Skip to main content
  • Methodology article
  • Open access
  • Published:

Isolation of neuronal chromatin from brain tissue



DNA-protein interactions in mature brain are increasingly recognized as key regulators for behavioral plasticity and neuronal dysfunction in chronic neuropsychiatric disease. However, chromatin assays typically lack single cell resolution, and therefore little is known about chromatin regulation of differentiated neuronal nuclei that reside in brain parenchyma intermingled with various types of non-neuronal cells.


Here, we describe a protocol to selectively tag neuronal nuclei from adult brain – either by (anti-NeuN) immunolabeling or transgene-derived histone H2B-GFP fusion protein – for subsequent fluorescence-activated sorting and chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP). To illustrate an example, we compared histone H3 lysine 4 and 9 methylation marks at select gene promoters in neuronal, non-neuronal and unsorted chromatin from mouse forebrain and human cerebral cortex, and provide evidence for neuron-specific histone methylation signatures.


With the modifications detailed in this protocol, the method can be used to collect nuclei from specific subtypes of neurons from any brain region for subsequent ChIP with native/un-fixed or crosslinked chromatin preparations. Starting with the harvest of brain tissue, ChIP-ready neuronal nuclei can be obtained within one day.


An increasing number of neurodevelopmental and neuropsychiatric disorders are thought to result from defective DNA:protein interactions specifically in neurons; furthermore, sustained changes in neuronal gene expression and behavior after exposure to certain drugs or stimuli are likely to involve chromatin remodeling, including DNA methylation and histone modification changes [15]. However, even the most sensitive chromatin immunoprecipitation assays and most other approaches used to study the regulation of DNA and histone modifications, transcription factor binding etc., lack single cell resolution and instead require the preparation of homogenates from at least 103 – 107 nuclei. Consequently, detailed chromatin analysis was until now not feasible for nuclei of terminally differentiated neurons that typically reside in brain parenchyma intermingled with various types of glia and other cells mostly in a 2:1 – 1:2 ratio, dependent on species and brain regions [6, 7].

Recently, immunostaining in conjunction with fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) was used successfully to selectively collect neuronal nuclei from human (postmortem) brain tissue for the purposes of retrospective birth dating [8] or assessment of age-related changes in DNA cytosine methylation [9]. However, these studies utilized the nuclear harvest for highly sensitive radiation and PCR assays, and it remained unclear whether the protocol could be modified for the purposes of chromatin immunoprecipitation and other techniques that require comparatively larger amount of input (for example, 105 107 nuclei). We provide a detailed protocol for selective sorting of neuronal nuclei from mouse and human brain in quantities sufficient for immunoprecipitation with different chromatin preparations (enzyme-based digestion and crosslinking/sonication), followed by microarray or PCR studies. In addition, we introduce a transgenic mouse line for neuron-specific expression of GFP (enhanced green fluorescent protein)-tagged histone H2B. Evidence is presented that even under baseline conditions, promoter-bound histone methylation in neuronal samples is significantly different when compared to unsorted, or non-neuronal nuclei from the same brain region. Therefore, the methods presented here will be important for the study of molecular mechanisms governing epigenetic control of neuronal gene expression and chromatin remodeling specifically in mature brain.


H2B-GFP transgenic mice

The promoter of the α subunit of the Ca2+/calmodulin dependent protein kinase II gene (CAMKII) was used to drive H2B-EGFP expression; as expected, this transgene labeled most of the neuronal populations in the fore- and midbrain, including cortex, striatum, hippocampus, with the notable exception of the GABAergic interneurons in cerebral cortex and hippocampus (Fig. 3). In contrast, labeling in hindbrain, incl cerebellum, was less consistent (data not shown). The transgene-derived labeling of neuronal nuclei with H2B-EGFP was robust pre- and post-FACS (Fig. 2, panel a-d). To date, our oldest transgenic mice are 5 months of age and so far we did not observe any overt neurological phenotypes, even in animals expressing the fusion protein at comparatively high levels in CNS neurons. Likewise, no adverse effects were reported for transgenic mice expressing high levels of H2B-EGFP in a wide range of tissues, including brain [10].

Figure 1
figure 1

Outline of the procedure to isolate neuronal nuclei from brain for chromatin immunoprecipitation.

Figure 2
figure 2

Neuronal nuclei isolated from adult brain via FACS. (A) Digitized images of nuclei extracted from forebrain of adult (a-d) CAMIIK-H2B-GFP transgenic mice, and (e-j) wild type mice labeled with NeuN immunoreactivity, as indicated pre and post (FACS sorting), and after pelleting. Green channel for (a, c) GFP or (e, g, i) NeuN; blue channel for DAPI. Notice that post-FACS samples are comprised entirely of neuronal nuclei. Bar = 20 μm. (B) Representative FACS scatter plots from (a) negative control (NC) processed without NeuN antibody, and (b) sample processed with NeuN antibody (NeuN).

