Skip to main content
Download PDF

Cycle-dependent sex differences in expression of membrane proteins involved in cerebrospinal fluid secretion at rat choroid plexus

BMC Neuroscience volume 24, Article number: 60 (2023) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Female sex is a known risk factor of brain disorders with raised intracranial pressure (ICP) and sex hormones have been suggested to alter cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) dynamics, thus impairing ICP regulation in CSF disorders such as idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH). The choroid plexus (CP) is the tissue producing CSF and it has been hypothesized that altered hormonal composition could affect the activity of transporters involved in CSF secretion, thus affecting ICP. Therefore, we aimed to investigate if expression of various transporters involved in CSF secretion at CP were different between males and females and between females in different estrous cycle states. Steroid levels in serum was also investigated.

Methods

Female and male rats were used to determine sex-differences in the genes encoding for the transporters Aqp1 and 4, NKCC1, NBCe2, NCBE; carbonic anhydrase enzymes II and III (CA), subunits of the Na+/K+-ATPase including Atp1a1, Atp1b1 and Fxyd1 at CP. The estrous cycle stage metestrus (MET) and estrous (ES) were determined before euthanasia. Serum and CP were collected and subjected to RT-qPCR analysis and western blots. Serum was used to measure steroid levels using liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (LC–MS/MS).

Results

Significant differences in gene expression and steroid levels between males and ES females were found, while no differences were found between male and MET females. During ES, expression of Aqp1 was lower (p < 0.01) and NKCC1 was higher in females compared to males. CAII was lower while CAIII was higher in ES females (p < 0.0001). Gene expression of Atp1a1 was lower in ES compared to male (p = 0.0008). Several of these choroidal genes were also significantly different in MET compared to females in ES. Differences in gene expression during the estrus cycle were correlated to serum level of steroid hormones. Protein expression of AQP1 (p = 0.008) and CAII (p = 0.035) was reduced in ES females compared to males.

Conclusions

This study demonstrates for the first time that expression at CP is sex-dependent and markedly affected by the estrous cycle in female rats. Further, expression was related to hormone levels in serum. This opens a completely new avenue for steroid regulation of the expression of CSF transporters and the close link to the understanding of CSF disorders such as IIH.

Peer Review reports

Introduction

Many neurological pathologies are over-represented in females including disorders of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) dynamics, in particular idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH) which is characterized by raised CSF pressure mainly affecting obese women [1, 2]. Approximately 80% of CSF is produced and secreted by the choroid plexus (CP), a unique structure consisting of a single layer of epithelial cells that reside in the cerebral ventricles [2,3,4]. The formation of CSF is assumed to involve co-transport of water by proteins located at CP [5,6,7]. Water is thought to be transported against the osmotic gradient by proteins co-transporting Cl−, Na+ and HCO3− [3, 8]. This is suggested to be mediated by ATP-dependent transporters and ionic gradients, which is highly dependent on the Na+/K+-ATPase (NKA), Na+/K+/Cl− cotransporter-1 (NKCC1) and the Na+/HCO3− antiporter (NBCe2) at the apical membrane facing the ventricles, and possibly also the Na+/HCO3− cotransporter (NBCn1) at the basolateral membrane [8,9,10,11]. Carbonic anhydrases (CA) also play an important role in CSF secretion by catalyzing the generation of HCO3− [9, 12]. Over the years it has been demonstrated that cotransporters at CP also contribute to CSF secretion [6, 13,14,15,16]. Changing the activity or blocking these transporters and enzymes thus have a great influence on CSF secretion [17].

Although CP is a key structure for maintaining normal brain physiology and may be involved in many CNS disorders such as IIH, Alzheimer’s disorder and multiple sclerosis, the knowledge regarding sex-specificities of CP and how it may be involved in some of the known sex-dependent CNS disorders is widely unknown. The CP is thought to be influenced by circulating sex hormones and a number of studies have shown that CP expresses sex hormone receptors such as androgen receptors (ARs), estrogen receptors (ERs) and progestogen receptors (PR) [18,19,20]. This localization has been hypothesized to be due to the involvement in regulating the transcriptome of the CP expressing secretory proteins and influence the composition of CSF [21,22,23,24]. Sex-related differences in whole transcriptomes from rat CP have also been demonstrated [23]. In contrast, a recent transcriptomic profile study in rats showed a highly shared expression profile between female and male CP [25]. Although, in this study the estrous stage of the female rats was not determined. Interestingly, it has been shown that expression of Aqp7 and 9 varies during the estrous cycle of mice, suggesting that expression of Aqps may be regulated by various hormonal stimuli and expression patterns is dependent on the estrous cycle stages. However this has not been evaluated in other animal models [26]. Importantly, expression of the AQPs in different tissues have shown to be regulated by hormones [21, 27,28,29]. It has been shown that gonadectomy in male and females downregulated AQP1 expression in rat nephron and that testosterone was able to upregulate the AQP1 expression strongly [30]. Further, circulating sex hormones may affect CP as it express receptors for these hormones. It has also been shown that gonadectomized female and male rats have profound differences in CP transcriptome compared to sham-operated rats suggesting sex hormones have a central role in CP functions and CSF homeostasis [24]. Therefore, the aim of this study was for the first time to investigate sex-related differences in CP expression of important transporter/channels/enzymes involved in CSF secretion between male and female rats during two different stages of the estrous cycle. In female rats, the estrous cycle has four phases, proestrus (PRO), estrus (ES), metestrus (MET) and diestrus (DI) and lasts for 4 to 5 days. PRO is associated with a rise in circulating estradiol concentrations which leads to increase in lutinizing hormone (LH) and follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) release, similar to the human follicular stage [31]. In ES there is a peak in FSH concentration with an associated rapid decline in estradiol levels corresponding to ovulation. During MET and DI progesterone levels are high, being homologous to human early and late secretory stages of the reproductive cycle [31]. As the serum sex steroid levels varies significantly over the course of the estrous cycle [32], we also aimed to relate the expression of these genes to serum level of steroid hormones in the same rats in order to examine if circulating sex hormones may be related to the transcription of CSF secretory genes at CP.

