Skip to main content
Download PDF

Extremely low frequency electromagnetic field exposure and restraint stress induce changes on the brain lipid profile of Wistar rats

BMC Neuroscience volume 19, Article number: 31 (2018) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Exposure to electromagnetic fields can affect human health, damaging tissues and cell homeostasis. Stress modulates neuronal responses and composition of brain lipids. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of chronic extremely low frequency electromagnetic field (ELF-EMF) exposure, restraint stress (RS) or both (RS + ELF-EMF) on lipid profile and lipid peroxidation in Wistar rat brain.

Methods

Twenty-four young male Wistar rats were allocated into four groups: control, RS, ELF-EMF exposure, and RS + ELF-EMF for 21 days. After treatment, rats were euthanized, the blood was obtained for quantitate plasma corticosterone concentration and their brains were dissected in cortex, cerebellum and subcortical structures for cholesterol, triacylglycerols, total free fatty acids, and thiobarbituric acid reactive substances (TBARS) analysis. In addition, fatty acid methyl esters (FAMEs) were identified by gas chromatography.

Results

Increased values of plasma corticosterone were found in RS and ELF-EMF exposed groups (p < 0.05), this effect was higher in RS + ELF-EMF group (p < 0.05, vs. control group). Chronic ELF-EMF exposure increased total lipids in cerebellum, and total cholesterol in cortex, but decreased polar lipids in cortex. In subcortical structures, increased concentrations of non-esterified fatty acids were observed in RS + ELF-EMF group. FAMEs analysis revealed a decrease of polyunsaturated fatty acids of cerebellum and increases of subcortical structures in the ELF-EMF exposed rats. TBARS concentration in lipids was increased in all treated groups compared to control group, particularly in cortex and cerebellum regions.

Conclusions

These findings suggest that chronic exposure to ELF-EMF is similar to physiological stress, and induce changes on brain lipid profile.

Background

Brain lipids have different roles such as structural, functional and metabolic. Brain lipids constitute about one-half of brain-tissue dry weight. The brain has fatty acids that are long-chain monocarboxylic acids, either saturated or unsaturated, and cholesterol; the most prevalent families of unsaturated fatty acids are n-3, n-6, and n-9 series and contains some unusual fatty acids, such as very long chain fatty acids [1]. However, fatty acids are associated to other compounds to form glycerophospholipids and sphingolipids. These lipids play important roles in the brain physiology, e.g. in signal transduction across membranes, formation of lipid rafts, and anchoring the cell membranes to the extracellular matrix; furthermore, lipids covalently coupled to proteins play a major role in anchoring marker proteins within membranes [2].

Cholesterol and phospholipids are the main constituents of biomembranes. Changes in membrane lipid content are usually associated to imbalance in lipid homeostasis. In central nervous system (CNS) the lipid imbalance could lead to functional alterations that could result in several pathologies [1] as Alzheimer, Huntington and Parkinson diseases [3].

Stress could be defined as a condition in which homeostasis is modified by several responses, physiological and adaptive, induced by stressing factors. Hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal (HPA) axis and the autonomic nervous system enhance the stress hormones in plasma, glucocorticoids and catecholamines, respectively [4, 5]. Stress exposure also induces deep changes in brain functions. Chronic stress has been related to increase in oxidative parameters for instance, increase in protein and lipid peroxidation, increased activity of antioxidant enzymes in the cortex, hippocampus and cerebellum [6]. However, the stress effects on brain lipids have not been extensively characterized.

Nowadays, the presence of electromagnetic fields in daily life it has resulted in an increase concerns regarding to the potential adverse effects of exposure to non-ionizing radiation; particularly to extremely low frequency electromagnetic fields (ELF-EMF). The effects induced by ELF-EMF exposure on biological systems are unclear. However, some effects are reported in epidemiological studies due to the incidence of certain types of brain cancer, and mood disorders [7]. Recent studies have reported the possible oxidant effect of ELF-EMF in brain, through the actions of reactive oxygen species [8]. Some authors have considered ELF-EMF as a mild stressor, and the effects related to its exposure have been reviewed [9]. In a previous study, carried out in Wistar rats acutely exposed to ELF-EMF, we have shown that they increase serum non-esterified fatty acids (NEFAs) concentration at 24 h post exposure [10] and impairs the antioxidant status of rat brain [11]. There are reports that show changes on the levels of Thiobarbituric Acid Reactive Substances (TBARS) of rats exposed to ELF-EMF in the cerebral cortex [12] or in various brain areas [13]. However, the effects of ELF-EMF on brain lipids and their metabolism have not been elucidated extensively. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the effects of chronic extremely low frequency electromagnetic field (ELF-EMF) exposure, restraint stress (RS), and both (RS + ELF-EMF) on lipid profile and lipoperoxidation status in cortex, cerebellum, and subcortical structures of Wistar rat brain.