Figure 3
figure 3

Neurons expressing H2B-GFP transgene. Digitized images from 8 week old CAMIIK-H2B-GFP mice. (a) Cerebral cortex. Notice GFP (green) nuclei across layers II-VI, but not in layer I or white matter (WM). (b) caudate-putamen and (c) hippocampus. (d-f) Nuclei extracted from forebrain and processed for NeuN (red), and nucleophilic dye, DAPI (blue). Notice that GFP (green) expression is limited to 5 of the 6 NeuN immunoreactive nuclei. Arrows label GFP-, NeuN- nuclei, * labels GFP-, NeuN+ nucleus. (g) Section from cerebral cortex labeled with anti-GAD67 antibody (red). Notice absence of GFP signal in GABA neuron. Bar is (a, c) 100, (b) 300, (d-g) 5 μm.

Loss of nuclei during the procedure

Each of the major steps in this protocol – (1) extraction of nuclei from the tissue, (2) ultracentrifugation, (3) immunolabeling and (4) fluorescence-activated sorting – could result in loss of nuclei, together totaling perhaps up to 50% of the neuronal nuclei in the starting material. However, despite of these limitations, the alternative approach, such as nuclei harvesting from primary neuronal culture, is likely not to improve results in a higher yield and would have the additional disadvantage of any ex vivo preparation.

Nucleosomes are preserved in sorted nuclei

Nucleosomes as the elementary unit of chromatin – are comprised of 146 bp of genomic DNA wrapped around core histones H2A, H2B, H3 and H4. To find out whether nucleosomal structures remain intact in sorted NeuN+ nuclei, we compared nucleosome occupancy at promoters in forebrain from unsorted and NeuN+ nuclei, using a modification-independent anti-H3 C-terminus antibody for ChIP-DSL in conjunction with M8K promoter array (Fig 4A, B). No significant differences between chip-to-input ratios of sorted NeuN+ and unsorted nuclei were observed. Instead, H3 occupancy at specific promoter sequences showed a strong correlation between the NeuN+ and unsorted samples (Spearman rank, r = 0.651370, p < 2.2e-16) (Fig. 4B). We conclude that promoter-bound nucleosomes are intact after the sorting procedure.

Figure 4
figure 4

Neuron-specific chromatin signatures in mouse brain. (A) Representative gel picture for 25 cycle PCR product (ChIP-GLAS) from 4 independent replicates of Input I and ChIP C, and water control W. (B) Scatter plot showing correlation between Chip-to-input ratios signal from NeuN+ sorted nuclei (NeuN+ FACS) (x-axis) and unsorted nuclei (NON-FACS) (y-axis), using modification-independent antibody against C-terminus of histone H3 anti-H3. (C) Bar graphs showing ChIP-to-input ratio (y-axis) for (top row) dimethylated H3-lysine 4 (H3K4me2) and (bottom row) trimethylated H3-lysine 9 (H3K9me3) as determined for Mecp2, Gad1, B2m, and Gfap gene promoters in chromatin of NeuN+ FACS and NON-FACS nuclei from mouse forebrain. Data shown as mean ± S.E.M., N = 6/sorting; *p < 0.05, ANOVA NeuN+ FACS v.s. NON-FACS.

Differential histone H3 methylation in neuronal nuclei

To find out whether or not neuronal chromatin, under baseline conditions, shows a histone methylation signature that is different compared to unsorted nuclei, we conducted ChIP for two histone lysine methylation marks, H3K4me2 and H3K9me3. All studies were conducted on the forebrain of male mice 8–12 weeks of age. Histone methylation levels were at 3 out of 4 – arbitrarily chosen – gene promoters significantly different in neuronal chromatin (Fig. 4C). Furthermore, in 2 out of 4 promoters (B2m, Mecp2), changes in the "open" mark, H3K4me2 and the "repressive" mark, H3K9me3, were in the opposite direction (Fig. 4C). Notably, H3K9me3 levels at the Mecp2 promoter – i.e., the Rett syndrome gene which is robustly and ubiquitously expressed in mature CNS neurons [1115] – were higher in neuronal vs. unsorted chromatin. This particular finding was unexpected and requires further investigations.

