Skip to main content
Download PDF

Resistance training modifies of serum levels of matrix metalloproteinase 2 and tissue inhibitor of matrix metalloproteinases in multiple sclerosis women - a randomized controlled trail

BMC Neuroscience volume 25, Article number: 13 (2024) Cite this article

Abstract

The objectives of the present study was to investigate the effects of resistance training (RT) on serum levels of controlling blood-brain barrier (BBB) permeability indices and cognitive performance in MS women (MS-W). In this randomized control trail study (IRCT registration code: IRCT20120912010824N3, 07.09.2023), twenty-five MS-W were randomly divided into sedentary (MS) and resistance exercise (12 weeks/3 times per week/ 60–80% of 1RM) (MS + RT) groups. Fifteen healthy aged-matched women participated as a control group (HCON). The serum level of matrix metalloproteinase-2 (MMP-2), matrix metallopeptidase-9 (MMP-9), tissue metalloproteinase inhibitors-1 (TIMP-1), tissue metalloproteinase inhibitors-2 (TIMP-2), and S100 calcium-binding protein B (S100B) were assessed. In addition, cognitive performance was assessed pre- and post- intervention with the Brief International Cognitive Assessment for MS (BICAMS). A significant reduction in MMP-2, TIMP-2 serum levels, and MMP-2/TIMP-2 ratio were observed in post-test for MS + RT group (p < 0.01) in comparison to the HCON and MS groups; however, no changes were observed in MMP-9, TIMP-1, S100B and MMP-9/TIMP-1 ratio after RT (p > 0.05). The verbal learning was improved in post-test for MS + RT group (p < 0.01), although no change were observed for visuospatial memory and information processing speed (p > 0.05). These findings suggest that resistance training can modify some indices of BBB permeability and improve verbal learning in MS-W. The findings may also be beneficial as a non-pharmacological intervention to reduce inflammation.

Peer Review reports

Introduction

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a chronic inflammatory and neurological disease of the central nervous system (CNS) that its prevalence in women is three times higher than in men indicating which sex-related factors have an effect on an individual’s susceptibility to developing the condition [1, 2]. MS occurs when lymphocytes cross the blood-brain barrier (BBB) and initiate axonal demyelinating processes [1]. Alterations in the functioning of the BBB, particularly increase resulting from permeability, is major problem for patients with MS [3,4,5]. In other words, entering of leukocytes to the CNS during periods of BBB disruption initiates a cascade of events that leads to demyelination and axonal loss and eventually progressive disability [4].

Many signaling pathways, including matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs), have been identified to control BBB permeability through the regulation of structural components inculding degrade and remodel the proteins that form the ECM (collagen IV, V, laminin, fibronectin and proteins creating tight junction in endothelium of BBB: ZO-1 and occludins) [5, 6]. MMPs play a key role in the function of the BBB and the pathogenesis of MS [7]. MMPs such as MMP-2 and MMP-9 are expressed by neurons, astrocytes, and microglia in the CNS, and they play a physiopathological role in the disruption of the BBB through digest the endothelial basal lamina, microglia activation and further progression of inflammatory cells [3, 7]. In addation, MMPs regulate several functions related to inflammation including bioavailability and activity of inflammatory cytokines and chemokines [8].

Studies have claimed that matrix MMP-2 and MMP-9 are markers of BBB disruption [1, 3, 7, 9]. Clinical studies have demonstrated that serum MMP-2 and MMP-9 were elevated in different MS subtypes [10,11,12,13] and this increase related with BBB leakage [5]. As the proteolytic activity of MMPs is regulated by tissue inhibitors of MMPs (TIMPs), the imbalance of MMPs and TIMPs cause a series of effects that cause BBB breakdown and the infiltration of peripheral blood leukocytes to CNS [7].

Calcium-binding protein B (S100B) is a small Ca2 + and Zn2+-binding protein mainly expressed by astrocytes and a small subset of oligodendrocytes [5, 14, 15] and gets extravasation into the bloodstream only when the BBB is disrupted [5]. In MS patients, increased levels of S100B in CSF and serum have been reported, and this increase may cause activation of microglia and astrocytes, as well as oligodendrocyte demise, exacerbating tissue damage during an MS episode or delaying re-myelination [5, 15]. Interestingly, the elevation of the inflammatory molecule S100B in the serum of MS patients has been associated with BBB disruption [5, 15].

Recently, exercise training has been considered an important non-pharmacological treatment method for reducing symptoms and side effects of MS [16, 17]. However, scientific evidence relating to exercise effects on MS pathophysiology including BBB function is limited. Few studies have investigated the effects of regular exercise on BBB parameters in MS patients [16, 18], although exercise-induced alterations in levels of MMP-9 [9, 19] and MMP-2 [9] have been observed. These changes are important in the function of the BBB in MS patients. Although previous studies have investigated the effects of exercise on serum levels of MMPs, its possible effect on the serum concentrations of tissue-specific inhibitors MMPs (TIMP-1 and TIMP-2) and MMP/TIMP homeostasis in MS patients remains unclear.