Methods

Reagents

All reagents and chemicals used for the buffers and solution preparation were of analytical grade. Chloroform and methanol were purchased from Merck (Mexico City, Mexico). Kits for the assessment of Total cholesterol (TC) and triacylglycerols (TAG) were purchased from Spinreact (Mexico City, Mexico), and kits for Non Esterified Fatty Acids from Roche (Mexico City, Mexico).

Animals and treatments

Male Wistar rats (aged 8 weeks) were bred in Faculty of Medicine, UNAM. A total of 24 young rats were used in the experiments (weight 180–200 g); the rats were acclimated to the room and light conditions by 3 days before the experimental period. The animals had free access to water and food in a room with controlled temperature of 23 °C ± 2 and 12 h light–dark cycles. The animals were placed in acrylic homecages of 47 × 21 × 25 cm. All procedures involving animal care were conducted in compliance with the guidelines of animal care, and previously approved by the ethics and research committee of UNAM School of Medicine. All efforts were made to minimize the number of animals used and their suffering. Rats were randomly assigned to four groups of 6 rats each: Control (C), intact animals (nonstressed, 21 days); Restraint stress (RS), (positive control for stress, 2 h/day for 21 days); Extremely low frequency electromagnetic field exposure (ELF-EMF, unrestrained, 2 h/day for 21 days); Restraint stress plus ELF-EMF exposure (RS + ELF-EMF, 2 h/day for 21 days).

After 21 days of treatment and immediately after last exposure, rats were euthanized by cervical dislocation and their blood was collected into heparinized tubes. Right away the brain was dissected in cortex, cerebellum and subcortical structures and stored at − 70 °C until analysis.

Restraint stress model (RS)

The model of movement restraint was used as a positive control for physical and psychological stress [14]. Movement restraint was performed by placing the animals into acrylic cylinders (18 cm in length × 7 cm in diameter) for 120 min/day during 21 days from 12:00 to 14:00 h. Unrestrained rats were individually placed in acrylic homecages during the same period into the same experimental room.

Extremely low frequency electromagnetic field exposure

ELF-EMF exposure was applied with a device previously used in our laboratory [15]. The electromagnetic field was generated with a pair of Helmholtz coils (30 cm internal diameter) composed of 18 gauge copper wire in 350 turns. When electrical current pass through the coils in the same direction, it creates a highly uniform magnetic field in a 3-dimension region of space inside the coils. Helmholtz coil is a device for producing a region of nearly uniform magnetic field. The coils were connected in parallel to a 120 V adjustable transformer (Staco Energy Products, Dayton, OH). An oscilloscope (Tecktronix 5103N, Beaverton, OR) was coupled to the system to monitor a 60 Hz sinusoidal magnetic waveform. The amplitude of the magnetic flux density was 2.4 mT, which was measured using a hand-held Gauss/Tesla meter (Alpha Lab, Salt Lake City, UT). Helmholtz coils were in an isolated room containing also the control animals out of the electromagnetic exposure area. Background static magnetic field value was about < 0.4 µT in the room where all animals were kept and in the central area of the switched off coils. The temperature inside the exposure chambers was 23.4 ± 0.4 °C. The temperature between the coils was monitored using a Hygro-thermometer (Extech instruments, Waltham, MA), this parameter remained constant during the 2 h of stimulation. The coils were separated 15 cm from the upper and lower surfaces of the animal cage [11, 15]. ELF-EMF exposure was applied during the same time (from 12:00 to 14:00 h) to the corresponding groups [15].

Plasma corticosterone determination

Plasma corticosterone concentration was quantitated using an ELISA kit (Enzo Life Sciences, Farmingdale, NY, USA), and microplate reader Stat Fax 3200 (Awareness Technology Inc. Palm City, FL, USA) according to the manufacturer´s instructions.

Brain lipid analysis

Total lipids of cortex, cerebellum and subcortical structures were extracted [16] with a chloroform/methanol mixture by a modified Folch’s method and gravimetrically evaluated: for cortex, cerebellum and subcortical structures samples, 0.5 g of fresh tissue was homogenized in 4 volumes of 0.05 M phosphate buffer, pH 7.2, containing 0.025% butylated hydroxytoluene as antioxidant. Then, the pH was adjusted to 6.0 by the addition of HCl dissolution, and this suspension was extracted three times with 3 volumes each of the chloroform/methanol mixture (Folch´s dissolvent). The extract was washed with 10 mL of water, the organic fraction was evaporated under a nitrogen stream, then weighed (for total lipids), and stored at − 70 °C prior to TC, TAG, NEFAs, and gas chromatography (GC) of fatty acid methyl esters (FAMEs) analyses were performed [17, 18]. The polar lipids (POL) were calculated as follows: POL = TL − (TC + TAG + NEFAs). All results were adjusted per mg total lipids (TL) and for measuring the absorbance it was performed with Genesis 10 UV spectrophotometer (Thermo Electron Corporation, Louisville, KY, USA).

