1 % of all individuals over the age of 60 years worldwide [1]. Although the direct cause of PD is as of yet unknown, the clinical symptoms include resting tremor, bradykinesia, rigidity and postural instability. In addition to these classical symptoms recent discoveries have shown that effects may include cognitive impairment such as loss of memory and depression [2]. These symptoms are caused by a decrease in the amount of dopamine available in the striatum area of the brain and in many cases characterized by an accumulation of harmful protein aggregates known as Lewy bodies in the neurons of the substantia nigra pars compacta [3]. The eventual dysfunction and breakdown of these neurons is responsible for the symptoms and pathology of PD [4]. Both genetic and environmental factors have been found to contribute to PD with many forms of the disease being attributed to a combination of the two. Environmental factors include: chemical exposure, brain trauma, obesity, diabetes and age [5]. Alternatively, there have been a number of familial cases of PD identified which suggests a genetic link to certain forms of this disease [6]. This link is especially strong in the case of early onset PD which shows a bias towards genetic causes, while environmental conditions seem to more often than not be linked to late onset PD [2]. Identifying and analysing the genes responsible for these inherited forms of PD may give rise to mechanisms of disease progression that are not presently understood. Impaired neuronal activity has been shown to contribute to the lack of dopamine commonly associated with PD etiology. Identifying the cause of this neuronal impairment may help lead to new, effective, strategies to combat PD.

As important and necessary components of eukaryotic cells, mitochondria are integral components in the creation of adenosine tri-phosphate (ATP) for use as chemical energy and are involved in other important pathways such as the control of cellular growth and death, cell signalling and differentiation [7]. As the mitochondria are involved in such diverse and important cellular functions; it is not surprising that the breakdown or dysfunction of mitochondria may result in a number of disorders or diseases including but not limited to movement disorders such as PD [8]. Many of these disorders are caused by defective removal of damaged or non-functional mitochondria and a subsequent lack of de novo synthesis of new mitochondria to replace the aforementioned damaged organelles. Thus, the study of genes that regulate and monitor the health of mitochondria is a reasonable next step for determining potential disease prevention strategies.

The peroxisome proliferation activated co-receptor gamma (PCG) family of genes have been linked to mitochondrial biogenesis [9]. PGC- has been found to be involved in de novo mitochondrial synthesis in various tissues including the liver and brain [10]. Medical data has shown that polymorphisms in PGC- have been commonly found in patients with early onset and severe PD [11]. Other members of this gene family, PGC- [12] and PRC (PGC-1-related-cofactor) [13] have been shown to maintain some functional homology with PGC- and protein sequence comparison of these genes shows close similarity and conservation of active sites [14] making it difficult to completely study the loss of function in human cells.

PGC- shares a functional pathway with two previously characterised PD genes; PINK1 and Parkin [15]. Parkin is a component of a multi-protein E3 ubiquitin ligase that leads to the ubiquitination and subsequent destruction of cellular proteins [16]. Mutations to the Parkin gene result in the degeneration of dopaminergic (DA) neurons, most likely by allowing the aggregation of multiple dysfunctional mitochondria that eventually lead to overall cell death [8]. PINK1 (PTEN induced putative kinase 1) is a serine/threonine-protein kinase that acts by recruiting Parkin to damaged mitochondria [17]. Similarly to Parkin, mutations in PINK1 lead to degeneration and dysfunction of dopaminergic neurons [18]. Parkin and PINK1 act together in concert along with mitofusin 2 (Mfn2) to remove any damaged or dysfunctional mitochondria that may be present while PGC- activity regulates the creation of new mitochondria to replace damaged or removed organelles [19]. Mutation to any of the components of this pathway can lead to impaired mitochondria, decreased cellular fitness and eventual cell death.