Since the MMPs/TIMPs ratio seems to provide a better measurement of proteolytic activity, and the effectiveness of resistance training in modulating BBB permeability in MS patients is unknown as well as the widespread prevalence of this disease in women compared to men; we hypothesized that a 12-week resistance training (RT) has effect on serum levels of S100B, MMP-2, 9, TIMP-1, 2, and cognitive performance with MS women (MS-W).

Materials and methods

Research design and participants

This study is a RCT (parallel-group) using a quasi-experimental design with pre- and post-testing which was performed in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the Ethics Committee of the Ethics in Research Working Group at the Sports Sciences Research Institute (ethical code: SSRI.REC-1402-101; IRCT registration code: IRCT20120912010824N3, 07.09.2023), Iran. “Informed” consent was obtained from all participants. The full trial was conducted from July, 2021 to February, 2022.

Women with MS (relapsing-remitting MS (RRMS)) were recruited through advertising at the Kermanshah multiple sclerosis center, Iran. Fifty MS-W (RRMS) volunteered to participate in the current study. Subsequently, thirty eligible MS-W (RRMS) were considered to enter the RCT based on inclusion/exclusion criteria (Fig. 1). The inclusion criteria were as follows: (a) history of at least two-year diagnosed MS; (b) no relapse or acute MS exacerbation within the last six months; (c) aged between 18 and 45 years; (d) EDSS ≤ 4; (e) no other chronic diseases (metabolic, cardiovascular, renal,…); (f) no history of regular physical activity in the previous 6 months. Exclusion criteria comprised: (a) severe relapses during the study period; (b) participation in any extra exercise training programs; (c) smoking and consuming other drugs (except MS medications); (d) lack of regular attendance in the intervention; (e) COVID-19 infection. To estimate the sample size in the present study, G*Power software [14] was used based on statistical power of 80% with a significance level of 0.5, effect size of 6.0, and standard deviation (SD) 0.5 based on previous studies. A sample size of 13 achieved with an estimated drop-out of 15% we included 15 participants per group.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Participant recruitment flow chart HCON: Health group; MS: Multiple Sclerosis; MS + RT: Multiple Sclerosis + resistance training group

Full size image

Finally, participants were assigned in two (a) MS (n = 15) and (b) MS + resistance training (MS + RT) (n = 15) groups with using a random number table by sport specialist. In addition, the fifteen healthy and non-exercised women were selected as healthy control group (HCON; n = 15) to monitored current research data. Participants in MS and HCON groups were instructed to keep their daily activity during the trial period without any exercise training; indeed, MS + RT group performed RT program based on Table 1. MS-W groups (with or without RT) received their drug treatment supervised by specialist neurologist. It should be mentioned here that 5 participants (Three and two people from MS + RT and MS groups, respectively) were excluded from the study due to contracting COVID-19, relapse, unwillingness to continue cooperation, and taking illegal drugs.

Table 1 Resistance training (RT) program
Full size table

The experiment lasted for 13 weeks: 1 weeks for familiarization with the training devices and movements and 12 weeks for resistance training (MS + RT) or daily activity (for MS and HCON). Blood samples (8 cc) were collected from cubital veins after 12 h fasted state. In addition, body composition induces (height, age, weight, body fat percentage, body mass index (BMI), waist-to-hip ratio (WHR)), muscular strength (lower body and upper body) via five-repetition maximum (5RM) test [20] were measured and recorded. Pre- and post-test data were collected from all participants 24-48-72 h before and after the RT program as detailed in Fig. 2.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Diagram of the research plan

Full size image

MMP-2, MMP-9, TIMP-1 and TIMP-2 and S100B serum levels measurements

Following blood collection, samples were centrifuged for all participants at a temperature of 4 °C and 3000 rpm for 10 min [9]. Thereafter, serum was separated and kept at − 80 °C until analysis. Serum levels of MMP-2, MMP-9, TIMP-1, TIMP-2 and S100B were measured by commercially available enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay kits [9, 18]: MMP-2, MMP-9, TIMP-1, TIMP-2, and S100B (Zellbio GmbH, Germany, with catalog number Cat. Nos: ZB-1973-H9648, ZB-1982- H9648, ZB-3003- H9648, ZB-11,218 C- H9648, and ZB-13,669 C- H9648, respectively). For all blood biochemistry measures the, intra-CV was < 10% and inter-CV was < 12%.

Assessment of cognitive performance

The Brief International Cognitive Assessment for MS (BICAMS) [21] was used to examine information processing speed and immediate verbal and visual recall. The BICAMS consists of the Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDMT), California Verbal Learning Test-II (CVLT-II) and the Brief Visuospatial Memory Test- Revised (BVMT-R).

Resistance exercise training (RT) program

Based on the recommendations in RT for MS patients [22], the RT program included 12 weeks, 3 sessions/week, 60–80% 1RM for 60–90 min/session. The RT program consisted of three exercises for the lower extremity (leg press, lunges, and deadlift), three exercises for the upper extremity (bench press, wide grip lat pulldown and front dumbbell raise) (Table 1 outlines details).

Medication administration

The participants were monitored by neurologist and the drug was administered based on MS treatment in four groups of drugs (including Interferon beta, Glatiramer acetate, Dimethyl fumarate, Fingolimod). There was no difference between the drugs of all MS patients.