Gas chromatography–mass spectrometry analysis

FAMEs from brain lipid extract were analyzed according to Torres-Durán [18] by GC in a Hewlett Packard gas chromatograph (HP 5890; Hewlett Packard, Mexico City) coupled to a mass selective detector (HP model 5972), with helium as gas carrier; temperature program starts at 200 °C for 3 min, then increased to 260 °C at a ramp velocity of 4 °C/min during 15 min and then maintained at 260 °C for 7 min. Spectra were obtained at 70 eV ionizing energy and mass range scanned was 50–700 a.m.u. at 1.5 scan/s. Fatty acid methyl esters were identified by comparing retention times of authentic fatty acids (Supelco) and by their mass spectra. Column, fused silica capillary column (25 m × 0.2 mm, 0.2 mm i.d.) coated with dimethylpolysiloxane (0.33 μm film) Hewlett Packard, Ultra 1 HP.

Lipoperoxides determination

Thiobarbituric acid reactive substances were determined according to Torres-Duran et al. [18]. Absorbance of the samples was interpolated in curves for concentration of malondialdehyde (MDA, ng/mg TL).

Statistical analyses

Frequency distribution for variables was determined by Kolgomorov–Smirnov test. Comparisons between groups were done using ANOVA (corticosterone, MDA, total cholesterol and, polar lipids) using Bonferroni post hoc test for contrasts among groups or Kruskal–Wallis test (NEFAs and saturated/unsaturated fatty acid ratio).

Results

Effects of RS and ELF-EMF exposure on plasma corticosterone

In order to visualize the effect of ELF-EMF on the stress status, we quantified the plasma corticosterone concentration. Increased values of plasma corticosterone were found in all the experimental groups (p < 0.05), this effect was higher in RS + ELF-EMF group compared to control group (C vs. RS + ELF-EMF and RS vs. RS + ELF-EMF, p < 0.05) (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1
figure1

Effects of EMF chronic exposure and RS on plasma corticosterone. Results are expressed as mean ± SD of 6 animals in each group (*p < 0.05 vs. C group and #p < 0.05 vs. RS group)

Full size image

RS and ELF-EMF effects on TL, TC, TAG, and POL

Total lipids concentration in all the experimental groups shows a tendency to decrease in cortex and subcortical structures (Table 1), the lowest value was observed in subcortical structures of the RS + ELF-EMF group. However, TL in the cerebellum shows an increase only in ELF-EMF group that was statistically significant.

Table 1 Effects of ELF-EMF chronic exposure and RS on total lipids, total cholesterol, polar lipids and NEFAS in brain regions
Full size table

Regarding with TC, the same table shows a significant increase on TC content in the cortex of ELF-EMF and RS + ELF-EMF groups, and in subcortical structures of RS + ELF-EMF group (p < 0.05), but without changes in the cerebellum. A decrease on POL content was found only in the cortex of ELF-EMF, and RS + ELF-EMF groups (p < 0.05 vs. C group). Subcortical structures in RS + ELF-EMF group showed lower POL values than in control and RS groups (p < 0.05). No statistical differences were found in cerebellum.

Triacylglycerol concentration was not different neither in the analyzed brain tissue (cortex, cerebellum, subcortical structures), nor in the four groups (C, RS, ELF-EMF, and RS + ELF-EMF). Their values were, in the range of 49.22–79.24 μg/mg TL.

The NEFAs content in cortex, cerebellum and subcortical structures are shown on Table 1. No statistically significant differences were found between groups and cerebral regions analysed, except in subcortical structures, where the exposure to RS + ELF-EMF induced a slight NEFAs increase compared to the RS and C groups, causing 1.6 and 2.0-fold increases, respectively (p < 0.05).

Effects of RS and ELF-EMF exposure on FAMEs relative content in brain regions

The FAMEs profile showed that palmitic acid was the most abundant, with a range 33–51% in relative abundance in all analysed tissues (data not shown). For stearic acid, a 23–28% relative abundance was found in cortex and cerebellum and 32–36% in subcortical structures. In addition, the percentage of total unsaturated fatty acids was 15–40% in the studied brain regions. Stress induced by RS or ELF-EMF caused an increase in the saturated/unsaturated fatty acid ratio in the cortex (p < 0.05 vs. control group), but not in other analyzed brain regions (Fig. 2). This increase was due to palmitic acid in RS group (51 ± 8.5 vs. 39.4 ± 4.4, p < 0.05 vs. C group). Finally, a significant increase of stearic acid was found in the cerebellum when the rats were exposed to ELF-EMF (27.4 ± 2.0 vs. 23.5 ± 1.9 p < 0.05 vs. control group), but not in other groups (data not shown).