A single PGC family gene homologue, spargel (srl), has been identified in Drosophila melanogaster. The SRL protein has been characterized as a downstream component of the insulin signalling TOR pathway and srl mutant flies have a “lean” phenotype typical of mutations that affect growth and proliferation and reduced mitochondrial fitness [20]. Although ubiquitous overexpression of srl has been found to negatively impact organism survival, tissue specific srl expression has been found to provide beneficial effects. Overexpression of srl has been shown to be sufficient to increase mitochondrial activity and mediate tissue specific lifespan extension in the digestive tract and intestine [21]. Altered expression of srl in the heart has been shown to increase capacity for exercise based endurance improvement while decreased srl in cardiac muscle decreases the loco-motor and endurance ability of flies [22]. The lack of gene redundancy present in D. melanogaster makes it an ideal model system to determine the effects of reduced or increase levels of srl expression on whole organism and neuronal longevity, leading to a new model of PD for use in future therapeutic studies.

Results

A multiple alignment of the SRL protein with the three mammalian homologues; PGC-1α, PGC-1β and PRC, provides evidence of evolutionarily conserved protein structure between the human and D. melanogaster forms of this gene (Fig. 1). These proteins differ in length from 1664 amino acids in the case of PRC to 798 amino acids for PGC-1α but functional domains remain consistent across all four. Each contains an N terminal proline rich domain, a bipartite nuclear localization signal, C terminal serine rich region and a highly conserved RNA recognition motif as well as an arginine rich region in all except PGC- (Fig. 1). Each of the mammalian proteins contain at least one leucine rich motif (LXXLL) known to interact with nuclear receptors [23] that is not found in srl, however, an alternative leucine rich motif (FEALLL) is present which has been shown to also interact with nuclear receptors and serve the same function in D. melanogaster [24]. The similarities between D. melanogaster and mammalian proteins indicate that SRL is an ideal candidate to study PGC family activity while avoiding the functional redundancy found in other systems.
Fig. 1

The PGC mammalian family and the Drosophila melanogaster protein SRL share conserved protein domains. a Aligned sequences show the position of each domain in one D. melanogaster and three human PGC family protein sequences. Light upward diagonal indicates proline rich region, wide downward diagonal indicates serine rich region, dark vertical indicates RNA recognition region, solid black box indicates nuclear localization sequence, black frame indicates arginine rich region, LXXLL and FEALLL indicate leucine rich nuclear recognition motifs. b A multiple alignment between PGC-1α, PGC-1β, PRC and SRL shows a high degree of sequence conservation within the RNA recognition motif found at the carboxyl terminus of each protein. Domains were identified using ScanProsite [41], alignment was done using ClustalW2 [42]. Protein sequences obtained from UniProt, accession numbers [Uniprot NP_037393 (PGC-1α)], [Uniprot NP_573570 (PGC-1β)], [Uniprot NP_055877 (PRC)] and [Uniprot NP_730835 (SRL)]. Elements of this figure were adapted from Scarpulla et al. [43]

In order to assay the effect of altered srl activity in neurons, we induced expression of three constructs previously used by Mukherjee and Duttaroy [25]; srl-RNAi (UAS-srl HMS00857 ), srl-RNAi (UAS-srl HMS00858 ) and a srl-EY (UAS- srl EY05931 ) in the neuron rich D. melanogaster eye. Eyes develop two separate yet equally important tissues which can be assayed for neuronal loss during development; ommatidia and bristles. At 25 and 29 °C (the latter for increased expression) under the direction of GMR-Gal4, expression of both srl-RNAi transgenes decreases the number of ommatidia and bristles present in the eye (Fig. 2). Tissue specific expression of srl-EY results in a slight decrease in number of ommatidia and bristles at 25 °C and an increase in number of ommatidia and bristles at 29 °C. Similarly, UAS-lacZ under the control of GMR-Gal4 shows a slight rough eye phenotype at 29 °C which is not produced by the expression of srl-EY.
Fig. 2