Statistical analysis

Distribution of data was assessed for normality using the Shapiro-Wilk test. A repeated-measure (RM) ANOVA 2 * 3 was used to evaluate the pre-post results of the three groups and to analyze the effect of time (pre–post) vs. the group (MS, MS + RT, and HCON). In addition, Bonferroni post hoc analysis was undertaken to compare the pairs. The effect size (ES) was also calculated as the change score divided by the SD of the change score to examine the magnitude of differences while controlling for the influence of the sample size, with 0.2 considered as a small ES, 0.5 as a moderate ES and > 0.8 as a large ES. The differences were accepted as significant if P ≤ 0.05. Data were expressed as mean ± SD.

Results

Physiological indicators

As Table 2, for weight, Time x group interaction effects was not significant (F (2, 37) = 1.914, p = 0.112, Eta-squared = 0.112). Also, a 2 (Time) x 3 (Group) mixed-model ANOVA for weight data analysis revealed that the main effect for time was not significant (F (1, 37) = 0.370, p = 0.547, Eta-squared = 0.010). This means weight was not different between pre and post time, for three groups. In addition, no significant main effect for group was obtained (F (2, 37) = 0.568, p = 0.572, Eta-squared = 0.030). Thus, there was no overall difference in the weight between the three groups.

Table 2 Demographic characteristics of subjects with difference groups at baseline level and after intervention
Full size table

In addition, data analysis of BMI showed that Time x group interaction effects was not significant (F (2, 37) = 1.870, p = 0.168, Eta-squared = 0.092). Also, no significant main effect for time and group was obtained (F (1, 37) = 0.753, p = 0.391, Eta-squared = 0.020); (F (2, 37) = 1.009, p = 0.374, Eta-squared = 0.052), respectively) (Table 2).

However, a significant Time x Group interaction effects was also obtained for body fat percent (F (2, 37) = 3.349, p < 0.05, Eta-squared = 0.153). A comparison of means indicated that body fat percent was decreased after resistance training only in the MS + RT group, in comparison to other groups. In addition, the results of repeated measures ANOVA revealed that there was significant main effect for group (F (2, 37) = 4.590, p < 0.05, Eta-squared = 0.199). Pairwise comparison test showed that body fat percent in MS + RT group was significantly lower than HCON group (p < 0.05) (Table 2).

For WHR, Time x group interaction effects was not significant (F (2, 37) = 1.146, p = 0.329, Eta-squared = 0.058). However, a significant main effect for Time was obtained (F (1, 37) = 5.299, p = 0.027, Eta-squared = 0.125). Pairwise comparison test showed that WHR was significantly different only in MS + RT group (p < 0.05). This means WHR was decreased after resistance training. Moreover, the main effect for group was not significant (F (2, 37) = 0.176, p = 0.839, Eta-squared = 0.009). Thus, there was no overall difference between the three groups (Table 2).

Biological indexes

For MMP2, a 2 (Time) x 3 (Group) mixed-model ANOVA revealed that a significant Time x Group interaction effect was observed (F (2, 37) = 28.377, p < 0.001, Eta-squared = 0.605, moderate ES). The comparison of means indicated that the MS + RT group had lower MMP2 levels after RT than baseline compared to the HCON and MS groups. There were significant pre–post differences for the time (F (1, 37) = 23.141, p < 0.001, Eta-Squared = 0.385, small ES). Where, MMP2 significantly increased in MS group (p < 0.001) and decreased in the MS + RT group (p < 0.05) (Table 3) (Fig. 3. (a1, 2)).

Table 3 The comparison of biological indexes in pre and post-test (Time effects) and between three groups (Time x Group interaction effects) (mean ± SD)
Full size table
Fig. 3
figure 3

(a1) MMP-2; (b1) MMP-9; (c1) TIMP-1; indicated percentage changes in all groups; (a2) MMP-2; (b2) MMP-9; (c2) TIMP-1; indicated variables contents from pre to post- test in all groups; HCON group; MS group; MS + RT group. *Significant Time x Group interaction; effect *Significant pre-post different

Full size image

For MMP-9, no significant results were obtained for Time x Group interaction effects were also obtained (F (2, 37) = 0.589, p = 0.560, Eta-squared = 0.031, small ES). Main effect for Time was not observed (F (1, 37) = 3.007, p = 0.091, Eta-Squared = 0.075, small ES) (Table 3) (Fig. 3. (b1, 2)).

For TIMP1, no significant Time x Group interaction effects were observed (F (2, 37) = 0.553, p = 0.580, Eta-squared = 0.029, small ES). Although, there was significant pre–post differences for the time in the TIMP1 for all of groups (F (1, 37) = 7.218, p < 0.05, Eta-Squared = 0.163, small ES). The pairwise comparison test showed that the TIMP1 levels in the post-test were significantly higher than in the pre-test for the HCON group (p < 0.05) (Table 3) (Fig. 3. (c1, 2)). For TIMP2, a significant Time x Group interaction effect was obtained (F (2, 37) = 5.383, p < 0.01, Eta-squared = 0.225, small ES). In addition, there was main effect for Time (F (1, 37) = 4.592, p < 0.05, Eta-Squared = 0.110, small ES). The pairwise comparison test showed that the TIMP2 levels in the post-test significantly increased only in the MS + RT group (p < 0.05). Moreover, Comparison of means indicated that the MS + RT group had higher TIMP2 levels after RT rather than the pre-test in comparison to the HCON and MS groups (Table 3) (Fig. 4. (a1, 2)).