Next, we wanted to (i) find out whether the above findings can be extrapolated to species other than mouse and (ii) further confirm that histone lysine methylation at select gene loci is differentially regulated in neurons as compared to non-neuronal cells residing in the same tissue. To this end, we utilized postmortem tissue from the human prefrontal cortex for ChIP with H3-tri-methyl-lysine 4 (H3K4me3), a chromatin mark enriched at sites of active gene expression [16, 17]. For each tissue sample, NeuN immunopositive and immunonegative nuclei were sorted separately by FACS, and then processed in parallel for anti-H3K4me3 ChIP followed by qPCR for the following genes: (1) The subunit 2B of the NMDA receptor (GRIN2B) and (2) brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF); both these genes are in postnatal and adult brain predominantly or exclusively expressed in neurons [18, 19]. (3) β 2 microglobulin (B2M), which in CNS is expressed in a mixed population of neuronal and non-neuronal cells and considered as a "housekeeping gene" in postmortem studies [20, 21], and (4) the locus control region of the β globin locus (HBB), which is highly regulated in erythopoetic tissues but silent and inactive in brain [22, 23]. Levels of H3K4me3 at promoters of the neuron-specific genes, GRIN2B and BDNF, were consistently higher in chromatin of the NeuN+ nuclei as compared to NeuN- (Fig. 5). These changes were highly specific because H3K4me3 levels in chromatin surrounding B2M were higher in NeuN- nuclei, and furthermore, H3K4me3 at the HBB locus control region were overall very low (Fig. 5). Taken together, our findings in mouse forebrain and human prefrontal cortex suggest that – even at baseline – important differences exist between histone methylation signatures of neuronal and non-neuronal chromatin.

Figure 5
figure 5

Neuron-specific chromatin signatures in human prefrontal cortex. Bar graphs showing ChIP-to-input ratio (y-axis) for trimethylated H3-lysine 4 (H3K4me3) at GRIN2B, BDNF and B2M promoters, and HBB (β-globin) locus control region in chromatin of NeuN positive (NeuN+) and negative (NeuN-) FACS sorted nuclei from human prefrontal cortex. Data shown as mean ± S.E.M., N = 3 specimens/sorting. The NeuN+ fraction showed, in comparison to NeuN- fraction of the same subject, increased levels of H3K4me3 at GRIN2B and BDNF in 3/3 cases. Notice further the extremely low ChIP-to-input ratio for HBB.


The protocol presented here should be particularly useful to investigators who wish to study chromatin regulation, including epigenetic mechanisms of neuronal gene expression, in the mature and the aging brain. The alternative approach, i.e. the study of primary neuronal cultures or neuron-like cell lines, certainly is suited to model developmental mechanisms and neurodevelopmental disease [2429]. However, neurons and other CNS cells are sustainable in culture, at best, for a few weeks [30, 31] and therefore are not ideal from the viewpoint of chronic neuropsychiatric diseases, which often involve a protracted course, late onset and predilection for a specific neuronal subtype. Furthermore, the complexities of brain connectivity and circuitry, among a myriad of other factors, is difficult or impossible to model ex vivo. For example, in vivo treatment with antipsychotic drugs induces chromatin remodeling in cerebral cortex and striatum, an effect that cannot be mimicked in cortical or striatal cell cultures lacking input from monoamine pathways [3234]. Finally, chromatin assays in whole brain tissue are potentially confounded by cellular heterogeneity, including potential shifts in cellular composition during the course of aging or due to disease. Given that chromatin immunoprecipitation with genome-wide coverage from as little as 10,000 cells is now feasible [35], it should be possible to use transgenic mice – including the CAMIIK-H2B-GFP lines presented here – to selectively study the epigenome for highly defined subpopulations of neurons in the mouse. Furthermore, the relative resilience of nuclei in frozen-then-thawed postmortem brain tissue makes it possible to apply the techniques presented here to species other than small laboratory animals, including normal and diseased human brain. It remains to be determined whether or not the approach presented here is applicable to tissues other than brain. When compared to sorting protocols that are based on trypsinization of tissue and sorting of intact (neuronal or non-neuronal) somata [36], our approach has several advantages. First, it is applicable to frozen tissues. Second, the yield of recovered nuclei appears to be much higher, albeit direct comparisons are lacking. Third, it is comparatively simple as compared to related protocols.

To summarize, the perspective to develop chromatin assays for specific types of neuronal populations of the mature brain, as described here, will be relevant for a wide range of physiological and neurological conditions related to transcriptional regulation and chromatin remodeling.


An overview of the procedure is provided in Fig. 1


Procedures involving human postmortem brain were approved by the institutional review boards of the University of Massachusetts Medical School. Frozen tissues (prefrontal cortex) from 3 specimens (age range: 8–69 years, autolysis interval 5–28 hours) were obtained from the Brain and Tissue Banks for Developmental Disorders, University of Maryland (National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Contract NO1-HD-8-3284) and from a brain bank at the University of California at Davis (Center for Neuroscience, Director Dr. Edward G. Jones).


A cassette, comprised of 8 kB of the CamIIK (α subunit) promoter and 1.4 kB of histone H2b-eGFP cDNA (CaMK II-H2B-EGFP), was used to generate 3 lines of transgenic mice by pronuclear injection. All the experiments were performed in strict accordance with Institutional Guidelines regarding use of experimental animals.