Tissue specific srl expression in the Drosophila melanogaster eye results in a reduction in both ommatidia and bristle number. a Scanning electron micrographs of D. melanogaster eyes taken at a horizontal field width of 500 µm. Genotypes are as follows: (I) GMR-Gal4/UAS-lacZ 25 °C, (II) GMR-Gal4/srl-RNAi 1 (UAS-srl HMS00857 ) 25 °C, (III) GMR-Gal4/srl-RNAi 2 (UAS-srl HMS00858 ) 25 °C, (IV) GMRGal4/srl-EY (UAS-srl EY05931 ) 25 °C, (V) GMR-Gal4/UAS-lacZ 29 °C, (VI) GMR-Gal4/srl-RNAi 1 (UAS-srl HMS00857 ) 29 °C, (VII) GMR-Gal4/srl-RNAi 2 (UAS-srl HMS00858 ) 29 °C, (VIII) GMRGal4/srl-EY (UAS-srl EY05931 ) 29 °C. Images were taken with a FEI MLA 650. b Flies show a decrease in the mean number of ommatidia present when srl-RNAi 1 (UAS-srl HMS00857 ) and srl-RNAi 2 (UAS-srl HMS00858 ) are driven with the GMR-Gal4 driver in both standard conditions (25 °C) and at a higher temperature (29 °C). Flies show a slight but not significant decrease in ommatidia number when srl-EY is expressed in a tissue specific manner (UAS-srl EY05931 ) in both standard conditions (25 °C) and at a higher temperature (29 °C). c Flies show a strong decrease in bristle number in standard conditions (25 °C) when srl-RNAi 1 (UAS-srl HMS00857 ), srl-RNAi 2 (UAS-srl HMS00858 ) and srl-EY (UAS-srl EY05931 ) are expressed in D. melanogaster eyes. At a higher temperature (29 °C) srl-EY causes an increase in number of bristles formed compared to lacZ controls, however, this is not statistically significant (UAS-lacZ). Comparisons were measured using a one-way ANOVA and significance was tested using a Tukey post hoc test, n = 10. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001

To determine if the phenotype caused by altered srl expression found in the eye is conserved in all neurons we next looked at tissue specific expression of srl in the DA neurons. To assay the effect of altered srl activity in DA neurons, we conditionally expressed a srl-RNAi transgene (UAS-srl HMS00857 ) and a tissue specific srl-EY construct under the control of the Ddc-Gal4 driver. Under the control of Ddc-Gal4, srl-RNAi expression leads to a marked increase in median lifespan with a premature loss of climbing ability over time when compared to the UAS-lacZ controls (Fig. 3). Tissue specific expression of srl-EY lead to both a decrease in lifespan and loco-motor climbing ability under the control of the Ddc-Gal4 driver. This indicates that altered srl expression responds in a tissue specific nature, even within similar cell types such as neurons. We obtained somewhat similar results when we carried out the experiment at 29 °C, indicating that the observed differences in phenotype between eye and dopaminergic neurons was tissue and not temperature specific.
Fig. 3

Tissue specific altered srl expression in dopaminergic neurons can lead to a model of Parkinson disease Drosophila melanogaster. a Expression of srl-RNAi (UAS-srl HMS00858 ) driven by Ddc-Gal4 results in an increase in lifespan compared to UAS-lacZ controls. Dopaminergic srl-EY (UAS-srl EY05931 ) expression resulted in a decrease in lifespan compared to UAS-lacZ controls. Longevity is shown as a percent survival (P < 0.05 as determined by the Mantel-Cox Log Rank test) N ≥ 200. b Expression of srl-RNAi (UAS-srl HMS00858 ) and srl-EY (UAS-srl EY05931 ) driven by Ddc-Gal4 cause a decrease in climbing ability over time. Dopaminergic specific expression of srl-EY causes a more severe decrease, however, srl-RNAi expressing flies live longer and climb slightly worse than UAS-lacZ controls indicating a potential decrease in climbing activity compared to lifespan. Climbing ability was determined via nonlinear curve fit (CI 95 %). Error bars indicate standard error of the mean, n = 50. c Expression of srl-RNAi (UAS-srl HMS00858 ) driven by Ddc-Gal4 HL4.3D at 29 °C results in an increase in lifespan while srl-EY (UAS- srl EY05931 ) expression at 29 °C resulted in a decrease in lifespan compared to UAS-lacZ controls. Longevity is shown as a percent survival (P < 0.0001 as determined by the Mantel-Cox Log Rank test) N ≥ 150