Fig. 4
figure 4

(a1) TIMP-2; (b1) MMP-2/ TIMP-2 ratio; (c1) MMP-9/TIMP-1 ratio; indicated percentage changes in all groups; and (a2) TIMP-2; (b2) MMP-2/ TIMP-2 ratio; (c2) MMP-9/TIMP-1 indicated variables contents from pre to post- test in all groups; HCON group; MS group; MS + RT group. *Significant Time x Group interaction; effect *Significant pre-post different

Full size image

For MMP2/TIMP2, a 2 (Time) x 3 (Group) mixed-model of Repeated measures ANOVA revealed that a significant Time x Group interaction effect was also obtained (F (2, 37) = 14.232, p < 0.001, Eta-squared = 0.435, small ES). Comparison of means indicated that the MS + RT group had lower MMP2/TIMP2 levels after RT rather than the pre-test compared to the HCON and MS groups. In addition, there was a main effect for Time (F (1, 37) = 6.661, p < 0.05, Eta-Squared = 0.153, small ES). Where, MMP2/TIMP2 was increased in the MS group (p < 0.05), and it decreased in the MS + RT group (p < 0.05) (Table 3) (Fig. 4. (b1, 2)).

No significant Time x Group interaction effects was obtained for MMP-9/TIMP-1, F (2, 37) = 0.580, p = 0.565, Eta-squared = 0.030, small ES). Moreover, for MMP-9/TIMP-1, there was a main effect for Time (F (1, 37) = 11.926, p < 0.01, Eta-Squared = 0.244, small ES). Pairwise comparison test showed that, only for HCON group, the MMP-9/TIMP-1 ratio in the post-test was significantly lower than the pre-test (p < 0.05). In addition, the main effect for Group was not significant (F (2, 37) = 3.168, p = 0.054, Eta-squared = 0.146, small ES) (Table 3) (Fig. 4. (c1, 2)).

For S100B, no significant Time x Group interaction effects was obtained (F (2, 37) = 1.019, p = 0.371, Eta-squared = 0.052, small ES). And no significant results were obtained for any of conditions (Table 3) (Fig. 5. (a1, 2)).

Fig. 5
figure 5

(a1) S100B; indicated percentage changes in all groups; and (a2) S100B; indicated variables contents from pre to post- test in all groups; HCON group; MS group; MS + RT group. *Significant Time x Group interaction effect; *Significant pre-post different

Full size image

Cognitive indexes

For SDMT, a non-significant Time x Group interaction effects were obtained (F (2, 37) = 1.023, p = 0.370, Eta-squared = 0.052, small ES). In addition, there was a main effect for Time (F (1, 37) = 12.933, p < 0.01, Eta-Squared = 0.259, small ES). The pairwise comparison test showed that the SDMT score in the post-test was significantly increased compared to the pre-test in HCON and MS + RT groups (p < 0.05) (Table 4) (Fig. 6. (a1, 2)).

Table 4 The comparison of cognitive indexes from pre- to post-test (Time effects) and between three groups (Time x Group interaction effects) (mean ± SD)
Full size table
Fig. 6
figure 6

(a1) SDMT; (b1) CVLT-II; (c1) BVMT-R; indicated percentage changes scores in all groups; and (a2) SDMT; (b2) CVLT-II; (c2) BVMT-R; indicated scores from pre to post- test in all groups; HCON group; MS group; MS + RT group. *Significant Time x Group interaction; effect *Significant pre-post different

Full size image

A significant Time x Group interaction effect was obtained for CVLT-II (F (2, 37) = 14.841, p < 0.001, Eta-squared = 0.445, small ES). The comparison of means indicated that the MS + RT group had a higher increase in CVLT-II scores in compare with other two groups. While, there was a solid main effect for Time (F (1, 37) = 109.574, p < 0.001, Eta-Squared = 0.748, moderate ES). The pairwise comparison test showed that CVLT-II scores in the post-test were significantly increased for all groups (p < 0.05) (Table 4) (Fig. 6. (b1, 2)).

Also, non-significant Time x Group interaction effects were obtained for BVMT-R (F (2, 37) = 0.342, p = 0.713, Eta-squared = 0.018, small ES). Where, there were significant pre–post differences for the time in the BVMT-R for all of groups (F (1, 37) = 126.967, p < 0.001, Eta-Squared = 0.442, small ES) (Table 4) (Fig. 6. (c1, 2)).

Discussion

The purpose of current study was to investigate the effects of resistance training (RT) on serum biomarkers of BBB pathology and cognitive performance with MS women (MS-W). The results showed that RT significantly reduced the serum concentration of MMP-2 and MMP2/TIMP2 and increased the serum concentration of TIMP2 in MS + RT compared to the MS and HCON groups. However, Changes in MMP-9, TIMP-1, s100B and MMP-9/TIMP-9 in the MS + RT group were non-significant compared to the MS and HCON groups. In addition, regarding cognitive function, RT led to a significant improvement in verbal memory in MS + RT over 12 weeks.

