Skip to content

Advertisement

BMC Neuroscience

Research article
Open Access

Pheromonal bile acid 3-ketopetromyzonol sulfate primes the neuroendocrine system in sea lamprey

  • Yu-Wen Chung-Davidson1,
  • Huiyong Wang1,
  • Michael J Siefkes1, 2,
  • Mara B Bryan1, 3,
  • Hong Wu1, 4,
  • Nicholas S Johnson1, 5 and
  • Weiming Li1Email author
BMC Neuroscience201314:11

https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2202-14-11

©  Chung-Davidson et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013

Received: 11 September 2012

Accepted: 15 January 2013

Published: 20 January 2013

Abstract

Background

Vertebrate pheromones are known to prime the endocrine system, especially the hypothalamic-pituitary-gonadal (HPG) axis. However, no known pheromone molecule has been shown to modulate directly the synthesis or release of gonadotropin releasing hormone (GnRH), the main regulator of the HPG axis. We selected sea lamprey (Petromyzon marinus) as a model system to determine whether a single pheromone component alters the output of GnRH.

Sea lamprey male sex pheromones contain a main component, 7α, 12α, 24-trihydroxy-5α-cholan-3-one 24-sulfate (3 keto-petromyzonol sulfate or 3kPZS), which has been shown to modulate behaviors of mature females. Through a series of experiments, we tested the hypothesis that 3kPZS modulates both synthesis and release of GnRH, and subsequently, HPG output in immature sea lamprey.

Results

The results showed that natural male pheromone mixtures induced differential steroid responses but facilitated sexual maturation in both sexes of immature animals (χ2 = 5.042, dF = 1, p < 0.05). Exposure to 3kPZS increased plasma 15α-hydroxyprogesterone (15α-P) concentrations (one-way ANOVA, p < 0.05) and brain gene expressions (genes examined: three lamprey (l) GnRH-I transcripts, lGnRH-III, Jun and Jun N-terminal kinase (JNK); one-way ANOVA, p < 0.05), but did not alter the number of GnRH neurons in the hypothalamus in immature animals. In addition, 3kPZS treatments increased lGnRH peptide concentrations in the forebrain and modulated their levels in plasma. Overall, 3kPZS modulation of HPG axis is more pronounced in immature males than in females.

Conclusions

We conclude that a single male pheromone component primes the HPG axis in immature sea lamprey in a sexually dimorphic manner.

Keywords

PheromonePrimingHPG axisGnRHSteroidSexual dimorphism

Background

The term “pheromones” was first introduced by Karlson and Lüscher (1959) to describe the substances involved in chemical communication among conspecifics [1]. Pheromones can be classified as releasers, primers, or more recently, signalers and modulators [2–6]. These functions are not mutually exclusive. Primer pheromones are exemplified by their effects on the onset of puberty, the length of estrous cycles in females, the success or failure of pregnancy, and shifts in hormone levels in mice [6]. Male pheromones have a direct impact on female sexual desire, menstrual cycles and ovulation in humans [7]. About 20% of women who have smelled male underarm secretions have an advanced onset of next luteinizing hormone (LH) pulse [8]. These primer pheromones are all putative pheromones since their chemical structures have yet to be determined.

Sex pheromones exert priming effects via the HPG axis that links environmental inputs to reproductive outputs [3]. Pheromone extracts or pheromone components have been shown to affect gonadotropin (GTH) or LH surge in many species [6, 9, 10]. However, no known pheromone component has been shown to directly induce GnRH release [9–12]. In fish, most studies of GnRH or GTH release have focused on seasonal changes and very few studies pay attention to the daily cycle or pulsatility of GnRH or GTH.

Sea lamprey provides an advantageous vertebrate model to examine the mechanisms by which a pheromone component primes the HPG axis since lamprey GnRH peptides are well characterized [13], and several pheromone molecules have been identified in this species [14–17]. Sea lamprey occupy a key position close to the root of the vertebrate phylogenetic tree [18, 19]. They develop through three distinct life stages [20, 21]. Larval sea lamprey spends several years in burrows as benthic filter feeders in the stream. After going through metamorphosis [22], the resulting parasitic juveniles enter large lakes or the ocean to feed on host fish. After 1.5 to 2 years, the adults cease feeding in the early spring and migrate into rivers to spawn and then die [20, 21]. For parasitic sea lamprey, sexual maturation is halted until they cease feeding and begin an upstream spawning migration [23]. It is not clear how lGnRH-I and -III regulate the final maturation and whether there is a differential expression of hormones or prehormones during this stage. Males arrive at the spawning ground first, build a nest, and complete the final sexual maturation. Mature males release sex pheromones containing 3kPZS through the gills at the onset of spermiation [24]. It is known that 3kPZS stimulates olfactory receptor neurons in the olfactory epithelium [25], and induces upstream movement and searching behavior toward the nest in ovulatory females [14, 26–28]. Downstream from the nests, immature animals are also exposed to 3kPZS, the possible effects of which have not been examined.

We hypothesized that 3kPZS exerts priming effects by altering the HPG output in immature sea lamprey. To test this hypothesis, we first examined the effect of natural pheromone mixtures on sexual maturation of immature lamprey. We then examined the dose response and the time course of synthesized 3kPZS on plasma 15α-P concentrations, brain gene expressions of neuronal activation markers (Jun and JNK) and lGnRH-I and -III, and lGnRH peptide concentrations in the forebrain, hindbrain, and plasma. The results confirmed that waterborne 3kPZS modulated the synthesis and release of lGnRH-I and -III in immature sea lamprey.

Results

Natural male pheromone mixtures facilitate sexual maturation

Exposure to spermiating male washings (SMW, natural male pheromone mixtures) facilitated reproductive maturation in immature males and females (χ2 = 5.042, dF = 1, p < 0.05; Table 1). On average, immature females exposed to SMW began to ovulate in 21 days, whereas immature females exposed to prespermiating male washings (PSMW, no pheromone control) did not start to ovulate until day 40. For immature males, the average time to spermiate when exposed to SMW was 17 days; in contrast, when exposed to PSMW, none of the immature males produced milt by day 40. Immature male lamprey appeared to mature faster (17 ± 3 days) than immature females (21 ± 8 days) after SMW exposure.
Table 1

Natural pheromones facilitate sexual maturation

Treatment

Animals

Days to mature (Mean ± S.E.M)

Percentage of maturation

No. of animals (Immature/Mature)

PSMW

POF

40

16.7

5/1

PSMW

PSM

ND

0

6/0

SMW

POF

21 ± 8

50

3/3

SMW

PSM

17 ± 3

50

3/3

Exposure to water conditioned by mature male sea lampreys (spermiating male washings, SMW) facilitated reproductive maturation in immature males and females. On average, immature females (POF) exposed to SMW began to ovulate in 21 days, whereas POF exposed to immature male washings (PSMW) did not ovulate until day 40. For immature males (PSM), the average time to spermiate after exposure to SMW was 17 days; in contrast, when exposed to PSMW, none of the PSMs had spermiated by day 40. χ2 = 5.042, dF = 1, p < 0.05 (Combine POF and PSM). ND: Not determined.