Fig. 2
figure2

Effects of EMF chronic exposure and RS on FAMEs in brain regions. a FAMEs saturated/unsaturated ratio. Results are expressed as mean ± SD of 6 animals in each group (*p < 0.05 vs. control group and #p < 0.05 vs. RS + EMF group). b Representative total ion chromatogram from each isolated region of rat brain from control group. Fatty acids are shown in order of appearing: palmitic (16:0), oleic (18:1), stearic (18:0), arachidonic (20:4) eicosenoic (20:1), docosahexenoic (22:6) and adrenic (22:4). c Representative total ion chromatogram of fatty acids lipid profile from cerebral cortex on different treatments. d Representative mass spectra of fatty acids obtained by relation mass/charge. Each fatty acid was identified by its specific molecular ion, base peak, and characteristic ions. Palmitic (16:0), oleic (18:1), stearic (18:0), arachidonic (20:4), eicosenoic (20:1), docosahexenoic (22:6), methyl ester

Full size image

The following unsaturated fatty acids were identified in the brain regions studied: eicosatetraenoic, docosahexaenoic, docosatetraenoic, octadecenoic and eicosenoic acids; however, only three unsaturated fatty acids (20:4, 22:4, and 22:6) showed differences among the treatments (Table 2). In brain cortex RS induced a decrease of eicosatetraenoic and docosahexaenoic acids percentages (p < 0.05 vs. C group), a decrease in docosatetraenoic acid was found in ELF-EMF group compared to C group (p < 0.05). In the cerebellum, we found a decrease of eicosatetraenoic and docosahexaenoic acids in ELF-EMF, and RS + ELF-EMF groups (p < 0.05 vs. C group). Cerebellum’s docosatetraenoic acid was only detected in control group. Finally, in subcortical structures it was found an increase of all unsaturated fatty acids in ELF-EMF group (p < 0.05) when compared to control group, and to other treatments.

Table 2 Effects of ELF-EMF and RS exposure on FAMEs in brain regions
Full size table

Effects of RS and ELF-EMF exposure on TBARS concentration in lipids of brain regions

TBARS (MDA concentration) in lipids was increased in all the treated groups compared to control group (p < 0.05), in cortical and cerebellar regions (Fig. 3). No statistical differences were found among the groups in subcortical structures.

Fig. 3
figure3

Effect of EMF chronic exposure and RS on the end products of oxidation (TBARS). Results are expressed as mean ± SD of 6 animals in each group. a MDA in cortex (*p < 0.05 vs. C group). b MDA in cerebellum (*p < 0.05 vs. C group). C MDA in subcortical structures

Full size image

Discussion

The magnetic flux density used in this work was half the limit recommended for occupational exposures to 50/60 Hz magnetic fields, which is 5 mT for short term exposure (maximum exposure duration is 2 h per workday) [19]. Our results demonstrate that ELF-EMF exposure induces a significant increase in plasma corticosterone levels, indicating a chronic stress status similar to induced by RS. Although major stress was found in RS + ELF + EMF group, there isn’t statistical difference between ELF + EMF and RS + ELF + EMF treatments. Nevertheless, this finding suggests a possible interaction, synergic or additive, that deserves further studies.

The RS model can induce deep changes in rat physiology; Hennebelle found an increment of 30-times basal corticosterone concentration when RS was applied 6 h/day for 21 days [20]. Buynitsky and Mostofsky [21] reported that a daily 3-week period of RS is used in rodents like a chronic stress physiological model, with an increase of corticosterone levels and metabolic perturbations that affects the function of the nervous system. In the present study, the three times increased corticosterone concentration on the exposure protocol supports the statement that RS and ELF-EMF alone, can act as a mild stress condition. These results are in accordance with previous studies, showing that plasma corticosterone levels are one of the most important indicators of stress [22, 23]. Some reports suggest that long-term ELF-EMF exposure may elevate the plasma corticosterone levels in rodents [23]. Taken together, RS + ELF-EMF may count as the addition of two stress situations, whose effects can be added. In the present study, an increase on corticosterone levels was found in RS, ELF-EMF, and RS + ELF-EMF groups, supporting the proposal that ELF-EMF exposure is like a mild stressor.