In the current study, baseline serum levels of MMP-2 and MMP-9 were significantly higher in the MS and MS + RT groups than in the HCON group. Physiological studies suggest that MMPs overexpression in MS induces infiltration of CD4 + Th1 cells and macrophages across the BBB and myelin and/or axonal damage and is associated with disability and disease severity [10, 12, 13, 23]. In accordance with our results, clinical studies demonstrated a significant elevation in MMP-9 and MMP-2 serum levels in the RRMS, primary progressive form (PP-MS) and secondary progressive MS (SPMS) groups compared to healthy controls [11, 12, 24]. In a study on RR-MS patients, the increase in MMP-9 serum levels was associated with BBB disruption [11]. Also, elevated levels of MMP-9 in both attack and remission periods in patients with RR-MS have been observed [24].

Our results suggest that RT led to a decrease in serum levels of MMP-2 while MMP-9 unchanged in the MS + RT group compared to the HCON and MS groups. This findings showed the role of resistance training to modify BBB biomarkers although there is limitation in the research studies in this area. Here, a pervious study [9] mentioned findings congruous with our study. This study, performed a three-week high-intensity aerobic exercise, indicated significantly reduction in MMP-2 but not MMP-9 in MS patients. Conversely, Deckx et al. reported a decrease in MMP-9 production at the end of a 12-week exercise (combined endurance and RT) in MS patients [19]. Despite limited studies in MS patients, MMP-2 and MMP-9 have been studied after different exercise training programs in other chronic diseases [25,26,27,28]. For example, Kadoglu et al. demonstrated a decrease in serum level of MMP-9 and no changes in MMP-2 in overweight patients with type 2 diabetes (T2DM) [25]. However, our study did not show a significant change for serum level of MMP-9 after 12 weeks of RT. It can be speculated that differences in training duration period, training intensity and pathology of different diseases might explain the inconsistencies in findings. Therefore, improving BBB integrity by reducing serum MMP-2 concentrations, a primary outcome of this study appears to be an integral component for reducing MS-specific symptoms and disease progression.

Our observations demonstrated that the serum level of TIMP-1 and TIMP-2 were higher in MS-W in the MS and MS + RT groups than in the HCON group. Consistent with our study, elevated levels of TIMP-1 and TIMP-2 in the serum of MS patients have been observed in different studies [7]. TIMPs inhibit the proteolytic activity of MMPs [29]. As part of a complex system of regulation, TIMP-1 is a tissue inhibitor of MMP-9 [7]. Besides, TIMP-2 is a well-known MMP-2 inhibitor that are present in the ECM in a soluble form [7]. When considering the role of resistance training, we observed an improvement in TIMP1and TIMP-2 levels in the MS + RT group compared to other groups. It has been previously demonstrated an increase in serum levels of TIMP-1 and TIMP-2 in chronic diseases after exercise training [25, 27, 30]. To the best of our knowledge, the possible effect of exercise intervention on serum TIMP-1 and TIMP-2 concentration as well as MMP/TIMP homeostasis in MS patients remains unknown.

Measuring MMPs/TIMPs ratio is important because a critical balance between circulating MMPs and TIMPs must exist, and MMPs/TIMPs ratio may be useable indexes of net MMPs activities [31]. In our study, MMP-9/TIMP-1 and MMP2/TIMP2 ratio were assessed. Similar to previous study [12] findings, we determined that values for both ratios was observed higher in MS-W than healthy people. It has been have suggested that the MMPs/TIMPs increase is associated with BBB disruption and the number of lesions increase in MS patients [11, 13, 32]. Liuzzi et al. reported a significant inverse correlation between MMP-9 and TIMP-1 with BBB disruption in RR-MS [13]. Furthermore, serum levels of MMP-2 and MMP-2/TIMP-2 ratio increase have previously caused enhanced BBB permeability and degradation of basement membrane via tight junction protein phosphorylation and are associated with disability and disease severity [12, 32]. We showed the MMP-2/TIMP-2 ratio decrease in the MS + RT group whereas it increased in MS groups. This change in the MMP-2/TIMP-2 ratio was due to the decrease in MMP-2 and the increase in TIMP-2 in the RT-MS group. It should be remarked that we could not find studies to measure MMP/TIMP ratio in MS patients after exercise training.

In addition, when considering this blood-brain barrier disorder due to an elevated serum MMP-2/TIMP-2 ratio [12, 32], exercise training can maintain blood-brain barrier integrity [33], and the anti-inflammatory response promoted by exercise training reduces TNF-α and IL-6 [34]. Razi et al. recently reported that aerobic training maintained BBB integrity through reducing astrogliosis and Ang-1 and reversing EAE-induced TJ protein down-regulation, and that a six-week aerobic training program has provided a protective role to neurons via attenuation of neuronal apoptosis [33]. However, we were not able to detect differences in MMP-9/TIMP-1 following 12 weeks of exercise. Kadoglou et al. reported a decrease in MMP-9/TIMP-1 ratio after exercise training program in T2DM [25]. Although the type and duration of exercise are important components in exercise training programs, our results showed resistance training effect in MS patients. Further studies need to clarify the reasons for the difference results in MS patients.