Reagents and reagent setup

Chemicals used include the following: 1 × PBS (Cellgro, 21-040-CV), Triton X-100 (Fluka, 93426), Igepal CA-630 (NP-40) (Sigma, 1–3021), Protease inhibitor cocktail tablets (Roche, 11697498001), Phenylmethanesulfonyl Fluoride (PMSF) (Sigma, P7626), Mouse anti-NeuN (Upstate, MAB377), Goat anti-mouse IgG, Alexa Fluor 488 (Invitrogen, A11029), Bovine serum Albumin (BSA) (Sigma, B-4287), Normal goat serum (Vector, S-1000), Micrococcal nuclease (Sigma, N-3765), Protein G Agarose, (Upstate, 16–266), Rabbit Anti-H3 (Abcam, ab1791), Rabbit Anti-H3K4me2 (Upstate, 07–030), Rabbit Anti-H3K9me3 (Upstate, 07–442), Rabbit Anti-H3K4me3 (Upstate, 07–473), Normal rabbit IgG (Upstate, 120370)

Nuclei Extraction Buffer (NEB): 0.32 M Sucrose, 5 mM CaCl2, 3 mM Mg(Ac)2, 0.1 mM EDTA, 10 mM Tris-HCl (pH8), 1 X Protease inhibitor cocktail, 0.1 mM PMSF, w/o 0.1% Triton X-100, w/o 0.1% NP-40. Sucrose Cushion: 1.8 M Sucrose, 3 mM Mg(Ac)2, 10 mM Tris-HCl (pH8). Blocking Solution: 0.5%. Bovine serum albumin (BSA), 10% normal goat serum, in 1 × PBS.

Nuclei extraction from brain tissue

Total nuclei were extracted via sucrose gradient ultracentrifugation. In the work presented here (mouse), each sample was derived from a single forebrain (adult males, 8–12 weeks of age); (human) 1000 mg of cerebral cortex. All the reagents used were pre-chilled and the entire procedure was performed on ice. Fresh or frozen samples were homogenized by douncing 50 times in 5 mL NEB with 0.1% Triton X-100, or alternatively, 0.1% NP-40. Triton X-100 was preferable if nuclei require immunotagging (with NeuN, for example), while NP-40 as a milder detergent left more nuclei intact and sufficient when working with nuclei expressing GFP. After douncing, brain homogenates were transferred into 14 mL ultracentrifuge tubes (Beckman, 14 × 95 mm, 344061), and 9 mL of Sucrose Cushion was carefully loaded directly to the bottom of the ultracentrifuge tube. Ultracentrifugation was performed at 24400 rpm for 2.5 hrs at 4°C (Beckman, L8-70M, SW28 rotor). After centrifugation, a nuclei pellet – thin and typically with a light yellow taint – was formed on the bottom of the tube. The sticky white tissue debris was restrained in the middle interface of the two sucrose layers. Supernatant, including debris, was carefully removed. 1200 μl of chilled 1 × PBS was then added into the tube and incubated without disturbing the pellet, for 20 min on ice. This incubation is recommended because the nuclei pellet is easier to dissociate and consequently, there will be less damage to the nuclei. After incubation, the nuclei were dissociated by pipetting up and down. FACS required single nuclei in solution but excess pipetting tended to break nuclei, at least in the unfixed preparations. Pipetting required optimization by checking the nuclei "quality" (intact single nuclei, non-adhering, without debris) under the light microscope. The total number of nuclei was counted by using a hemacytometer. One mouse forebrain typically yielded 20–30 × 106 unfixed nuclei after ultracentrifugation.

One alternative option was to fix the nuclei by directly douncing the tissue in NEB containing 1% formalin. Typically, we fixed with formalin at room temperature for 5–10 min, and then added glycine to a final concentration of 125 mM. The fixed nuclei were pelleted by centrifugation, re-suspended in 5 mL of NEB, and subjected to ultracentrifugation as described above. Nuclei clumping during isolation was – in our experience – usually to blame if the final yield was lower than expected. For unfixed samples, factors that appear to promote clumping are (i) contamination from brain debris, or (ii) DNA leaking from broken nuclei, which appears to be alleviated via careful handling and performing the whole procedure on ice. When a fixation step was included (see above), the only way to significantly alleviate the clumping was to remove Ca2+ from the NEB, albeit this increased the proportion of broken and damaged nuclei. Thus, lower post-FACS yield is to be expected when working with fixed samples.

Immunotagging of neuronal nuclei

Next, neuronal nuclei were tagged by immnofluorescence staining, using an anti-NeuN antibody (Fig. 2A, panels e-j). Firstly, anti-NeuN (Ms) and anti-Ms IgG (Alexa 488) antibodies were co-incubated at room temperature for 5 min (Table 1), then nuclei solution was added and the mixture incubated in darkness for at least 20 min at 4°C before FACS. The proportion of NeuN positive nuclei in the material recovered after ultracentrifugation was about 50%. The FACS background signal was minimal in these preparations (Fig. 2B, panel a).

Table 1 Antibodies used for immunotagging of neuronal nuclei.