Lipids play a critical role in structure and function of the nervous system; glucocorticoids may alter lipid metabolism in brain and other tissues; as reported previously, where the administration of glucocorticoids can induce a shift in arachidonic acid metabolism in brain [24]. In the present study, we found changes on TC (increase), and POL (decrease) in the brain cortex of rats exposed to RS + ELF-EMF and ELF-EMF groups, and in subcortical structures in RS + ELF-EMF group, this finding corroborates previous reports in which movement/synthesis of cholesterol is brain are area-dependent. Segatto, found a differential activity pattern of 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase in different brain regions with the highest activity in brain cortex and the lowest activity in brainstem [25]. Cholesterol is essential for membrane structure and stability, it decreases during stress and depressive-like behaviour in rats [26], and in neuronal diseases in human beings [27, 28]. Oliveira found that free cholesterol was the most abundant of the lipids in all brain regions analyzed, showing higher levels in cerebellum [29]. Results of the present work confirm the observation of highest cholesterol levels in cerebellum, and extend the finding of resistance to mild stressor conditions at this brain area.

Increased cholesterol levels found in cortex and subcortical structures in response to ELF-EMF exposure or RS + ELF-EMF could be an adaptive response for cellular protection, as observed in cerebellum. On the contrary, reduced cholesterol levels could affect the animal behaviour [26], suggesting a decrease in brain function. The increasing CT observed in the present study suggest that brain cortex CT turnover increases in response to ELF-EMF exposure, as seen in neuroinflammation and in other pathologic conditions, according to different reports [27, 28, 30]. On the other hand, we found a decrease in POL content of the cortex in the groups exposed to ELF-EMF, and RS + ELF-EMF groups, this finding is in accordance with previous reports in which some noxious conditions as maternal deprivation, RS, and ELF-EMF stimulation have effects on phospholipids and phospholipid-dependent pathways [20, 31].

According to our results, Oliveira [29] found POL changes in cortex and cerebellum after deep chronic stress, sphingolipid and phospholipid metabolism were deeply affected, showing a decrease in: phosphatidylethanolamine, ether phosphatidylcholine, and an increase in lysophosphatidylethanolamine levels similar to Lee et al. [32].

It has been observed that stress modifies the profile of mainly POL and fatty acid in different brain regions; in our results, we found a decrease of POL in cortex and in subcortical structures of ELF-EMF and RS + ELF-EMF groups, suggesting an association of this effect to ELF-EMF stimulation.

Fatty acids are usually bound to complex lipids in the cell membrane, and many stimulus can induce the breakdown of these complex lipids, which can be converted to signalling molecules, second messengers, and other molecules involved in neuronal metabolism and survival [33]. In the present study, we found an increase of NEFAs (as breakdown index for fatty acid released from complex lipids) in subcortical structures of rats exposed to RS + ELF-EMF, but not in other brain regions studied. We suggest that this increase in NEFAs could be through phospholipase activation by ELF-EMF, as described by Piacentini et al. [34]; nevertheless, the regional effects in NEFAs composition remains unclear [31, 35].

In further analysis, we found changes in total FAMEs composition in cortex, cerebellum and subcortical structures. According to our chromatographic method, eicosatetraenoic, docosahexaenoic, docosatetranoic, octadecanoic, and eicosenoic acids were found with major abundance in the tissues analyzed. Under physiologic conditions, the balance of membrane lipid metabolism, particularly of arachidonic and docosahexaenoic acids, lead a very small and tightly controlled cellular pool of free arachidonic acid, but their levels increase very quickly upon cell activation, cerebral ischemia, seizures or other types of brain stress [30, 35, 36]. However, in the present study a decrease in the relative abundance of FAMEs was found, especially in brain cortex in RS group. This effect could be due to membrane-bound fatty acids transformation into other metabolites as suggested by Malcher-Lopes et al. [24]; similar findings were observed in the cerebellum, with a decrease in eicosatetraenoic and docosahexaenoic acids in rats exposed to ELF-EMF, but not in the RS group, this may suggest that an ELF-EMF-mediated mechanism is involved in metabolism of these lipids, this mechanism could be through phospholipase activation as suggested by some authors [30, 37, 38]. We also observed a differential effect on the subcortical structures; RS induces a decrease in eicosatetraenoic and docosahexaenoic acids, while ELF-EMF stimulation induces an increase in these lipids. These findings agree with those reported by Clejan et al. [39], who found a differential effect of ELF-EMF on phospholipases and their patterns in second messengers in hematopoietic cell lines.