Discussion

PGC- has been identified as a modulator of mitochondrial biogenesis, energy metabolism [26], insulin signalling [27] and is believed to be linked to human ailments including Alzheimer [28], Huntington [29] and Parkinson diseases [30]. The study of human PGC- is complicated by the partial functional redundancy of the other PGC family members, PGC- and PRC (PGC-1-related-cofactor). The single Drosophila PGC family homologue, srl, has been linked to mitochondrial biogenesis and insulin signalling [25]. We investigate srl as a potential key regulator of disease progression and seek to model this system for future analysis.

The D. melanogaster eye has been used to study potential genes involved in neurodegenerative disease due to the neuron rich nature of the developing tissues located there. When two srl-RNAi constructs are expressed in this tissue, there is a significant reduction in the number of ommatidia and bristles formed. This effect is exacerbated when flies are raised at 29 °C, caused by an increase in the activity of the Gal4 expression system. Alternatively, expression of a previously characterized srl-EY transgene seems to have little effect on ommatidial viability under normal physiological conditions (25 °C). At 29 °C the amount of ommatidial degeneration increases significantly across all genotypes. Interestingly, overexpression of srl-EY at 29 °C does not cause significant degeneration of ommatidia or bristles as found in the UAS-lacZ control at higher temperatures. Experiments by Mukherjee and colleagues have shown that srl overexpression can rescue FoxO mediated eye destruction, indicating a similar effect [25]. It is possible that tissue specific expression of srl in the eye may be sufficient to prevent physiological stressors from causing aberrant cell formation under these conditions.

Surprisingly, expression of srl-RNAi in DA neurons under the control of the Ddc-Gal4 driver caused an increase in the mean lifespan of flies. Despite the increased longevity of these flies, they lose their climbing ability slightly earlier than controls. When considering the increase in lifespan this indicates that although they live longer, they may have severe loco-motor defects during the latter part of their life. Alternatively, DA expression of the srl-EY transgene under the control of the Ddc-Gal4 driver showed a significant decrease in lifespan compared to UAS-lacZ controls. The loco-motor and climbing ability of these flies was also decreased. Taken together, the premature mortality and decreased climbing ability displayed in flies expressing srl-EY in dopamine decarboxylase neurons appears to give a new, previously uncharacterized, model of PD in D. melanogaster.

Altered srl expression has been found to cause various phenotypes in a tissue specific manner. Ubiquitous overexpression of srl has been shown to moderately reduce mean lifespan while overexpression in intestinal stem cells and cells of the digestive tract caused increased lifespan [21]. Similarly, increased srl expression in cardiac muscle has been linked to exercise based endurance improvement and cardiovascular performance [22]. These findings lead us to believe that altered srl expression does not react the same way in the eye model of neurodegeneration as in DA neurons.

Although an increase in lifespan caused by the expression of srl-RNAi was an unexpected result, we hypothesize that a strong decrease in srl expression causes an amount of mitochondrial stress sufficient to activate a protein stress response which has been shown to increase lifespan [31]. The exact mechanism of this increase is a topic of much debate with the most popular hypothesis involving an activation of the unfolded protein response (UPR) [32]. However, it has recently been found that in Caenorhabditis elegans many of the genes involved in the UPR are non-essential for this increase in longevity, suggesting another mechanism for the increase in organismal longevity [33]. Alternatively, this increase in longevity may involve the concept of stress causing the formation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) at a low level which provoke cellular anti-oxidants, causing a stronger response to future ROS exposure [34]. The most commonly used term for this is mitochondrial hormesis (or mitohormesis) [35]. It is quite plausible that stress causes increased longevity through a combination of factors involving ideas from both of the aforementioned explanations.