Neuronal nuclei isolation via FACS

Next, the fluorescent nuclei (H2B-GFP transgene or NeuN labeled) were filtered through a 40 μm Nitex mesh to remove any remaining clumps, and then run through a FACS machine (Vantage SE/Diva, BD Biosciences) with proper gates settings based on the size and density of nuclei, to ensure that only single NeuN+ nuclei were sorted, which typically included 40% of the whole population (Fig. 2B, panel b). After FACS, the NeuN+ nuclei were reanalyzed to confirm the purity. Sample purity typically is > 95%. For selected samples, the purity of NeuN+ nuclei was checked under the microscope (Fig. 2A, panels c, d and g, h). FACS sorting should be performed on the same day as extraction and NeuN labeling of nuclei. For a subset of experiments, including those involving human postmortem brain, immunonegative (NeuN-) nuclei were collected and processed in parallel to the fraction of neuronal (NeuN+) nuclei.

Expected yield of neuronal nuclei

We usually obtained – from a single mouse forebrain – 2.5 × 106 NeuN+ nuclei post-FACS if fixative was added to the NEB and up to 8 × 106 nuclei if processed unfixed. We usually obtained from 1000 mg of human (prefrontal) cerebral cortex 5 × 106 NeuN+ nuclei if processed unfixed.

Post-FACS nuclei pelleting

After FACS, nuclei were collected in a large volume of 1 × PBS, roughly 4 × 106 nuclei in 10 mL of 1 × PBS. This was not ideal for ChIP because processing such a large volume is associated with very high expense and potential "wasting" of antibodies and other reagents. Therefore, pelleting was important, but the challenge thereby was that post-FACS nuclei became fragile and most of them were destroyed by centrifugation in 1 × PBS. Therefore, we tested different buffers and noticed that the presence of Ca2+ and Mg2+ is crucial for integrity of nuclei during pelleting. Hence, the concentration of sucrose, Ca2+, and Mg2+ in post-FACS nuclei solution was adjusted by adding the following to each 10 mL of post-FACS nuclei: 2 mL of 1.8 M Sucrose, 50 μl of 1 M CaCl2, and 30 μl of 1 M Mg(Ac)2. Samples were mixed gently, incubated on ice for 15 min, and centrifuged at 3000 rpm for 15 min at 4°C.

Chromatin immunoprecipitation

The FACS sorted nuclei were prepared either by micrococcal nuclease digestion for native chromatin immunoprecipitation (NChIP) as described [37], or in case of fixed nuclei, sheared by sonication (Branson Sonifier 250) for XChIP. (Typically, samples were sonicated at power level 6 (Branson, Danbury CT) in ice water, by applying 10 runs of 30 sec impulse with 1 min resting interval. Again, sonication conditions need to be optimized before each experiment.) In the work presented here, only NChIP was used. In brief, micrococcal nuclease (MNase) digestion was performed with a working concentration of 4U/mL at 37°C for 5 min. The resulting mono-nucleosomal preparation (around 146 bp) [see Additional file 1, panel A] was precleaned by incubating with protein G agarose (which should also remove the antibodies used for NeuN labeling of nuclei) and then subjected to immunoprecipitation using antihistone antibodies (see Reagents). Control experiments included samples processed with normal rabbit IgG, in parallel to samples with specific antibodies. Typically, we used 0.5 – 8 × 106 nuclei as input.

Real time PCR

Quantification of DNA extracted from immunoprecipitates was done by real time PCR using custom-designed primers targeting the promoter regions of the following genes: (mouse) methyl CpG binding protein 2 (Mecp2), glutamate decarboxylase 1 (Gad 1), β2-microglobulin (B2m), and Glial fibrillary acidic protein (Gfap); (human) glutamate receptor, ionotropic, N-methyl D-aspartate 2B (GRIN2B), brain derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF), β2-microglobulin (B2M), and the locus control region of the globin genes (HBB). Mouse Mecp2 primer sequence (119 bp): forward GCCTCTTTTCCCTGCCTAAA, reverse CCCTTGCTCTTTGTCGAGAT; Gad 1 (98 bp): forward TGTCTCACCAAAGTCCCTGTC, reverse CACGTCTGGTTCGGTGTCT; B2m (112 bp): forward GGGAAAGTCCCTTTGTAACCT, reverse GCGCGCGCTCTTATATAGTT; Gfap (100 bp): forward TACCAGAAAGGGGGTTCCTT, reverse AACTCCTCTCACCCCACTGA. Human GRIN2B primer sequence (64): forward TCCTCTTCCATTCAGGTTGG, reverse GGCTATACCATTCCTGGGACA; BDNF (102): forward AGCCCAACAACTTTCCCTTT, reverse GAGAGCTCGGCTTACACAGG; B2M (99): forward GGGCACCATTAGCAAGTCAC, reverse GGCGCTCATTCTAGGACTTC; HBB (87): forward CCCCAGGTAGTTCCCTTT reverse TTCAAGGCCCTGTAGTTGCT. Quantification was done as described [37]. For each of the antibodies used in this study (anti-H3K4me2, -H3K9me3, and -H3K4me3), specific signal was limited to input and chip fractions, and differed from controls by at least 3–4 cycle thresholds [see Additional file 1, panel B, C].