The cellular effects of extremely low frequency electromagnetic fields remain unknown, but several hypothesis about the mechanism of action have been proposed; one is the lifetime extension of free radicals, and radical-mediated damages on macromolecules [8, 40]. Some authors have hypothesized that ELF-EMF can act on living organisms in a similar way to other stressors, like heat and RS, by inducing the neuroendocrine stress response [41, 42]. According to that proposal, the findings that cortex and cerebellum of experimental groups showed higher lipoperoxide levels than control group, but without differences in subcortical structures, could be explained because these areas were the closest and most exposed to ELF-EMF, so producing free radicals that induce lipid damage and increase of saturated-/unsaturated-fatty acids ratio. In a previous report we observed that acute exposure to EMF induces reduction in catalase and superoxide dismutase activities, without changes in lipoperoxidation [11]. In the present study, lipid damage could be by induction of oxidative imbalance due to chronic exposure, suggesting that chronic ELF-EMF exposure could be like a mild-stressor; this finding is supported by the increase levels in plasma corticosterone concentration and brain lipid peroxidation. Changes in lipid composition, could have deep effects on membrane function by affecting membrane-associated enzymes, receptors and ion channels [43]. In the present study, different effects of RS and ELF-EMF were found in different brain regions, we speculate that these effects may be mediated by specific mechanisms, like phospholipase [30] activation by ELF-EMF and genomic and non-genomic effects of glucocorticoids, but these observations deserve further research as has been suggested previously in clinical trials [44].

Conclusions

Changes found in the present study are in accordance with previous reports indicating the effects of chronic stress on brain lipid metabolism and suggest that the actions of extremely low frequency electromagnetic fields are similar to physiological stress. The effects found in different brain regions indicate that the extremely low frequency electromagnetic fields could be distance-dependent from the source of exposure due to findings in the analyzed brain regions. The effects in EMF versus RS were found differences on total cholesterol and polar lipids in cortex. In addition, in subcortical zone was found differences on total lipids. Although cerebellum’s lipid peroxidation induced by any stressor was similar to the found in cortex, minor changes in lipid profile were found in cerebellum and subcortical structures were more susceptible to increase NEFAs content in response to RS + ELF-EMF exposure.

Abbreviations

ANOVA:

analysis of variance

C:

control

CNS:

central nervous system

ELF-EMF:

extremely low frequency electromagnetic field

ELISA:

enzyme-linked immune sorbent assay

FAMEs:

fatty acid methyl esters

GC:

gas chromatography

HPA:

hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal

MDA:

malondialdehyde

mT:

milliTesla

NEFAs:

non-esterified fatty acids

POL:

polar lipids

RS:

restraint stress

TAG:

triacylglycerols

TBARS:

thiobarbituric acid reactive substances

TC:

total cholesterol

TL:

total lipids

UNAM:

Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México

References

  1. 1.

    Brady ST, Siegel GJ, Albers RW, Price DL, Benjamins J. Basic neurochemistry: principles of molecular, cellular, and medical neurobiology. 8th ed. Amsterdam; Boston: Elsevier/Academic Press; 2012. http://www.loc.gov/catdir/enhancements/fy1606/2012382367-d.html.

  2. 2.

    Adibhatla RM, Hatcher JF. Role of lipids in brain injury and diseases. Future Lipidol. 2007;2:403–22.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Farooqui T, Farooqui AA. Lipid-mediated oxidative stress and inflammation in the pathogenesis of Parkinson’s disease. Park Dis. 2011;2011:247467.

    Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Rostamkhani F, Zardooz H, Zahediasl S, Farrokhi B. Comparison of the effects of acute and chronic psychological stress on metabolic features in rats. J Zhejiang Univ Sci B. 2012;13:904–12.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Rabasa C, Pastor-Ciurana J, Delgado-Morales R, Gomez-Roman A, Carrasco J, Gagliano H, et al. Evidence against a critical role of CB1 receptors in adaptation of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis and other consequences of daily repeated stress. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol. 2015;25:1248–59.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Wang Chao, He-ming Wu, Jing Xiao-rong, Meng Qiang, Liu Bei, Zhang Hua, et al. Oxidative parameters in the rat brain of chronic mild stress model for depression: relation to anhedonia-like response. J Membr Biol. 2012;245:675–81.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Feychting M, Ahlbom A, Kheifets L. EMF and health. Annu Rev Public Health. 2005;26:165–89.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Simko M. Cell type specific redox status is responsible for diverse electromagnetic field effects. Curr Med Chem. 2007;14:1141–52.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Consales C, Merla C, Marino C, Benassi B. Electromagnetic fields, oxidative stress, and neurodegeneration. Int J Cell Biol. 2012;2012:683897.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Torres-Duran PV, Ferreira-Hermosillo A, Juarez-Oropeza MA, Elias-Vinas D, Verdugo-Diaz L. Effects of whole body exposure to extremely low frequency electromagnetic fields (ELF-EMF) on serum and liver lipid levels, in the rat. Lipids Health Dis. 2007;6:31.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Martinez-Samano J, Torres-Duran PV, Juarez-Oropeza MA, Verdugo-Diaz L. Effect of acute extremely low frequency electromagnetic field exposure on the antioxidant status and lipid levels in rat brain. Arch Med Res. 2012;43:183–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Jelenkovic A, Janac B, Pesic V, Jovanovic DM, Vasiljevic I, Prolic Z. Effects of extremely low-frequency magnetic field in the brain of rats. Brain Res Bull. 2006;68:355–60.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Falone S, Mirabilio A, Carbone MC, Zimmitti V, Di Loreto S, Mariggio MA, et al. Chronic exposure to 50 Hz magnetic fields causes a significant weakening of antioxidant defence systems in aged rat brain. Int J Biochem Cell Biol. 2008;40:2762–70.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Sahin E, Gumuslu S. Stress-dependent induction of protein oxidation, lipid peroxidation and anti-oxidants in peripheral tissues of rats: comparison of three stress models (immobilization, cold and immobilization-cold). Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol. 2007;34:425–31.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Vazquez-Garcia M, Elias-Vinas D, Reyes-Guerrero G, Dominguez-Gonzalez A, Verdugo-Diaz L, Guevara-Guzman R. Exposure to extremely low-frequency electromagnetic fields improves social recognition in male rats. Physiol Behav. 2004;82:685–90.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Heffner TG, Hartman JA, Seiden LS. A rapid method for the regional dissection of the rat brain. Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 1980;13:453–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Folch J, Lees M, Sloane Stanley GH. A simple method for the isolation and purification of total lipids from animal tissues. J Biol Chem. 1957;226:497–509.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Torres-Duran PV, Paredes-Carbajal MC, Mascher D, Zamora-Gonzalez J, Diaz-Zagoya JC, Juarez-Oropeza MA. Protective effect of Arthrospira maxima on fatty acid composition in fatty liver. Arch Med Res. 2006;37:479–83.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Interim guidelines on limits of exposure to 50/60 Hz electric and magnetic fields. International Non-ionizing Radiation Committee of the International Radiation Protection Association. Health Phys. 1990;58:113–22.