It has been reported that people with MS higher serum level of S100B compared to healthy control [35, 36]; which was also observed in the current study. S100B level in the serum has been used as a marker for BBB disintegration and brain damage [3, 18]. Studies suggest that the inhibition of the S100B may be protective against both demyelination and consequent axonal injury [36]. We did not detect any significant differences following 12 weeks of RT in the S100B serum level as an index of BBB permeability; however, adjusted plots of these analyses and univariate tests indicated a trend towards a decline in MS + RT and an elevation for MS Together, these results suggest that resistance training may be effective on this factor. Contrary to our results, other studies that used HIIT and endurance training reported significant reductions in S100B levels (in MS and Parkinson patients, respectively) [18, 37]. Probably, the nature of training and the type of activity (resistance training vs. aerobic training) and training intensity (HIIT) play a major role in the activation of different signals; however, Chupel et al. observed that combined exercise for 14 weeks preserves BBB integrity and reduces chronic inflammation in elderly women with no reduction in S100B [38].

Studies have reported improved cognitive functions in MS patients following an aerobic training program [9, 39]. In our study, data analysis showed the significant time effects for SDMT in healthy and MS + RT groups, and for CVLT-II, and BVMT-R in all three groups. Excluding verbal learning (CVLT-II) in the MS + RT group, the differences were insignificant regarding Time x Group interaction. These findings are in-line with the results of an RCT study suggesting that HIT improved verbal memory in individuals with MS in-patient rehabilitation [9]. Changes in CVLT-II scores were strongly associated with changes of the hippocampus [39]. Conversely, Oken et al. reported that MS patients who participated in a 6-month yoga programme showed no relative improvement in cognitive function in either intervention groups [40]. One pilot study conducted by Kierkegaard et al. investigated the effect of 12 weeks of high-intensity RT on the cognitive performance of MS patients, and reported the positive effects of training on information SDMT [41]. However, our findings are limited due to the lack of a clearly in-defined level of cognitive impairments at baseline.

Our results showed that 12 weeks of resistance training decreased body fat percentage (BF %) and WHR in women with MS. It has been shown that Decreasing the BF % with resistance exercises leads to the reduction of inflammatory factors (IFNγ and TNF -α) which are factors involved in the pathophysiology of MS [42, 43]. The results of our study are consistent with previous studies that resistance training can reduce fat percentage and coronary artery disease risk factors in women with MS [44, 45]. However, recent studies have shown that resistance exercises can positively affect strength, balance, physical functioning, and self-care strategies, all of which improved their sleeping, emotion regulation, depression, and participation in social activities [43, 46, 47]. The main limitation of the study was the date when COVID-19 was occurred. Therefore, the small groups of MS patients participated in our study. Another limitation was the non-controlled diet which could influence on neuroinflammation. One of the strengths of current study was that resistance training supervized for safety by an experienced staff. Also, compared to the endurance exercise, resistance training in heat sensitive patients less frequently cause symptom exacerbations due to increased body temperature.

Conclusion

The present results suggest that resistance training in the form of moderate-intensity resistance exercise training may modify and manage BBB pathology markers of MS, although the role of S100B, MMP-9, TIMP-1, and MMP-9/TIMP-1 ratio in MS remains unclear when considering exercise training. Since MMP-2 has been described to be mediated inflammatory processes, exercise-induced MMP-2 and TIMP-2 changes support the hypothesis that regular exercise has mediated anti-inflammatory properties. Future research with considering exercise type, intensity, duration and effects on BBB permeability and cognitive function in MS patients.

Data availability

The data and information are available with the correspondence author if requested.

Abbreviations

1RM:

One-repetition maximum

BBB:

Blood brain barrier

BICAMS:

Brief International Cognitive Assessment for MS

BVMT-R:

Brief Visuospatial Memory Test- Revised

CVLT-II:

California Verbal Learning Test-II

EAE:

Experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis

EDSS:

Expanded Disability Status Scale

HCON:

Healthy control group

MMP-2:

Matrix metalloproteinase-2

MMP-9:

Matrix metallopeptidase-9 (MMP-9)

MS:

Multiple sclerosis

RT:

Resistance exercise training

RRMS:

Patients with relapsing-remitting MS

S100B:

S100 calcium-binding protein B

SDMT:

Symbol Digit Modalities Test

TIMP-1:

Tissue metalloproteinase inhibitors-1

TIMP-2:

Tissue metalloproteinase inhibitors-2

MS-W:

MS Women

MS + RT:

MS + resistance exercise training

References

  1. Negaresh R, et al. Effects of exercise training on multiple sclerosis biomarkers of central nervous system and disease status: a systematic review of intervention studies. Eur J Neurol. 2019;26(5):711–21.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Muñoz-Jurado A, et al. Neuroprotective and antioxidant effects of docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) in an experimental model of multiple sclerosis. J Nutr Biochem. 2024;124:109497.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Waubant E. Biomarkers indicative of blood-brain barrier disruption in multiple sclerosis. Dis Markers. 2006;22(4):235–44.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Ortiz GG, et al. Role of the blood–brain barrier in multiple sclerosis. Arch Med Res. 2014;45(8):687–97.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Chmielewska N, et al. Looking for novel, brain-derived, peripheral biomarkers of neurological disorders. Neurol Neurochir Pol. 2018;52(3):318–25.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Ishii D, et al. Marked changes in blood-brain barrier biomarkers after direct bypass surgery for moyamoya angiopathy: preliminary study. World Neurosurg. 2018;120:e611–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Cabral-Pacheco GA, et al. The roles of matrix metalloproteinases and their inhibitors in human diseases. Int J Mol Sci. 2020;21(24):9739.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Nissinen L, Kähäri V-M. Matrix metalloproteinases in inflammation. Biochim et Biophys Acta (BBA)-General Subj. 2014;1840(8):2571–80.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Zimmer P, et al. High-intensity interval exercise improves cognitive performance and reduces matrix metalloproteinases-2 serum levels in persons with multiple sclerosis: a randomized controlled trial. Multiple Scler J. 2018;24(12):1635–44.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Avolio C, et al. Serum MMP-2 and MMP-9 are elevated in different multiple sclerosis subtypes. J Neuroimmunol. 2003;136(1–2):46–53.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Fainardi E, et al. Cerebrospinal fluid and serum levels and intrathecal production of active matrix metalloproteinase-9 (MMP-9) as markers of disease activity in patients with multiple sclerosis. Multiple Scler J. 2006;12(3):294–301.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Benešová Y, et al. Matrix metalloproteinase-9 and matrix metalloproteinase-2 as biomarkers of various courses in multiple sclerosis. Multiple Scler J. 2009;15(3):316–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Liuzzi G, et al. Intrathecal synthesis of matrix metalloproteinase-9 in patients with multiple sclerosis: implication for pathogenesis. Multiple Scler J. 2002;8(3):222–8.

    Article  MathSciNet  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Santos G et al. S100B impairs oligodendrogenesis and myelin repair following demyelination through RAGE engagement. Front Cell Neurosci, 2020: p. 279.

  15. Barateiro A, et al. S100B as a potential biomarker and therapeutic target in multiple sclerosis. Mol Neurobiol. 2016;53(6):3976–91.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Souza PS, et al. Physical exercise attenuates experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis by inhibiting peripheral immune response and blood-brain barrier disruption. Mol Neurobiol. 2017;54(6):4723–37.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Kjølhede T, et al. Neuromuscular adaptations to long-term progressive resistance training translates to improved functional capacity for people with multiple sclerosis and is maintained at follow-up. Multiple Scler J. 2015;21(5):599–611.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Mokhtarzade M, et al. Exercise-induced changes in neurotrophic factors and markers of blood-brain barrier permeability are moderated by weight status in multiple sclerosis. Neuropeptides. 2018;70:93–100.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Deckx N et al. 12 weeks of combined endurance and resistance training reduces innate markers of inflammation in a randomized controlled clinical trial in patients with multiple sclerosis Mediators of inflammation, 2016. 2016.

  20. Pescatello L, et al. ACSM’s Guidelines for exercise testing and prescription. 9th edn Wolters Kluwer. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins: American College of Sports Medicine; 2013.

  21. Langdon D, et al. Recommendations for a brief international cognitive assessment for multiple sclerosis (BICAMS). Multiple Scler J. 2012;18(6):891–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Halabchi F, et al. Exercise prescription for patients with multiple sclerosis; potential benefits and practical recommendations. BMC Neurol. 2017;17(1):1–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Fainardi E, et al. Potential relevance of cerebrospinal fluid and serum levels and intrathecal synthesis of active matrix metalloproteinase-2 (MMP-2) as markers of disease remission in patients with multiple sclerosis. Multiple Scler J. 2009;15(5):547–54.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Sanli A, et al. Matrix metalloproteinases and their tissue inhibitors in relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis: possible markers and treatment agents. Ideggyogy Sz. 2020;74(1–2):50–6.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Kadoglou N, et al. Exercise ameliorates serum MMP-9 and TIMP-2 levels in patients with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Metab. 2010;36(2):144–51.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Niessner A, et al. Endurance training reduces circulating inflammatory markers in persons at risk of coronary events: impact on plaque stabilization? Atherosclerosis. 2006;186(1):160–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Filipović T et al. Effects of 12-week exercise program on enzyme activity of serum matrix metalloproteinase-9 and tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase-1 in female patients with postmenopausal osteoporosis: A randomized control study BioMed Research International, 2020. 2020.

  28. Lucotti P, et al. Aerobic and resistance training effects compared to aerobic training alone in obese type 2 diabetic patients on diet treatment. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2011;94(3):395–403.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Futtrup J et al. Blood-brain barrier pathology in patients with severe mental disorders: A systematic review and meta-analysis of biomarkers in case-control studies Brain, behavior, & immunity-health, 2020. 6: p. 100102.

  30. Parvin F. Impact of the synchronization of portulaca oleracea and aerobic training on levels of MMP2 and MMP9 and TIMP1 in diabetic women type II. 2014.

  31. Martins-Oliveira A, et al. Different circulating metalloproteinases profiles in women with migraine with and without aura. Clin Chim Acta. 2009;408(1–2):60–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Mannello F. New implications of the proteolytic balance between matrix metalloproteinases and their tissue inhibitors in migraine with and without aura. Elsevier; 2009. pp. 1–3.

  33. Razi O, et al. Aerobic training improves blood-brain barrier and neuronal apoptosis in experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis. Iran J Basic Med Sci. 2022;25(2):245.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Małkiewicz MA, et al. Blood-brain barrier permeability and physical exercise. J Neuroinflamm. 2019;16(1):1–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Barateiro A, et al. S100B as a potential biomarker and therapeutic target in multiple sclerosis. Mol Neurobiol. 2016;53:3976–91.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Santos G, et al. S100B impairs oligodendrogenesis and myelin repair following demyelination through RAGE engagement. Front Cell Neurosci. 2020;14:279.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Al-Jarrah MD, Jamous M. Effect of endurance exercise training on the expression of GFAP, S100B, and NSE in the striatum of chronic/progressive mouse model of Parkinson’s disease. NeuroRehabilitation. 2011;28(4):359–63.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Chupel MU, et al. Exercise and taurine in inflammation, cognition, and peripheral markers of blood-brain barrier integrity in older women. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2018;43(7):733–41.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Sandroff BM, Johnson CL, Motl RW. Exercise training effects on memory and hippocampal viscoelasticity in multiple sclerosis: a novel application of magnetic resonance elastography. Neuroradiology. 2017;59(1):61–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Oken BS, et al. Randomized controlled trial of yoga and exercise in multiple sclerosis. Neurology. 2004;62(11):2058–64.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Kierkegaard M, et al. High-intensity resistance training in multiple sclerosis—An exploratory study of effects on immune markers in blood and cerebrospinal fluid, and on mood, fatigue, health-related quality of life, muscle strength, walking and cognition. J Neurol Sci. 2016;362:251–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. White LJ, Castellano V, Mc Coy SC. Cytokine responses to resistance training in people with multiple sclerosis. J Sports Sci. 2006;24(8):911–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Shobeiri P, et al. IL-6 and TNF-α responses to acute and regular exercise in adult individuals with multiple sclerosis (MS): a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Med Res. 2022;27(1):185.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. White L, et al. Effect of resistance training on risk of coronary artery disease in women with multiple sclerosis. Scand J Clin Lab Investig. 2006;66(4):351–6.

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Khademosharie M, et al. The effect of 12-weeks resistance and endurance training on the serum levels NGF, BDNF, and VDBP in women with multiple sclerosis. Int J Appl Exerc Physiol. 2018;7(1):76–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Ploughman M. Breaking down the barriers to physical activity among people with multiple sclerosis–a narrative review. Phys Therapy Reviews. 2017;22(3–4):124–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Momsen A-MH, Ørtenblad L, Maribo T. Effective rehabilitation interventions and participation among people with multiple sclerosis: an overview of reviews. Annals Phys Rehabilitation Med. 2022;65(1):101529.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to thank all MS patients for their enthusiastic participation in this investigation.

Funding

This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Sport Bio-Sciences Department, Physical Education and Sports Sciences Faculty, Razi University, University Street, Kermanshah, Iran

    Nasrin Niazi Nezhad & Abdolhossein Parnow

  2. Department of Neurology, Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences, Kermanshah, Iran

    Kianoosh Khamoushian

  3. Exercise Physiology Department, Faculty of Physical Education and Sport Sciences, Allameh Tabataba’i University, Tehran, Iran

    Rasoul Eslami

  4. Institute for Population Health and Medical Informatics, Hong Kong Baptist University, Kowloon, Hong Kong, China

    Julien S Baker

Authors
  1. Nasrin Niazi Nezhad
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Abdolhossein Parnow
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Kianoosh Khamoushian
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Rasoul Eslami
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Julien S Baker
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

N. Niazi Nezhad involved in conceptualization, methodology and study design, formal analysis, data curation and writing original draft; AH. Parnow supervised the research project conceptualization, methodology and study design, validation, formal analysis, data curation, and writing-review and editing; K. Khamoushian involved in validation, data curation, writing-review and editing; R. Eslami contributed in formal analysis, data curation, software, and writing-review and editing; and J. S. Baker surprised and contributed in writing-review and editing.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Abdolhossein Parnow.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This randomized controlled clinical trial (RCT) study was performed in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the Ethics Committee of the Ethics in Research Working Group at the Sports Sciences Research Institute (ethical code: SSRI.REC-1402-101; IRCT registration code: IRCT20120912010824N3, 07.09.2023), Iran. “Informed” consent was obtained from all participants.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Nezhad, N.N., Parnow, A., Khamoushian, K. et al. Resistance training modifies of serum levels of matrix metalloproteinase 2 and tissue inhibitor of matrix metalloproteinases in multiple sclerosis women - a randomized controlled trail. BMC Neurosci 25, 13 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12868-024-00856-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12868-024-00856-1

Keywords

BMC Neuroscience

ISSN: 1471-2202

Contact us