To study histone occupancy at gene promoters on a larger scale, a mouse promoter array, M8K (Aviva Systems Biology, San Diego, CA), containing 8000 40-mer oligonucleotide probes targeting gene promoters, was used. The DNA samples were amplified and labeled by Aviva's ChIP-GLAS system. Briefly, both input and immunoprecipated (ChIP) DNA were biotinylated and annealed to the M8K-Oligo-Mix. The DNA samples were then amplified by ligation mediated PCR with T3 and T7 based primers (25 cycles), labeled with Atto 550 or 647, and hybridized onto the chip. Amplification, labeling, hybridization, and washing was carried out according to the manufacturer's instruction (Aviva, AK-0524). Slides were scanned with DNA Microarray ScannerBA (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA) and intensities extracted with Feature Extraction Software Version 9.1 (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA). Raw data were read into the R statistical computation environment for preprocessing and data analysis (R: Development core team (2004). R: A language end environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria.URL found in Availability and requirements section). Local background intensities were subtracted from raw signals and negative values were replaced with small positive ones. Signals were then normalized using a variance stabilization method described in [38, 39] and implemented in the vsn Bioconductor package (Gentleman, RC. et. al., Bioconductor: open software development for computational biology and bioinformatics. Genome Biology 5, R80 (2004)).

Other amplification procedures

We used the Genomeplex whole genomic amplification kit (WGA2, Sigma) to amplify DNA immunoprecipitates, which resulted in 2 to 5 ug of (amplified) DNA from starting material (10 ng of input DNA; ChIP DNA from 0.5 × 106 nuclei).

Availability and requirements

R:A language end environment for statistical computing:


  1. Tsankova N, Renthal W, Kumar A, Nestler EJ: Epigenetic regulation in psychiatric disorders. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2007, 8 (5): 355-367. 10.1038/nrn2132.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Francke U: Mechanisms of disease: neurogenetics of MeCP2 deficiency. Nat Clin Pract Neurol. 2006, 2 (4): 212-221. 10.1038/ncpneuro0148.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Weaver IC, Cervoni N, Champagne FA, D'Alessio AC, Sharma S, Seckl JR, Dymov S, Szyf M, Meaney MJ: Epigenetic programming by maternal behavior. Nat Neurosci. 2004, 7 (8): 847-854. 10.1038/nn1276.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Lubin FD, Sweatt JD: The IkappaB kinase regulates chromatin structure during reconsolidation of conditioned fear memories. Neuron. 2007, 55 (6): 942-957. 10.1016/j.neuron.2007.07.039.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Nan X, Hou J, Maclean A, Nasir J, Lafuente MJ, Shu X, Kriaucionis S, Bird A: Interaction between chromatin proteins MECP2 and ATRX is disrupted by mutations that cause inherited mental retardation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007, 104 (8): 2709-2714. 10.1073/pnas.0608056104.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Herculano-Houzel S, Mota B, Lent R: Cellular scaling rules for rodent brains. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006, 103 (32): 12138-12143. 10.1073/pnas.0604911103.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Sherwood CC, Stimpson CD, Raghanti MA, Wildman DE, Uddin M, Grossman LI, Goodman M, Redmond JC, Bonar CJ, Erwin JM, Hof PR: Evolution of increased glia-neuron ratios in the human frontal cortex. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006, 103 (37): 13606-13611. 10.1073/pnas.0605843103.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Spalding KL, Bhardwaj RD, Buchholz BA, Druid H, Frisen J: Retrospective birth dating of cells in humans. Cell. 2005, 122 (1): 133-143. 10.1016/j.cell.2005.04.028.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Siegmund KD, Connor CM, Campan M, Long TI, Weisenberger DJ, Biniszkiewicz D, Jaenisch R, Laird PW, Akbarian S: DNA Methylation in the Human Cerebral Cortex Is Dynamically Regulated throughout the Life Span and Involves Differentiated Neurons. PLoS ONE. 2007, 2: e895-10.1371/journal.pone.0000895.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Hadjantonakis AK, Papaioannou VE: Dynamic in vivo imaging and cell tracking using a histone fluorescent protein fusion in mice. BMC Biotechnol. 2004, 4: 33-10.1186/1472-6750-4-33.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Akbarian S, Chen RZ, Gribnau J, Rasmussen TP, Fong H, Jaenisch R, Jones EG: Expression pattern of the Rett syndrome gene MeCP2 in primate prefrontal cortex. Neurobiol Dis. 2001, 8 (5): 784-791. 10.1006/nbdi.2001.0420.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Chen RZ, Akbarian S, Tudor M, Jaenisch R: Deficiency of methyl-CpG binding protein-2 in CNS neurons results in a Rett-like phenotype in mice. Nat Genet. 2001, 27 (3): 327-331. 10.1038/85906.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Shahbazian MD, Antalffy B, Armstrong DL, Zoghbi HY: Insight into Rett syndrome: MeCP2 levels display tissue- and cell-specific differences and correlate with neuronal maturation. Hum Mol Genet. 2002, 11 (2): 115-124. 10.1093/hmg/11.2.115.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Jung BP, Jugloff DG, Zhang G, Logan R, Brown S, Eubanks JH: The expression of methyl CpG binding factor MeCP2 correlates with cellular differentiation in the developing rat brain and in cultured cells. J Neurobiol. 2003, 55 (1): 86-96. 10.1002/neu.10201.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Kishi N, Macklis JD: MECP2 is progressively expressed in post-migratory neurons and is involved in neuronal maturation rather than cell fate decisions. Mol Cell Neurosci. 2004, 27 (3): 306-321.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Mikkelsen TS, Ku M, Jaffe DB, Issac B, Lieberman E, Giannoukos G, Alvarez P, Brockman W, Kim TK, Koche RP, Lee W, Mendenhall E, O'Donovan A, Presser A, Russ C, Xie X, Meissner A, Wernig M, Jaenisch R, Nusbaum C, Lander ES, Bernstein BE: Genome-wide maps of chromatin state in pluripotent and lineage-committed cells. Nature. 2007, 448 (7153): 553-560. 10.1038/nature06008.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Sims RJ, Nishioka K, Reinberg D: Histone lysine methylation: a signature for chromatin function. Trends Genet. 2003, 19 (11): 629-639. 10.1016/j.tig.2003.09.007.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Sasner M, Buonanno A: Distinct N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor 2B subunit gene sequences confer neural and developmental specific expression. J Biol Chem. 1996, 271 (35): 21316-21322. 10.1074/jbc.271.35.21316.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Huntley GW, Benson DL, Jones EG, Isackson PJ: Developmental expression of brain derived neurotrophic factor mRNA by neurons of fetal and adult monkey prefrontal cortex. Brain Res Dev Brain Res. 1992, 70 (1): 53-63. 10.1016/0165-3806(92)90103-4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Lipska BK, Deep-Soboslay A, Weickert CS, Hyde TM, Martin CE, Herman MM, Kleinman JE: Critical factors in gene expression in postmortem human brain: Focus on studies in schizophrenia. Biol Psychiatry. 2006, 60 (6): 650-658. 10.1016/j.biopsych.2006.06.019.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Mimmack ML, Brooking J, Bahn S: Quantitative polymerase chain reaction: validation of microarray results from postmortem brain studies. Biol Psychiatry. 2004, 55 (4): 337-345. 10.1016/j.biopsych.2003.09.007.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Forsberg EC, Downs KM, Christensen HM, Im H, Nuzzi PA, Bresnick EH: Developmentally dynamic histone acetylation pattern of a tissue-specific chromatin domain. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000, 97 (26): 14494-14499. 10.1073/pnas.97.26.14494.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Stadler F, Kolb G, Rubusch L, Baker SP, Jones EG, Akbarian S: Histone methylation at gene promoters is associated with developmental regulation and region-specific expression of ionotropic and metabotropic glutamate receptors in human brain. J Neurochem. 2005, 94 (2): 324-336. 10.1111/j.1471-4159.2005.03190.x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Nelson ED, Kavalali ET, Monteggia LM: Activity-dependent suppression of miniature neurotransmission through the regulation of DNA methylation. J Neurosci. 2008, 28 (2): 395-406. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3796-07.2008.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Yasui DH, Peddada S, Bieda MC, Vallero RO, Hogart A, Nagarajan RP, Thatcher KN, Farnham PJ, Lasalle JM: Integrated epigenomic analyses of neuronal MeCP2 reveal a role for long-range interaction with active genes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007, 104 (49): 19416-19421. 10.1073/pnas.0707442104.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Chen WG, Chang Q, Lin Y, Meissner A, West AE, Griffith EC, Jaenisch R, Greenberg ME: Derepression of BDNF transcription involves calcium-dependent phosphorylation of MeCP2. Science. 2003, 302 (5646): 885-889. 10.1126/science.1086446.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Ge W, He F, Kim KJ, Blanchi B, Coskun V, Nguyen L, Wu X, Zhao J, Heng JI, Martinowich K, Tao J, Wu H, Castro D, Sobeih MM, Corfas G, Gleeson JG, Greenberg ME, Guillemot F, Sun YE: Coupling of cell migration with neurogenesis by proneural bHLH factors. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006, 103 (5): 1319-1324. 10.1073/pnas.0510419103.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Iwase S, Lan F, Bayliss P, de la Torre-Ubieta L, Huarte M, Qi HH, Whetstine JR, Bonni A, Roberts TM, Shi Y: The X-linked mental retardation gene SMCX/JARID1C defines a family of histone H3 lysine 4 demethylases. Cell. 2007, 128 (6): 1077-1088. 10.1016/j.cell.2007.02.017.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Ballas N, Grunseich C, Lu DD, Speh JC, Mandel G: REST and its corepressors mediate plasticity of neuronal gene chromatin throughout neurogenesis. Cell. 2005, 121 (4): 645-657. 10.1016/j.cell.2005.03.013.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Yang Z, Watanabe M, Nishiyama A: Optimization of oligodendrocyte progenitor cell culture method for enhanced survival. J Neurosci Methods. 2005, 149 (1): 50-56. 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2005.05.003.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Gingras M, Gagnon V, Minotti S, Durham HD, Berthod F: Optimized protocols for isolation of primary motor neurons, astrocytes and microglia from embryonic mouse spinal cord. J Neurosci Methods. 2007, 163 (1): 111-118. 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2007.02.024.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Huang HS, Akbarian S: GAD1 mRNA expression and DNA methylation in prefrontal cortex of subjects with schizophrenia. PLoS ONE. 2007, 2 (8): e809-10.1371/journal.pone.0000809.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Huang HS, Matevossian A, Whittle C, Kim SY, Schumacher A, Baker SP, Akbarian S: Prefrontal dysfunction in schizophrenia involves mixed-lineage leukemia 1-regulated histone methylation at GABAergic gene promoters. J Neurosci. 2007, 27 (42): 11254-11262. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3272-07.2007.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Li J, Guo Y, Schroeder FA, Youngs RM, Schmidt TW, Ferris C, Konradi C, Akbarian S: Dopamine D2-like antagonists induce chromatin remodeling in striatal neurons through cyclic AMP-protein kinase A and NMDA receptor signaling. J Neurochem. 2004, 90 (5): 1117-1131. 10.1111/j.1471-4159.2004.02569.x.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Acevedo LG, Iniguez AL, Holster HL, Zhang X, Green R, Farnham PJ: Genome-scale ChIP-chip analysis using 10,000 human cells. Biotechniques. 2007, 43 (Dec 07): 791-797. 10.2144/000112625.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Lobo MK, Karsten SL, Gray M, Geschwind DH, Yang XW: FACS-array profiling of striatal projection neuron subtypes in juvenile and adult mouse brains. Nat Neurosci. 2006, 9 (3): 443-452. 10.1038/nn1654.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Huang HS, Matevossian A, Jiang Y, Akbarian S: Chromatin immunoprecipitation in postmortem brain. J Neurosci Methods. 2006, 156 (1-2): 284-292. 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2006.02.018.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Gibbons FD, Proft M, Struhl K, Roth FP: Chipper: discovering transcription-factor targets from chromatin immunoprecipitation microarrays using variance stabilization. Genome Biol. 2005, 6 (11): R96-10.1186/gb-2005-6-11-r96.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Huber W, von Heydebreck A, Sultmann H, Poustka A, Vingron M: Variance stabilization applied to microarray data calibration and to the quantification of differential expression. Bioinformatics. 2002, 18 Suppl 1: S96-104.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references