  20. 20.

    Hennebelle M, Balasse L, Latour A, Champeil-Potokar G, Denis S, Lavialle M, et al. Influence of omega-3 fatty acid status on the way rats adapt to chronic restraint stress. PLoS ONE. 2012;7:e42142.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Buynitsky T, Mostofsky DI. Restraint stress in biobehavioral research: recent developments. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2009;33:1089–98.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Lightman SL. The neuroendocrinology of stress: a never ending story. J Neuroendocr. 2008;20:880–4.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Mostafa RM, Mostafa YM, Ennaceur A. Effects of exposure to extremely low-frequency magnetic field of 2 G intensity on memory and corticosterone level in rats. Physiol Behav. 2002;76:589–95.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Malcher-Lopes R, Franco A, Tasker JG. Glucocorticoids shift arachidonic acid metabolism toward endocannabinoid synthesis: a non-genomic anti-inflammatory switch. Eur J Pharmacol. 2008;583:322–39.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Segatto M, Trapani L, Lecis C, Pallottini V. Regulation of cholesterol biosynthetic pathway in different regions of the rat central nervous system. Acta Physiol. 2012;206:62–71.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Sun S, Yang S, Mao Y, Jia X, Zhang Z. Reduced cholesterol is associated with the depressive-like behavior in rats through modulation of the brain 5-HT1A receptor. Lipids Health Dis. 2015;14:22.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Block RC, Dorsey ER, Beck CA, Brenna JT, Shoulson I. Altered cholesterol and fatty acid metabolism in Huntington disease. J Clin Lipidol. 2010;4:17–23.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Valenza M, Rigamonti D, Goffredo D, Zuccato C, Fenu S, Jamot L, et al. Dysfunction of the cholesterol biosynthetic pathway in Huntington’s disease. J Neurosci. 2005;25:9932–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Oliveira TG, Chan RB, Bravo FV, Miranda A, Silva RR, Zhou B, et al. The impact of chronic stress on the rat brain lipidome. Mol Psychiatry. 2016;21:80–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Sun GY, Xu J, Jensen MD, Simonyi A. Phospholipase A2 in the central nervous system: implications for neurodegenerative diseases. J Lipid Res. 2004;45:205–13.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Mathieu G, Denis S, Lavialle M, Vancassel S. Synergistic effects of stress and omega-3 fatty acid deprivation on emotional response and brain lipid composition in adult rats. Prostaglandins Leukot Essent Fat Acids. 2008;78:391–401.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Lee LHW, Tan CH, Lo YL, Farooqui AA, Shui GH, Wenk MR, et al. Brain lipid changes after repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation: potential links to therapeutic effects? Metabolomics. 2012;8:19–33.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Hayashi H, Karten B, Vance DE, Campenot RB, Maue RA, Vance JE. Methods for the study of lipid metabolism in neurons. Anal Biochem. 2004;331:1–16.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Piacentini MP, Piatti E, Fraternale D, Ricci D, Albertini MC, Accorsi A. Phospholipase C-dependent phosphoinositide breakdown induced by ELF-EMF in Peganum harmala calli. Biochimie. 2004;86:343–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Farooqui AA, Horrocks LA. Excitotoxicity and neurological disorders: involvement of membrane phospholipids. Int Rev Neurobiol. 1994;36:267–323.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Martín Municio A, Miras-Portugal MT. Cell signal transduction, second messengers, and protein phosphorylation in health and disease. New York: Plenum Press; 1994. http://www.loc.gov/catdir/enhancements/fy1006/94038606-t.html.