Methods

Animals

20 (10 in MET and 10 in ES) female and 10 male Sprague–Dawley rats (Taconic, Denmark) at the age 10–12 weeks were used, housed in animal facility at Glostrup Research Institute, Denmark. Rats were left 2 weeks to acclimatize prior to all procedures. The rats were fed a standard rodent chow diet (Altromin, Germany) and had access to food and water ad libitum. In the facility, rats were housed at 22 ℃ in a 12:12 h light dark cycle. All experiment were approved by the Danish Animal Experiments Inspectorate (license number 2019-15-0201-00365).

Vaginal smears- determination of estrous cycle

The estrous cycle stage of each rat was monitored daily by collection of vaginal smears for cytological characterization following a standard protocol [33]. Prior to euthanasia, all rats were allowed to undergo a complete estrus cycle. Euthanasia was performed within a 14-day timeframe, with tissue extraction conducted between 9 and 12 am. Rats in MET and ES were euthanized by 70% CO2 followed by decapitation within 30 min after cycle stage determination. ES and MET are easy to distinguish between by the cell type. In ES, cornified epithelial cells are the dominant cell type where MET is characterized by an even distribution of leucocytes, cornified epithelial cells and nucleated cells (see Additional file 1: Figure S2). The rational for choosing ES was that the hormonal concentrations are high in proestrus (the phase just before estrus). Since there is a delay in transcription of genes and proestrus is relatively short (~ 14 h) we would expect to see a difference in the two estrous stages despite the hormonal concentration of progesterone and estradiol are relatively similar (lower concentration in estrus and rising concentrations in metestrus).

Tissue and serum collection

After the rats were decapitated under CO2 sedation, brains were removed quickly and placed in ice cold PBS. The CP from the lateral and fourth ventricles were dissected from the brain and snap frozen on dry ice. The tissue samples were stored at – 80 ℃ until used for subsequent analysis. The blood was collected following decapitation. Whole blood was allowed to clot by leaving it at room temperature for 20 min followed by centrifugation at 2000 × g for 10 min at 4 ℃. The supernatant was then immediately transferred and the serum samples were stored at – 80 ℃ until later analysis.

mRNA expression

The CP were used for mRNA expression experiments. Change in gene expression of Aqp1 and 4, Slc12a2 (NKCC1), Slc4a10 (NCBE), Slc4a5 (NBCe2), Car2 (CaII) and Car3 (CaIII) and subunits of the Na+/K+-ATPase (Atp1a1, Atp1b1, Fxyd1) were compared between male and female during two different estrous phases, MET and ES. Trizol™ was used for isolation of total RNA. Each sample was homogenized in 1 mL TRIzol (Invitrogen™, Waltham, MA, USA), whereafter RNA was precipitated in isopropanol. The purified RNA samples were diluted in nuclease-free water (QIAGEN) and afterwards concentrations and quality were measured by UV spectrophotometry on NanoDrop (Thermo Scientific). RNA was converted to cDNA according to the manufacture’s description with Applied Biosystems High-Capacity cDNA Reverse Transcription Kit (Applied Biosystems, Waltham, MA). To access gene expression each sample was ran in single-plex 9 ng cDNA reactions using the Taqman Gene Expression Master Mix (Applied Biosystems™) combined with a TaqMan primer/probe set for each of the following targets (all from Applied Biosystems): Aqp1 (Rn_00562834_m1), Aqp4 (Rn_01401327_s1), Slc12a2 (Rn_00582505_m1), Slc4a5 (Rn_01420902_m1), Slc4a10 (Rn_00710136_m1), Car2 (Rn_01462065_m1), Car3 (Rn_01461970_m1), Atp1a1 (Rn_01533986_m1), Atp1b1 (Rn_00565405_m1), Fxyd1 (Rn_00581299_m1). The reactions were run on QuantStudio™ 6 Pro Real-Time PCR System, 384-well (Applied Biosystems™). Each gene was ran in triplicate for each sample. Expression of the target gene was normalized to expression of housekeeping gene Actb (Rn_00667869_m1), ΔCT = CT (target gene) − CT (reference gene). ΔCT was converted into arbitrary units (AU), \(AU={2}^{-\Delta Ct}\).

Western blot

Protein was obtained by the Trizol reagent (Invitrogen) method after RNA extraction in each sample. Protein was extracted, precipitated and washed accordingly to the manufactures protocol (BioRad, Hercules, CA, USA). The protein was solubilized in lysis buffer with 1% sodium dodecyl sulfate. β-mercaptoethanol was added as a reducing agent making up 5% of the solution. Protein concentration was determined in triplicates on NanoDrop Spectrophotometer (NanoDrop 2000c, Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA). 25 µg protein was diluted and mixed with LDS sample buffer (Thermo Fisher scientific) and sample reducing agent (Thermo Fisher scientific) followed by separation on a bolt 4–12% bis–tris plus gel (Invitrogen) under gel electrophoresis. Proteins were transferred to a polyvinylidene difluoride membrane by an iblot machine (Invitrogen). The membranes were blocked with blocking buffer (5% non-fat milk in Tris-buffered saline 0,1% Tween 20 (TBST)) and incubated overnight with primary antibodies; 1:1000 Aqp1 (ab168387, Abcam, Cambridge, UK), 1:1000 Car2 (ab124687), 1:500 Atp1a1 (3060S, cell signalling), 1:500 Lamin-B1 (ab65986, Abcam). The membranes were washed with TBST and incubated with secondary antibody 1:10,000 (goat-anti-rabbit (P0448). Bands were detected using chemiluminescent (Amersham ECL, GE Healthcare, Chicago, IL). The reaction was captured on luminescent image analyzer (LAS-4000 Luminescent Image Analyzer, Fujifilm, Tokyo, Japan). Protein bands were quantified using ImageJ (NIH, USA). Gels and samples were ran in parallel and membrane cut according to molecular weight prior to incubation with antibodies. Protein was normalized to the male level, set as 1. Due to protein limit or lack of suitable commercial antibodies, the protein expression of NKCC1 could not be determined. Moreover, numbers are uneven across groups due to protein availability. Raw and annotated blots can be found in Additional file 1: Figure S3.

Liguid chromatography—mass spectrometry

Prior to quantification of steroid hormones, purification and extraction were performed using solid phase extraction (SPE) followed by LC–MS/MS analysis. A modified version of the method described by Weisser et al. was applied [34]. The data processing from the LC–MS/MS analysis were carried out in MultiQuant v 3.0 software (AB SCIEX). The chromatographic peak was manually integrated for each steroid. Individual datapoints were excluded if the chromatographic peaks were of bad quality or if the peaks were below limit of detection and limit of quantitation. Calculations and graphs were conducted using Microsoft excel 2010 and GraphPad.

Statistics

The relative gene expression (AU) and correlation to serum hormone level was analyzed using GraphPad Prism (V9.1, Graphpad Software Inc, San Diego, CA). The normality of the data was assessed by Shapiro–Wilk normality test where p < 0.05 was considered significant. For normally distributed genes we did a one-way ANOVA with multiple comparisons (Tukey’s multiple comparisons test). Here we compared both Male vs. MET, Male vs. ES and MET vs. ES. We used Brown-Forsyth and Welch ANOVA where the SD were significantly different: Test performed on Car2, Aqp1, ATP1a1, ATP1b1. Non-normal distributed data differences in gene expression were assessed by Kruskal–Wallis test combined with a post hoc Dunn’s multiple comparisons test: test performed on Slc4a, Car3, FXYd1.

Pearson’s r was used for the correlation analysis for parametric data and Spearmans r was used for non-parametric data. Gene expression data is presented as mean ± SD and correlation data is presented as p-value (p), correlation coefficient (r). Genes that were significantly different expressed were correlated to all the analyzed steroid hormones in the serum. We did not correct for multiple comparisons for the correlation analysis because this would have increased the likelihood of type II statistical errors.

Results

Gene expression at CP

Males compared to females

We found significant changes in gene expression at CP when comparing males to females in ES. Specifically, we found that females in ES had lower Aqp1 expression by 0.47-fold (226 ± 29 vs 106 ± 6 AU, p = 0.03, Fig. 1A) compared to males. There was no difference in expression of Aqp4 between the groups (Fig. 1B). Further, a pronounced difference was observed in expression of Slc2a12 (NKCC1), where females in ES had higher expression by threefold (250 ± 36 vs 747 ± 38 AU, p < 0.0001, Fig. 1C) compared to males. No differences were found between male and females in ES in expression of Slc4a10 (NCBE) and Slc4a5 (NBCe2) (Fig. 1D, E). The carbonic anhydrase isozyme Car2 (CaII) expression was also different when comparing males to ES females where Car2 was lower by 0.6-fold (1879 ± 90 vs 1167 ± 26 AU, p < 0.0001, Fig. 1F). In contrast, expression of Car3 was higher by 1.6-fold in ES females (1.7 ± 0.4 vs 2.7 ± 0.5 AU, p = 0.04, Fig. 1G). The catalytic subunit of NKA, ATP1a1, showed lower expression in ES females compared to males by 0.5-fold (0.76 ± 0.03 vs 0.36 ± 0.07 AU, p = 0.0008, Fig. 1H). No change was observed in expression of ATP1b1 or FXYD1 (Fig. 1I, J). No differences were found when comparing gene expression of the markers between male and female rats during MET.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Gene expression at choroid plexus. Gene expression in rat CP from males, metestrus (MET) females and estrus (ES) females. The gene expression includes, Aqp1, Aqp4, Slc4a5, Slc4a10, Slc12a2, Car2 and Car3, Atp1a1, Atp1b1, Fxyd1 and was determined by RT-qPCR. The data is presented as AU, mean ± SD. For A, H and I Brown-Forsyth and Welch ANOVA with post-hoc Dunnets were performed. For B, C, D and F One-way ANOVA awith post-hoc Tukey’s test were performed. For E, G and J Kruskal–Wallis test with post-hoc Dunnet’s was performed. The statistics were done on the AU values. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, ****p < 0.0001 (n = 8–10)

Full size image

MET females compared to ES females

When comparing females in MET to females in ES, expression of Aqp1 was lower in ES females, although not significant (221 ± 54 vs 106 ± 17 AU, p = 0.06, Fig. 1A). No difference was found in expression of Aqp4 (Fig. 1B). A profound difference was found in expression of Slc2a12 (NKCC1), between MET females and ES females by 4.5-fold (189 ± 34 vs 747 ± 38 AU, p < 0.0001, Fig. 1C). Further, difference in one of two bicarbonate transporters was found when comparing ES female and MET females. ES females had a 0.8-fold lower expression of Slc4a5 (NBCe2) (1021 ± 200 vs 778 ± 84, AU, p = 0.04, Fig. 1E). Further, both CA isozymes were different when comparing MET females to ES females where Car2 was lower by 0.6-fold (1954 ± 76 vs 1167 ± 26 AU p ≤ 0.0001, Fig. 1F) while Car3 was higher by 2.2-fold during ES (1.3 ± 0.1 vs 2.7 ± 0.5 AU, p = 0.03, Fig. 1G). The \(\alpha\)-subunit of the NKA, ATP1a1, showed lower expression in ES females compared to MET females by 0.5-fold (0.76 ± 0.12 vs 0.36 ± 0.075 AU, p = 0.04, Fig. 1H).

Western blots

Given that we identified differences in gene expression at the RT-qPCR level, we performed western blots to identify if the changes translate to the protein level (Fig. 2A). It was found that total AQP1 was decreased in both MET (1.09 ± 0.68, p = 0.043) and ES (0.79 ± 0.30, p = 0.0082) females compared to males (2.00 ± 0.96) (Fig. 2B). We also identified that non-glycosylated AQP1 was reduced in MET (0.60 ± 0.33, p = 0.042) and ES (0.36 ± 0.12, p = 0.0013) females compared to males (1.00 ± 0.39) (Fig. 2C). In contrast, glycosylated AQP1 only decreased in ES (0.43 ± 0.17, p = 0.03) females compared to males (1.00 ± 0.59) (Fig. 2D). MET females (2.03 ± 1.03, p = 0.0007) had an increased non-glycosylated AQP1/glycosylated AQP1 ratio compared to ES females (0.96 ± 0.16) (Fig. 2E). In addition, we found a reduction in CAII expression ES females (0.44 ± 0.38, p = 0.03) compared to males (1.00 ± 0.58) (Fig. 2F). No significant difference in ATP1a1 expression was found. However, there was a trend to decrease of ATP1a1 expression between ES females (0.38 ± 0.32, p = 0.08) and males (1.00 ± 0.62) (Fig. 2G).

Fig. 2
figure 2

Protein expression at choroid plexus. Western blots on rat CP from males, MET and ES females (A), where membranes are cut by molecular weight and the resultant images cropped to show representative bands. ATP1a1, lamin and AQP1 columns represent 1 set of gels ran in parallel and the same well number on each membrane. Lamin and CAII represent another set of gels ran in parallel and the same well number on a membrane. Expression of total AQP1 (B), non-glycosylated AQP1 (C), glycosylated AQP1 (D), non-glycosylated/glycosylated ratio (E), carbonic anhydrase 2 (CAII) (F) and ATP1a1 (G). One-way ANOVA with post-hoc Holm-Sidak’s test for B, C and D. Kruskal–Wallis test with post-hoc Dunn’s test for E, F and G. Data presented as mean ± SD. N = 8–10. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01 and ***p < 0.001

Full size image

Correlation analysis

Serum hormone levels and gene expression

Gene expression and serum hormone analysis were performed in the same rats thereby allowing for correlation analysis (Fig. 3). The females were analyzed as one group for the correlation analysis. Serum hormone concentrations was assessed for: pregnenolone, progesterone, 11-deoxycorticosterone, corticosterone, 17OH-pregnenolone, 17OH-progesterone, cortisone, dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA), dihydrotestosterone (DHT), androstenedione, testosterone and 17ß-estradiol (Additional file 1: Figure S1). We performed targeted correlation analysis on those genes that we found statistical difference between to all steroids analyzed (Fig. 1). In female rats gene expression of Car2 was positively correlated to serum level of progesterone (p = 0.02, r = 0.53, Fig. 3A) and the expression was also positively correlated to serum level of androstenedione (p = 0.0015, r = 0.69, Fig. 3E). Gene expression of Slc12a2 (NKCC1) showed a moderate negative correlation with serum level of progesterone (p = 0.015, r = -0.58, Fig. 3B). Further, gene expression of Slc4a5 (NBCe2) was positively correlated to serum level of progesterone (p = 0.001, r = 0.69, Fig. 3C). Lastly, Atp1a1 was positively correlated to serum level of progesterone (p = 0.004, r = 0.64, Fig. 3D) and also positively correlated to the serum level of androstenedione in female rats (p = 0.005, r = 0.63, Fig. 3F). We found no significance with the other steroids assessed.

Fig. 3
figure 3

Gene expression in correlation to hormones in the serum. Correlations between steroid hormones in rat serum and gene expression in rat CP. A correlation between Car2 and progesterone, B Slc12a2 and progesterone, C: Slc4a5 and progesterone, D Atp1a1 and progesterone, E Car2 and androstenedione, F Atp1a1 and androstenedione. Spearman’s correlation coefficient for A, B, C, E and F. D was Pearson’s correlations

Full size image

Discussion

Little is known about sex-specificities of CP which is the main tissue producing CSF. Therefore, this study aimed at resolving sex-differences in the expression of important choroidal transport proteins. The current study demonstrated that there are sex-dependent differences in expression at CP in important transporters, channels and enzymes involved in CSF secretion when comparing male rats to age matched female rats during two different estrous cycle stages. Here we showed for the first-time significant differences in expression of Aqp1, Slc12a2 (NKCC1), Car2, Car3 and \(\alpha\)-subunit of NKA, Atp1a1, when comparing male rats to females in ES. The gene expression data of AQP1 and CAII was also confirmed by protein data. All these choroidal proteins are implicated in CSF secretion and highly expressed at CP. Further, we found that gene expression of some of CSF proteins investigated in this study were correlated to serum levels of the steroids progesterone or androstenedione in the female rats, suggesting that hormonal levels may influence CP function and dynamics.

A growing body of research has shown sex differences in the prevalence and symptomatology of many CNS disorders including CSF pathologies such as IIH. Although IIH is overrepresented in women, it has not been fully determined, whether IIH patients have increased CSF secretion, reduced CSF drainage or a combination of those. However, as IIH patients are mainly females of childbearing age, it is possible that steroid hormones have a pathogenic role in IIH. Therefore, it is of great importance to identify sex-related differences in order to understand how this may contribute to disease presentation. In this study we selected to examine the gene expression in female rats during MET and ES. A limitation of the study is that pituitary drivers of sex hormones, LH or FSH were not assessed. We found no differences in gene expression between female rats in MET and males. Interestingly, extensive differences in gene expression were found in ES female rats both compared to male but also MET females. In the expression of water channels involved in CSF secretion, we found lower expression of Aqp1 but not of Aqp4 in females during ES compared to males. The difference in gene expression of Aqp1 was confirmed by protein expression where the protein level of AQP1 was lower in female ES compared to male. In support, it has been shown that there is gender specific expression of AQP1 in the rat nephron, where AQP1 protein and mRNA expression was higher in adult males compared to females [30]. We also compared ES females to MET females, where ES females had a tendency of lower AQP1 in gene expression. Further, in another study it has been shown that expression and staining pattern of AQP7 and 9 are different during stages of mouse estrus cycle which emphasizes the importance of taken the estrous cycle in account as performed in the current study [25]. In contrast to these results, no differences in expression of AQP1, 2 and 4 in mice CP were identified between male and females in different stages of the estrous cycle [35]. However, the limitation of that study was that the protein levels were only evaluated by immunohistochemistry, which is not an optimal quantification method.

Over the recent years is has been demonstrated that co-transporters such as NKCC1 at CP contribute more to CSF secretion than the AQPs [13, 14]. Here we describe differences in gene expression in some of these important ion-transporters involved in the CSF formation in female rats during ES compared to male and female rats in MET. NKCC1 is robustly expressed at the CP and localized in the luminal membrane facing the ventricles, where it is thought to have an outward directed transport, and therefore acts as a key contributor to CSF secretion, as previously described in mice, rats and dogs [5, 17, 36, 37]. We found that NKCC1 displayed the highest degree of change by threefold increase in ES females compared to males. This suggests that female rats may have increased CSF secretion during ES however more research is needed to explore this. The observed differences of NKCC1 in this study needs to be evaluated by protein level and protein activity in future studies. For the other exchangers, we found that expression of NCBE was not different in any of the groups while the expression of NBCe2 was lower in ES females compared to MET females. Further, in expression of the three subunits of NKA we found that Atp1a1 expression was lower in ES females compared to males and MET females. The effect of the observed changes of the CP transporters needs to be further examined in order to understand how this will impact CSF and ICP dynamics. CA is an enzyme highly expressed at CP and involved in the regulation of CSF secretion by indirectly reducing cerebral water transport. Therefore, CA inhibitors such as acetazolamide are used as first line pharmacological treatment for elevated ICP [38]. Here we demonstrated that gene and protein expression of Car2 was profoundly decreased while gene expression of Car3 was higher in ES compared to male and females in MET. It remains to be determined whether the expression of these transport proteins with different expression levels may be functionally different and physiologically relevant during disease stage. Further, the protein data revealed no differences in expression of these proteins between ES and MET females as observed in the gene expression data. This may be due difference cycle lengths (ES 24–48 h, MET 6-8 h) and the latency for protein turnover.