Conclusion

The use of a model organism in identifying and characterizing the pathways of disease progression is a fundamental step in creating new and novel treatment options. Studying the consequences of altered srl expression in D. melanogaster allows us to study the complex mammalian PGC gene family in a system containing only a single homologue. Identifying the role of srl will lead to an understanding of the associations and pathways related to proper function of this gene and subsequently the consequences of improper gene function. Currently, there is no preventative treatment available for PD with limited options available to combat advanced symptoms. Identification of this new model of PD provides a framework for more advanced studies into complex gene interactions. Connecting cellular processes and characterizing genetic pathways of disease progression may eventually allow for the preventative treatment of genetic forms of PD and novel therapeutic options.

Methods

Drosophila media

The standard cornmeal-yeast-molasses-agar medium is made with 65 g/L cornmeal, 10 g/L nutritional yeast and 5.5 g/L agar supplemented with 50 mL/L fancy grade molasses and 5 mL of 0.1 g/mL methyl 4-hydroxybenzoate in 95 % ethanol and 2.5 mL of propionic acid in standard plastic shell vials. The medium is stored at 4–6 °C and warmed to room temperature for use.

Drosophila transgenic lines

To express transgenes in a subset of cells, including the dopaminergic neurons, the Ddc-Gal4 HL4.3D line was the generous gift of Dr. Jay Hirsh (University of Virginia) [36]. The following lines were obtained from the Bloomington Drosophila Stock Center at Indiana University-Bloomington: (1) to drive expression behind the morphogenetic furrow in the developing eye disc G lass M ultiple R eporter-Gal4 12 (GMR-Gal4; [37]); (2) to act as a benign control for the ectopic expression of transgenes UAS-lacZ 421 (UAS-lacZ; [38]); (3) to express in the presence of Gal4 the endogenous srl gene product a line bearing an EPgy2 insertion in the 5 prime flanking region of srl: y w; P{EPgy2 srlEY05931 (UAS-srl EY05931 ) and (4) to, in the presence of Gal4, express a dsRNA for RNA inhibition (RNAi) of srl: y sc v; P{TRiP.HMS00857}attP2 (UAS-srl HMS00857 ) and y sc v; P{TRiP.HMS00858}attP2 (UAS-srl HMS00858 ).

Scanning electron microscopy of Drosophila melanogaster eye

Female virgins of the GMR-Gal4 were mated with UAS-lacZ, UAS-srl EY05931 , UAS-srl HMS00857 and UAS-srl HMS00858 males. Male progeny of each cross were collected, aged for 3–5 days and frozen at −80 °C. Flies were mounted under a dissecting microscope, and desiccated overnight. The eyes of mounted flies were imaged via scanning electron micrography at 130 times magnification with a Mineral Liberation Analyzer 650F scanning electron microscope. Total bristle count, and total ommatidia count were obtained using ImageJ [39].

Ageing analysis

Female virgins of the Ddc-Gal4 line were mated with UAS-lacZ, UAS-srl EY05931 and UAS-srl HMS00858 males. Male progeny of each cross were collected, maintained in cohorts of no more than 20 to avoid crowding and were placed on new medium every 2 or 4 days for the duration of the experiment. Flies were scored for viability every 2 days until all flies in all genotypes perished. Survival curves were compared by the log-rank (Mantel Cox) test.