  37. 37.

    Dibirdik I, Bofenkamp M, Skeben P, Uckun F. Stimulation of Bruton’s tyrosine kinase (BTK) and inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate production in leukemia and lymphoma cells exposed to low energy electromagnetic fields. Leuk Lymphoma. 2000;40:149–56.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Kim SS, Shin HJ, Eom DW, Huh JR, Woo Y, Kim H, et al. Enhanced expression of neuronal nitric oxide synthase and phospholipase C-gamma1 in regenerating murine neuronal cells by pulsed electromagnetic field. Exp Mol Med. 2002;34:53–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Clejan S, Ide C, Walker C, Wolf E, Corb M, Beckman B. Electromagnetic field induced changes in lipid second messengers. J Lipid Mediat Cell Signal. 1996;13:301–24.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Patruno A, Tabrez S, Pesce M, Shakil S, Kamal MA, Reale M. Effects of extremely low frequency electromagnetic field (ELF-EMF) on catalase, cytochrome P450 and nitric oxide synthase in erythro-leukemic cells. Life Sci. 2015;121:117–23.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Sandyk R, Tsagas N, Anninos PA, Derpapas K. Magnetic fields mimic the behavioral effects of REM sleep deprivation in humans. Int J Neurosci. 1992;65:61–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Szemerszky R, Zelena D, Barna I, Bardos G. Stress-related endocrinological and psychopathological effects of short- and long-term 50 Hz electromagnetic field exposure in rats. Brain Res Bull. 2010;81:92–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Hong I, Garrett A, Maker G, Mullaney I, Rodger J, Etherington SJ. Repetitive low intensity magnetic field stimulation in a neuronal cell line: a metabolomics study. PeerJ. 2018;6:e4501.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Martinez D, Urban N, Grassetti A, Chang D, Hu MC, Zangen A, et al. Transcranial magnetic stimulation of medial prefrontal and cingulate cortices reduces cocaine self-administration: a pilot study. Front Psychiatry. 2018;9:80.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors’ contributions

All listed authors developed different substantial activities. JMS performed the main techniques of the experiment, and interpretation of data. AFP identified fatty acids and performed the experiments, he performed the mass spectrometry analyses and he was involved in drafting the manuscript. LVD contributed substantially to the experiment design. She participated in drafting and writing the manuscript. MAJO done statistical analysis of the results, he participated in drafting and writing the manuscript. PVTD contributed substantially on the lipid analysis and performed the experiments, drafting and writing the manuscript. Each author participated sufficiently in writing and reviewing the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Acknowledgements

None.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Availability of data and materials

All data are included in the manuscript. However, the datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

All procedures involving animal care were conducted in compliance with the guidelines of animal care. All efforts were made to minimize the number of animals used and their suffering. The protocol of research was reviewed and approved by the Ethics and Research Committee (No. 100-2011) of the Faculty of Medicine of the Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico (UNAM), based in Norma Oficial Mexicana (NOM-062-ZOO-1999).

Funding

This work was supported by PAPIIT grants IN217812 to LVD and Faculty of Medicine, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Departamento de Bioquímica, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Circuito Escolar s/n, Ciudad Universitaria, C.P. 04510, Mexico City, Mexico

    Jesús Martínez-Sámano, Alan Flores-Poblano, Marco Antonio Juárez-Oropeza & Patricia V. Torres-Durán

  2. Departamento de Fisiología, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Circuito Escolar s/n, Ciudad Universitaria, C.P. 04510, Mexico City, Mexico

    Leticia Verdugo-Díaz

Authors
  1. Jesús Martínez-Sámano
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Alan Flores-Poblano
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Leticia Verdugo-Díaz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Marco Antonio Juárez-Oropeza
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Patricia V. Torres-Durán
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Patricia V. Torres-Durán.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Martínez-Sámano, J., Flores-Poblano, A., Verdugo-Díaz, L. et al. Extremely low frequency electromagnetic field exposure and restraint stress induce changes on the brain lipid profile of Wistar rats. BMC Neurosci 19, 31 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12868-018-0432-1

Download citation

Keywords

  • ELF-EMF
  • Corticosterone
  • Cholesterol
  • Fatty acids

BMC Neuroscience

ISSN: 1471-2202

Contact us