Sex difference in steroid responses to natural male pheromone mixtures

SMW exposure for 24 h altered plasma 15α-P concent-rations in immature sea lamprey (one-way ANOVA, p < 0.05; Figure 1). There were seasonal effects and sex differences in plasma 15α-P concentrations after exposure to SMW. Plasma 15α-P concentrations increased in immature males but decreased or showed no effect in immature females (Figure 1). Immature males showed an increase in 15α-P concentrations in response to SMW exposure early in the spawning season (May and June) while immature females did not show the decrease in response to SMW until mid-season (June) and the response dropped abruptly after July (Figure 1).
Figure 1

Sex difference in seasonal steroidal responses after natural pheromone exposure in sea lamprey. Exposure to mature male washings (SMW) for 24 h decreased plasma 15α-hydroxyprogesterone (15α-P) concentrations in immature females in June and July while the same treatment increased 15α-P concentrations in immature males in May and June. Lake Huron water (control) and immature male washings (data not shown) had no effect on 15α-P levels in either sex. Females did not have detectable 15α-P in their plasma early in the spawning season (May), but as the season progressed in June and July, plasma 15α-P concentrations became detectable. In immature males, changes in circulating 15α-P after SMW treatment was greater earlier in the spawning season (May) but diminished in later in the season (July). Sex differences in plasma 15α-P concentrations were significant (p < 0.05). * Statistically significant between pre- and post-treatment level in the same group (p < 0.05).

Exposure to 3kPZS increased plasma 15α-P in males

Immature males showed elevated plasma 15α-P concent-rations after continuous exposure to a wide range of 3kPZS for 4 h up to 8 h (2- to 4-fold increase, Figure 2). Exposure to 10-10 M 3kPZS for 4 h was the most effective treatment to increase plasma 15α-P concentration (4-fold change, Figure 1). 3kPZS had no effect on plasma 15α-P concentrations in immature females (Figure 2). There was no apparent dose effect of 3kPZS within the range examined. In fact, higher concentration (10-9 M) of 3kPZS appeared to show longer latency in elevating plasma 15α-P compared to lower concentration (10-11 M or 10-10 M, Figure 2).
Figure 2

Sex difference in steroidal responses after exposure to synthesized pheromone component in sea lamprey. Exposure to 3kPZS increased plasma 15α-hydroxyprogesterone (15α-P) concentrations in immature male but not in immature female sea lamprey. Δ15α-P = (post-treatment 15α-P level) - (pre-treatment 15α-P level). * Statistically different from 0 h control group (p < 0.05).

Induction of forebrain gene expression after 3kPZS exposure in males

3kPZS was most effective at 10-11 M with 24 h exposure time, inducing 7- to 21-fold increase in forebrain gene expressions. As the concentration of 3kPZS increased, the peak of gene expressions shifted to earlier time points (Figure 3) but the magnitude decreased.
Figure 3

Sex difference in forebrain gene expressions after exposure to synthesized pheromone component in sea lamprey. Exposure to 10-11 M 3kPZS increased Jun mRNA (2 h, p < 0.05) but decreased lGnRH-III mRNA concentrations (8 h, 48 h, p < 0.05) in the forebrain of immature females (A-C). Exposure to 3kPZS increased GAP49, 50, 58, lGnRH-III, Jun and JNK mRNA concentrations in the forebrain of immature males (D-E). The following data points are statistically different from 0 h control (p < 0.05). D. GAP49: 8 h, 24 h, and 48 h; GAP58: 4 h, 8 h, 24 h & 48 h; GAP50: 24 h; lGnRH-III: 2 4 h & 48 h; Jun: 24 h & 48 h; JNK: 24 h & 48 h. E. GAP49: 8 h & 24 h; GAP58: 8 h & 24 h; GAP50: 8 h, 24 h & 48 h; lGnRH-III: 8 h & 24 h; Jun: 8 h & 24 h; JNK: 8 h & 24 h. F. GAP49: 4 h & 48 h; GAP58: 4 h; lGnRH-III: 4 h; Jun: 48 h.

Exposure to 10-11 M 3kPZS increased all mRNA transcripts examined in the forebrain of immature males (Figure 3). All three known splice variants of lGnRH-I mRNA were altered by 3kPZS exposure. GAP49 transcripts increased after exposure for 8 h (4-fold), 24 h (8-fold), and 48 h (4-fold). Increases in GAP58 transcripts occurred earlier and lasted longer after exposure for 4 h (4-fold), 8 h (4-fold), 24 h (13-fold), and 48 h (5-fold). GAP50 transcripts only increased after 24 h exposure (21-fold). lGnRH-III transcripts increased after exposure for 24 h (7-fold) and 48 h (5-fold). Jun transcripts increased after exposure for 8 h (5-fold), 24 h (14-fold), and 48 h (7-fold). JNK transcripts increased after exposure for 8 h (2-fold) and 24 h (3-fold).

Exposure to 10-10 M 3kPZS also increased all mRNA transcripts examined in the forebrain of immature males (Figure 3). GAP49 transcripts increased after exposure for 4 h (2-fold), 8 h (4-fold), and 24 h (3-fold). GAP58 transcripts increased after exposure for 8 h (3-fold) and 24 h (2-fold). GAP50 transcripts only increased after exposure for 8 h (5-fold). lGnRH-III transcripts increased after exposure for 8 h (3-fold), 24 h (3-fold), and 48 h (2-fold). Jun transcripts increased the earliest, after exposure for 2 h (2-fold), 8 h (3-fold), and 24 h (3-fold). JNK transcripts increased after exposure for 8 h (2-fold) and 24 h (2-fold).

Exposure to 10-9 M 3kPZS only increased lGnRH-I transcript variants, lGnRH-III and Jun mRNA concentrations in the forebrain of immature males (Figure 3). GAP49 transcripts increased after exposure for 4 h (2-fold), 8 h (4-fold), and 24 h (3-fold). GAP58 transcripts increased later after exposure for 8 h (3-fold) and 24 h (2-fold). GAP50 transcripts only increased after 8 h exposure (5-fold). lGnRH-III transcripts increased after exposure for 8 h (3-fold), 24 h (3-fold), and 48 h (2-fold). Jun transcripts rose the earliest, after exposure for 2 h (2-fold), 8 h (3-fold), and 24 h (3-fold).

Sex difference in forebrain gene expression after 3kPZS exposure

Immature females showed increases in Jun (2-fold) and JNK (2-fold) expression rapidly (2 h) after 10-11 M 3kPZS exposure (Figure 3), whereas immature males had more delayed responses (≥ 4 h, Figure 3). Exposure to 10-10 M or 10-9 M 3kPZS had no effect on forebrain gene expression in immature females (Figure 3).

Differential effect of 3kPZS on hindbrain gene expression

In the brain stem of immature males, 3kPZS seemed to be most effective at 10-10 M in increasing gene expressions, and the response appeared to be phasic with an earlier peak (2 h) and a delayed peak (48 h) at the time points examined. On the other hand, in the brain stem of immature females, only 10-10 M 3kPZS decreased GAP50 expression after 2 h (2-fold), 8 h (3-fold) and 48 h (2-fold) exposure (Figure 4). 3kPZS at other concentrations examined showed no effect on hindbrain gene expression in immature females (Figure 4).
Figure 4

Sex difference in hindbrain gene expressions after exposure to synthesized pheromone component in sea lamprey. Exposure to 10-10 M 3kPZS decreased GAP50 mRNA (2 h, 8 h, 24 h, and 48 h, p < 0.05) and JNK mRNA (2 h, 4 h, 8 h, and 24 h, p < 0.05) concentrations in the brain stem of immature females (A-C). Exposure to 3kPZS increased GAP49 & 58, lGnRH-III, Jun and JNK mRNA concentrations in the brain stem of immature males (D-E). The following data points are statistically different from 0 h control (p < 0.05). D. lGnRH-III: 2 h & 48 h; Jun: 48 h; JNK: 2 h, 8 h, 24 h & 48 h. E. GAP58: 48 h; lGnRH-III: 48 h; Jun: 2 h & 48 h; JNK: 2 h, 4 h & 48 h. F. GAP49: 8 h & 24 h; GAP58: 48 h; lGnRH-III: 8 h & 48 h; JNK: 2 h & 8 h.