Loco-motor analysis

From each of the crosses described above, fifty male progeny were collected and maintained in vials of ten flies, and transferred to new medium twice weekly throughout the duration of the experiment. One week (7 days) after collection, and in seven-day intervals, five cohorts of flies for each genotype were assessed for climbing ability as previously described [40]. Flies were scored every 7 days for their ability to climb within a glass tube of 1.5 cm diameter. Ten trials of each cohort of ten or less flies were scored based upon two cm intervals of height reached. A climbing index was calculated for each vial by the equation: climbing Index = ∑ nm/N, where n is the number of flies at a given level, m is the score for that level (1–5), and N is the total number of flies climbed for that trial. A nonlinear regression curve of 95 % confidence intervals was used to analyze graphs of 5—climbing index as a function of time in days for each genotype. The slope (k) and Y-intercept (Y°) of each non-linear regression curve were calculated, where slope represents the rate of decline in climbing ability, and the Y-intercept represents the initial climbing ability (in the form of 5—climbing index). As neither the slope nor the Y-intercept remained constant across all groups, it was necessary that both parameters were incorporated into statistical analysis to determine differences in climbing ability. A comparison of fits concluded whether or not curves differed between groups.

Abbreviations

ATP: 

adenosine tri-phosphate

DA: 

dopaminergic

D. melanogaster

Drosophila melanogaster

Mfn2: 

mitofusin 2

PD: 

Parkinson disease

PRC: 

PGC-1 related cofactor

PGC: 

proliferation activated co-receptor gamma

Pink1: 

PTEN induced putative kinase 1

srl: 

spargel

Declarations

Authors’ contributions

EMM performed the longevity, loco-motor and eye analysis assays, carried out the bioinformatics and statistical analyses and drafted the initial manuscript. BES conceived and participated in the design and supervision of the study and contributed to the final draft of the manuscript. Both authors have read and approved the final manuscript.

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank a number of talented undergraduate research assistants in the collection of preliminary data including Allison Lamond, Frankie Slade, Maggie McGuire, Daria Snow, Erin McCarthy and Louise Twells. EMM was partially funded by Department of Biology Teaching Assistantships and a School of Graduate Studies Fellowship from Memorial University of Newfoundland. BES received research support from the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) Discovery Grant and Parkinson Society Canada Pilot Project Regional Partnership Program with the Parkinson Society Quebec via Fond Saucier-Van Berkom-Parkinson Quebec and Parkinson Society Newfoundland & Labrador.

Animal ethics

This study was conducted under the approval of the Animal Care Committee of Memorial University of Newfoundland as a Category of Invasiveness Level A protocol under the project title of “Genetic, biochemical and molecular analysis of cell survival and cell death in Drosophila melanogaster” (protocol number: 14-09-BS).

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Biology, Memorial University of Newfoundland