The authors thank Dr. Ralph Kuehn for the CAMIIK promoter and Dr. Konrad Hochedlinger for the H2B-GFP DNA; Dr. Ron Zielke and staff (Brain and Tissue Bank for Developmental Disorders) and Dr. Edward G. Jones and staff (University of California at Davis) for providing postmortem brain specimens. This study was supported by grants from National Institutes of Health (NIH) to S.A.

Core resources supported by the Diabetes Endocrinology Research Center Grant DK032520 were also used.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations


Corresponding author

Correspondence to Schahram Akbarian.

Additional information

Authors' contributions

YJ, H-SH and SA contributed to conception and study design, YJ, H-SH and AM conducted experiments and data analyses; JS performed microarray data analyses; YJ and SA wrote the paper.

Electronic supplementary material


Additional file 1: (A) Images from ethidium bromide-stained 1.3% agarose gels showing chromatin DNA from mouse forebrain before (MNase-) and after (MNase+) micrococcal nuclease (MNase) digestion. All samples were treated with RNase A. The DNA ladder is shown on the left side of gel picture. Notice approximately 146 bp DNA fragment only in MNase+ samples. (B), SYBR-green based melting curves from immunoprecipitates with anti-H3K4me2 antibody using primer pairs for mouse B2m and Gad1; notice single peak for specific product. (C) Representative amplification curves of inputs (black circles), immunoprecipitates (red circles) and IgG control (green circles), dotted line indicating cycle threshold. Data shown for Gad1 and B2m separately. Notice samples processed with non-specific IgG show much higher cycle thresholds than input and immunoprecitats. (PDF 496 KB)

Authors’ original submitted files for images

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Jiang, Y., Matevossian, A., Huang, HS. et al. Isolation of neuronal chromatin from brain tissue. BMC Neurosci 9, 42 (2008).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: