 Research Article
 Open access
 Published:
Dynamic effect of electromagnetic induction on epileptic waveform
BMC Neuroscience volume 23, Article number: 78 (2022)
Abstract
Background
Electromagnetic induction has recently been considered as an important factor affecting the activity of neurons. However, as an important form of intervention in epilepsy treatment, few people have linked the two, especially the related dynamic mechanisms have not been explained clearly.
Methods
Considering that electromagnetic induction has some brain area dependence, we proposed a modified twocompartment cortical thalamus model and set eight different key bifurcation parameters to study the transition mechanisms of epilepsy. We compared and analyzed the application and getting rid of memristors of singlecompartment and coupled models. In particular, we plotted bifurcation diagrams to analyze the dynamic mechanisms behind abundant discharge activities, which mainly involved Hopf bifurcations (HB), fold of cycle bifurcations (LPC) and torus bifurcations (TR).
Results
The results show that the coupled model can trigger more discharge states due to the driving effect between compartments. Moreover, the most remarkable finding of this study is that the memristor shows two sides. On the one hand, it may reduce tonic discharges. On the other hand, it may cause new pathological states.
Conclusions
The work explains the control effect of memristors on different brain regions and lays a theoretical foundation for future targeted therapy. Finally, it is hoped that our findings will provide new insights into the role of electromagnetic induction in absence seizures.
Introduction
Absence epilepsy, characterized by transient disturbance of consciousness, is a kind of generalized nonconvulsive epilepsy [1]. As one of the most typical refractory diseases, it has extremely complex manifestations [2]. Clinically, electroencephalogram (EEG) is mainly used to record the discharges of neurons and detect the characteristics of absence seizures [3, 4]. In recent years, with the indepth study of clinical trials, the evolution of typical to atypical pathological states has been widely concerned [5, 6]. The characteristics of absence epilepsy are no longer limited to spikeandslow wave discharges of 2–4 Hz, but are subdivided into alternating multiple spikewave oscillations, tonic oscillations, etc. [7, 8]. However, many dynamic phenomena in recorded EEG are still mysterious. It is still unclear what dynamic mechanisms are hidden behind the diversification of pathological features, and whether the choice of models and different parameters can induce new pathological changes. Therefore, the influence of various random factors on the mechanisms of epilepsy is still worthy of further discussion.
Building biophysical models is the primary task for understanding epilepsy. Many scholars have subsequently discussed the etiology of epilepsy by building different neural field models [9, 10]. In 2014, Taylor built a fully functional thalamocortical model to simulate the system, reappeared the spike and wave discharges (SWDs) phenomenon with practical significance and studied the influence of noise on the dynamic characteristics of the system [11]. In 2017, Fan et al. found that the multispike wave discharges phenomenon may be related to fold of cycles bifurcations [12]. In 2019, Wang et al. extended the single model to the twocompartment oneway coupled model and found that the interaction between compartments could increase the occupied area of absence epilepsy by a small margin [13]. In 2020, Zhang et al. introduced a second inhibitory neuron to study the dynamic bifurcation mechanism, and proved that Hopf bifurcation participated in the transition of the system from the steady state to the unstable limit cycle [14]. Although experimental studies in recent years have provided some valuable insights into the pathogenesis of epilepsy, most theorists are limited to the discussion of single model or single parameter. If the model structure or related parameters change, some conclusions may no longer be valid. Therefore, we need to add more factors learn more about epilepsy. It should be emphasized that dynamic analysis is still an effective means to study the expansion and reduction of SWDs.
It is worth noting that electromagnetic induction is an important factor affecting the electrophysiological activities of neurons [15]. Some studies have confirmed that the electromagnetic field mainly interferes with the membrane potential between individual and group neurons through current [16, 17]. Later, some scholars began to pay attention to the relationship between the memristor and epilepsy. Vinaya et al. demonstrated that memristors played a leading role in controlling the absence seizures and contribute to the alleviation of absence seizures [18]. By applying the memristor to PY neurons, Zhao et al. found that absence seizures were not only inhibited but might have the opposite result under electrical radiation [19]. In fact, these two arguments are not contradictory. The difference of conclusions just emphasizes the importance of considering different parameters and models of absence seizures. However, most scholarly studies have only explored the effects of electromagnetic induction on absence seizures, rarely combined with the dynamic mechanism, especially the effects between different neuronal populations have not been adequately investigated. Moreover, the uncertainty of parameters space range and the discussion of the diversity of models are often neglected.
In order to break through these limitations, we design a cortical thalamus network model improved by electromagnetic induction. Our main purpose is to compare the dynamic evolution mechanism between singlecompartment model and coupled model. In addition, in order to break the limitations of the model discussion, we further consider selecting the coupling strength between multiple neuron populations as dynamic parameters and expanding the numerical simulation range with adjustable parameters. In “Dynamic changes induced by coupling strength in different models” section, we mainly prove that the coupled model can trigger more discharge states such as 2spike and wave discharges (2SWDs) and rapid spike discharges with irregular periodic amplitude. See“Single model under electromagnetic induction” and “Coupled model under electric attraction” sections focus on control effects of different model structures and different connection parameters on absence seizures when applying the memristor. Finally, in the conclusion part, we summarize the simulation results of the experiment. The main contribution of this work is to emphasize that electromagnetic induction is of great significance in the treatment of epilepsy in different brain regions. We find that the different choice of connection parameters may lead to the transition from epileptic state to normal background state, or it may also lead to more complicated pathological state and aggravate the area of absence seizures. In particular, this paper combines bifurcation analysis to explain the rich dynamic phenomena and reveals the differences of the mechanisms involved in different discharge states. This paper provides a new vision for a deeper understanding of electromagnetic induction, hoping to provide new ideas for clinical treatment of epilepsy.
Models and methods
Network definition and topological analysis
Biophysical computational models are an important way to rapidly recognize and understand absence epilepsy [20, 21]. Many scholars have proposed hypotheses for the abnormal discharges of epilepsy, and good research results have been achieved based on the corticalthalamic network model [22, 23]. The original Taylor model as shown in Fig. 1a, the pink coneshaped structure represent the excitatory pyramidal neurons PY, and the blue elliptical structure represent the inhibitory neurons IN, which together form the cortical part [24]. The orange and green cylinders represent TC (specific relay nucleus) and RE (thalamic reticular nucleus), which together form the thalamic portion [25].
All neurons are not separate individuals, and neuronal populations interconnect and interact with each other [26, 27]. To investigate the effect of spatial topology on different neuronal populations, we studied the complex structure as shown in Fig. 1b. In this paper, we introduce the electromagnetic induction mechanism into the coupled cortical thalamus model proposed by Wang et al. [13]. The improved model can be described by the following differential equations [12, 13, 19, 28]:
ε_{py}, ε_{in}, ε_{tc}, ε_{re} are additive constants, τ_{1}–τ_{4} denote different time scales. k_{1}k_{9} represent the strengths of connections between different neuronal populations. F[.] and G[.] are activation functions, which are mainly used to describe the cortical subsystem and thalamic subsystem. F[x] = 1/(1 + ε^{−x}) where x = PY_{i}, IN_{i}, TC_{i}, RE_{i} (i = 1, 2), and ε represents the steepness of sigmoid function F[x]. G[x] = ax + b where x = TC_{i}, RE_{i} (i = 1, 2) [15, 29].
Induction of electrical stimulation
We use memristor to realize the coupling relationship between average magnetic flux and average membrane potential, and propose a more reliable thalamocortical model with electromagnetic induction [15, 30, 31]. Due to the dominant role of pyramidal neurons, we only consider the electromagnetic induction of pyramidal neurons. In Eq. (1), λ_{1} and λ_{2} are related to electromagnetic induction, and the terms λ_{1}PY_{i} and λ_{2}PY_{i} (i = 1, 2) denote the effect of electromagnetic induction and selfinduction, respectively. ϕ_{i} (i = 1, 2) means that the average magnetic flux is the magnetic flux passing through the cell membrane. ρ(ϕ_{i}) is the coupling strength between the membrane potential of neurons and magnetic flux. It is a memristor controlled by magnetic flux, which is equivalent to memory conductance. ρ(ϕ_{i}) is often described by Eq. (10), where α_{1}, β_{1} are fixed parameters. According to Faraday's law of electromagnetic induction and the description of memristor, the fluctuation of membrane potential will produce induced current, which is expressed by the term k_{0}ρ(ϕ_{i})PY_{i} in Eq. (1). k_{0} represents the feedback gain of the average magnetic flux. k_{0} = 0 or 0.5 is used to compare the difference between no average magnetic flux and electromagnetic induction interference.
Simulating method
This paper uses MATLAB environment to simulate. The fourthorder Runge–Kutta method is used to solve the delay differential equations of four neurons in the left compartment and right compartment in the model. The simulation time is set to 30 s long enough, and the fixed time step of numerical integration is 0.05 ms. Most of the parameters in this paper are taken from previous experimental studies, and the values of all parameters are shown in Table 1 [13, 19, 32]. In order to see more abundant dynamic phenomena, the connection strengths are set within a certain reasonable range (k_{1}–k_{9}). The value of k_{0} is generally 0 or 0.5, which indicates whether the system is disturbed by electromagnetic field. In addition, we describe the macroscopic dynamics of cortex by using extreme value diagrams and dominant frequency diagrams. The main frequency is simulated by fast Fourier transform. Finally, we obtain the bifurcation results of system dynamics using the continuation package AUTO in XPPAUT software.
Numerical results
Dynamic changes induced by coupling strength in different models
It has been confirmed that sensory movement at the individual level is not caused by the emission of electricity from individual neurons, but by the collective behavior of many neurons in the cortex, thalamus and spinal cord in the brain system [33, 34]. Therefore, we no longer limit our discussion to a single pathway within or outside the thalamus, but focus on multiple excitatory inputs and inhibitory projections from the cortex and thalamus [35, 36]. In this section, we selected eight coupling strengths k_{i} (i = 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9) between cortex and thalamus as key parameters to explore the dynamic changes of epileptic waveforms in single and coupled models. Our main purpose is to find the dynamic relationship of the system by studying the changes between different single pathways and to pave the way for comparing the dynamical changes induced by electromagnetic induction.