References

  1. Lew M. Overview of Parkinson’s disease. Pharmacotherapy. 2007;27(12):155–60.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Wirdefeldt K, Adami HO, Cole P, Trichopoulos D, Mandel J. Epidemiology and etiology of Parkinson’s disease: a review of the evidence. Eur J Epidemiol. 2011;26(Suppl 1):S1–58.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Olanow CW, McNaught K. Parkinson’s disease, proteins, and prions: milestones. Mov Disord. 2011;26(6):1056–71.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Bekris LM, Mata IF, Zabetian CP. The genetics of Parkinson disease. J Geriatr Psychiatry Neurol. 2010;23(4):228–42.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Vanitallie TB. Parkinson disease: primacy of age as a risk factor for mitochondrial dysfunction. Metabolism. 2008;57(Suppl 2):S50–5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Bereznai B, Molnar MJ. Genetics and present therapy options in Parkinson’s disease: a review. Ideggyogy Sz. 2009;62(5–6):155–63.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Campbell NAWB, Heyden RJ, editors. Biology: exploring life. Boston: Pearson Prentice Hall; 2006.Google Scholar
  8. Greene JC, Whitworth AJ, Kuo I, Andrews LA, Feany MB, Pallanck LJ. Mitochondrial pathology and apoptotic muscle degeneration in Drosophila parkin mutants. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2003;100(7):4078–83.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Krempler F, Breban D, Oberkofler H, Esterbauer H, Hell E, Paulweber B, et al. Leptin, peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma, and CCAAT/enhancer binding protein-alpha mRNA expression in adipose tissue of humans and their relation to cardiovascular risk factors. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2000;20(2):443–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Uldry M, Yang W, St-Pierre J, Lin J, Seale P, Spiegelman BM. Complementary action of the PGC-1 coactivators in mitochondrial biogenesis and brown fat differentiation. Cell Metab. 2006;3(5):333–41.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Clark J, Reddy S, Zheng K, Betensky RA, Simon DK. Association of PGC-1alpha polymorphisms with age of onset and risk of Parkinson’s disease. BMC Med Genet. 2011;12:69.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Kamei Y, Ohizumi H, Fujitani Y, Nemoto T, Tanaka T, Takahashi N, et al. PPARgamma coactivator 1beta/ERR ligand 1 is an ERR protein ligand, whose expression induces a high-energy expenditure and antagonizes obesity. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2003;100(21):12378–83.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Andersson U, Scarpulla RC. Pgc-1-related coactivator, a novel, serum-inducible coactivator of nuclear respiratory factor 1-dependent transcription in mammalian cells. Mol Cell Biol. 2001;21(11):3738–49.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Gershman B, Puig O, Hang L, Peitzsch RM, Tatar M, Garofalo RS. High-resolution dynamics of the transcriptional response to nutrition in Drosophila: a key role for dFOXO. Physiol Genomics. 2007;29(1):24–34.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Ventura-Clapier R, Garnier A, Veksler V. Transcriptional control of mitochondrial biogenesis: the central role of PGC-1alpha. Cardiovasc Res. 2008;79(2):208–17.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Narendra D, Tanaka A, Suen DF, Youle RJ. Parkin is recruited selectively to impaired mitochondria and promotes their autophagy. J Cell Biol. 2008;183(5):795–803.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Koh H, Chung J. PINK1 and Parkin to control mitochondria remodeling. Anat Cell Biol. 2011;43(3):179–84.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Yang Y, Gehrke S, Imai Y, Huang Z, Ouyang Y, Wang JW, et al. Mitochondrial pathology and muscle and dopaminergic neuron degeneration caused by inactivation of Drosophila Pink1 is rescued by Parkin. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2006;103(28):10793–8.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Chen Y, Dorn GW 2nd. PINK1-phosphorylated mitofusin 2 is a Parkin receptor for culling damaged mitochondria. Science. 2013;340(6131):471–5.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Tiefenbock SK, Baltzer C, Egli NA, Frei C. The Drosophila PGC-1 homologue Spargel coordinates mitochondrial activity to insulin signalling. EMBO J. 2009;29(1):171–83.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Rera M, Bahadorani S, Cho J, Koehler CL, Ulgherait M, Hur JH, et al. Modulation of longevity and tissue homeostasis by the Drosophila PGC-1 homolog. Cell Metab. 2011;14(5):623–34.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Tinkerhess MJ, Healy L, Morgan M, Sujkowski A, Matthys E, Zheng L, et al. The Drosophila PGC-1alpha homolog spargel modulates the physiological effects of endurance exercise. PLoS One. 2012;7(2):e31633.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Matsuda S, Harries JC, Viskaduraki M, Troke PJ, Kindle KB, Ryan C, et al. A Conserved alpha-helical motif mediates the binding of diverse nuclear proteins to the SRC1 interaction domain of CBP. J Biol Chem. 2004;279(14):14055–64.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Wang J, Li Y, Zhang M, Liu Z, Wu C, Yuan H, et al. A zinc finger HIT domain-containing protein, ZNHIT-1, interacts with orphan nuclear hormone receptor Rev-erbbeta and removes Rev-erbbeta-induced inhibition of apoCIII transcription. FEBS J. 2007;274(20):5370–81.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Mukherjee S, Duttaroy A. Spargel/dPGC-1 is a new downstream effector in the insulin-TOR signaling pathway in Drosophila. Genetics. 2013;195(2):433–41.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Liang H, Ward WF. PGC-1alpha: a key regulator of energy metabolism. Adv Physiol Educ. 2006;30(4):145–51.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Pagel-Langenickel I, Bao J, Joseph JJ, Schwartz DR, Mantell BS, Xu X, et al. PGC-1alpha integrates insulin signaling, mitochondrial regulation, and bioenergetic function in skeletal muscle. J Biol Chem. 2008;283(33):22464–72.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Qin W, Haroutunian V, Katsel P, Cardozo CP, Ho L, Buxbaum JD, et al. PGC-1alpha expression decreases in the Alzheimer disease brain as a function of dementia. Arch Neurol. 2009;66(3):352–61.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Cui L, Jeong H, Borovecki F, Parkhurst CN, Tanese N, Krainc D. Transcriptional repression of PGC-1alpha by mutant huntingtin leads to mitochondrial dysfunction and neurodegeneration. Cell. 2006;127(1):59–69.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Zheng B, Liao Z, Locascio JJ, Lesniak KA, Roderick SS, Watt ML. PGC-1alpha, a potential therapeutic target for early intervention in Parkinson’s disease. Sci Transl Med. 2010;2(52):52ra73.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Houtkooper RH, Mouchiroud L, Ryu D, Moullan N, Katsyuba E, Knott G, et al. Mitonuclear protein imbalance as a conserved longevity mechanism. Nature. 2013;497(7450):451–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Haynes CM, Ron D. The mitochondrial UPR—protecting organelle protein homeostasis. J Cell Sci. 2010;123(Pt 22):3849–55.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Bennett CF, Vander Wende H, Simko M, Klum S, Barfield S, Choi H, et al. Activation of the mitochondrial unfolded protein response does not predict longevity in Caenorhabditis elegans. Nat Commun. 2014;5:3483.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Lopez-Torres M, Barja G. Calorie restriction, oxidative stress and longevity. Revista espanola de geriatria y gerontologia. 2008;43(4):252–60.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Ristow M, Zarse K. How increased oxidative stress promotes longevity and metabolic health: the concept of mitochondrial hormesis (mitohormesis). Exp Gerontol. 2010;45(6):410–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Lin JY, Yen SH, Shieh KR, Liang SL, Pan JT. Dopamine and 7-OH-DPAT may act on D(3) receptors to inhibit tuberoinfundibular dopaminergic neurons. Brain Res Bull. 2000;52(6):567–72.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Freeman M. Reiterative use of the EGF receptor triggers differentiation of all cell types in the Drosophila eye. Cell. 1996;87(4):651–60.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Brand AH, Perrimon N. Targeted gene expression as a means of altering cell fates and generating dominant phenotypes. Development. 1993;118(2):401–15.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Schneider CA, Rasband WS, Eliceiri KW. NIH Image to ImageJ: 25 years of image analysis. Nat Methods. 2012;9(7):671–5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Todd AM, Staveley BE. Pink1 suppresses alpha-synuclein-induced phenotypes in a Drosophila model of Parkinson’s disease. Genome. 2008;51(12):1040–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. De Castro ESC, Gattiker A, Falquet L, Pagni M, Bairoch A, Bucher P. ScanProsite: detection of PROSITE signature matches and ProRule-associated functional and structural residues in proteins. Nucleic Acids Res. 2006;1(34):W362.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  42. Larkin MABG, Brown NP, Chenna R, McGettigan PA, McWilliam H, Valentin F, Wallace IM, Wilm A, Lopez R, Thompson JD, Gibson TJ, Higgins DG. Clustal W and Clustal X version 2.0. Bioinformatics. 2007;23(21):2947–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Scarpulla RC. Metabolic control of mitochondrial biogenesis through the PGC-1 family regulatory network. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2011;1813(7):1269–78.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Merzetti and Staveley. 2015

Advertisement