Skip to main content

The protocadherins, PCDHB1 and PCDH7, are regulated by MeCP2 in neuronal cells and brain tissues: implication for pathogenesis of Rett syndrome



Rett syndrome is a neurodevelopmental and autistic disease caused by mutations of Methyl-CpG-binding protein 2 (MECP2) gene. MeCP2 protein is mainly expressed in neurons and binds to methylated gene promoters to suppress their expression, indicating that Rett syndrome is caused by the deregulation of target genes in neurons. However, it is likely that there are more unidentified neuronal MeCP2-targets associated with the neurological features of RTT.


Using a genome-microarray approach, we found 22 genomic regions that contain sites potentially regulated by MeCP2 based on the features of MeCP2 binding, DNA methylation, and repressive histone modification in human cell lines. Within these regions, Chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) analysis revealed that MeCP2 binds to the upstream regions of the protocadherin genes PCDHB1 and PCDH7 in human neuroblastoma SH-SY5Y cells. PCDHB1 and PCDH7 promoter activities were down-regulated by MeCP2, but not by MBD-deleted MeCP2. These gene expression were up-regulated following MeCP2 reduction with siRNA in SH-SY5Y cells and in the brains of Mecp2-null mice. Furthermore, PCDHB1 was up-regulated in postmortem brains from Rett syndrome patients.


We identified MeCP2 target genes that encode neuronal adhesion molecules using ChIP-on-BAC array approach. Since these protocadherin genes are generally essential for brain development, aberrant regulation of these molecules may contribute to the pathogenesis of the neurological features observed in Rett syndrome.


Methyl-CpG-binding protein 2 (MeCP2) is one of the proteins associated with epigenetic regulation, and mutations of this gene have been identified in the majority of patients with a severe neurodevelopmental disorder, Rett syndrome (RTT), characterized by seizures, ataxic gait, language dysfunction, and autistic behavior [1, 2]. Mecp2-null mice exhibit neurological abnormalities strikingly similar to those of RTT, supporting the hypothesis that classical RTT is due to a loss of MeCP2 function [3, 4], and that MeCP2 is essential for neuronal development, maturation, synaptic activity, learning and memory [57].

MeCP2 has been thought to be a transcriptional repressor that acts by binding to a number of methylated-CpG dinucleotides in the mammalian genome. However, its deficiency does not result in the significant deregulation of the expression of a subset of genes as determined by a comparative expression microarray analyses between Mecp2-null mice and wild-type mice [8], but induces global changes in neuronal chromatin structure [9]. These findings indicate that MeCP2 may be a global gene silencer. Furthermore, MeCP2 deficiency affects the expression levels of a large number of genes as determined by a comparative expression microarray analyses between Mecp2-knock-in mice and Mecp2-duplication mice [10], indicating that MeCP2 target genes are numerous. However, it is still worthwhile to identify MeCP2-target genes which that are centrally involved in RTT pathogenesis, since MeCP2 functions cell-autonomously in neuronal maturation and dendritic arborization and discrete subsets of genes regulated by MeCP2 may be essential for mature neuronal function [11].

So far several genes associated with neuronal function have been reported as MeCP2 targets, such as brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) [12, 13], glucocorticoid-regulated genes [14], interleukin-1 receptor-associated kinase 1 (IRAK 1) [15], insulin-growth factor binding protein 3 (IGFBP3) [16], a transmembrane modulator of Na+, K+-ATPase activity (FXYD1) [17], and cyclin-dependent kinase-like 5 (CDKL5) [18]. However, it is likely that there are more unidentified neuronal MeCP2-targets associated with the neurological features of RTT.

In this study, we used a genome-microarray based approach [19, 20] rather than a standard expression-microarray approach, to identify genomic regions that are epigenetically regulated by MeCP2.


Screening for BACs containing MeCP2 binding sites with epigenetic modification

We assumed that MeCP2 was bound to multiple sites in human genome. In order to clarify these sites, we first performed ChIP on chip assay using our in-house BAC array ("ChIP on BAC array" assay) with an anti-MeCP2 antibody in human oral cancer cell lines (ZA, KOSC2, HSC5, NA). As a result, we obtained 846 "positive" BAC clones, which were suggestive of having MeCP2 binding sites, out of the 4,500 clones on the array (data not shown). We next screened BAC clones encompassing hypermethylation site(s) and repressive histone modification sites based on DNA methylation using the BAMCA and ChIP-on-BAC array assay with an anti-histone H3K9-2Me antibody in the same cell lines [19, 20]. We identified 22 "triple positive" BAC out of the 846 "MeCP2 positive" BAC clones, which contain MeCP2-binding site(s), hypermethylation site(s), and repressive histone modification site(s). Although "triple positive" did not necessary mean these three epigenetic modifications existed at the same genomic site in a genomic region (~300 kb) in a BAC, we considered that the genomic regions in these 22 BAC clones potentially contained the site(s) regulated by MeCP2. At this step, we used oral cancer cell lines because they had previously screened to identify MeCP2 targets in carcinogenesis (manuscript in preparation), and used this screening data in this study.

Search for Neuronal Genes

We next searched for neuronal genes in the genomic regions within these 22 BAC clones using a genome database (NCBI MAPVIEW), and identified the following four genes: APBB3 (amyloid beta precursor protein-binding, family B, member 3) and SRA1 (steroid receptor RNA activator 1) in BAC RP11-115I4 (located at chromosome 5q31.3), PCDHB1 (protocadherin beta 1) in BAC RP11-79K4 (5q31.3), and PCDH7 (protocadherin 7; brain-heart protocadherin) in RP11-205N12 (4p15.1). Among these genes, the consensus MeCP2-binding sequence with A/T bases [A/T≥4] within 1-3 or 6-9 base pairs from a CpG di-nucleotide [21] was identified in the 5' flanking region (within 1 kb region from the transcriptional start site) in APBP3, PCDHB1 and PCDH7, but not in SRA1 (data not shown).

MeCP2-binding status in the upstream regions of the neuronal genes in SH-SY5Y human neuroblastoma cells

Since the observed epigenetic alterations were found in oral cancer cell lines, we confirmed whether MeCP2 was bound to the APBP3, PCDHB1 and PCDH7 genes using the ChIP-PCR assay in human neuroblastoma SH-SY5Y cells as neuronal origin cells.

Within the 5' flanking regions of these genes, we found that MeCP2 was bound to the regions of PCDH7, PCDHB1 genes, but not to the APBP3 gene (Figure 1). In this assay, we confirmed that MeCP2 was bound to the promoter region of SNURF/SNRPN gene (a known MeCP2 target site) but not bound to the promoter region of the GAPDH gene (a known non-MeCP2 target site) in SH-SY5Y cells [22].

Figure 1
figure 1

MeCP2 binds to the promoter region of two target genes in SH-SY5Y cells. Immunoprecipitation (IP) was performed using an anti-MeCP2 antibody or normal rabbit serum (NRS) as negative control. Equal amounts of precleared chromatin were processed without IP as total input control. The purified DNA was amplified by PCR using primers located within the 1.0 kb upstream genomic regions from the transcriptional start sites of the APBB3, PCDHB1, or PCDH7 genes. SNURF/SNRPN was used as a positive control for a promoter previously demonstrated to bind MeCP2. GAPDH was used as a negative control.

Methylation status in the upstream regions of the two neuronal genes in SH-SY5Y human neuroblastoma cells

We examined the methylation status in the upstream regions of the PCDHB1 and PCDH7 genes, in order to determine whether the CpG sites were hypermethylated for MeCP2 binding (Figure 2A, B). The PCDHB1 up-stream region was highly methylated as expected. However, the PCDH7 up-stream region was unexpectedly less methylated, and the result was nonetheless consistent with a recent report, in which MeCP2 not only binds to highly methylated regions, but also binds to less methylated regions [23].

Figure 2
figure 2

Mapping the methylation status of the PCDHB1 (A) and PCDH7 (B) regions in SH-SY5Y cells by bisulfite genomic DNA sequencing. The top diagram depicts the 5' flanking region of each gene with its transcription start site. CpG island regions are shown as gray areas. Methylated-CpG sites are shown as closed circles and unmethylated CpG sites as open circles. The triangles represent the CpG sites with A/T bases ([A/T]>4) located 1-3 or 6-9 base pairs from the CpG sites, indicating the putative MeCP2-binding sequences. Arrows at the bottom indicate the region that was amplified for ChIP-PCR. (A) 5' flanking region of the PCDHB1 gene. (B) 5' flanking region of the PCDH7 gene.

Suppression of PCDHB1 and PCDH7 genes by MeCP2 in SH-SY5Y human neuroblastoma cells

To examine whether the expression of the PCDHB1 and PCDH7 genes was controlled by MeCP2, we evaluated the effects of wild-type or MBD-deleted MECP2 on either unmethylated or methylated promoter by the luciferase assay in SH-SY5Y cells. Methylation status of these constructs was confirmed by bisulfite sequencing (data not shown). Luciferase fusion plasmids containing 1.5 kb of upstream sequences of the PCDHB1 or PCDH7 transcription start site were methylated by methylase SssI in vitro. These luciferase reporter plasmids were co-transfected in combination with the MECP2-expressing plasmid into SH-SY5Y cells. The transcriptional activity of the unmethylated PCDHB1 promoter was suppressed by wild-type MeCP2, but not MBD-deleted mutant MeCP2 (Figure 3A). Likewise, the transcriptional activity of the methylated PCDHB1 promoter was suppressed by wild-type MeCP2, but not MBD-deleted mutant MeCP2 (Figure 3A). Approximately 70% reduction in promoter activity was found in methylated promoters, compared with unmethylated promoters, by mock (no MeCP2), indicating that endogenous MeCP2 preferentially suppresses PCDHB1 methylated promoter (Figure 3A). Similar to PCDHB1, the transcriptional activity of both the unmethylated and methylated PCDH7 promoter was suppressed by wild-type MeCP2, but not MBD-deleted mutant MeCP2 (Figure 3B). We did not find down-regulation of the SV2 promoter region by wild-type MeCP2, suggesting that the SV2 gene is not a MeCP2-target gene (data not shown). Taken together, these results indicate that not only methylated but also unmethylated promoter of the PCDHB1 and PCDH7 genes are regulated by MeCP2 in SH-SY5Y cells.

Figure 3
figure 3

Effects of wild-type MECP2 or MBD-deleted mutations on the transcriptional activity of the methylated or unmethylated PCDHB1 and PCDH7 promoter fragments. SH-SY5Y cells were transfected with the methylated or unmethylated PCDHB1-luc (A), PCDH7-luc (B) as a reporter vector. As an effector, an MECP2-expression vector was co-transfected. After 48 h, the transfectants were lysed and assayed for luciferase activity. PCDHB1 and PCDH7 promoter transcriptional activities are repressed by wild-type MeCP2 (gray), but not by MBD-deleted mutant (black) in SH-SY5Y cells. Luciferase reporter activity in each sample was normalized according to the beta-galactosidase activity measured in the same sample. The luciferase activity of the cells transfected with the reporter vector was taken as 100%. All results are shown as the mean ± SEM of three replicates.

Knock-down effect on the two neuronal genes with MECP2-siRNA in SH-SY5Y human neuroblastoma cells

If PCDHB1 and PCDH7 genes are controlled by MeCP2, their expression from these genes should be increased under the MeCP2 deficient condition. To assess this, we performed knockdown experiments using MECP2-siRNA. We first confirmed the transfection efficiency of siRNA in SH-SY5Y cells, and the fluorescent labeled siRNA showed that the efficiency of siRNA delivery was approximately 50~60%. As a result, the expression level of MECP2 mRNA decreased by 85% by following treatment with MECP2-siRNA compared with scramble-siRNA (Figure 4A). Under this condition, the expression levels of PCDHB1 and PCDH7 mRNA were significantly increased by MECP2-siRNA compared with scramble-siRNA (4.9- and 2.7-fold, respectively) (Figure 4B, C).

Figure 4
figure 4

Expression of PCDHB1 and PCDH7 by RNAi-mediated knockdown of MECP2 in SH-SY5Y cells. SH-SY5Y cells were transfected with MECP2-siRNA or Scramble siRNA (Control) for 24 h. The expression level of MECP2 (A), PCDHB1 (B) and PCDH7 (C) were examined by qRT-PCR and normalized using the expression level of GAPDH. All results are shown as the mean ± SEM of three replicates with the mean Control normalized to 1.0.

Expression levels of the two neuronal genes in Mecp2-null mice and RTT brain tissue samples

We examined the expression of the two genes in brain tissue samples from Mecp2-null mice (Mecp2 tm1.1 Bird) [4]. We compared the mRNA expression level in the frontal cortex of 14-day-old Mecp2-null mice with those of wild-type male mice. As a result, we found that Pcdhb1 and Pcdh7 mRNA were significantly increased in Mecp2-null mice compared with wild-type mice (5.0- and 5.9-fold respectively) (Figure 5).

Figure 5
figure 5

Comparison of Pcdhb1 and Pcdh7 expression in cortical tissues from wild-type and Mecp2 -null mice. Total RNA was extracted from the Mecp2-null and wild-type mice at postnatal day 14 (P14) and cDNA was synthesized with random primers. The expression levels of Mecp2 (A), Pcdhb1 (B) and Pcdh7 (C) were examined by qRT-PCR and normalized using the expression level of Gapdh. All results are shown as the mean ± SEM of three replicates with the mean Control normalized to 1.0.

We further investigated the expression of these genes in postmortem RTT brain tissues. As a result, the aberrant expression of the PCDHB1 gene was found in three of four RTT patients (RTT-1, RTT-2 and RTT-4) compared with control individuals (Figure 6). However, there was no apparent difference in the expression of PCDH7 gene in the brain tissue of controls and RTT individuals.

Figure 6
figure 6

Comparison of PCDHB1 and PCDH7 expression in the cortical tissues from four control individuals and four RTT patients. Total RNA was extracted from postmortem brain cortical tissue in controls (CTR-1~4) and RTT patients (RTT-1~4). The expression levels of PCDHB1, PCDH7 and GAPDH were examined by RT-PCR.


It had been thought that the causative gene for RTT should encode a synapse-associated molecule based on its pathogenesis. However, the gene in which most RTT patients have mutations does not encode a synapse molecule, but encodes an epigenetic regulation protein. This raises the question about which synaptic molecules are regulated by MeCP2, and directly contribute to its neuropathogenesis. To address this question, several attempts to identify MeCP2 target genes have been performed. The initial study using a expression microarray demonstrated that subtle expression changes occur in the brain of Mecp2-null mice [8], indicating that the accumulation of subtle changes affect brain function and that brains are less tolerant of background transcriptional noise than other organs [24]. To date, several neuronal molecules regulated by MeCP2, such as BDNF, IGFBP3 and CRMP1 have been identified by candidate gene approaches or MeCP2 target screenings using expression microarrays [1216]. To our knowledge, this is the first attempt to identify MeCP2 target genes using ChIP-on-BAC array approach using a genome microarray. We identified two genes PCDHB1 and PCDH7 that encode molecules associated with neuronal function.

However, we did not detect the previously reported MeCP2 target genes probably because our in-house array only covers one third of the human genome and the genomic loci of previously identified genes might not be located within the overlapping regions with MeCP2 binding, DNA methylation and repressive histone modification, although the reported genes are located at sites where MeCP2 is bound. A newly-developed ChIP-sequencing approach using a next-generation sequencer, which is a more quantitative method to assess methylation [25], will shed light on the identification of new MeCP2 target genes.

It has been thought that MeCP2 represses transcription by binding specifically to methylated DNA. However, it was recently reported that MeCP2 is also bound to unmethylated DNA [26, 27]. In this context, our data supported this notion, because MeCP2 repressed transcriptional activity of PCDHB1 and PCDH7 genes either via methylated or unmethylated promoter constructs. However, the transcriptional activity was more effectively repressed via the methylated promoter constructs than via the unmethylated promoter constructs, which are consist with a report showing that the affinity of MeCP2 for methylated DNA is ~3-fold greater than unmethylated DNA [26].

The protocadherins comprise the largest subfamily of the cadherin superfamily and are predominantly expressed in the nervous system [28]. They are divided into two groups (the clustered and nonclustered Pcdh families) based on their genomic structure. PCDHB1 and PCDH7 are belonged to the clusterd and nonclustered families, respectively. Genome association studies have shown that single-nucleotide polymorphisms and deletions in Pcdh genes, such as PCDH10, PCDH11Y and PCDH12, are associated with bipolar disorder, schizophrenia and autism, respectively [2933].

The clustered Pcdh family is subdivided into three distinct gene groups in mammals (Pcdh-α, Pcdh-β, and Pcdh-γ). Pcdh-α expression is down regulated by myelination during neuronal maturation [34, 35], and Pcdh-β, namely PCDHB16, is expressed in dendritic spines and plays an important role in synaptogenesis [36]. Since the expression of PCDHB1 is not detectable in normal brains during development [37], the presence of PCDHB1 in the brains of RTT patients and the up-regulation of PCDHB1 in Mecp2-null mice may be associated with the neurological findings in RTT brains, such as decreased neuronal size, increased cell density and reduced dendritic arborization [5, 3739]. Furthermore, since our results indicate that PCDHB1 is epigenetically regulated by MeCP2, the Pcdh-β gene cluster may be epigenetically regulated similar to the Pcdh- α gene cluster in which epigenetic regulation produces isoforms in neurons [40].

PCDH7 is predominantly expressed in the somatosensory and visual cortices in the cerebral cortex, external granule cell layer in the cerebellar cortex, and the brainstem starting from embryonic day 17, and PCDH7 exhibits a critical period for the establishment of specific synaptic connections [41, 42]. PCDH7 is also expressed in the ganglion cell layer of the retina [43], and its over-expression leads to a morphological change and Ca2+-dependent cell adhesion in mouse fibroblast L cells [44]. Therefore, the up-regulation of PCDH7, observed in the brains of Mecp2-null mice and neuroblastoma cells following MECP2-siRNA treatment, could potentially alter synaptic connections. However, no up-regulation was found in the brain tissues of RTT patients, and this may be due to the area of the brain examined (prefrontal cortex). Another finding in our study, in which the upstream region of PCDH7 was unexpectedly unmethylated despite its transcriptional respression by MeCP2 binding to its promoter, was consistent with the recent report that MeCP2 can bind to less methylated regions of genes and repress their expression [45].

Several lines of evidence suggest that MeCP2 acts as (1) a promoter of neuronal differentiation [46, 47], (2) an effecter of dendritic arborization [3, 5, 38, 39], (3) a modulator of synapses in postmitotic neurons), (4) an essential factor for the maturation of NMDA receptors [48] and (5) a controller of the balance between excitatory and inhibitory synaptic transmission through the maintenance of density between glutamate and GABA receptors [4954]. Here we show that MeCP2 also regulates protocadherins, including PCDH7 that is potentially associated with synaptogenesis. Therefore, our findings may help to clarify the pathogenesis of RTT with synaptic dysfunction.


In this study we identified two novel direct MeCP2 target genes by ChIP and reporter assay. Expression of PCDHB1 and PCDH7 were regulated by MeCP2 in human neuroblastoma cells and brain tissue. On the basis of the previous findings of the nature of protocadherins, dysregulation of these molecules are potentially associated with the neuronal and synaptic dysfunction observed in the brains of RTT patients.


Cell culture

Four human oral cancer cell lines (ZA, KOSC2, HSC5, NA) and a human neuroblastoma cell line (SH-SY5Y) were maintained in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (DMEM) (Sigma Aldrich, St. Louis, MO) supplemented with 10% fetal calf serum at 37°C in a 5% humidified atmosphere.

Bacterial artificial chromosome screening

Bacterial artificial chromosomes (BACs), which contain MeCP2 binding site(s), and repressive histone modification (H3K9) site(s), were screened using a ChIP-on-BAC array. Briefly, Chromatin Immunoprecipitation (ChIP) samples were prepared from the four cell lines using an anti-C-terminal anti-MeCP2 antibody and an anti-histone H3K9-2Me antibody (Abcam, Cambridge, UK) as described below. The antibody-enriched immunoprecipitate and total input control were amplified by adaptor PCR and labeled with Cy3-dCTP and Cy5-dCTP, respectively. Labeled test and control PCR products were co-hybridized to our in-house BAC-array (MCG Whole Genome Array-4500). Hybridizations were carried out as described elsewhere [55]. Arrays were scanned with a GenePix 4000 B (Axon Instruments, Foster City, CA) and analyzed using GenePix Pro 4.1 software (Axon Instruments).

BACs, which contains DNA methylated region(s), were screened using BAC array-based methylated CpG island amplification (BAMCA) [19, 20] analyses of the four cell lines (ZA, KOSC2, HSC5, and NA). Briefly, the preparation of DNA probes for screening of methylated regions was carried out by the Methylated CpG island Amplification (MCA) method [56]. Five-microgram aliquots of test DNA (extracted from the four cell lines) were first digested with 100 units of a methylation-sensitive restriction enzyme Sma I and subsequently with 20 U of methylation-insensitive Xma I. Adaptors were ligated to the Xma I-digested sticky ends and PCRs were performed using an adaptor primer and Cy3-dCTP for labeling. Control DNA (extracted from primary cultured cells of normal oral mucosa) was treated in the same manner except that they were labeled with Cy5-dCTP. Hybridization and array scanning were performed described above.

In either assay (ChIP-on-BAC array with MeCP2 antibody, ChIP-on-BAC array with histone H3K9 antibody, and BAMCA), if a BAC demonstrated a Cy3/Cy5 intensity ratio more than 1, it was recognized as a "positive" BAC.

Chromatin immunoprecipitation

Immunoprecipitation and reverse crosslinking were performed using a ChIP Assay Kit (Millipore, Billerica, MA) with C-terminal anti-MeCP2 antibody (Abcam) or normal rabbit serum (NRS) (Wako, Osaka, Japan) as a negative control according to the manufacturer's instructions. Equal amounts of precleared chromatin were processed without IP as total input control. Immunoprecipitates collected by centrifugation were washed, then digested with 50 mg/ml DNase free RNase A for 30 min at 37°C, followed by SDS/proteinase K digestion and subjected to phenol/chloroform extraction before ethanol precipitation with glycogen. One twentieth of the DNA from each IP reaction was PCR amplified in reactions containing 2.5 U of AmpliTaq GOLD (Applied Biosystems, Norwalk, CT), with buffer II, dNTP mix (2.5 mM each), and 0.2 mM primers of either GAPDH-F (5' - CCAATCTCAGTCCCTTCCCCC -3') and GAPDH-R (5' - GTTTCTCTCCGCCCGTCTTC -3') specific to the GAPDH promoter region (Fulmer-Smentek et al., 2001), SNURF-F (5' - ACTGCCATAGCCTCCTCGCCTC - 3' and SNURF-R (5' -CTTGCTGTTGTGCCGTTCTGCC - 3') specific to the SNURF/SNRPN promoter region within the 15q11-13 imprinting control region (Thatcher et al., 2005), APBB3-F (5' - CCTGGATGGGCTTTACCTCT - 3') and APBB3-R (5' - AACAGTGTGGAGTGGTGTGG - 3') specific to the APBB3 upstream region, PCDHB1-F (5' - TCAGTGGCTCCAGACAGCTA - 3') and PCDHB1-R (5' - TGCCACTGAATAGCGGATAG - 3') specific to the PCDHB1- upstream region, or PCDH7-F (5' - GACAAGCCTGATCCGTGAG - 3') and PCDH7-R (5' - GCAGGGAACTCAAGCTGAAC - 3') specific to the PCDH7- upstream region, using one cycle of 95°C for 10 min, 33-35 cycles of 95°C for 30 s, 55 or 60°C for 30 s, 72°C for 30 s, with a final cycle of 72°C for 7 min. PCR products were resolved by agarose gel electrophoresis and stained with ethidium bromide. Primers were designed within 1.0 kb upstream genomic regions from the transcriptional start sites of either the APBB3, PCDHB1, or PCDH7 gene, which contain CpG islands that fulfilled our criteria (>100 base pairs; % of C or G >50%; Observed CG / Expected CG > 0.6), and the putative MeCP2-binding sequences with A/T bases ([A/T]>4) located 1-3 base pairs or 6-9 base pairs from the CG site [21].

DNA methylation analyses

Genomic DNA was extracted from SH-SY5Y cells using a DNeasy Blood and Tissue Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany), and was subjected to sodium bisulfite modification with an EpiTect bisulfite kit (Qiagen). Modified DNA was amplified by PCR with the primers PCDHB1-BF (5' - TTTGAAAGGGAATTAATAGGTGAGTTTG - 3') and PCDHB1-BR (5' - TCCCCCACAAATATACACAAAAAAATA - 3') specific to the PCDHB1- upstream region, and PCDH7-BF (5' - TATTTAGTAGTAATTATTATTTTGGGTAAT - 3') and PCDH7-BR (5' - ATTCAAAAATAAACAAACCAAACTC - 3') specific to the PCDH7-upstream region, using one cycle of 95°C for 10 min, 33-35 cycles of 95°C for 30 s, 55 or 60°C for 30 s, 72°C for 30 s, with a final cycle of 72°C for 7 min. The primers used in this analysis were located in the same regions as those used in the ChIP analysis described above. Each PCR product was cloned into a pPCR4 vector using a TOPO TA Cloning Kit (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) and sequenced.

MECP2-expression vectors

To make an MECP2-expression plasmid, an MECP2 cDNA (I.M.A.G.E #03956518, Geneservice, Cambridge, UK) was inserted into the TA cloning vector (Invitrogen), and then an EcoRI-XhoI fragment of the MECP2 cDNA, created with primers containing either an EcoRI or XhoI site, was inserted into pcDNA3 (Invitrogen). MECP2 cDNA lacking the methyl-binding domain (MBD) was made by PCR amplification using KOD-Plus-Mutagenesis Kit (Toyobo, Osaka, Japan). The primers of MECP2-MBDdel-f (5' - GGGAGCCCCTCCCGGCGAGAGCAG - 3') and MECP2-MBDdel-r (5' - AGCTTCCGGCACAGCCGGGGCGGAG - 3'), located at both flanking sites of MBD in opposite directions to each other, were used for PCR with pcDNA3 containing the normal MECP2 cDNA sequence as a template DNA.

In vitro methylation of reporter plasmid

In vitro methylation of reporter plasmids was carried out as reported previously [57]. Briefly, to make a reporter plasmid, we amplified approximately 1.5 kb of the upstream genomic regions from the transcription start site with primers PCDHB1-RF (5' - GGGGTACCAAGAGGAAAATGAGAGCACACC - 3') and PCDHB1-RR (5' - GGAAGCTTAGCCAACTGTTGCGGATATACT - 3') specific to the PCDHB1 upstream region, and PCDH7- RF (5' - GGGGTACCACACTTCCATCCAACGGGCATCTAC - 3') and PCDH7-RR (5' - GGAAGCTTCTCTGCGCAAGGTCATTAGTCACG - 3') specific to the PCDH7 upstream region, and these were fused upstream of the firefly luciferase gene in the pGL3-Basic vector (Promega). Whole PCDHB1 and PCDH7 reporter plasmids were methylated using SssI methylase, which methylates all cytosine residues within the double-stranded dinucleotide recognition sequence 5'-CG-3'.

Each plasmid was digested with KpnI/HindIII and then incubated with 3 U/μg of M.Sss I. The same plasmid was mock methylated in the absence of M.Sss I. Methylated and mock-methylated plasmids were religated back to KpnI/HindIII-restricted pGL3-Basic vector. The extent of methylation was determined by bisulfite sequence.

Luciferase assay

One microgram of the MECP2 expression plasmid, 3 μg of the reporter plasmid and 1 μg of SV2-β-gal, a β-galactosidase expression vector, were transfected into SH-SY5Y cells (approximately 80% confluent) in a 6-cm dish using the FuGENE HD transfection reagent (Roche) as described by the manufacturer. Two days after transfection, whole cell extracts were prepared by the addition of the Triton X-100-containing solution from a Pica gene kit (Wako) to the cells. Approximately a one-fifth volume of the extract was used for the β-galactosidase assay to normalize the transfection efficiency as described previously [58], and luciferase activity was determined using the Pica gene kit and a Luminometer, Lumat LB9501 (EG & G Berthold, Berlin, Germany). The same experiments were repeated five times.

RNAi knockdown

Twenty nanomolar MECP2-siRNA (SI02664893, Qiagen) were transfected into SH-SY5Y cells using the Hiperfect transfection Reagent (Qiagen). To determine the efficiency of siRNA delivery into the cells and the efficiency of the reduction of gene expression, we used 20 nM of an Alexa 488 fluorescence labeled control siRNA (1027284, Qiagen) and siRNA for the MARK1 gene (SI03650367, Qiagen). We also used a scrambled siRNA (1027284, Qiagen) as a negative control. At 24 h after transfection, cells were harvested for use in further experiments.

Mouse and human tissue samples

B6.129P2 (C)-Mecp2 tm1.1Bird/J mice lacking exons 3 and 4 were obtained from the Jackson Laboratory (Bar Harbor, ME). Mecp2-null mice and wild-type male littermates, as controls, were used at postnatal day 14 (P14). All animal experiments were approved by the University of Yamanashi Animal Care and Use Committee. Postmortem brain (cortex) samples from individuals were obtained with informed consent and postmortem brain samples from RTT patients were obtained from the Harvard Brain Tissue Bank, USA. The profile of each individual is shown in Table 1.

Table 1 Characteristics of the RTT patient and control brain samples used in this study

RNA extraction and quantitative reverse transcription PCR

Total RNA was extracted from the mouse and human brain (cerebral cortices) samples using an RNeasy mini kit (Qiagen). Total RNA was reverse-transcribed with random primers and Ominscript reverse transcriptase (Qiagen) according to the manufacturer's instructions. One tenth of the reaction was used in the PCR amplification. Gene expression was measured by quantitative reverse transcription PCR (qRT-PCR) on an ABI Prism 7500 with a QuantiTect SYBR Green PCR kits (Qiagen) using primers for the human MAPK1, MECP2, PCDH7 or PCDHB1 (QT00065933, QT00039361, QT01005662, or QT01019543, respectively, Qiagen), or mouse Mecp2, Pcdh7 or Pcdhb1 (QT00268555, QT01052366, or QT01055453) genes. The expression level of each gene was normalized against that of human GAPDH or mouse Gapdh (QT01192646 or QT01658692, Qiagen). All qRT-PCRs were performed in triplicate.

Statistical Analysis

Results are given as the mean +/- SEM. The significance of differences was determined by Student's t-test for single comparisons and analysis of variance (ANOVA) for multiple comparisons.


  1. Amir RE, Van den Veyver IB, Wan M, Tran CQ, Francke U, Zoghbi HY: Rett syndrome is caused by mutations in X-linked MECP2, encoding methyl-CpG-binding protein 2. Nat Genet. 1999, 23: 185-188. 10.1038/13810.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Chahrour M, Zoghbi HY: The story of Rett syndrome: from clinic to neurobiology. Neuron. 2007, 56: 422-437. 10.1016/j.neuron.2007.10.001.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Chen RZ, Akbarian S, Tudor M, Jaenisch R: Deficiency of methyl-CpG binding protein-2 in CNS neurons results in a Rett-like phenotype in mice. Nat Genet. 2001, 27: 327-331. 10.1038/85906.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Guy J, Hendrich B, Holmes M, Martin JE, Bird A: A mouse Mecp2-null mutation causes neurological symptoms that mimic Rett syndrome. Nat Genet. 2001, 27: 322-326. 10.1038/85899.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Kishi N, Macklis JD: MECP2 is progressively expressed in post-migratory neurons and is involved in neuronal maturation rather than cell fate decisions. Mol Cell Neurosci. 2004, 27: 306-321. 10.1016/j.mcn.2004.07.006.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Pelka GJ, Watson CM, Radziewic T, Hayward M, Lahooti H, Christodoulou J, Tam PP: Mecp2 deficiency is associated with learning and cognitive deficits and altered gene activity in the hippocampal region of mice. Brain. 2006, 129: 887-898. 10.1093/brain/awl022.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Chao HT, Zoghbi HY, Rosenmund C: MeCP2 controls excitatory synaptic strength by regulating glutamatergic synapse number. Neuron. 2007, 56: 58-65. 10.1016/j.neuron.2007.08.018.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Tudor M, Akbarian S, Chen RZ, Jaenisch R: Transcriptional profiling of a mouse model for Rett syndrome reveals subtle transcriptional changes in the brain. Proc Natl Acad Sci (USA). 2002, 99: 15536-15541. 10.1073/pnas.242566899.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Skene PJ, Illingworth RS, Webb S, Kerr AR, James KD, Turner DJ, Andrews R, Bird AP: Neuronal MeCP2 is expressed at near histone-octamer levels and globally alters the chromatin state. Mol Cell. 2010, 37: 457-468. 10.1016/j.molcel.2010.01.030.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Chahrour M, Jung SY, Shaw C, Zhou X, Wong ST, Qin J, Zoghbi HY: MeCP2, a key contributor to neurological disease, activates and represses transcription. Science. 2008, 320: 1224-1229. 10.1126/science.1153252.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Kishi N, Macklis JD: MeCP2 functions largely cell-autonomously, but also non-cell-autonomously, in neuronal maturation and dendritic arborization of cortical pyramidal neurons. Exp Neurol. 2010, 222: 51-58. 10.1016/j.expneurol.2009.12.007.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Chen WG, Chang Q, Lin Y, Meissner A, West AE, Griffith EC, Jaenisch R, Greenberg ME: Derepression of BDNF transcription involves calcium-dependent phosphorylation of MeCP2. Science. 2003, 302: 885-889. 10.1126/science.1086446.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Martinowich K, Hattori D, Wu H, Fouse S, He F, Hu Y, Fan G, Sun YE: DNA methylation-related chromatin remodeling in activity-dependent BDNF gene regulation. Science. 2003, 302: 890-893. 10.1126/science.1090842.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Nuber UA, Kriaucionis S, Roloff TC, Guy J, Selfridge J, Steinhoff C, Schulz R, Lipkowitz B, Ropers HH, Holmes MC, Bird A: Up-regulation of glucocorticoid-regulated genes in a mouse model of Rett syndrome. Hum Mol Genet. 2005, 14: 2247-2256. 10.1093/hmg/ddi229.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Jordan C, Li HH, Kwan HC, Francke U: Cerebellar gene expression profiles of mouse models for Rett syndrome reveal novel MeCP2 targets. BMC Med Genet. 2007, 8: 36.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Itoh M, Ide S, Takashima S, Kudo S, Nomura Y, Segawa M, Kubota T, Mori H, Tanaka S, Horie H, Tanabe Y, Goto Y: Methyl CpG-binding protein 2 (a mutation of which causes Rett syndrome) directly regulates insulin-like growth factor binding protein 3 in mouse and human brains. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol. 2007, 66: 117-123. 10.1097/nen.0b013e3180302078.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Deng V, Matagne V, Banine F, Frerking M, Ohliger P, Budden S, Pevsner J, Dissen GA, Sherman LS, Ojeda SR: FXYD1 is a MeCP2 target gene overexpressed in the brains of Rett syndrome patients and Mecp2-null mice. Hum Mol Genet. 2007, 16: 640-650.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Carouge D, Host L, Aunis D, Zwiller J, Anglard P: CDKL5 is a brain MeCP2 target gene regulated by DNA methylation. Neurobiol Dis. 2010, 38: 414-424. 10.1016/j.nbd.2010.02.014.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Inazawa J, Inoue J, Imoto I: Comparative genomic hybridization (CGH)-arrays pave the way for identification of novel cancer-related genes. Cancer Sci. 2004, 95: 559-563. 10.1111/j.1349-7006.2004.tb02486.x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Misawa A, Inoue J, Sugino Y, Hosoi H, Sugimoto T, Hosoda F, Ohki M, Imoto I, Inazawa J: Methylation-associated silencing of the nuclear receptor 1I2 gene in advanced-type neuroblastomas, identified by bacterial artificial chromosome array-based methylated CpG island amplification. Cancer Res. 2005, 65: 10233-10242. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-05-1073.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Klose RJ, Sarraf SA, Schmiedeberg L, McDermott SM, Stancheva I, Bird AP: DNA binding selectivity of MeCP2 due to a requirement for A/T sequences adjacent to methyl-CpG. Mol Cell. 2005, 19: 667-678. 10.1016/j.molcel.2005.07.021.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Thatcher KN, Peddada S, Yasui DH, Lasalle JM: Homologous pairing of 15q11-13 imprinted domains in brain is developmentally regulated but deficient in Rett and autism samples. Hum Mol Genet. 2005, 14: 785-797. 10.1093/hmg/ddi073.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Yasui DH, Peddada S, Bieda MC, Vallero RO, Hogart A, Nagarajan RP, Thatcher KN, Farnham PJ, Lasalle JM: Integrated epigenomic analyses of neuronal MeCP2 reveal a role for long-range interaction with active genes. Proc Natl Acad Sci (USA). 2007, 104: 9416-8421. 10.1073/pnas.0700908104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Carter AR, Segal RA: Rett syndrome model suggests MECP2 gives neurons the quiet they need to think. Nat Neurosci. 2001, 4: 342-343. 10.1038/85970.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Laird PW: Principles and challenges of genome-wide DNA methylation analysis. Nat Rev Genet. 2010, 11: 191-203.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Fraga MF, Ballestar E, Montoya G, Taysavang P, Wade PA, Esteller M: The affinity of different MBD proteins for a specific methylated locus depends on their intrinsic binding properties. Nucleic Acids Res. 2003, 31: 1765-1774. 10.1093/nar/gkg249.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Nikitina T, Shi X, Ghosh RP, Horowitz-Scherer RA, Hansen JC, Woodcock CL: Multiple modes of interaction between the methylated DNA binding protein MeCP2 and chromatin. Mol Cell Biol. 2007, 27: 864-877. 10.1128/MCB.01593-06.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Yagi T, Takeichi M: Cadherin superfamily genese: functions, genomic organaization, and neurologic diversity. Genes Dev. 2000, 14: 1169-1180.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Miki R, Hattori K, Taguchi Y, Tada MN, Isosaka T, Hidaka Y, Hirabayashi T, Hashimoto R, Fukuzako H, Yagi T: Identification and characterization of coding single-nucleotide polymorphisms within human protocadherin-alpha and -beta gene clusters. Gene. 2005, 349: 1-14.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Pedrosa E, Stefanescu R, Margolis B, Petruolo O, Lo Y, Nolan K, Novak T, Stopkova P, Lachman HM: Analysis of protocadherin alpha gene enhancer polymorphism in bipolar disorder and schizophrenia. Schizophr Res. 2008, 102: 210-219.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Morrow EM, Yoo SY, Flavell SW, Kim TK, Lin Y, Hill RS, Mukaddes NM, Balkhy S, Gascon G, Hashmi A, Al-Saad S, Ware J, Joseph RM, Greenblatt R, Gleason D, Ertelt JA, Apse KA, Bodell A, Partlow JN, Barry B, Yao H, Markianos K, Ferland RJ, Greenberg ME, Walsh CA: Identifying autism loci and genes by tracing recent shared ancestry. Science. 2008, 321: 218-223. 10.1126/science.1157657.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Gregório SP, Sallet PC, Do KA, Lin E, Gattaz WF, Dias-Neto E: Polymorphisms in genes involved in neurodevelopment may be associated with altered brain morphology in schizophrenia: preliminary evidence. Psychiatry Res. 2009, 165: 1-9. 10.1016/j.psychres.2007.08.011.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Kalmady SV, Venkatasubramanian G: Evidence for positive selection on Protocadherin Y gene in Homo sapiens: implications for schizophrenia. Schizophr Res. 2009, 108: 299-300. 10.1016/j.schres.2008.09.015.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Hirayama T, Yagi T: The role and expression of the protocadherin-alpha clusters in the CNS. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2006, 16: 336-342. 10.1016/j.conb.2006.05.003.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Yagi T: Clustered protocadherin family. Dev Growth Differ. 2008, 50: S131-S140.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Junghans D, Heidenreich M, Hack I, Taylor V, Frotscher M, Kemler R: Postsynaptic and differential localization to neuronal subtypes of protocadherin beta16 in the mammalian central nervous system. Eur J Neurosci. 2008, 27: 559-571. 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2008.06052.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Bauman ML, Kemper TL, Arin DM: Pervasive neuroanatomic abnormalities of the brain in three cases of Rett's syndrome. Neurology. 1995, 45: 1581-1586.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Armstrong D, Dunn JK, Antalffy B, Trivedi R: Selective dendritic alterations in the cortex of Rett syndrome. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol. 1995, 54: 195-201. 10.1097/00005072-199503000-00006.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Armstrong DD, Dunn K, Antalffy B: Decreased dendritic branching in frontal, motor and limbic cortex in Rett syndrome compared with trisomy 21. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol. 1998, 57: 1013-1017. 10.1097/00005072-199811000-00003.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Kawaguchi M, Toyama T, Kaneko R, Hirayama T, Kawamura Y, Yagi T: Relationship between DNA methylation states and transcription of individual isoforms encoded by the protocadherin-alpha gene cluster. J Biol Chem. 2008, 283: 12064-12075. 10.1074/jbc.M709648200.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Yoshida K, Yoshitomo-Nakagawa K, Seki N, Sasaki M, Sugano S: Cloning, expression analysis, and chromosomal localization of BH-protocadherin (PCDH7), a novel member of the cadherin superfamily. Genomics. 1998, 49: 458-461. 10.1006/geno.1998.5271.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Kim SY, Chung HS, Sun W, Kim H: Spatiotemporal expression pattern of non-clustered protocadherin family members in the developing rat brain. Neuroscience. 2007, 147: 996-1021. 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2007.03.052.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Etzrodt J, Krishna-K K, Redies C: Expression of classic cadherins and delta-protocadherins in the developing ferret retina. BMC Neurosci. 2009, 10: 153-10.1186/1471-2202-10-153.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Yoshida K: Fibroblast cell shape and adhesion in vitro is altered by overexpression of the 7a and 7b isoforms of protocadherin 7, but not the 7c isoform. Cell Mol Biol Lett. 2003, 8: 735-741.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Yakabe S, Soejima H, Yatsuki H, Tominaga H, Zhao W, Higashimoto K, Joh K, Kudo S, Miyazaki K, Mukai T: MeCP2 knockdown reveals DNA methylation-independent gene repression of target genes in living cells and a bias in the cellular location of target gene products. Genes Genet Syst. 2008, 83: 199-208. 10.1266/ggs.83.199.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Kohyama J, Kojima T, Takatsuka E, Yamashita T, Namiki J, Hsieh J, Gage FH, Namihira M, Okano H, Sawamoto K, Nakashima K: Epigenetic regulation of neural cell differentiation plasticity in the adult mammalian brain. Proc Natl Acad Sci (USA). 2008, 105: 18012-18017. 10.1073/pnas.0808417105.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Tsujimura K, Abematsu M, Kohyama J, Namihira M, Nakashima K: Neuronal differentiation of neural precursor cells is promoted by the methyl-CpG-binding protein MeCP2. Exp Neurol. 2009, 219: 104-111. 10.1016/j.expneurol.2009.05.001.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Maliszewska-Cyna E, Bawa D, Eubanks JH: Diminished prevalence but preserved synaptic distribution of N-methyl-d-aspartate receptor subunits in the methyl CpG binding protein 2(MeCP2)-null mouse brain. Neuroscience. 2010, 168: 624-632. 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2010.03.065.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Zoghbi HY: Postnatal neurodevelopmental disorders: meeting at the synapse?. Science. 2003, 302: 826-830. 10.1126/science.1089071.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Johnston MV, Blue ME, Naidu S: Rett syndrome and neuronal development. J Child Neurol. 2005, 20: 759-763.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Francke U: Mechanisms of disease: neurogenetics of MeCP2 deficiency. Nat Clin Pract Neurol. 2006, 2: 212-221. 10.1038/ncpneuro0148.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Medrihan L, Tantalaki E, Aramuni G, Sargsyan V, Dudanova I, Missler M, Zhang W: Early defects of GABAergic synapses in the brain stem of a MeCP2 mouse model of Rett syndrome. J Neurophysiol. 2008, 99: 112-121.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Wood L, Shepherd GM: Synaptic circuit abnormalities of motor-frontal layer 2/3 pyramidal neurons in a mutant mouse model of Rett syndrome. Neurobiol Dis. 2010, 38: 281-287. 10.1016/j.nbd.2010.01.018.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Zhang ZW, Zak JD, Liu H: MeCP2 is required for normal development of GABAergic circuits in the thalamus. J Neurophysiol. 2010, 103: 2470-2481. 10.1152/jn.00601.2009.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Sonoda I, Imoto I, Inoue J, Shibata T, Shimada Y, Chin K, Imamura M, Amagasa T, Gray JW, Hirohashi S, Inazawa J: Frequent silencing of low density lipoprotein receptor-related protein 1B (LRP1B) expression by genetic and epigenetic mechanisms in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Cancer Res. 2004, 64: 3741-3747. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-04-0172.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Toyota M, Ho C, Ahuja N, Jair KW, Li Q, Ohe-Toyota M, Baylin SB, Issa JP: Identification of differentially methylated sequences in colorectal cancer by methylated CpG island amplification. Cancer Res. 1999, 59: 2307-2312.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Hwang CK, Song KY, Kim CS, Choi HS, Guo XH, Law PY, Wei LN, Loh HH: Evidence of endogenous mu opioid receptor regulation by epigenetic control of the promoters. Mol Cell Biol. 2007, 27: 4720-4736. 10.1128/MCB.00073-07.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Taira T, Sawai M, Ikeda M, Tamai K, Iguchi-Ariga SM, Ariga H: Cell cycle-dependent switch of up-and down-regulation of human hsp70 gene expression by interaction between c-Myc and CBF/NF-Y. J Biol Chem. 1999, 274: 24270-24279. 10.1074/jbc.274.34.24270.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references


This work was supported in part by Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research (T.K.), Exploratory Research (T.K.), Start-Up (K.M.) and Young Scientists (B) (T.H.) from the Ministry of Education, Culture Sports, Science, and Technology, Japan, and the Kawano foundation for medical research (T.K.). We thank Prof. Kazuo Itabashi (Showa University, Tokyo) for helpful discussions and the Harvard Brain Tissue Resource Center for providing RTT samples.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations


Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kunio Miyake.

Additional information

Authors' contributions

KM and TH performed luciferase assay, RNA interference, quantitative PCR and drafted the manuscript. MS and TT performed ChIP assay, vector construction luciferase assay. KE and KT performed bisulfate sequence. MI and YG provided experimental advice for Mecp2 null mouse and RTT patients. TN, SY and JI performed microarray analysis. TK designed the study and wrote the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Kunio Miyake, Takae Hirasawa contributed equally to this work.

Authors’ original submitted files for images

Rights and permissions

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Miyake, K., Hirasawa, T., Soutome, M. et al. The protocadherins, PCDHB1 and PCDH7, are regulated by MeCP2 in neuronal cells and brain tissues: implication for pathogenesis of Rett syndrome. BMC Neurosci 12, 81 (2011).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI:


  • Bacterial Artificial Chromosome
  • Rett Syndrome
  • External Granule Cell Layer
  • Repressive Histone Modification
  • Oral Cancer Cell Line