First, we get rid of the electric radiation and simply draw the bifurcation diagrams in the singlecompartment model. We can see that in Fig. 2a, with the change of bifurcation parameter k_{1}, the system state continuously transits from low discharge to pathological SWDs and high saturation discharge. Interestingly, the same dynamic transfer mechanisms can be seen in Fig. 2h by adjusting k_{9} reasonably. We have verified that by adjusting the connection strengths of the two pathways of cortex selfexcitation (k_{1}) and thalamus selfinhibition (k_{9}), the absence seizures can be reproduced and disappeared. In Fig. 2b, with the change of the bifurcation parameter k_{2}, the system exhibits a richer dynamical characteristics. When k_{2} ≥ 1.604, the system transitions from a low firing state to a tonic state, which corresponds to a dominant frequency around 16 Hz. In Fig. 2c and d, the initial state of the system is highfrequency tonic discharge. With the increase of synaptic connection strengths (k_{3} or k_{5}), the system changes in three different states. In Fig. 2e we observe more obvious state fluctuations. Not only the lower (0.22 < k_{6} < 0.46) coupling strength can initiate SWDs, but also SWDs can be triggered when k_{6} > 1.7. Also, a small pathological discharge (1.16 < k_{6} < 1.34) appears in the low discharge (0.22 < k_{6} < 1.7) region. In Fig. 2f, when k_{7} ≥ 1.4, the normal background state of the system is broken and the absence seizure phenomenon occurs. In Fig. 2g, when the coupling strength k_{8} is low, the activation level of the RE neuron is small enough to inhibit the TC neuron. So the initial state of the system is high saturated firings. With the increasing of k_{8}, the activation of some TC neurons is inhibited, which makes the system appear SWDs. When k_{8} ≥ 9.152, the system shows low discharge. Here, we take Fig. 2f as an example, select several specific values to draw the discharge diagrams as shown in Fig. 3, high saturated state (Fig. 3a), SWDs state (Fig. 3b), low saturated state (Fig. 3c) and tonic state (Fig. 3d).
Next, in order to observe what effect the interaction between compartments will have on absence epilepsy. We set the same parameter range for the connection strength of different pathways as the single compartment model, drawing the bifurcation diagrams of the coupled model. As shown in Fig. 4a, with the increase of coupling strength, the steady state is broken when k_{1} > 1.48, which changes the model from low firing oscillation to tonic oscillation. And as the inhibition of left compartment to right compartment increases, the dominant frequency corresponding to tonic oscillation gradually decreases. In Fig. 4b–f, we find that the coupled model is prone to transform the tonic oscillation into a fast spike discharge with periodic up and down amplitude fluctuations. Although the waveform changes, the corresponding fluctuation frequency is basically unchanged.
In Fig. 4e, when the coupling strength k_{6} is large enough (k_{6} > 1.7), the system transitions from SWDs to clonic discharge with a frequency of about 5 Hz. In Fig. 4g, a smaller coupling strength (k_{8} = 5.4) makes the system transition from high saturation state to large SWDs state. When k_{8} > 9.8, the low firing oscillation of the system disappears and the system behaves as a tonic state. In Fig. 4h, with the increased inhibition of RE neurons at around k_{9} = 0.6 the system shows 2–4 Hz spike and slow wave discharge. Until the excessive inhibition of the left compartment on the right compartment increases the connection strength of k_{9} to about 1, the pathological state disappears and the system shows low discharge with the frequency of 0 Hz.
Macroscopically, the effects of the coupled model for completely different populations of pathways share a common feature: the expansion of pathological area. We find that the right compartment, whether stimulated by excitability or inhibited projection of left compartment, show the result that the normal background was easily transformed into atypical pathological area. It is particularly noted that in Fig. 4c, d, f, and g the pathological state covers almost more than 80% of the area within the parameters we set. It can be seen that the discussion of complex model is an important part of epilepsy research.
Next, we select several specific parameters in different states to draw the discharge diagram (Fig. 5), and find the special pathological states that do not appear in a single model. As shown in Fig. 5a, the system experience a rapid sharp wave oscillation with a frequency of about 15 Hz and the amplitude exhibits periodic fluctuations when k_{2} = 1.65. In Fig. 5b, the system breaks through the typical SWDs and the 3SWDs around 2 Hz appears as k_{6} = 0.21. As shown in Fig. 5c, the system shows 2SWDs at 2–3 Hz when k_{6} = 0.37. The appearance of multiple spike wave discharges often predicts the onset of spasm, which is the main waveform of myoclonic epilepsy [37]. In Fig. 5d, when k_{6} = 1.8 the system shows a lowfrequency clonic oscillation of about 5 Hz, which has a high amplitude between 0.8 and 0.9. In Fig. 5e and f, we plot the special discharge associated with k_{9}. When k_{9} = 0.62, the system shows multiple spike complex oscillation with increasing periodic amplitude and frequency essentially greater than 13 Hz. When k_{9} = 0.8, the system shows isolated spike oscillation. These two waveforms are mostly related to paroxysmal epilepsy.
Single model under electromagnetic induction
It has been shown that fluctuations in the membrane potential of neurons can have a significant impact on the distribution of electromagnetic fields, causing changes in magnetic flux and electromagnetic induction across the cell membrane [38, 39]. Therefore, it is crucial to consider the effect of electromagnetic induction on neuronal activity in the model. Memristor is considered as a perfect device to simulate neural synapses, and the artificial neural network using memristor to simulate neural synapses is called memristor neural network [40, 41]. In this section, the classical single cortical thalamus model is improved by using the memristor model with magnetic flux variable, and the main purpose is to use the memristor to regulate the electrophysiological activities of neurons. We investigate the influence of electromagnetic radiation within the nervous system on the dynamic characteristics of different neuron populations, and compare it with a single model free from electrical radiation.
We first explore the dynamic effects of changes in the connection parameters (k_{3}, k_{5}, k_{7}) of corticothalamic interactions in a macroscopic sense on the system separately. It can be clearly seen from the bifurcation diagram of Fig. 6a that under the combined effect of k_{3} and memristor, the system can transition from tonic oscillation to low firing oscillation with less excitatory stimulus of TC to RE. Compared with Fig. 2c, the high saturated firings when 1.57 < k_{3} < 1.67 is converted into SWDs, and the absence seizures of the system are aggravated. In Fig. 6b and c, we observe that electric radiation affects the early generation of HB_{1} point, which means that the tonic state induced by limit cycle ends prematurely. When 0.4009 ≤ k_{3} ≤ 1.264, the system transits to a wider range of monostable state. Meanwhile, the electric radiation delays the generation of HB_{2} and HB_{3} points, which is also the reason for the delay and aggravation of SWDs phenomenon in the system.
Compared with Fig. 6e, we can clearly see in Fig. 6f that electromagnetic induction induces more bifurcation mechanisms. In detail, the HB_{1} point is shifted from 1.81 to the left to 0.2077, and the tonic state was well suppressed by the reduction of limit cycle range. When 0.2077 < k_{5} < 3.355, the limit cycle disappears and the system converges to a stable fixed point, which corresponds to the low firing oscillation in Fig. 6d. When 3.355 < k_{5} < 3.519, the fold of cycles bifurcation (LPC_{1}) appears, making the system transition from monostable to bistable state. When 3.519 < k_{5} < 3.59, two stable limit loops appear, making the system transition to tristable state. We suggest that the appearance of 2SWDs in Fig. 6d is closely related to the generation of LPC_{1}, LPC_{2}. LPC_{1} gradually disappears after the start of LPC_{3} and the system becomes bistable state (3.59 < k_{5} < 3.824). When k_{5} = 3.824, the appearance of HB_{2} changes the state of the fixed point from stable to unstable, and the system enters a monostable state. When 5.449 < k_{5} < 6.654, HB_{3} makes the fixed point return to a stable state, and the system enters the bistable region again. When 6.654 < k_{5} < 7, the fold of cycles bifurcation disappears and the system returns to the monostable state.
In Fig. 6g, the system is reduced from the original five states to four states under the action of the memristor, and the tonic state disappears. Comparing Fig. 6h and i, it is not difficult to find that the fold of cycles bifurcations (LPC_{1} and LPC_{2}) of the system advance and the Hopf bifurcation point decreases. Therefore, the system transits from high saturated firings to SWDs with smaller connection strength and the supercritical bifurcation induced by HB_{3} disappears. That is, in Fig. 6h, when k_{7} > 2.041, the solutions of the system converge to stable fixed points. To sum up, electric radiation promotes the early generation of pathological state. Fortunately, in Fig. 6a, d, and g, we all see that the tonic oscillation of the system under electric attraction is reduced. In Fig. 6g, the tonic state disappears.
Then we focus on the internal function of cortex and thalamus. In order to independently discuss the influence of electrical stimulation target selection on the neural network, k_{0} is also set to 0.5. Then we focus on k_{1} and k_{2}, and draw bifurcation diagrams as shown in Fig. 7a and d. For the cortical selfexcitation pathway PYPY, the function of memristor is not obvious. The role of the memristor is not obvious. The dynamic transfer mechanism of the system does not change and shows a larger range of the region of low saturated firing under electrical attraction compared to Fig. 4a. In Fig. 7b and c, we find that when the degree of cortical selfexcitation is not high, the system will always converge to a stable fixed point, that is, it shows low saturaed firings. With the increasing degree of cortical selfexcitation the system first transits to the bistable region between LPC_{1} and HB_{1}, because the appearance of HB_{1} transits to the monostable region. Then a second bistable region appears between HB_{2} and LPC_{2}. Finally, the system returns to monostable state with the disappearance of limit cycle.
In addition, we can observe that low and high saturated state can coexist with SWDs (between HB_{1} and LPC_{1}, and between HB_{2} and LPC_{2}). In Fig. 7d, the enhancement of the inhibition from IN to PY can make the system transition from the initial high saturated state to the pathological SWDs state, and can also make the system transition from absence seizures to low saturated state. As shown in Fig. 7e and f, we can also observe the coexistence of steady state and SWDs state. But the unstable limit cycle generated at HB_{3} can not coexist with electromagnetic induction of a certain intensity. So the number of Hopf bifurcation points is reduced to two, and finally the system transits to the monostable region under the electric attraction, that is, it shows a low saturated firings of 0 Hz.
For the neural population in thalamus, we mainly focus on k_{i} (i = 6, 8, 9). We can see that, as shown in Fig. 8a, the memristor eliminates 2SWDs, SWDs (> 4 Hz) and tonic that appear in Fig. 2e.With the increasing inhibition of RE on TC, the system only changes in three dynamic states. Furthermore, we find in Fig. 8b that there is a region where low saturated firing and SWDs coexist between Hopf bifurcations and fold of cycles bifurcations (LPC). At the same time, a tristable region is found between LPC_{2} and LPC_{3}. In Fig. 8c, the amplitude of the limit cycle increases with the inhibition of RE neurons, and the fold of cycles bifurcation converges to fixed points (k_{6} > 0.23). In Fig. 8d, the joint modulation of electromagnetic induction and k_{8}, the system changes from the original four states to five states (5 ≤ k_{8} ≤ 13). That is, the emergence of 2SWDs. We have learned that the formation of multispike discharges is closely related to multifold of cycle bifurcations. So we draw the dynamic bifurcation diagrams as shown in Fig. 8d and e. With the enhancement of excitability from TC to RE, the system changes from monostable to bistable region with fold of cycles bifurcation (LPC_{1}).The unstable HB_{1} point appear earlier, which make the system return to monostable ahead of time. Then, between LPC_{2} and HB_{2}, the system transits to the bistable region composed of limit cycle and stable points, and 2SWDs appears between them. Until the limit cycle disappears, the system converges to stable fixed points. In Fig. 8g, the memristor has played a very good role. With the increase of k_{9}, there is no typical absence seizures in the system. When 1.11 ≤ k_{9} ≤ 1.31, clonic oscillation with stepwise decreasing frequency of 2–3 Hz appears in the system. In Fig. 8h, slow wave oscillations occurs between LPC and HB_{2} until the limit cycle disappears and clonic oscillations ends. In Fig. 8i, the stability of the fixed point of the system at HB_{1} point disappears. The appearance of fold of cycles bifurcations are also responsible for the slowwave oscillation generation. To sum up, we find that the system has a good therapeutic effect on atypical pathological state such as tonic state under the joint action of memristor and connection strengths (k_{2,} k_{3}, k_{5}, k_{7}). It is worth noting that the parameter k_{9} shows a more effective inhibitory effect on absence seizures than other connection parameters.
Coupled model under electric attraction
The human brain is a very complex neural network. There are tens of billions of nerve cells in the cortex, also known as neurons, each of which can interact with information by connecting other neurons through thousands of synapses [42]. Therefore, the connection of brain network and the change of topology of brain network are the key factors that affect the cerebral cortex system [43, 44]. We have realized from “Dynamic changes induced by coupling strength in different models” Section that the coupled model triggers many states that do not exist in the singlecompartment model, which makes the dynamic mechanism of the system more complicated. The role of the memristor in the simple singlecompartment model has been understood, and how it affects the diverse dynamical characteristics arising from the more complex twocompartment model needs to be investigated in more depth. Here, we also introduce electromagnetic induction into the coupled model, and discuss in detail the changes of brain activity caused by the arrival of memristors.
In Fig. 9a, we see that the system mainly shows three state transitions with the increase of k_{1}. Compared with Fig. 4a, we find that the tonic state was completely transformed into low firing oscillation. Similarly, it can be observed in Fig. 9f that the system exhibits only a single low firing oscillation when k_{8} > 9. In Fig. 9b, under the combined action of electromagnetic induction and k_{2}, the absence seizure occurred in advance. The memristor shows the ability to reduce the rapid spike discharge to tonic, which makes the amplitude of fluctuation stable. The initial state of the system changes from high saturated state to clonic. As k_{7} also shows a similar state transition mechanism in Fig. 9e, it will not be explained too much. Compared with Fig. 4c, when k_{3} > 1.8 in Fig. 9c, the system is unable to convert pathological state into high saturated state. Similarly, in Fig. 9d, when k_{5} = 8, the original high saturated firings of the system was replaced by SWDs due to the existence of memristor. This also shows that the memory resistor will interfere with the information exchange between cortex and thalamus to a certain extent.
Next, we will introduce in detail what changes will be brought when the electromagnetic induction parameter k_{0} is fixed and the parameters k_{6}, k_{9} fluctuate within a certain range. From Fig. 10a, we can see that the state distribution of disorder becomes modular. With the increasing inhibition of RE neurons to TC neurons from bottom to top, the system gradually changes from high saturated state to pathological state, and then to a wide range of low firing state. The distribution of different states in Fig. 10c also shows the feature of regionalization. Unlike Fig. 10a, the system pathological states appear in larger connection strengths and the corresponding frequencies show a stepwise decrease. Then we select specific values to plot the waveforms of the simple oscillation transition changes. states (I) to (IV) in Fig. 10d depict the change process of the slow wave oscillation gradually distorted by the combined effect of the memristor and k_{9}.
Then, we select the range values near the pathological state to draw the dynamic bifurcation diagram. From Fig. 11a, we get that 3SWDs is accompanied by the fold of cycle bifurcations and 4SWDs appears near the TR_{1} bifurcation point. Finally, with the disappearance of the limit cycle of LPC_{6}, the system enters the monostable state with this line and the low saturated firing appears. As shown in Fig. 11b, with the generation of HB_{1} point the system starts to transition to slow wave oscillation (I) and slowly evolves into waveform (II) with a stable limit cycle. Then an unstable limit cycle appear at point HB_{2}, at which time the waveform gradually evolves into state (III) and the waveform (IV) appears near LPC_{1}.
Discussion
Hundreds of millions of neurons are interconnected by synapses to form neural networks, and information is exchanged and propagated among neural networks through electrical signals [45,46,47]. Previous studies have proved that the complex electrophysiological state in the nervous system will inevitably produce electromagnetic fields, which will affect the electrical activity of neurons [48, 49]. However, it is not clear what kind of connection exists between electromagnetic induction and epilepsy. In this study, we found that electromagnetic induction affects the dynamic characteristics of epilepsy. In addition, our data show that the effect of the memristor is different for different pathways and models.
More and more evidence shows that network topology has a key influence on the collective behavior of neurons [12, 13, 50]. A previous study showed the importance of network topology for studying the spatiotemporal evolution of SWDs [12, 51]. In this study, we set up a singlecompartment and coupled cortical thalamic model, and revealed by bifurcation analysis that the activation and attenuation of SWDs can be realized when the activation level of any neuron changes. In the coupled model, regulating k_{i} (i = 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9), the system appeared with more firing states such as fast spike wave oscillations, 2SWDs, 3SWDs, and Multiple spike wave discharges. These results are consistent with previous studies, indicating that the coupled model may trigger more bifurcation mechanisms and lead to the diversification of pathological states [28, 32].
As we all know, electromagnetic induction has a serious influence on collective behavior in neural networks [52, 53]. We found that the memristor showed a certain therapeutic effect on typical SWDs by adjusting k_{i} (i = 1, 2, 6, 9) in a singlecompartment model. Specifically, electromagnetic induction makes the hopf point move, and the system transits to a larger monostable. Electromagnetic induction makes the stable point (HB) move, and the system transits to a wider monostable. Specifically, partial tonic discharge and rapid spike discharge of the system are reduced to normal discharge. Previous studies have reported similar findings, indicating that the presence of electromagnetic induction helps to inhibit the formation of absence seizures in the cortical thalamic system [54, 55]. Interestingly, in the pathway of cortical thalamus interaction (k_{3}, k_{5}, k_{7}), the memristor fails. The pathological SWD oscillation state is aggravated due to more LPC bifurcations in the system to form a multistable region. In the coupled model, we also found that the existence of electromagnetic induction can also change the location and stability of Hopf bifurcation point for k_{2}, k_{7} and k_{8}. We focus on the inhibitory projection from RETC and RE–RE (k_{6}, k_{9}). Combined with the dynamic mechanism, 3,4SWDs should be caused by torus bifurcation and multistable region of the system, while the slow wave oscillation with gradual distortion is mainly related to the position shift of Hopf bifurcation points and the inhibitory projection of RE–RE.
It should be noted that we limited the parameters and initial conditions of the memristor, and did not discuss the control strategy of the memristor, which is a limitation of our research. Secondly, the model we established is a simplified model in the macroscopic sense, and we should consider the basal ganglia and more nuclei in the future work.
Conclusion
Based on our findings and previous studies, the theory that the coupled model can trigger more discharge states has been more effectively supported. Furthermore, previous studies have proved that memristor can be used as an additional strategy to treat epilepsy. However, in this study, we use bifurcation analysis to study the dynamic changes of multiple pathways in singlecompartment and coupled models under electrical attraction. We observe that when the parameters of memristor are fixed, the choice of different brain regions may lead to the aggravation of the characteristics of absence seizures. Of course, this requires more clinical studies to test the theoretical results. We hope that our results can provide a testable hypothesis for the treatment of epilepsy patients in the future.
Availability of data and materials
All data generated or analysed during this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
Abbreviations
 HB:

Hopf bifurcations
 LPC:

Fold of cycle bifurcations
 TR:

Torus bifurcations
 EEG:

Electroencephalogram
 SWDs:

Spike and wave discharges
 PY:

Excitatory pyramidal neurons
 IN:

Inhibitory neurons
 TC:

Specific relay nucleus
 RE:

Thalamic reticular nucleus
References
Breakspear M, Roberts JA, Terry JR, Rodrigues S, Mahant N, Robinson PA. A unifying explanation of primary generalized seizures through nonlinear brain modeling and bifurcation analysis. Cereb Cortex. 2006;16(9):1296–313.
Marten F, Rodrigues S, Benjamin O, Richardson MP, Terry JR. Onset of polyspike complexes in a meanfield model of human electroencephalography and its application to absence epilepsy. Philos Trans Math Phys Eng Sci. 1891;2009(367):1145–61.
Marten F, Rodrigues S, Suffczynski P, Richardson MP, Terry JR. Derivation and analysis of an ordinary differential equation meanfield model for studying clinically recorded epilepsy dynamics. Phys Rev E. 2009;79(2):021911.
Grubov VV, Sitnikova E, Pavlov AN, Koronovskii AA, Hramov AE. Recognizing of stereotypic patterns in epileptic EEG using empirical modes and wavelets. Physica A. 2017;486:206–17.
Medvedeva TM, Sysoeva MV, Lüttjohann A, van Luijtelaar G, Sysoev IV. Dynamical mesoscale model of absence seizures in genetic models. PLoS ONE. 2020;15(9):e0239125.
Shen Z, Deng Z, Du L, Zhang H, Yan L, Xiao P. Control and analysis of epilepsy waveforms in a disinhibition model of cortex network. Nonlinear Dyn. 2021;103(2):2063–79.
Fan D, Wang Q. Synchronization and bursting transition of the coupled HindmarshRose systems with asymmetrical timedelays. Sci China Technol Sci. 2017;60(7):1019–31.
Frolov N, Maksimenko V, Lüttjohann A, Koronovskii A, Hramov A. Feedforward artificial neural network provides datadriven inference of functional connectivity. Chaos. 2019;29(9):091101.
Myers MH, Kozma R. Mesoscopic neuron population modeling of normal/epileptic brain dynamics. Cogn Neurodynamics. 2018;12(2):211–23.
Wang Z, Wang Q. Eliminating absence seizures through the deep brain stimulation to thalamus reticular nucleus. Front Comput Neurosci. 2017;11:22.
Taylor PN, Wang Y, Goodfellow M, Dauwels J, Moeller F, Stephani U, Baier G. A computational study of stimulus driven epileptic seizure abatement. PLoS ONE. 2014;9(12):e114316.
Fan D, Liao F, Wang Q. The pacemaker role of thalamic reticular nucleus in controlling spikewave discharges and spindles. Chaos. 2017;27(7):073103.
Wang Z, Wang Q. Stimulation strategies for absence seizures: targeted therapy of the focus in coupled thalamocortical model. Nonlinear Dyn. 2019;96(2):1649–63.
Zhang H, Shen Z, Zhao Q, Yan L, Du L, Deng Z. Dynamic transitions of epilepsy waveforms induced by astrocyte dysfunction and electrical stimulation. Neural Plast. 2020;2020:1–15.
Lv M, Wang C, Ren G, Ma J, Song X. Model of electrical activity in a neuron under magnetic flow effect. Nonlinear Dyn. 2016;85(3):1479–90.
Lv M, Ma J. Multiple modes of electrical activities in a new neuron model under electromagnetic radiation. Neurocomputing. 2016;205:375–81.
Xia Q, Yang JJ. Memristive crossbar arrays for braininspired computing. Nat Mater. 2019;18(4):309–23.
Vinaya M, Ignatius RP. Electromagnetic radiation from memristor applied to basal ganglia helps in controlling absence seizures. Nonlinear Dyn. 2020;101(4):2369–80.
Zhao J, Wang Q. The dynamical role of electromagnetic induction in epileptic seizures: a doubleedged sword. Nonlinear Dyn. 2021;106(1):975–88.
Suffczynski P, Kalitzin S, Da Lopes Silva FH. Dynamics of nonconvulsive epileptic phenomena modeled by a bistable neuronal network. Neuroscience. 2004;126(2):467–84.
Liu S, Wang Q. Transition dynamics of generalized multiple epileptic seizures associated with thalamic reticular nucleus excitability: a computational study. Commun Nonlinear Sci. 2017;52:203–13.
McCormick DA. Cortical and subcortical generators of normal and abnormal rhythmicity. Int Rev Neurobiol. 2002;49:99–114.
Yu T, Wang X, Li Y, Zhang G, Worrell G, Chauvel P, Ni D, Qiao L, Liu C, Li L, et al. Highfrequency stimulation of anterior nucleus of thalamus desynchronizes epileptic network in humans. Brain. 2018;141(9):2631–43.
Ruths J, Taylor PN, Dauwels J. Optimal control of an epileptic neural population model. IFAC Proc. 2014;47(3):3116–21.
Baier G, Taylor PN, Wang Y. Understanding epileptiform afterdischarges as rhythmic oscillatory transients. Front Comput Neurosci. 2017;11:25.
Chen M, Guo D, Wang T, Jing W, Xia Y, Xu P, Luo C, ValdesSosa PA, Yao D. Bidirectional control of absence seizures by the basal ganglia: a computational evidence. PLoS Comput Biol. 2014;10(3):e1003495.
Hu B, Guo D, Wang Q. Control of absence seizures induced by the pathways connected to SRN in corticothalamic system. Cogn Neurodyn. 2015;9(3):279–89.
Fan D, Zhang L, Wang Q. Transition dynamics and adaptive synchronization of timedelay interconnected corticothalamic systems via nonlinear control. Nonlinear Dyn. 2018;94(4):2807–25.
Fan D, Wang Q, Perc M. Disinhibitioninduced transitions between absence and tonicclonic epileptic seizures. Sci Rep. 2015;5(1):1–12.
Ge Y, Cao Y, Yi G, Han C, Qin Y, Wang J, Che Y. Robust closedloop control of spikeandwave discharges in a thalamocortical computational model of absence epilepsy. Sci Rep. 2019;9(1):1–16.
Bao H, Zhang Y, Liu W, Bao B. Memristor synapsecoupled memristive neuron network: synchronization transition and occurrence of chimera. Nonlinear Dyn. 2020;100(1):937–50.
Cao Y, He X, Hao Y, Wang Q. Transition dynamics of epileptic seizures in the coupled thalamocortical network model. Int J Bifurcat Chaos. 2018;28(08):1850104.
Fan D, Zheng Y, Yang Z, Wang Q. Improving control effects of absence seizures using singlepulse alternately resetting stimulation (SARS) of corticothalamic circuit. Appl Math Mech. 2020;41(9):1287–302.
McCafferty C, David F, Venzi M, Lőrincz ML, Delicata F, Atherton Z, Recchia G, Orban G, Lambert RC, Di Giovanni G, et al. Cortical drive and thalamic feedforward inhibition control thalamic output synchrony during absence seizures. Nat Neurosci. 2018;21(5):744–56.
Lewis LD, Voigts J, Flores FJ, Schmitt LI, Wilson MA, Halassa MM, Brown EN. Thalamic reticular nucleus induces fast and local modulation of arousal state. Elife. 2015;4:e08760.
Yan L, Zhang H, Sun Z, Shen Z. Control analysis of electrical stimulation for epilepsy waveforms in a thalamocortical network. J Theor Biol. 2020;504:110391.
Trinka E, Lattanzi S, Carpenter K, Corradetti T, Nucera B, Rinaldi F, Shankar R, Brigo F. Exploring the evidence for broadspectrum effectiveness of perampanel: a systematic review of clinical data in generalised seizures. CNS Drugs. 2021;35(8):821–37.
Gao Z, Yuan Z, Wang Z, Feng P. Modulation of astrocytes on mode selection of neuron firing driven by electromagnetic induction. Neural Plast. 2020;2020:1–18.
Yuan ZX, Feng PH, Du MM, Wu Y. Dynamical response of a neuron–astrocyte coupling system under electromagnetic induction and external stimulation. Chin Phys B. 2020;29(3):030504.
Guo S, Xu Y, Wang C, Jin W, Hobiny A, Ma J. Collective response, synapse coupling and field coupling in neuronal network. Chaos Solitons Fractals. 2017;105:120–7.
ZandiMehran N, Jafari S, Hashemi Golpayegani SMR, Nazarimehr F, Perc M. Different synaptic connections evoke different firing patterns in neurons subject to an electromagnetic field. Nonlinear Dyn. 2020;100(2):1809–24.
Haghighi HS, Markazi AHD. Dynamic origin of spike and wave discharges in the brain. Neuroimage. 2019;197:69–79.
Benjamin O, Fitzgerald TH, Ashwin P, TsanevaAtanasova K, Chowdhury F, Richardson MP, Terry JR. A phenomenological model of seizure initiation suggests network structure may explain seizure frequency in idiopathic generalised epilepsy. J Math Neurosci. 2012;2(1):1–30.
Douw L, van Dellen E, de Groot M, Heimans JJ, Klein M, Stam CJ, Reijneveld JC. Epilepsy is related to theta band brain connectivity and network topology in brain tumor patients. BMC Neurosci. 2010;11(1):1–10.
Lin H, Wang C, Tan Y. Hidden extreme multistability with hyperchaos and transient chaos in a Hopfield neural network affected by electromagnetic radiation. Nonlinear Dyn. 2020;99(3):2369–86.
Wen S, Hu R, Yang Y, Huang T, Zeng Z, Song YD. Memristorbased echo state network with online least mean square. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern Syst. 2018;49(9):1787–96.
Ge M, Lu L, Xu Y, Zhan X, Yang L, Jia Y. Effects of electromagnetic induction on signal propagation and synchronization in multilayer HindmarshRose neural networks. Eur Phys J Spec Top. 2019;228(11):2455–64.
Wu F, Wang C, Jin W, Ma J. Dynamical responses in a new neuron model subjected to electromagnetic induction and phase noise. Physica A. 2017;469:81–8.
Etémé AS, Tabi CB, Beyala Ateba JF, Ekobena Fouda HP, Mohamadou A, Crépin KT. Chaos break and synchrony enrichment within Hindmarsh–Rosetype memristive neural models. Nonlinear Dyn. 2021;105(1):785–95.
Meeren HKM, Pijn JPM, Van Luijtelaar ELJM, Coenen AML, da Lopes Silva FH. Cortical focus drives widespread corticothalamic networks during spontaneous absence seizures in rats. J Neurosci. 2002;22(4):1480–95.
Shi X, Wang Z, Zhuang L. Spatiotemporal pattern in a neural network with nonsmooth memristor. Electron Res Arch. 2022;30(2):715–31.
Wu F, Gu H, Li Y. Inhibitory electromagnetic induction current induces enhancement instead of reduction of neural bursting activities. Commun Nonlinear Sci. 2019;79:104924.
Usha K, Subha PA. HindmarshRose neuron model with memristors. Biosystems. 2019;178:1–9.
Yan B, Li P. An integrative view of mechanisms underlying generalized spikeandwave epileptic seizures and its implication on optimal therapeutic treatments. PLoS ONE. 2011;6(7):e22440.
Kalitzin S, Petkov G, Suffczynski P, Grigorovsky V, Bardakjian BL, da Lopes Silva F, Carlen PL. Epilepsy as a manifestation of a multistate network of oscillatory systems. Neurobiol Dis. 2019;130:104488.
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank the anonymous referees for their efforts and valuable comments.
Funding
This work was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 11502139, 11871377 and 12071274). No funding bodies were involved in the design of the study, writing of the manuscript, or the collection, analysis, and interpretation of data.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
YS, YChen and YChai contributed to the conception and design of the study. YS, YChen, HZ and YChai acquired the data and performed the data analysis. YS, YChen, HZ and YChai interpreted the results. YS, YChen and YChai drafted the manuscript. YS, YChen and YChai edited and revised the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics approval and consent to participate
Not applicable.
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
About this article
Cite this article
Sun, Y., Chen, Y., Zhang, H. et al. Dynamic effect of electromagnetic induction on epileptic waveform. BMC Neurosci 23, 78 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s1286802200768y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s1286802200768y