Altogether, the current work shows clear sex-differences in expression of choroidal proteins involved in CSF secretion dependent on the estrous cycle stage. Sex-related specificities of CP has been suggested by cDNA microarrays studies with differences in CP transcriptome between female and male rats in pathways related to circadian rhythm signalling, metabolism, neurogenesis and stem cell differentiation [23]. In support, sex-related differences in CSF protein composition have been shown [24]. However, a more recent transcriptomic study did not show any sex-related differences in all genes or for transporters/channels involved in CSF secretion [25] although with the limitation that the estrous cycle of the female rats were not determined which may explain the high overlay of genes in female and male rats. Further, gene expression may not mirror the quantitative expression at protein level or protein activity and a limitation with these studies is that protein expression was not assessed. Nevertheless, in the current study, we demonstrated that there are sex-differences in expression of these transporters when taking the estrous cycle in account. This has been lacking in previous studies which demonstrated RNA transcripts at CP. Although the current study demonstrated profound differences of several membrane transport proteins suggested to be involved in CSF secretion, their individual function or net effect on CSF secretion levels were not assessed. Our data reveals differences in various ion transporters and exchangers in the CP during the female cycle, however the impact on the CSF secretion rate cannot be determined. Thereby, it can only be speculated that female rats may have changed CSF secretion during ES however more research is needed to explore this. In support of this theory, a recent study demonstrated the CSF production in young female mice was 30% higher compared to young male mice [39]. Further, obese female rats have also been found to present with elevated CSF secretion compared to obese male rats [40]. Taken these data together with our study, we suggest that expression of certain CSF secretion transporters at CP is sex and cycle-dependent and may thereby affect CSF homeostasis. Future work on assessing the role of how CSF and ICP may vary with the female cycle is warranted.

It is not known how the expression of the sex steroid receptors vary with the cycle. In order to understand if circulating sex hormones may be correlated to the gene expression at CP, we measured the serum level of steroid hormones in the same rats by LC–MS/MS. By this we found that expression of Car2 was positively correlated to both progesterone and androstenedione levels. Androstenedione is an androgen, but with a much lower affinity for the androgen receptor compared to testosterone. However, androstenedione can easily and rapidly be transformed into testosterone in a single enzymatic step by the 17β-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase, which the female rat CP expresses [41]. Expression of NKCC1 in female rats during MET and ES was moderately inversely correlated to serum level of progesterone. Little is known about hormonal regulation of NKCC1 expression or activity. To our knowledge the correlation between progesterone and NKCC1 has not been showed before and the hormonal regulation on expression and activity is thereby unknown. Further, we found that progesterone also positively correlated to gene expression of NBCe2 and Atp1a1. One older study showed that exposing rabbit CP to progesterone in combination with 17-β-estradiol reduced the activity of Na+/K+-ATPase and other ATPases [42]. The subunit Atp1a1 also positively correlated to the serum level of androstenedione. Interestingly, testosterone has been associated with an increased activity of NKA in cultured CP cells which associated with increased CAII and CAIII expression [43]. The data in the present study is based on correlation analysis and therefore the direct evidence of change in mRNA expression at CP cannot be concluded. Although this study supports the hypothesis that level of sex hormones may impact expression of various transporters at CP, futures studies investigating the direct impact of each hormone needs to be performed.

Although this works focus was on sex steroids, other steroids namely the corticosteroids have their receptors expressed at the CP [44, 45]. To assess the effects of glucocorticoids and mineralocorticoids and their cognate receptors on the expression of genes at the CP, future chronotyping studies will be required due to the diurnal variation of corticosteroids.

Conclusions

Sex-related differences in brain pathophysiology involving CSF and CP still pose many unanswered questions complicating the understanding of pathophysiology and the treatment strategies. The current study demonstrated profound sex-related differences in expression of key transporters/channels/enzymes involved in CSF secretion that were dependent on the estrous cycle. This study proposes for a hormonal regulation of the expression of CSF transporters which may have great importance in the understanding of CSF disorders. Further, the study suggests that future studies on CP physiology and related pathology should take the cycle determination of female rats in consideration.

Availability of data and materials

All data generated or analysed during this study are included in this published article [and its Additional files].

Abbreviations

CA:

Carbonic anhydrases

CSF:

Cerebrospinal fluid

CP:

Choroid plexus

CPe:

CP epithelial

ES:

Estrous

FSH:

Follicle stimulating hormone

IIH:

Idiopathic intracranial hypertension

ICP:

Intracranial pressure

LH:

Lutinizing hormone

MET:

Metestrus

NKA:

Na+/K+-ATPase

NKCC1:

Na+/K+/Cl− cotransporter-1

NBCe2:

Na+/HCO3− cotransporter

NBCn1:

Na+/HCO3− cotransporter

References

  1. Bruce BB, Kedar S, Van Stavern GP, Monaghan D, Acierno MD, Braswell RA, et al. Idiopathic intracranial hypertension in men. Neurology. 2009;72(4):304–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Kratzer I, Ek J, Stolp H. The molecular anatomy and functions of the choroid plexus in healthy and diseased brain. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2020;1862(11):183430.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Milhorat TH. Choroid plexus and cerebrospinal fluid production. Science. 1969;166(3912):1514–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Spector R, Robert Snodgrass S, Johanson CE. A balanced view of the cerebrospinal fluid composition and functions: focus on adult humans. Exp Neurol. 2015;273:57–68.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Steffensen AB, Oernbo EK, Stoica A, Gerkau NJ, Barbuskaite D, Tritsaris K, et al. Cotransporter-mediated water transport underlying cerebrospinal fluid formation. Nat Commun. 2018;9(1):2167.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Damkier HH, Brown PD, Praetorius J. Cerebrospinal fluid secretion by the choroid plexus. Physiol Rev. 2013;93(4):1847–92.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Zeuthen T. Cotransport of K+, Cl- and H2O by membrane proteins from choroid plexus epithelium of Necturus maculosus. J Physiol. 1994;478(Pt2):203–19.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Zeuthen T. Secondary active transport of water across ventricular cell membrane of choroid plexus epithelium of Necturus maculosus. J Physiol. 1991;444:153–73.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Hutton D, Fadelalla MG, Kanodia AK, Hossain-Ibrahim K. Choroid plexus and CSF: an updated review. Br J Neurosurg. 2022;36(3):307–15.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Hamann S, Herrera-Perez JJ, Zeuthen T, Alvarez-Leefmans FJ. Cotransport of water by the Na+-K+-2Cl(-) cotransporter NKCC1 in mammalian epithelial cells. J Physiol. 2010;588(Pt 21):4089–101.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Javaheri S, Wagner KR. Bumetanide decreases canine cerebrospinal fluid production. in vivo evidence for NaCl cotransport in the central nervous system. J clin Investig. 1993;92(5):2257–61.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Barbuskaite D, Oernbo EK, Wardman JH, Toft-Bertelsen TL, Conti E, Andreassen SN, et al. Acetazolamide modulates intracranial pressure directly by its action on the cerebrospinal fluid secretion apparatus. Fluids Barriers CNS. 2022;19(1):53.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. MacAulay N, Zeuthen T. Water transport between CNS compartments: contributions of aquaporins and cotransporters. Neuroscience. 2010;168(4):941–56.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. MacAulay N, Hamann S, Zeuthen T. Water transport in the brain: role of cotransporters. Neuroscience. 2004;129(4):1031–44.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Zeuthen T. Water-transporting proteins. J Membr Biol. 2010;234(2):57–73.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Praetorius J, Damkier HH. Transport across the choroid plexus epithelium. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol. 2017;312(6):C673–86.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Oernbo EK, Steffensen AB, Razzaghi Khamesi P, Toft-Bertelsen TL, Barbuskaite D, Vilhardt F, et al. Membrane transporters control cerebrospinal fluid formation independently of conventional osmosis to modulate intracranial pressure. Fluids Barriers CNS. 2022;19(1):65.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Redzic ZB, Segal MB. The structure of the choroid plexus and the physiology of the choroid plexus epithelium. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2004;56(12):1695–716.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Quadros PS, Pfau JL, Wagner CK. Distribution of progesterone receptor immunoreactivity in the fetal and neonatal rat forebrain. J Comp Neurol. 2007;504(1):42–56.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Hong-Goka BC, Chang FL. Estrogen receptors alpha and beta in choroid plexus epithelial cells in Alzheimer’s disease. Neurosci Lett. 2004;360(3):113–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Santos CR, Duarte AC, Quintela T, Tomás J, Albuquerque T, Marques F, et al. The choroid plexus as a sex hormone target: functional implications. Front Neuroendocrinol. 2017;44:103–21.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Alves CH, Gonçalves I, Socorro S, Baltazar G, Quintela T, Santos CR. Androgen receptor is expressed in murine choroid plexus and downregulated by 5alpha-dihydrotestosterone in male and female mice. J Mol Neurosci MN. 2009;38(1):41–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Quintela T, Marcelino H, Deery MJ, Feret R, Howard J, Lilley KS, et al. Sex-related differences in rat choroid plexus and cerebrospinal fluid: a cDNA microarray and proteomic analysis. J Neuroendocrinol. 2016. https://doi.org/10.1111/jne.12340.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Quintela T, Gonçalves I, Carreto LC, Santos MA, Marcelino H, Patriarca FM, et al. Analysis of the effects of sex hormone background on the rat choroid plexus transcriptome by cDNA microarrays. PLoS ONE. 2013;8(4):e60199.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Andreassen SN, Toft-Bertelsen TL, Wardman JH, Villadsen R, MacAulay N. Transcriptional profiling of transport mechanisms and regulatory pathways in rat choroid plexus. Fluids Barriers CNS. 2022;19(1):44.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Yaba A, Sozen B, Suzen B, Demir N. Expression of aquaporin-7 and aquaporin-9 in tanycyte cells and choroid plexus during mouse estrus cycle. Morphologie. 2017;101(332):39–46.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Castañeyra-Ruiz L, González-Marrero I, Hernández-Abad LG, Carmona-Calero EM, Meyer G, Castañeyra-Perdomo A. A distal to proximal gradient of human choroid plexus development, with antagonistic expression of Glut1 and AQP1 in mature cells vs. calbindin and PCNA in proliferative Cells. Front Neuroanat. 2016;10:87.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Quek AM, McKeon A, Lennon VA, Mandrekar JN, Iorio R, Jiao Y, et al. Effects of age and sex on aquaporin-4 autoimmunity. Arch Neurol. 2012;69(8):1039–43.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Quintela T, Albuquerque T, Lundkvist G, Carmine Belin A, Talhada D, Gonçalves I, et al. The choroid plexus harbors a circadian oscillator modulated by estrogens. Chronobiol Int. 2018;35(2):270–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Herak-Kramberger CM, Breljak D, Ljubojević M, Matokanović M, Lovrić M, Rogić D, et al. Sex-dependent expression of water channel AQP1 along the rat nephron. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol. 2015;308(8):F809–21.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Ajayi AF, Akhigbe RE. Staging of the estrous cycle and induction of estrus in experimental rodents: an update. Fertil Res Pract. 2020;6:5.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Nilsson ME, Vandenput L, Tivesten Å, Norlén AK, Lagerquist MK, Windahl SH, et al. Measurement of a comprehensive sex steroid profile in rodent serum by high-sensitive gas chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Endocrinology. 2015;156(7):2492–502.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Marcondes FK, Bianchi FJ, Tanno AP. Determination of the estrous cycle phases of rats: some helpful considerations. Braz J Biol = Revista Brasleira de Biologia. 2002;62(4a):609–14.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Weisser JJ, Hansen CH, Poulsen R, Larsen LW, Cornett C, Styrishave B. Two simple cleanup methods combined with LC-MS/MS for quantification of steroid hormones in in vivo and in vitro assays. Anal Bioanal Chem. 2016;408(18):4883–95.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Sozen B, Aytac G, Demir N, Suzen B, Tanriover G. Are there any sex-depended differences in water transporting proteins of choroid plexus in mice? J Basic and Clin Health Sci. 2020;4(2):123–7.

    Google Scholar 

  36. MacAulay N. Molecular mechanisms of brain water transport. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2021;22(6):326–44.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Karimy JK, Zhang J, Kurland DB, Theriault BC, Duran D, Stokum JA, et al. Inflammation-dependent cerebrospinal fluid hypersecretion by the choroid plexus epithelium in posthemorrhagic hydrocephalus. Nat Med. 2017;23(8):997–1003.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Eftekhari S, Westgate CSJ, Uldall MS, Jensen RH. Preclinical update on regulation of intracranial pressure in relation to idiopathic intracranial hypertension. Fluids Barriers CNS. 2019;16(1):35.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Liu G, Mestre H, Sweeney AM, Sun Q, Weikop P, Du T, et al. Direct measurement of cerebrospinal fluid production in mice. Cell Rep. 2020;33(12):108524.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Alimajstorovic Z, Pascual-Baixauli E, Hawkes CA, Sharrack B, Loughlin AJ, Romero IA, et al. Cerebrospinal fluid dynamics modulation by diet and cytokines in rats. Fluids Barriers CNS. 2020;17(1):10.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Badawy MT, Sobeh M, Xiao J, Farag MA. Androstenedione (a natural steroid and a drug supplement): a comprehensive review of its consumption, metabolism, health effects, and toxicity with sex differences. Molecules. 2021;26(20):6210.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Lindvall-Axelsson M, Owman C. Changes in transport functions of isolated rabbit choroid plexus under the influence of oestrogen and progesterone. Acta Physiol Scand. 1989;136(1):107–11.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. O’Reilly MW, Westgate CS, Hornby C, Botfield H, Taylor AE, Markey K, et al. A unique androgen excess signature in idiopathic intracranial hypertension is linked to cerebrospinal fluid dynamics. JCI Insight. 2019;4(6):e125348.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Nakano M, Hirooka Y, Matsukawa R, Ito K, Sunagawa K. Mineralocorticoid receptors/epithelial Na(+) channels in the choroid plexus are involved in hypertensive mechanisms in stroke-prone spontaneously hypertensive rats. Hypertens Res. 2013;36(3):277–84.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Sinclair AJ, Walker EA, Burdon MA, van Beek AP, Kema IP, Hughes BA, et al. Cerebrospinal fluid corticosteroid levels and cortisol metabolism in patients with idiopathic intracranial hypertension: a link between 11beta-HSD1 and intracranial pressure regulation? J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2010;95(12):5348–56.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

Open access funding provided by Royal Library, Copenhagen University Library. This study was supported by The Candys Foundation, Lundbeck foundation (Grant nr 276-2018-403), A.P. Møller Foundation and International Headache Society fellowship grant. The funders had no specific role in the conceptualization, design, data collection, analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Author information

Author notes

  1. Christina Kamp-Jensen and Connar Stanley James Westgate have contributed equally.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Danish Headache Center, Department of Neurology, Glostrup Research Institute, Rigshospitalet-Glostrup, University of Copenhagen, Nordstjernevej 42, 2600, Glostrup, Denmark

    Ida Marchen Egerod Israelsen, Christina Kamp-Jensen, Connar Stanley James Westgate, Rigmor H. Jensen & Sajedeh Eftekhari

  2. Department of Pharmacy, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark

    Bjarne Styrishave

Authors
  1. Ida Marchen Egerod Israelsen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Christina Kamp-Jensen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Connar Stanley James Westgate
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Bjarne Styrishave
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Rigmor H. Jensen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Sajedeh Eftekhari
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

IMI, CKJ and CSJW designed and performed experiments, analyzed data, and contributed to writing of the manuscript. BS and RHJ guided the experimental design and contributed to the writing of manuscript. SE guided, designed the experiments, and wrote the manuscript. All authors reviewed and approved the final version of the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sajedeh Eftekhari.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

All methods were performed in accordance with the relevant guidelines and regulations. Animals experiments in this study were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee, the Danish Animal Experiments Inspectorate (2019-15-0201-00365).

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1: Figure S1.

Steroid profile of serum in males and females in metestrus and estrus as measured by LCMS.Figure S2. Representative light micrographs of vaginal smears in each phase in the estrus cycle of female rats. Figure S3. Raw and annotated western blot images for lamin-B1, AQP1, ATP1a1 and CAII.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Israelsen, I.M.E., Kamp-Jensen, C., Westgate, C.S.J. et al. Cycle-dependent sex differences in expression of membrane proteins involved in cerebrospinal fluid secretion at rat choroid plexus. BMC Neurosci 24, 60 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12868-023-00829-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12868-023-00829-w

Keywords

BMC Neuroscience

ISSN: 1471-2202

Contact us