The brain stem of immature males showed more pronounced gene expression changes than the forebrain after exposure to 10-11 M 3kPZS. lGnRH-III transcripts increased after 2 h (19-fold) and 48 h (55-fold) exposure (Figure 4). Jun transcripts increased after 48 h exposure (99-fold, Figure 4). JNK transcripts increased after 2 h (2-fold), 8 h (2-fold), 24 h (2-fold), and 48 h (4-fold) exposure (Figure 4).

At 10-10 M 3kPZS increased GAP49 transcripts after 8 h exposure (2-fold). Jun transcripts increased after 2 h (9-fold) and 48 h (8-fold) exposure. Prolonged exposure to 10-10 M 3kPZS (48 h) increased GAP58 (1122-fold), lGnRH-III (826-fold), and JNK (2-fold) transcripts in the brain stem of immature males (Figure 4).

At 10-9 M 3kPZS increased lGnRH-III transcripts after 8 h (379-fold) and 48 h (1052-fold) exposure (Figure 4). Jun transcripts increased after exposure for 2 h (12-fold) and 48 h (16-fold, Figure 4). JNK transcripts increased after exposure for 2 h (2-fold), 4 h (2-fold), 8 h (2-fold), and 48 h (2-fold, Figure 4). Prolonged exposure to 10-9 M 3kPZS (48 h) decreased GAP49 (7-fold) but increased GAP58 (2735-fold) expressions in the brain stem of immature males (Figure 4).

Differential effect of 3kPZS on forebrain and plasma lGnRH peptide concentrations

Exposure to 10-10 M 3kPZS increased lGnRH-I and -III peptide concentrations in the forebrain (Figures 5 & 6) but had no effect in the brain stem of immature males (Additional file 1: Figures S1& S2). Plasma lGnRH-I and -III peptide concentrations pulsed at the short time course after 3kPZS exposure. 3kPZS increased plasma lGnRH-I and -III peptide concentrations when the control level was low, but this effect was inhibited when the control level was high (Figures 5 & 6).
Figure 5

Differential effects of synthesized pheromone component on plasma and forebrain lGnRH-I concentrations in male sea lamprey. (A) Plasma lGnRH-I concentrations showed various effects after 10-10 M 3kPZS exposure. Exposure to 10-10 M 3kPZS increased lGnRH-I concentrations in the forebrain (B) but had no effect in the brain stem (data not shown).

Figure 6

Differential effects of synthesized pheromone component on plasma and forebrain lGnRH-III concentrations in male sea lamprey. (A) Plasma lGnRH-III concentrations showed various effects after 10-10 M 3kPZS exposure. Exposure to 10-10 M 3kPZS increased lGnRH-III concentrations in the forebrain (B) but had no effect in the brain stem (data not shown).

No effect of 3kPZS on the number of lGnRH neurons in the hypothalamus

The distribution of lGnRH mRNA, observed in the in situ hybridization experiments, was similar to that observed by Reed et al. [29], and was found mainly in the preoptic-hypothalamic area (Additional file 1: Figure S3). Immunocytochemistry using antibodies specific for lGnRH-I and -III demonstrated that the distributions of lGnRH-I or lGnRH-III immunoreactivities in lamprey brain (Additional file 1: Figures S4 & S5) were consistent with data described by Nozaki et al. [30]. Exposure to 3kPZS had no effect on the number of lGnRH-I or -III immunoreactive cells in the preoptic-hypothalamic area.

Discussion

To our knowledge, this is the first study of the dose response and time course of the priming effects of a single pheromone component on GnRH synthesis and release. The synthesized male pheromone molecule affects both sexes but induces more dramatic responses in males. An interesting possibility is that immature males develop the ability to respond to 3kPZS as a result of chemical spying [31] since odors from conspecifics of the same sex tend to diminish reproductive activities in most species and there is no benefit to the mature males in broadcasting a signal to immature males [32]. As migratory adults arrive at the spawning ground with various sexual maturity at different times throughout the spawning season (about 2–3 months), spying on sex pheromones to synchronize gonadal development and other aspects of spawning readiness would be beneficial because sea lamprey are semelparous, i.e., spawning only once in their life time. This is especially important for immature males since they have to build nests and accelerate final sexual maturation so that they can release sex pheromones to attract mature females. The sex difference in the response to 3kPZS also revealed that different genders are likely tuned in to different chemical signals.

Waterborne 3kPZS increased forebrain lGnRH peptide concentrations and gene expressions, and altered plasma lGnRH peptide and sex steroid concentrations. These results indicate that 3kPZS modulates GnRH release, which is important for steroidogenesis and final sexual maturation. Mammalian neurosecretory cells in the hypothalamus display pulsatile activities [33], and ovulation is induced by a LH (one of the mammalian counter-parts of GTH) surge which is preceded by a surge of GnRH [LH releasing hormone (LHRH) in mammals] secretion into the brain portal system [34–36]. Parallel to this preovulatory increase in GnRH secretion is an increase in GnRH gene expression, as indicated by expression of the immediate-early genes (c-fos and c-jun) [37, 38] and elevated GnRH mRNA [39, 40], and increased levels of newly synthesized GnRH [41]. Lampreys and teleost fishes, however, lack the portal system in the brain, and GnRH neurons either terminate directly in the pituitary gland or release GnRH directly into the third ventricle [42, 43]. Teleost fishes have well-characterized GTH with similar function and regulatory mechanisms as its mammalian counterpart [LH and follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH)]. A cDNA encoding lamprey GTH subunit β has been cloned, but its function has not been validated [44].

We found differential expression of lGnRH-I and -III transcripts in sea lamprey brain exposed to 3kPZS. Lampreys are the most primitive vertebrates for which multiple GnRH neurohormones are involved in pituitary-reproductive activity [45, 46]. Both lGnRH-I and -III have been shown to induce gonadal maturation, steroidogenesis, and spermiation or ovulation in adult sea lamprey [45–49]. In immunocytochemical studies, both immunoreactive-lGnRH-I and -III can be found in the cell bodies of the rostral hypothalamus and preoptic area in larval and adult sea lamprey [30, 44, 50, 51]. lGnRH-III was considered the more active form during development and gonadal maturation [52]. Our results indicated that lGnRH-III concentrations were more responsive to pheromone exposure. However, lGnRH-I may be more important in inducing behavioral responses in mature females, given that the transcripts of its three splice variants fluctuated in the brainstem after pheromone exposure while lGnRH-III transcripts stayed constant.

It is interesting that three lGnRH-I splice variants also showed differential expressions after pheromone exposure. Lamprey GnRH-I precursor was the first identified agnathan GnRH to contain the same tripartite structure with the signal peptide, GnRH decapeptide, and GnRH-associated peptide (GAP) as gnathostome GnRH precursors [52]. Unlike other known vertebrate GnRH precursors, which typically have one or two splice variants, three distinct splice variants were isolated and sequenced in lampreys [52]. The lGnRH-I splice variants, GAP49, GAP50 and GAP58, differed in the length of the GAP coding sequence [52]. The relative abundance of these splice variants in our results followed a magnitude decrease in the order of GAP58, GAP50, and GAP49. According to the changes after pheromone exposure, GAP50 seemed to be important for forebrain function whereas GAP49 and 58 may be associated with brainstem function in both sexes. However, forebrain GAP49 and brainstem GAP50 may serve additional functions in immature females [53].

Corresponding to its gene expression level in male sea lamprey, lGnRH-III is the most prominent lGnRH peptides in the brain and plasma. Its concentration is around 20 times more than lGnRH-I. We also found that 3kPZS altered the pulsatile pattern of GnRH concentrations in plasma. Pulsatile release of GnRH is a common neurobiological feature in vertebrates. It is autonomous within the GnRH neuronal network without spontaneous pacemaker cells [54]. It is interesting that menstrual synchrony in humans is mediated by pheromones through two opposing effects of the same compounds [55]. Axillary compounds (putative human pheromones) from donor women in the follicular phase shortened both the time to ovulation and the length of the menstrual cycle in recipients and those in the ovulatory phase delayed ovulation and lengthened the total cycle [55]. We found that when GnRH level is low in the control group, 3kPZS increased GnRH peptide concentrations in the plasma whereas when GnRH level is high in the control group, 3kPZS showed opposite effects. There may be some similarity in the control mechanism involved in this process.

Pulsatile GnRH regulates the gonadotropin subunit genes in a differential manner, with faster frequencies (8 to 60 min pulse intervals) favoring mammalian LH β subunit gene expression and slower frequencies (≥ 120 min pulse intervals) favoring the expression of FSH β subunit [56]. The mechanism is through the activation of GnRH receptor and its signaling cascades including JNK and its substrate JUN [57–61]. We found that 3kPZS induced GnRH release within 15 min, and Jun and JNK gene expression after 2 h exposure, suggesting that 3kPZS can modulate GnRH release and its signaling cascades.

The detection of lGnRH peptides in the plasma was a surprise since many previous attempts using HPLC and radioimmunoassays had failed to detect lGnRH peptides in sea lamprey plasma [62–65]. However, high-affinity binding sites for lGnRH peptides were detected in lamprey gonads, and GnRH appears to stimulate steroidogenesis independent of the pituitary [48, 66]. Previous reports also noticed that the concentrations of brain GnRH peptides in lamprey occur at higher concentrations than seen in other vertebrates [62, 67], suggesting that there may be a higher production or metabolism (or both) of each of the lGnRH peptides compared to gnathostomes [65]. Taken together, lGnRH peptides likely serve as hormones that are released into the third ventricle and then into the blood stream, and act on target organ such as gonads. Therefore, our results provide an additional explanation for GnRH binding affinity in peripheral organs [66]. Furthermore, our results support a possible peripheral endocrine function of lGnRH peptides, which may bypass the pituitary gland in the HPG axis.

The acquisition of a HPG axis was a seminal event in vertebrate evolution leading to the neuroendocrine control of many biological functions [68]. GnRH is a critical neuropeptide that acts through the HPG axis to regulate vertebrate reproduction. However, invertebrate GnRH peptides seem to exert a wide range of central and peripheral functions not limited to reproduction [69]. In addition, GnRH may even function as spawning pheromone in invertebrates [70]. The presence of lGnRH peptides in sea lamprey plasma indicates that the function of lGnRH peptides may not be fully centralized. It is likely that sea lamprey GnRH peptides function in an evolutionary transitional state where they not only act on the HPG axis, but also exert hormonal functions through systemic circulation. Furthermore, environmental factors such as a single pheromone component (i.e. 3kPZS) can modulate the HPG axis through olfaction. The considerable specialization of GnRH in the HPG axis as a reproductive activator may be a phenomenon specific to jawed vertebrates (gnathostomes) (Figure 7).
Figure 7

A schematic diagram of the evolutionary transition between pheromone and GnRH control from invertebrates to sea lamprey (agnathan) to mammals (gnathostome).

Conclusions

3kZPS is a primer pheromone in sea lamprey that exerts its functions through the HPG axis via GnRH release.

Methods

Animals

Sea lamprey were collected by agents of the US Fish and Wildlife Service Marquette Biological Station (Marquette, MI) and Department of Fisheries and Oceans Canada Sea Lamprey Control Centre (Sault Ste. Marie, ON). Pheromone treatments of animals were conducted at the US Geological Survey Great Lakes Science Center Hammond Bay Biological Station (Millersburg, MI). For each set of experiments, all test subjects were captured from the same stream on the same day to reduce variation in maturity. Standard operating procedures for transporting, maintaining, handling, anesthetizing, and euthanizing sea lamprey were approved by the Institutional Committee on Animal Use and Care of Michigan State University (AUF#05/09-088-00). Ethical guidelines were followed throughout the course of this research. Pheromone exposure time in the following experiments was chosen according to our previous publications [14, 53, 71, 72].

Pheromone exposure experiment 1

Twelve immature males were held in separate tanks (100 gallon; 16°C; water replenishment 1 L min-1), and acclimated for 2 days. 16°C was within the optimal temperature range for lamprey reproduction [73]. Animals were randomly assigned to two treatment groups (6/group): water from a tank (pheromone source tank) containing 5 mature males (spermiating male washings, SMW) or 5 immature males (prespermiating male washings, PSMW). Every two days, animals were checked for spermiation. The number of days to reach spermiation was recorded. The same experiment was repeated using 12 immature females (checking for egg release), and data were analyzed with the χ2 test.

Pheromone exposure experiment 2

Two hundred and fifty-two immature females and males were acclimated as described in experiment 1, and assigned to two treatment groups (control or SMW). At 0 h (immediately before introducing the odorants) and 24 h (completion of odorant treatment), 1 ml of blood was drawn to obtain plasma according to previously established protocols and stored at −80°C until use [71, 72]. Plasma samples were assayed for immunoreactive 15α-P using HPLC and radioimmunoassays [71, 72]. The same experiment was repeated in the summers of 2001, 2002 and 2003. Data were pooled for each month (May, June and July) and analyzed by One-way ANOVA for repeated measurements (before and after pheromone exposures). If treatment effects were detected (p < 0.05), Fisher’s PLSD post hoc tests were followed to determine which treatment induced apparent changes in the parameters measured.

Pheromone exposure experiment 3

To examine the time course of hormonal responses of immature sea lamprey exposed to 3kPZS at a wide range of concentrations, 108 immature males were acclimated for 2 days (6/tank; test tank: 200 L, 16°C, water replenishment 1 L min-1). Each tank was randomly assigned a treatment of 10-11 M, 10-10 M or 10-9 M 3kPZS. Immediately before and after pheromone exposure, 1 ml blood was drawn for plasma 15α-P analyses [71, 72]. One-way ANOVA was used to compare the changes in plasma 15α-P concentration [Δ15α-P = (post-treatment 15α-P level) - (pre-treatment 15α-P level)] among groups treated with the same pheromone concentration but sampled at different time points. Fisher’s PLSD post hoc tests were performed if the ANOVA showed significant effects (p < 0.05).

At 0 (control), 2, 4, 8, 24 and 48 h after pheromone exposure, animals were euthanized with 0.5% MS222 (Sigma, St. Louis, MO). Eight brain samples were snap frozen and analyzed for transcripts of lGnRH-I (GAP49, GAP50, and GAP58) [74] and -III, jun, JNK, and 40S ribosomal RNA. Six brain samples from each group were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde (in 0.1 M phosphate buffer, pH 7.4) for immunocytochemistry (ICC) and in situ hybridization (ISH) analyses. From each preserved brain, serial transverse sections of 20 μm were collected. Neighboring sections were processed for lGnRH-I or -III ICC [53], or lGnRH mRNA ISH. Negative controls (deprived of primary antibody for ICC or using sense probe for ISH) were processed simultaneously in each experiment. ISH and ICC results were examined by investigators with no knowledge of the experimental condition. The number of immunoreactive cells in the preoptic-hypothalamic area was counted [53], and the average number in a square area (0.0625 mm2) was used for statistical analyses. Brain nuclei were identified according to sea lamprey brain atlas by Nieuwenhuys and Nicholson [75]. The nonparametric Kruskal-Wallis test was used to compare the number of lGnRH-I or -III immunoreactive neurons among treatment groups. Parallel experiments were conducted with immature females.

Pheromone exposure experiment 4

Since 3kPZS had no dramatic effects in immature females and the gene expression changed after 2 h exposure, we only examined the time course of GnRH release in immature males exposed to vehicle (5 ppm methanol) or 10-10 M 3kPZS. 64 immature males were acclimated as described above. Immediately and at 15 min, 30 min, 1 h or 2 h after pheromone exposure, animals were euthanized and blood was drawn by cardiac puncture for plasma lGnRH-I and -III analyses using UPLC-MS/MS (method described below). Brain samples were snap-frozen and analyzed for lGnRH-I and -III using ultra performance liquid chromatography coupled with tandem mass spectrometry (UPLC-MS/MS).

In situ Hybridization used digoxigenin-labeled antisense and sense RNA probes generated by in vitro Transcription Systems (Promega BioSciences, San Luis Obispo, CA, USA). Sections were treated with proteinase K at room temperature (R.T.) for 10 min followed by 4% paraformaldehyde (0.1 M phosphate buffer, pH 7.4) for 15 min. Sections were incubated in prehybridization solution [50% formamide, hybridization salt (150 mM NaCl, 50 mM EDTA, 50 mM PIPES), Denhardt’s solution (Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA), 2.5 μg/ml calf thymus DNA, 2.5 μg/ml poly-adenosine, 0.2% sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS), and 0.1% diethylpyrocarbonate] at 42°C for 2 h, and then in antisense or sense RNA probe in hybridization solution (prehybridization solution with 5% dextran sulfate) at 60°C overnight (about 18 h). Sections were rinsed with 4× SSC (150 mM NaCl and 15 mM sodium citrate), followed by 2× SSC (with 0.3% Tween-20) at 68°C for 15 min 3 times, 0.2× SSC (with 0.3% Tween-20) at 68°C for 15 min 3 times, 0.1× SSC (with 0.3% Tween-20) at R.T. for 15 min, and then 0.1 M phosphate buffer saline (PBS, pH 7.4). Sections were incubated in alkaline phosphatase-conjugated sheep-anti-digoxigenin Fab fragments (1:1000; Roche Applied Science, Indianapolis, IN, USA) with normal sheep serum (in 0.1 M PBS with 0.3% Tween-20) at 5°C overnight (about 18 h). Sections were rinsed in 0.1 M Tris buffer saline (TBS, pH 9.5) for 15 min 3 times, followed by nitroblue tetrazolium chloride and 5-bromo-4-chloro-3 indolyl phosphate substrate (Roche) for 1 h, rinsed in PBS (pH 7.4) for 15 min 3 times, counter stained with Nuclear Fast Red (Vector Laboratories, Inc., Burlingame, CA, USA) for 5 min, and coverslipped with Vector AQ mounting media.

Real time quantitative RTQ-PCR followed the procedure described by Chung-Davidson et al. [53]. Synthetic oligos were used as standards and run on the sample plate. 40S ribosomal RNA was used as an internal standard and confirmed to have no change in the expression level in all experiments. RTQ-PCR data (among groups treated with same pheromone concentration but sampled at different time points) were analyzed by one-way ANOVA followed by Fisher’s PLSD post hoc tests if the ANOVA showed significant time effects (p < 0.05). The sequence for primers and TaqMan RGB probe (Applied Biosystems) for each mRNA was listed below. 40S ribosomal RNA: 5' primer (5'ACCTACGCAGGAACAGCTATGAC3'), probe (5'ATCTCGAGCAGCTGAA3'), 3' primer (5'CGACGAATTCCACCACATTG3'). Jun: 5' primer (5'CATGGCCGCAAACTTTGG3'), probe (5'CACGAACCTGACCAGC3'), 3' primer (5'CCACCTCCCTGCTGATGCT3'). JNK: 5' primer (5'TCAGGCGTGTGGCCAAGT3'), probe (5'CCATGACTTGATCGAATGT3'), 3' primer (5'GAATCAAATTGAGAACGCAAACG3'). Lamprey GnRH-III: 5' primer (5'TGACACGAACCCTGTCAATGA3'), probe (5'ATGCCCTCGCTGTGGT3'), 3' primer (5'ACAAAGGGTCTAAGAGACGTCACA3'). To analyze three transcripts of lGnRH-I, we used the same 5' primer (5'TGAATTACGCGCAGCACTACTC3') and probe (5'TGGAATGGAAACCCGG3'), but the 3' primers were designed so that they were located at the splice junction of each corresponding transcript (GAP49: 5'CTCCTCCAGGTCTCGTTTGC3'; GAP50: 5'CTCCTGCTCCAGGTCTCGTT3'; GAP58: 5'CCAGCTCTCGTGTGTGACTGA3').

UPLC-MS/MS analyses of lGnRH

lGnRH-I standard was custom synthesized from GenScript USA Inc. (Piscataway, NJ, USA). lGnRH-III and LHRH were purchased from BAChem Americas, Inc. (Torrance, CA, USA). Each compound was dissolved in 50% methanol/H2O (v/v) to make 1 mg/ml stock solution, and stored at −20°C until use. Subsequent dilutions were made in 50% methanol/H2O. Calibration standard spiking solutions were prepared in a range from 0.01 to 10 ng/ml by spiking appropriate stock solutions to brain tissue or plasma extracts. Internal standard (LHRH) solution (50 ng/ml) was prepared in 50% methanol/H2O and 20 μl was added to each sample (1 ng per sample).

Brain samples were weighed and homogenized with 400 μl of 1% formic acid in cold (−20°C) acetonitrile with 1 ng internal standard. 1 ml of 1% formic acid in cold (−20°C) acetonitrile was added to the homogenate, incubated at −20°C for 15 min, and centrifuged at 15,800 × g for 20 min at 4°C. The supernatant was transferred to a new tube, freeze-dried using a CentriVap Cold Trap Concentrator (Labconco Co., Kansas City, MO, USA), and reconstituted in 1 ml water solution with 3% acetic acid and 1% TFA. 500 μl plasma samples were processed in a similar procedure without the homogenization step. The reconstituted supernatant was transferred to a SPE HLB cartridge preconditioned with 3 ml methanol followed by 3 ml loading solution (water/acetic acid/TFA, 96:3:1, v/v), washed with 3 ml loading solution and followed by 3 ml loading solution/methanol (70:30, v/v). Samples were eluted with 3 ml 3% acetic acid/ solution: methanol (30:70, v/v), freeze-dried and reconstituted in 100 μl 3% acetic acid/methanol (50:50, v/v), vortexed for 30 seconds and transferred to glass autosampler vials for UPLC-MS/MS analyses.

A Waters Xevo TQ-S mass spectrometry was coupled to an H-Class UPLC system with a Waters BEH C18 column (1.0 × 50 mm, 1.7 μm particle size) and oven temperature at 35°C. The injection volume was 10 μl, and the UPLC flow rate is 0.15 ml/min with a gradient (mobile phase A: 0.1% formic acid in water; B: 0.1% formic acid in acentonitrile): initial, 88% A and 12% B; 0.5 min 88% A, 4 min 65% A, 7 min 1% A, 8 min 1% A, 8 min 88% A, and 9 min 88% A. Mass spectra were acquired using electrospray ionization in positive ion mode and MRM. The capillary voltage, cone voltage, and rf lens setting were 3.20 kV, 64 V, and 0.3, respectively. The flow rates of cone gas and desolvation gas were 20 and 400 L/h, respectively. The source temperature and desolvation temperature were 150 and 500°C. Collision-induced dissociation employed argon as collision gas at a manifold pressure of 2 × 10-3 mbar, and collision energies and source cone potentials were optimized for each transition using Waters QuanOptimize software. Data were acquired with MassLynx 4.1 and QuanLynx softwares.

Abbreviations

HPG: 

Hypothalamic-pituitary-gonadal

GnRH: 

Gonadotropin-releasing hormone

3kPZS: 

3-keto petromyzonol sulfate

15α-P: 

15α-hydroxyprogesterone

lGnRH-I: 

lamprey GnRH-I

lGnRH-III: 

lamprey GnRH-III

JNK: 

Jun N-terminal kinase

LH: 

Luteinizing hormone

GTH: 

Gonadotropin

SMW: 

Spermiating male washing

PSMW: 

Prespermiating male washing

LHRH: 

Luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone

FSH: 

Follicle-stimulating hormone

ICC: 

Immunocytochemistry

ISH: 

In situ hybridization

RTQ-PCR: 

Real-time quantitative PCR

UPLC-MS/MS: 

Ultra-performance liquid chromatography coupled with tandem mass spectrometry.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

We thank Dr. Stacia A. Sower for her generous gifts of lamprey GnRH antibodies. We thank all summer assistants, especially David Partyka, Joseph Bednark, Christine N. Bedore, and Aaron Smuda, for their help in sample collection. We thank the staff of US Fish and Wildlife Service Marquette Biological Station (Marquette, MI) and Department of Fisheries and Ocean Canada Sea Lamprey Control Centre (Sault St. Marie, ON, Canada) for supplying animals and (Contribution 1729) US Geological Survey Great Lakes Science Center Hammond Bay Biological Station (Millersburg, MI) for providing animal housing facility. This study is supported by NSF grant IOB0517491, NIH grant 5R24GM83982 and the Great Lakes Fishery Commission to WL.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Fisheries and Wildlife, Michigan State University, East Lansing, USA
(2)
Great Lakes Fishery Commission, 2100 Commonwealth Blvd, Ann Arbor, USA
(3)
Energy Biosciences Institute, University of California, Berkeley, USA
(4)
Department of Microbiology & Immunology, School of Medicine, Emory University, Atlanta, USA
(5)
USGS, Great Lakes Science Center, Hammond Bay Biological Station, Millersburg, USA

References

  1. Karlson O, Lüscher M: ‘Pheromones’: a new term for a class of biologically active substances. Nature. 1959, 183: 55-56. 10.1038/183055a0.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Brennan PA, Zufall F: Pheromonal communication in vertebrates. Nature. 2006, 444: 308-315. 10.1038/nature05404.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Rekwot PI, Ogwu D, Oyedipe EO, Sekoni VO: The role of pheromones and biostimulation in animal reproduction. Anim Reprod Sci. 2001, 65: 157-170. 10.1016/S0378-4320(00)00223-2.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Stowers L, Marton TF: What is a pheromone? Mammalian pheromones reconsidered. Neuron. 2005, 46: 699-702. 10.1016/j.neuron.2005.04.032.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Wyatt T: Pheromones and signature mixtures: defining species-wide signals and variable cues for identity in both invertebrates and vertebrates. J Comp Physiol A. 2010, 196: 685-700. 10.1007/s00359-010-0564-y.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Wysocki CJ, Preti G: Facts, fallacies, fears, and frustrations with human pheromones. Anat Rec Part A. 2004, 281A: 1201-1211. 10.1002/ar.a.20125.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Motofei IG: A dual physiological character for sexual function: libido and sexual pheromones. J Compil BJUI. 2009, 104: 1702-1708. 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2009.08610.x.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Preti G, Wysocki CJ, Barnhart KT, Sondheimer SJ, Leyden JJ: Male axillary extracts contain pheromones that affect pulsatile secretion of luteinizing hormone and mood in women recipients. Biol Reprod. 2003, 68: 2107-2113.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Murata K, Wakabayashi Y, Kitago M, Ohara H, Watanabe H, Tamogami S, Warita Y, Yamagishi K, Ichikawa M, Takeuchi Y, Okamura H, Mori Y: Modulation of gonadotrophin-releasing hormone pulse generator activity by the pheromone in small ruminants. J Neuroendocrinol. 2009, 21: 346-350. 10.1111/j.1365-2826.2009.01836.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Okamura H, Murata K, Sakamoto K, Wakabayashi Y, Ohkura S, Takeuchi Y, Mori Y: Male effect pheromone tickles the gonadotrophin-releasing hormone pulse generator. J Neuroendocrinol. 2010, 22: 825-832. 10.1111/j.1365-2826.2010.02037.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Yu KL, Peng C, Peter RE: Changes in brain levels of gonadotropin-releasing hormone and serum levels of gonadotropin and growth hormone in goldfish during spawning. Can J Zool. 1989, 69: 182-188.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Zhang W, Stacey NE: A steroidal pheromone and spawning stimuli act via different neuroendocrine mechanisms to increase gonadotropin and milt volume in male goldfish Carassius auratus. Gen Comp Endocrinol. 1997, 105: 228-238. 10.1006/gcen.1996.6825.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Sower SA: The endocrinology of reproduction in lampreys and applications for lamprey sterilization. J Great Lakes Res. 2003, 29: 50-65.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Li W, Scott AP, Siefkes MJ, Yan HG, Liu Q, Yun SS, Gage DA: Bile acid secreted by mate sea lamprey that acts as a sex pheromone. Science. 2002, 296: 138-141. 10.1126/science.1067797.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Li K, Siefkes MJ, Brant CO, Li W: Isolation and identification of petromyzesterosterol, a polyhydroxysteroid from sexually mature male sea lamprey (Petromyzon marinus L.). Steroids. 2012, 77: 806-810. 10.1016/j.steroids.2012.03.006.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Sorensen PW, Fine JM, Dvornikovs V, Jeffrey CS, Shao F, Wang J, Vrieze LA, Anderson KR, Hoye TR: Mixture of new sulfated steroids functions as a migratory pheromone in the sea lamprey. Nat Chem Biol. 2005, 1: 324-328. 10.1038/nchembio739.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Yun SS, Scott AP, Li W: Pheromones of the male sea lamprey, Petromyzon marinus L.: structural studies on a new compound, 3-keto allocholic acid, and 3-keto petromyzonol sulfate. Steroids. 2003, 68: 297-304. 10.1016/S0039-128X(02)00178-2.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Hardisty MW: The significance of lampreys for biological research. Endeavour. 1983, 7: 110-115. 10.1016/0160-9327(83)90002-9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Kuratani S, Kuraku S, Murakami Y: Lamprey as an evo-devo model: lessons from comparative embryology and molecular phylogenetics. Genesis. 2002, 34: 175-183. 10.1002/gene.10142.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Applegate VC: Natural history of the sea lamprey (Petromyzon marinus) in Michigan. In US Fish and Wildlife Service Special Science Report on Fishery Service. 1950, 55: 237.Google Scholar
  21. Hardisty MW, Potter IC: The general biology of adult lampreys. The biology of lampreys. Volume 1. Edited by: Hardisty MW, Potter IC. 1971, New York: Academic Press, 127-206.Google Scholar
  22. Youson JH, Potter IC: A description of the stages in the metamorphosis of the anadromous sea lamprey, Petromyzon marinus L. Can J Zool. 1979, 57: 1808-1817. 10.1139/z79-235.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Potter IC, Gill HS: Adaptive radiation of lampreys. J Great Lakes Res. 2003, 29 (Suppl 1): 95-112.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Siefkes MJ, Scott AP, Zielinski B, Yun S-S, Li W: Male sea lampreys, Petromyzon marinus L., excrete a sex pheromone from gill epithelia. Biol Reprod. 2003, 69: 125-132. 10.1095/biolreprod.102.014472.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Siefkes MJ, Li W: Electrophysiological evidence for detection and discrimination of pheromonal bile acids by the olfactory epithelium of female sea lampreys (Petromyzon marinus). J Comp Physiol A. 2004, 190: 193-199. 10.1007/s00359-003-0484-1.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. Johnson NS, Yun S-S, Thompson HT, Brant CO, Li W: A synthesized pheromone induces upstream movement in female sea lamprey and summons them into traps. PNAS. 2009, 106: 1021-1026. 10.1073/pnas.0808530106.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Li W, Scott AP, Siefkes MJ, Yun SS, Zielinski BS: A male pheromone in the sea lamprey (Petromyzon marinus): an overview. Fish Physiol Biochem. 2003, 28: 259-262.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. Siefkes MJ, Winterstein SR, Li W: Evidence that 3-keto petromyzonol sulphate specifically attracts ovulating female sea lamprey, Petromyzon marinus. Anim Behav. 2005, 70: 1037-1045. 10.1016/j.anbehav.2005.01.024.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  29. Reed KL, MacIntyre JK, Tobet SA, Trudeau VL, MacEachern L, Rubin BS, Sower SA: The spatial relationship of γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA) neurons and gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) Neurons in larval and adult sea lamprey, Petromyzon marinus. Brain Behav Evol. 2002, 60: 1-12. 10.1159/000064117.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Nozaki M, Ominato K, Gorbman A, Sower SA: The distribution of lamprey GnRH-III in brains of adult sea lampreys (Petromyzon marinus). Gen Comp Endocrinol. 2000, 118: 57-67. 10.1006/gcen.1999.7451.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Sørensen PW, Scott AP: The evolution of hormonal sex pheromones in teleost fish: poor correlation between the pattern of steroid release by goldfish and olfactory sensitivity suggests that these cues evolved as a result of chemical spying rather than signal specialization. Acta Physiol Scand. 1994, 152: 191-205. 10.1111/j.1748-1716.1994.tb09799.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Koyama S: Primer: effects by conspecific odors in house mice: a new perspective in the study of primer effects on reproductive activities. Horm Behav. 2004, 46: 303-310. 10.1016/j.yhbeh.2004.03.002.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Misgeld U, Zeilhofer HU, Swandulla D: Synaptic modulation of oscillatory activity of hypothalamic neuronal networks in vitro. Cell Mol Neurobiol. 1998, 18: 29-43. 10.1023/A:1022571025830.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Caraty A, Evans NP, Fabre-Nys CJ, Karsch FJ: The preovulatory gonadotropin-releasing hormone surge: a neuroendocrine signal for ovulation. J Reprod Fertil Suppl. 1995, 49: 245-255.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Christian CA, Moenter SM: Critical roles for fast synaptic transmission in mediating estradiol negative and positive feedback in the neural control of ovulation. Endocrinol. 2008, 149: 5500-5508. 10.1210/en.2008-0453.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  36. Ping L, Mahesh VB, Bhat GK, Brann DW: Regulation of gonadotropin-releasing hormone and luteinizing hormone secretion by AMPA receptors. Evidence for a physiological role of AMPA receptors in the steroid-induced luteinizing hormone surge. Neuroendocrinol. 1997, 66: 246-253. 10.1159/000127245.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  37. Lee WS, Smith MS, Hoffman GE: Luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone neurons express Fos protein during proestrous surge of luteinizing hormone. PNAS. 1990, 87: 5163-5167. 10.1073/pnas.87.13.5163.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Lee WS, Abbud R, Smith MS, Hoffman GE: LHRH neurons express c-Jun protein during proestrous surge of luteinizing hormone. Endocrinol. 1992, 130: 3101-3103. 10.1210/en.130.5.3101.Google Scholar
  39. Park OK, Gugneja S, Mayo KE: Gonadotropin-releasing hormone gene expression during the rat estrous cycle: effect of pentobarbital and ovarian steroids. Endocrinol. 1990, 127: 365-372. 10.1210/endo-127-1-365.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  40. Zoeller RT, Young WS: Changes in cellular levels of messenger ribonucleic acid encoding gonadotropin-releasing hormone in the anterior hypothalamus of female rats during the estrous cycle. Endocrinol. 1988, 123: 1688-1689. 10.1210/endo-123-3-1688.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  41. Gore AC, Roberts JL: Regulation of gonadotropin-releasing hormone gene expression in the rat during the luteinizing hormone surge. Endocrinol. 1995, 136: 889-896. 10.1210/en.136.3.889.Google Scholar
  42. King JC, Sower SA, Anthony EL: Neuronal systems immunoreactive with antiserum to lamprey gonadotropin-releasing hormone in the brain of Petromyzon marinus. Cell Tissue Res. 1988, 253: 1-8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Zohar Y, Muñoz-Cueto JA, Elizur A, Kah O: Neuroendocrinology of reproduction in teleost fish. Gen Comp Endocrinol. 2010, 165: 438-455. 10.1016/j.ygcen.2009.04.017.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Sower SA, Moriyama S, Kasaraha M, Takahashi A, Nozaki M, Uchida K, Dahlstrom JM, Kawauchi H: Identification of sea lamprey GTHβ-like cDNA and its evolutionary implications. Gen Comp Endocrinol. 2006, 148: 22-32. 10.1016/j.ygcen.2005.11.009.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Sower SA: Gonadotropin-releasing hormone in primitive fishes. Prog Clin Biol Res. 1990, 342: 73-78.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Sower SA: Neuroendocrine control of reproduction in lampreys. Fish Physiol Biochem. 1990, 8: 365-374. 10.1007/BF00003368.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Deragon KL, Sower SA: Effects of lamprey gonadotropin-releasing hormone-III on steroidogenesis and spermiation in male sea lampreys. Gen Comp Endocrinol. 1994, 95: 363-367. 10.1006/gcen.1994.1134.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Gazourian L, Derragon KL, Chase CF, Pati D, Habibi HR, Sower SA: Characteristics of GnRH binding in the gonads and effects of lamprey GnRH-I and -III on reproduction in the adult sea lamprey. Gen Comp Endocrinol. 1997, 108: 327-339. 10.1006/gcen.1997.6981.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Sower SA, Chiang YC, Lovas S, Conlon JM: Primary structure and biological activity of a third gonadotropin-releasing hormone from lamprey brain. Endocrinol. 1993, 132: 1125-1131. 10.1210/en.132.3.1125.Google Scholar
  50. Tobet SA, Nozaki M, Youson JH, Sower SA: Distribution of lamprey gonadotropin releasing hormone-III (GnRH-III) in brains in larval lampreys (Petromyzon marinus). Cell Tissue Res. 1995, 279: 261-267. 10.1007/BF00318482.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  51. Wright GM, McBurney KM, Youson JH, Sower SA: Distribution of lamprey gonadotropin-releasing hormone in the brain and pituitary of larval, metamorphic and adult sea lamprey, Petromyzon marinus. Can J Zool. 1994, 72: 48-53. 10.1139/z94-008.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  52. Sower SA, Kawauchi H: Update: brain and pituitary hormones of lampreys. Comp Biochem Physiol. 2001, 129: 291-302. 10.1016/S1096-4959(01)00333-5.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  53. Chung-Davidson Y-W, Bryan MB, Teeter J, Bedore CN, Li W: Neuroendocrine and behavioral responses to weak electric fields in adult sea lampreys (Petromyzon marinus). Horm Behav. 2008, 54: 34-40. 10.1016/j.yhbeh.2008.01.004.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. Dellovade T, Schwanzel-Fukuda M, Gordan J, Pfaff D: Aspects of GnRH neurobiology conserved across vertebrate forms. Gen Comp Endocrinol. 1998, 112: 276-282. 10.1006/gcen.1998.7157.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. Stern K, McClintock MK: Regulation of ovulation by human pheromones. Nature. 1998, 392: 177-179. 10.1038/32408.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. Burger LL, Haisenleder DJ, Dalkin AC, Marshall JC: Regulation of gonadotropin subunit gene transcription. J Mol Endocrinol. 2004, 33: 559-584. 10.1677/jme.1.01600.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. Bonfil D, Chuderland D, Kraus S, Shahbazian D, Friedberg I, Seger R, Naor Z: Extracellular signal-regulated kinase, Jun N-terminal kinase, p38, and c-Src are involved in gonadotropin-releasing hormone-stimulated activity of the glycoprotein hormone follicle-stimulating hormone β-subunit promoter. Endocrinol. 2004, 145: 2228-2244. 10.1210/en.2003-1418.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  58. Burger LL, Haisenleder DJ, Aylor KW, Marshall JC: Regulation of Lhb and Egr1 gene expression by GnRH pulses in rat pituitaries is both c-Jun N-terminal kinase (JNK)- and extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK)-dependent. Biol Reprod. 2009, 81: 1206-1215. 10.1095/biolreprod.109.079426.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. Haisenleder DJ, Burger LL, Walsh HE, Stevens J, Aylor KW, Shupnik MA, Marshall JC: Pulsatile gonadotropin-releasing hormone stimulation of gonadotropin subunit transcription in rat pituitaries: evidence for the involvement of Jun N-terminal kinase but not p38. Endocrinol. 2008, 149: 139-145.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  60. Harris D, Bonfil D, Chuderland D, Kraus S, Seger R, Naor Z: Activation of MAPK cascades by GnRH: ERK and Jun N-terminal kinase are involved in basal and GnRH-stimulated activity of the glycoprotein hormone LHβ-subunit promoter. Endocrinol. 2002, 143: 1018-1025. 10.1210/en.143.3.1018.Google Scholar
  61. Yokoi T, Ohmichi M, Tasaka K, Kimura A, Kanda Y, Hayakawa J, Tahara M, Hisamoto K, Kurachi H, Murata Y: Activation of the luteinizing hormone β promoter by gonadotropin-releasing hormone requires c-Jun NH2-terminal protein kinase. J Biol Chem. 2000, 275: 21639-21647. 10.1074/jbc.M910252199.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. Fahien CM, Sower SA: Relationship between brain gonadotropin-releasing hormone and final reproductive period of the adult male sea lamprey, Petromyzon marinus. Gen Comp Endocrinol. 1990, 80: 427-437. 10.1016/0016-6480(90)90192-O.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  63. Millar RP, King JA: Structure and functional evolution of gonadotropin-releasing hormone. Int Rev Cytol. 1987, 106: 149-182.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. Nozaki M, Gorbman A, Sower SA: Diffusion between the neurophysis and the adenohypophysis of lampreys, Petromyzon marinus. Gen Comp Endocrinol. 1994, 96: 385-391. 10.1006/gcen.1994.1194.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  65. Sower SA, Balz E, Aquilina-Beck A, Kavanaugh SI: Seasonal changes of brain GnRH-I, -II, and -III during the final reproductive period in adult male and female sea lamprey. Gen Comp Endocrinol. 2011, 170: 276-282. 10.1016/j.ygcen.2010.08.005.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  66. Gazourian L, Evans EL, Hanson L, Chase CF, Sower SA: The effects of lamprey GnRH-I, -III and analogs on steroidogenesis in the sea lamprey (Petromyzon marinus). Aquaculture. 2000, 188: 147-165. 10.1016/S0044-8486(00)00327-6.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  67. Bolduc TG, Sower SA: Changes in brain gonadotropin-releasing hormone, plasma estradiol 17-beta, and progesterone during the final reproductive cycle of the female sea lamprey, Petromyzon marinus. J Exp Zool. 1992, 264: 55-63. 10.1002/jez.1402640109.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  68. Kavanaugh SI, Nozaki M, Sower SA: Origins of gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) in vertebrates: identification of a novel GnRH in a basal vertebrate, the sea lamprey. Endocriol. 2008, 149: 3860-3869. 10.1210/en.2008-0184.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  69. Zhang L, Tello JA, Zhang W, Tsai P-S: Molecular cloning, expression pattern, and immunocytochemical localization of a gonadotropin-releasing hormone-like molecule in the gastropod mollusk, Aplysia californica. Gen Comp Endocrinol. 2008, 126: 201-209.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  70. Gorbman A, Whiteley A, Kavanaugh S: Pheromonal stimulation of spawning release of gametes by gonadotropin releasing hormone in the chiton, Mopalia sp. Gen Comp Endocrinol. 2003, 131: 62-65. 10.1016/S0016-6480(02)00647-0.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  71. Bryan MB, Scott AP, Cerny I, Young BA, Li W: 15 Alpha-hydroxyprogesterone in male sea lampreys, Petromyzon marinus L. Steroids. 2004, 69: 473-481. 10.1016/j.steroids.2004.04.004.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  72. Bryan MB, Young BA, Close DA, Semeyn J, Robinson TC, Bayer J, Li W: Comparison of synthesis of 15 alpha-hydroxylated steroids in males of four North American lamprey species. Gen Comp Endocrinol. 2006, 146: 149-156. 10.1016/j.ygcen.2005.11.003.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  73. Hanson LH, Manion PJ: Sterility method of pest-control and its potential role in an integrated sea lamprey (Petromyzon marinus) control program. Can J Fish Aquat Sci. 1980, 37: 2108-2117. 10.1139/f80-252.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  74. Suzuki K, Gamble RL, Sower SA: Multiple transcripts encoding lamprey gonadotropin-releasing hormone-I precursors. J Mol Endocrinol. 2000, 24: 365-376. 10.1677/jme.0.0240365.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  75. Nieuwenhuys R, Nicholson C: Lampreys, Petromyzontoidea. The Central Nervous System of Vertebrates. Volume 1. Edited by: Nieuwenhuys R, ten Donkelaar HJ, Nicholson C. 1998, Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag, 397-495.View ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Chung-Davidson et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Advertisement

BMC Neuroscience

ISSN: 1471-2202

Contact us