Skip to main content
Download PDF

Changes of cerebral cortical structure and cognitive dysfunction in “healthy hemisphere” after stroke: a study about cortical complexity and sulcus patterns in bilateral ischemic adult moyamoya disease

BMC Neuroscience volume 22, Article number: 66 (2021) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Moyamoya disease (MMD) is an uncommon cerebrovascular disease which leads to progressive stenosis and occlusion of the bilateral internal carotid artery and main intracerebral arteries. Concerns are always on how the hemisphere with infarction affects cognitive function, while little attention is paid to the role that the non-infarcted hemisphere plays. Therefore, we aimed to detect cortical indexes, especially cortical complexity in the left or right hemisphere separately in patients with MMD after stroke.

Methods

28 patients with MMD (14 males, 14 females) and 14 healthy controls were included in this study. All participants underwent cognitive tests and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scan. The preprocessing of three-dimensional T1 weighted images were performed by standard surface-based morphometry. Surface-based morphometry statistical analysis was carried out with a threshold of False Discovery Rate (FDR) P < 0.05 and fractal dimension (FD) was used to provide a quantitative description of cerebral cortical complexity.

Results

Widespread cognitive dysfunctions were found in MMD patient with stroke. Extensive FD reduction in the left hemisphere with right-sided infarction, mainly in the superior temporal, inferior frontal, and insula, while the post central gyrus, superior parietal, and inferior parietal gyrus also showed a wide range of significant differences (FDR corrected P < 0.05). Meanwhile, FD changes in the right hemisphere with left-sided infarction are restricted to the precuneus and cingulate isthmus (FDR corrected P < 0.05).

Conclusions

Extensive cognitive impairment was reconfirmed in Moyamoya disease with stroke, while wild and asymmetrical decrease of cortical complexity is observed on both sides. These differences could be relative to unbalanced cognitive dysfunction, and may be the result of a long-term chronic ischemia and compensatory of the contralateral hemisphere to the infarction.

Peer Review reports

Background

Moyamoya disease (MMD) is an uncommon cerebrovascular disease which leads to progressive stenosis and occlusion of the bilateral internal carotid artery, middle cerebral artery, anterior artery and even posterior artery [1]. The outcome is often severe cerebrovascular accidents, especially cerebral infarction. The mechanism of physical function injury and recovery in patients with cerebral infarction has been widely studied. So, more and more researchers begin to focus on relatively undetectable cognitive dysfunction. Previous studies have found that the proportion of cognitive injury caused by cerebral infarction is as high as 30–50% [2, 3], and cognitive recovery of post-stroke within 6 month is less optimistic [4]. Cognitive impairment can have a significant impact on quality of life and daily life activities by reducing the degree of independence of individuals [5], and is associated with long-term occupancy and disability, so it should be more thoroughly studied. Concerns are always on how the hemisphere with infarctions affects cognitive function, while little attention is paid to the role that the non-infarcted hemisphere plays.

In previous studies, both gray matter and white matter were found to be secondary impaired to varying degrees in patients with MMD without stroke [6,7,8], and different types of cognitive dysfunction are relative to cortical or subcortical impairments [9]. However, it was interesting to see if the relatively “healthy hemispheres” of patients with infarction also had similar changes. Therefore, we aimed to detect the cortical indexes such as gyrification index (GI), cortical complexity, cortical thickness and sulcus depth in the relatively normal left or right hemisphere separately in patients with MMD after stroke with surface-based morphometry (SBM), by means of neuroimaging, especially volumetric T1 in Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI), which is a non-invasive method to study brain structure.

Brain structure analysis generally used voxel-based morphometry (VBM) to investigate changes in gray matter (GM) [10]. However, this well-established method needs a whole brain structural analysis that examines local changes in gray matter volume (GMV), not for left or right hemisphere respectively. Freesurfer [11] is another well-known toolbox to progress and analysis structural MRI data for its high accuracy and separation, while it cost too much time (about 6–8 h) for each subject. Therefore, we seek another toolbox named Computational Anatomy Toolbox 12 (CAT12) [12] with both advantages of VBM and Freesurfer. There is evidence [13] suggesting that although cortical thickness estimations were systematically higher in CAT12, CAT12 delivers accurate cortical estimates and can be considered a fast and reliable alternative to FreeSurfer. Meanwhile, unlike FreeSurfer, CAT12 can reconstruct the central surface directly by using projection-based thickness (PBT) method [14]. Numbers of studies [15,16,17] have been carried out with CAT12 and the results were fairly reliable.

The concept of fractal dimension (FD) has been largely used to describe the geometric properties of complex objects made up of parts that are similar to the whole in some ways [18]. Fractal dimension was thought to be a great sensitivity to detect cortical atrophy and age-related effects [19, 20], and provided distinct information from traditional indices such as cortical thickness and gyrification in all kinds of psychiatric diseases [21,22,23,24,25,26].Cortical complexity can be considered a measure of gyrification by combining multifactorial messages from folding frequency, sulcal depth, convolution of gyral shape, and cortical thickness into a single value [27, 28]. It reflects properties such as dendrite complexity and synaptic density, which are highly correlated with cognitive ability.

We hypothesized that cerebral infarction in unilateral hemisphere resulted in significant cognitive impairment and that cortical surface index changes could be found in the non-infarcted hemisphere. These changes may be asymmetrical and associated with the type or location of cognitive impairments. Cortical complexity may be one of the most characteristic changes, reflecting long-term cerebral ischemia and cognitive compensation on the non-infarcted side.

Results

Cognitive test

In the left hemisphere with right -sided infarction, compared with the control group, there was a statistical difference in the mental rotation (ROT), while there were significant statistical differences in Raven's Standard Progressive Matrices (RSPM), verbal working memory 2 (VWM2), simple subtraction (SUB), complex subtraction (COMSUB) and word-memory (WORDM). Meanwhile, in the right hemisphere with left-sided infarction, compared with the control group, there were statistical differences in RSPM, SUB, WORDM, and PICTM, whereas there were significant statistical differences in ROT, COMSUB, VWM1, and VWM2. See Table 1 for details.

Table 1 Cognitive results of patients and controls
Full size table

SBM analysis

On the one hand, MMD demonstrated extensive FD reduction in the left hemisphere with right -sided infarction, mainly in the superior temporal, inferior frontal, and insula, while the post central gyrus, superior parietal, and inferior parietal gyrus also showed a wide range of significant differences (TFCE, FDR corrected P < 0.05). On the other hand, changes in the right hemisphere with left-sided infarction are restricted to the precuneus and cingulate isthmus (TFCE, FDR corrected P < 0.05). No matter left or right infarction, significant reductions in FD were observed in the contralateral precuneus, post central gyrus, and cingulate isthmus. No positive results are found in correlation analyses between Suzuki stages and FD. See Tables 2, 3 and Fig. 1 for more details.

Table 2 Participants information
Full size table
Table 3 Cortical areas of decreased cortical complexity in MMD patients with right or left infarction compared to controls
Full size table
Fig. 1
figure 1

Cortical areas of decreased cortical complexity in MMD patients (TFCE, FDR corrected P < 0.05). Left hemisphere stands for the unilateral left hemisphere of patients with right infarction and Right hemisphere stands for the unilateral right hemisphere of patients with right infarction

Full size image

Conversely, significant differences in gyrification, sulcus depth and cortical thickness were not observed in the relatively healthy hemispheres (TFCE, FDR corrected P < 0.05). However, using a less rigorous statistical threshold (TFCE, uncorrected P < 0.001), decreased sulcus depth areas with significant differences in posterior cingulate, isthmus cingulate in the right with left-sided infarction and superior parietal, inferior parietal in the left with right-sided infarction can be observed. No positive results are observed in correlation analyses between Suzuki stages and sulcus depth. More information in detail could be found in Fig. 2.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Cortical areas of decreased sulcus depth in MMD patients (TFCE, uncorrected P < 0.001). Left hemisphere stands for the unilateral left hemisphere of patients with right infarction and Right hemisphere stands for the unilateral right hemisphere of patients with right infarction

Full size image

Discussion

Our study is the first one using morphological analysis to evaluate the gray matter microstructure rather than volume in the contralateral hemisphere to the infarction separately in adult MMD. In precious study, just two related articles showed morphological changes in adult MMD. Through FSL (FSL-VBM, version 4.1, http://www.fmrib.ox.ac.uk/fsl), Ken Kazumata [8] has found decreased gray matter density in the bilateral posterior cingulate cortex, but lack of surface indexes analysis and explanation. Next, decreased volume of corpus callosum, bilateral subcortical nuclei (thalamus, putamen, caudate), and hippocampus are observed following revascularization surgery using Freesurfer (version 5.1.0; surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu) [9]. However, only volume and cortical thickness are estimated. Apart from these two studies, no more attention was paid to brain structure recently especially gray matter in MMD. Therefore, we refer some other mental diseases and neuropathies for our discussion.

Not surprisingly, many cognitive impairments were found in patients with MMD due to cerebral infarction on one side of the brain, while morphological changes in the contralateral side of non-infarction also existed. Cortical changes in the left hemisphere appear to be more widespread than in the right. This led us to wonder if the difference between dominant and non-dominant hemispheres can fully explain the phenomenon. In the following parts, we will discuss each indicator with significant differences in detail.

Deeply analyzing the results of cognitive function, verbal working memory and picture-memory deficits are greater in patients with left infarction than the right side, while simple subtraction, intelligence and word-memory are similarly worse in patients with right infarction than the left side. For the difference of left and right lesions, we suspect that it is related to whether the lesions touch the dominant hemisphere of a certain cognitive function. Previous studies have reported that patients with left hemisphere cerebral infarction have a worse prognosis [29,30,31]. In a cognitive study involving nine sub-tests [32], cognitive impairment and sleep quality impairment caused by middle cerebral artery stroke were observed in the left and right hemispheres, regardless of gender. In another previous study investigating motor observation and imagination ability of hemispheric stroke patients [33], patients with left subcortical lesions recruited more cortical regions when processing motor images and videos, suggesting that lesions in the dominant hemisphere had a greater impact on the motor system. However, another recent studies [34, 35] showed that visuospatial working memory deficits were greater in patients with right hemisphere infarction than in patients with left hemisphere infarction. Similarly, studies [36] have shown that imaginative psychology, such as mental rotation, tends to be biased towards the right hemisphere. These studies all prove that there is asymmetry in cognitive impairment, and the asymmetry of different cognitive functions may be an important reason for the distinguish in the degree of impairment.

The decrease of FD reflects lower cortical complexity, which may be related to the unreduced cortical thickness and cognitive impairment. In a study of FD value of human cortical surface [27], researchers found a negative correlation between cortical FD value and cortical thickness. The frequency of folds and convolution of gyral shape will increase, rather than deepen sulcal regions when the FD is increased in cerebral cortex. This is consistent with previous findings [37] that cortical cellular growth would occur preferentially along tangential axes which is the path of least resistance. These previous findings are according with our result. Cortical complexity has also been proved to be correlated with cognitive function and age [38]. The complexity of adult cerebral cortex is lower than that of adolescents [39], and the complex shape of cortical surface is significantly related to intelligence and education level. In our study, there were more reasons to suspect that reduction of cortical complexity could be caused by long-term ischemic states of bilateral hemispheres due to chronic stenosis or occlusion of intracarotid artery and/or middle brain artery which is characteristic of MMD, while more evidences of blood flow combined with cognitive function are needed to prove our hypothesis.

Limitations

Our study also had some limitations. Firstly, the small sample limited the wildly use of our results, and a larger number of samples were needed to support our conclusions. Secondly, we studied bilateral ischemic Moyamoya disease with stroke, and the effect of stroke on cognition has been clearly demonstrated. However, further study of the contribution to cognitive impairment of the relatively healthy cerebral hemisphere is required. Third, due to the different size and location of cerebral infarction, quantitative measurement cannot be carried out, so we can only roughly remove the injured side of the cerebral hemisphere in our study. These patients have yet to be studied using more advancing methods to investigate the mechanisms of cognitive impairment. Finally, restricted to the small sample size, correlation analyses between vascular stages and SBM parameters do not provide a strong power. Larger sample sizes are needed to prove the relationship and presumption in discussion part.

Conclusions

Extensive cognitive impairment was reconfirmed in Moyamoya disease with stroke, while wild FD decrease, on behalf of cortical complexity, was asymmetrical on both sides. These differences could cause unbalanced cognitive dysfunction in unilateral hemisphere separately, and may be the result of a long-term chronic ischemia and compensatory of the contralateral hemisphere to the infarction.

Method

Participants

This prospective study was approved by the research ethics committee of Beijing Tiantan Hospital affiliated to Capital Medical University (KYSQ2019-058-01). Written informed consent was obtained from all participants. The study included 28 patients with MMD (14 males, 14 females) from the Neurosurgery Department of Beijing Tiantan Hospital which is affiliated to the Capital Medical University and Peking University International Hospital between October 2018 and December 2019. Moreover, the control group included 14 volunteers (7 males, 7 females). There was no significant difference in age, education level, sex composition, and risk factors between patient group and control group (P > 0.10). More details of statistical result could be found in Table 2.

The inclusion criteria of patients were as follows: (1) All patients should follow the Guidelines for Diagnosis and Treatment of Moyamoya Disease (Spontaneous Occlusion of the Circle of Willis), the research committee on the pathology and treatment of spontaneous occlusion of the circle of Willis; [40] (2) In the MMD patients group, there must be previous ischemic or hemorrhagic attack in only either left or right hemisphere more than 3 months but less than 6 months ago, but no new ischemic or hemorrhagic attack within 3 months. The lesion area should be more than 1.5 cm; (3) Righthand dominance; (4) Being free of dementia, or depression; and (5) no major psychiatric disease or other medical conditions.

The exclusion criteria of patients were as follows: (1) Acute stage of cerebral infarction within 3 month or any infarction happened in both hemispheres, other neuropsychiatric diseases and severe systemic diseases (e.g., AD, Parkinson’s disease); (2) Any contraindications for MR scans (e.g., metal implants); (3) Manifestation of any medications that could affect cognitive abilities; (4) Fatigue or hunger; (5) An inability to complete tasks independently.

By means of social recruitment, we released recruitment advertisements for the control group. By asking medical history, we recorded clinical variables such as age, sex and past medical history, and conducted cognitive test after MRI examination. 14 people were finally included in the control group and matched with the MMD group.

Inclusion criteria for the control group were as follows: no clinical evidence of psychiatric or neurological disease, no brain damage on routine MRI, and no history of drugs use that could affect cognitive function.

MRI parameters

MRI data were obtained using a 3.0-Tesla MR system (Verio A Tim + Dot System, Siemens, Germany). Volumetric T1 (three-dimension, 3D) gradient echo was acquired with a thickness of 1.0 mm (Voxel size = 1.0 × 1.0 × 1.0 mm, flip angle = 8°, time of repetition (TR) = 2300 ms, time of echo (TE) = 3.25 ms, matrix = 256 × 256, FOV = 250 × 250 mm, FOV phase = 100%). T2-weighted images were acquired with a thickness of 8 mm (flip angle = 150 degrees, TR = 5000 ms, TE = 98 ms, FOV = 220 × 220 mm).

Neuropsychological assessments

For the neurocognitive function test, we adopted the method of Liu et al. [7]. All cognitive assessment programs were tested using the Online Psychological Experimental System. The participants were tested using computer workstations by only one neuropsychologist who was blinded to the clinical data. The interval time between the neuropsychological test and MRI examination was less than 3 days. More specific details about the neurocognitive function test could be found in the Additional file 1.

Surface-based morphometry analysis

The structural MRI data preprocessing was performed in a standard manner by Computational Anatomy Toolbox 12 (CAT12, http://www.neuro.unijena.de/cat/,version r1450) in statistical parametric mapping 12 (SPM12, http://www.fil.ion.ucl.ac.uk/spm/software/spm12/, version 7219) using MATLAB 2014b software (MathWorks, Natick, Massachusetts, USA). The CAT12 toolbox for SPM contains a series of fully automated pipelines for processing surface-based morphometry that allows the measurement of cortical thickness and reconstruction of the central surface in one step. Secondly, before and after progressing, all images are checked though “Check data quality” in CAT12 in order to ensure the image quality and homogeneity. Then, central surface parameters, such as gyrification index(GI) [41], FD [42] and sulcus depth, are then extracted or calculated for both hemispheres respectively which is described in Yotter [42] and Louders [41]. The GI and FD were computed following the manual established by Gaser and Kurth (http://www.neuro.unijena.de/cat12/CAT12-Manual.pdf). At last, all surface measures for both hemispheres were merged and resampled to a higher resolution mesh (164 k) that is compatible with Freesurfer data. Resample and Smooth with a Gaussian kernel of 15 mm are performed for all surface-based parameters for both hemispheres separately, prior to the second-level analyses.

Statistical analysis

The analyses of clinical characteristics were conducted using ANOVA for age, education and a χ2 test for sex ratio and medical history. Two-sample t-test was used for cognitive results for left and right hemispheres groups separately. All above were analyzed in SPSS 19.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, Illinois, USA).

To determine differences between groups, a two-sample t-test was performed through the batch-mode implemented in SPM12, adjusting for total intracranial volume (TIV) as covariates of no interest. Contrasts were processed using 5000 times displacement test after Threshold-Free Cluster Enhancement (TFCE) [43] and statistical significance was defined as P < 0.05 FDR (False Discovery Rate) corrected for cortical complexity or uncorrected P < 0.001 for gyrification index, cortical thickness and sulcus depth. All significant results were presented on Desikan-Killiany Atlas (DKA) template for left or right hemisphere respectively [44].

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Abbreviations

MMD:

Moyamoya disease

SBM:

Surface-based morphometry

MRI:

Magnetic Resonance Imaging

VBM:

Voxel-based morphometry

GMV:

Gray matter volume

TFCE:

Threshold-Free Cluster Enhancement

WM:

White matter

PBT:

Projection-based thickness

SPM:

Statistical Parametric Mapping software

DKA:

Desikan-Killiany Atlas

SD:

Standard deviation

CRT_RT/ACC:

Choice reaction time_ reaction time/ accuracy

RSPM:

Raven's Standard Progressive Matrices

ROT:

Mental rotation

VWM:

Verbal working memory

SUB:

Simple subtraction

COMSUB:

Complex subtraction

WORDM:

Word-memory

PICTM:

Picture-memory

EXCUT:

Executive function

VBM:

Voxel-based morphometry

MRI:

Magnetic Resonance Imaging

CAT12:

Computational Anatomy Toolbox 12

GI:

Gyrification index

FD:

Fractal dimension

CT:

Cortical thickness

FDR:

False Discovery Rate

PD:

Parkinson disease

References

  1. Kuroda S, Houkin K. Moyamoya disease: current concepts and future perspectives. Lancet Neurol. 2008;7(11):1056–66.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Pendlebury ST, Rothwell PM. Prevalence, incidence, and factors associated with pre-stroke and post-stroke dementia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Neurol. 2009;8(11):1006–18.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Henon H, Durieu I, Guerouaou D, Lebert F, Pasquier F, Leys D. Poststroke dementia: incidence and relationship to prestroke cognitive decline. Neurology. 2001;57(7):1216–22.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Mellon L, Brewer L, Hall P, Horgan F, Williams D, Hickey A, et al. Cognitive impairment six months after ischaemic stroke: a profile from the ASPIRE-S study. BMC Neurol. 2015;15:31.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Douiri A, Rudd AG, Wolfe CD. Prevalence of poststroke cognitive impairment: South London Stroke Register 1995–2010. Stroke. 2013;44(1):138–45.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Kazumata K, Tha KK, Narita H, Ito YM, Shichinohe H, Ito M, et al. Characteristics of diffusional kurtosis in chronic ischemia of adult moyamoya disease: comparing diffusional kurtosis and diffusion tensor imaging. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2016;37(8):1432–9.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Liu Z, He S, Xu Z, Duan R, Yuan L, Xiao C, et al. Association between white matter impairment and cognitive dysfunction in patients with ischemic Moyamoya disease. BMC Neurol. 2020;20(1):302.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Kazumata K, Tha KK, Narita H, Kusumi I, Shichinohe H, Ito M, et al. Chronic ischemia alters brain microstructural integrity and cognitive performance in adult moyamoya disease. Stroke. 2015;46(2):354–60.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Kazumata K, Tha KK, Tokairin K, Ito M, Uchino H, Kawabori M, et al. Brain structure, connectivity, and cognitive changes following revascularization surgery in adult moyamoya disease. Neurosurgery. 2019;85(5):E943–52.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Fox KC, Nijeboer S, Dixon ML, Floman JL, Ellamil M, Rumak SP, et al. Is meditation associated with altered brain structure? A systematic review and meta-analysis of morphometric neuroimaging in meditation practitioners. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2014;43:48–73.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Fischl B, Dale AM. Measuring the thickness of the human cerebral cortex from magnetic resonance images. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000;97(20):11050–5.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Ziegler G, Dahnke R, Gaser C. Alzheimer’s disease neuroimaging I. Models of the aging brain structure and individual decline. Front Neuroinform. 2012;6:3.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Seiger R, Ganger S, Kranz GS, Hahn A, Lanzenberger R. Cortical thickness estimations of freesurfer and the CAT12 toolbox in patients with Alzheimer’s disease and healthy controls. J Neuroimaging. 2018;28(5):515–23.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Dahnke R, Yotter RA, Gaser C. Cortical thickness and central surface estimation. Neuroimage. 2013;65:336–48.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Hedderich DM, Bauml JG, Berndt MT, Menegaux A, Scheef L, Daamen M, et al. Aberrant gyrification contributes to the link between gestational age and adult IQ after premature birth. Brain. 2019;142(5):1255–69.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Ni MF, Wang XM, Wang HY, Chang Y, Huang XF, Zhang BW. Regional cortical thinning and cerebral hypoperfusion in patients with panic disorder. J Affect Disord. 2020;277:138–45.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Lu J, Yuan L, Jin J, Yang S, Zhang W, Li M, et al. Brain cortical complexity and subcortical morphometrics in lifelong premature ejaculation. Front Hum Neurosci. 2020;14:283.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Havlin S, Buldyrev SV, Goldberger AL, Mantegna RN, Ossadnik SM, Peng CK, et al. Fractals in biology and medicine. Chaos Solitons Fractals. 1995;6:171–201.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Madan CR, Kensinger EA. Cortical complexity as a measure of age-related brain atrophy. Neuroimage. 2016;134:617–29.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Madan CR, Kensinger EA. Age-related differences in the structural complexity of subcortical and ventricular structures. Neurobiol Aging. 2017;50:87–95.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Nenadic I, Yotter RA, Sauer H, Gaser C. Cortical surface complexity in frontal and temporal areas varies across subgroups of schizophrenia. Hum Brain Mapp. 2014;35(4):1691–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Sandu AL, Rasmussen IA Jr, Lundervold A, Kreuder F, Neckelmann G, Hugdahl K, et al. Fractal dimension analysis of MR images reveals grey matter structure irregularities in schizophrenia. Comput Med Imaging Graph. 2008;32(2):150–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Ha TH, Yoon U, Lee KJ, Shin YW, Lee JM, Kim IY, et al. Fractal dimension of cerebral cortical surface in schizophrenia and obsessive-compulsive disorder. Neurosci Lett. 2005;384(1–2):172–6.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Li X, Jiang J, Zhu W, Yu C, Sui M, Wang Y, et al. Asymmetry of prefrontal cortical convolution complexity in males with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder using fractal information dimension. Brain Dev. 2007;29(10):649–55.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Squarcina L, De Luca A, Bellani M, Brambilla P, Turkheimer FE, Bertoldo A. Fractal analysis of MRI data for the characterization of patients with schizophrenia and bipolar disorder. Phys Med Biol. 2015;60(4):1697–716.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Zhao G, Denisova K, Sehatpour P, Long J, Gui W, Qiao J, et al. Fractal dimension analysis of subcortical gray matter structures in schizophrenia. PLoS ONE. 2016;11(5):e0155415.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Im K, Lee JM, Yoon U, Shin YW, Hong SB, Kim IY, et al. Fractal dimension in human cortical surface: multiple regression analysis with cortical thickness, sulcal depth, and folding area. Hum Brain Mapp. 2006;27(12):994–1003.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. King RD, Brown B, Hwang M, Jeon T, George AT. Alzheimer’s disease neuroimaging I. Fractal dimension analysis of the cortical ribbon in mild Alzheimer’s disease. Neuroimage. 2010;53(2):471–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Hedna VS, Bodhit AN, Ansari S, Falchook AD, Stead L, Heilman KM, et al. Hemispheric differences in ischemic stroke: is left-hemisphere stroke more common? J Clin Neurol. 2013;9(2):97–102.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Naess H, Waje-Andreassen U, Thomassen L, Myhr KM. High incidence of infarction in the left cerebral hemisphere among young adults. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2006;15(6):241–4.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Rodriguez Hernandez SA, Kroon AA, van Boxtel MP, Mess WH, Lodder J, Jolles J, et al. Is there a side predilection for cerebrovascular disease? Hypertension. 2003;42(1):56–60.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Wahid D, Rabbani H, Inam A, Akhtar Z. A hemispheric comparison of cognitive dysfunction and sleep quality impairment in Middle Cerebral Artery infarction. Pak J Med Sci. 2020;36(3):511–5.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Dettmers C, Nedelko V, Schoenfeld MA. Impact of left versus right hemisphere subcortical stroke on the neural processing of action observation and imagery. Restor Neurol Neurosci. 2015;33(5):701–12.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Malouin F, Richards CL, Durand A. Slowing of motor imagery after a right hemispheric stroke. Stroke Res Treat. 2012;2012:297217.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Malouin F, Jackson PL, Richards CL. Towards the integration of mental practice in rehabilitation programs. A critical review. Front Hum Neurosci. 2013;7:576.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Corballis MC, Sergent J. Hemispheric specialization for mental rotation. Cortex. 1989;25(1):15–25.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Van Essen DC. A tension-based theory of morphogenesis and compact wiring in the central nervous system. Nature. 1997;385(6614):313–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Mustafa N, Ahearn TS, Waiter GD, Murray AD, Whalley LJ, Staff RT. Brain structural complexity and life course cognitive change. Neuroimage. 2012;61(3):694–701.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Sandu AL, Izard E, Specht K, Beneventi H, Lundervold A, Ystad M. Post-adolescent developmental changes in cortical complexity. Behav Brain Funct. 2014;10:44.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Research Committee on the Pathology and Treatment of Spontaneous Occlusion of the Circle of Willis; Health Labour Sciences Research Grant for Research on Measures for Infractable Diseases. Guidelines for diagnosis and treatment of moyamoya disease (spontaneous occlusion of the circle of willis). Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo). 2012;52(5):245–66. https://doi.org/10.2176/nmc.52.245.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Luders E, Thompson PM, Narr KL, Toga AW, Jancke L, Gaser C. A curvature-based approach to estimate local gyrification on the cortical surface. Neuroimage. 2006;29(4):1224–30.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Yotter RA, Nenadic I, Ziegler G, Thompson PM, Gaser C. Local cortical surface complexity maps from spherical harmonic reconstructions. Neuroimage. 2011;56(3):961–73.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Smith SM, Nichols TE. Threshold-free cluster enhancement: addressing problems of smoothing, threshold dependence and localisation in cluster inference. Neuroimage. 2009;44(1):83–98.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Desikan RS, Segonne F, Fischl B, Quinn BT, Dickerson BC, Blacker D, et al. An automated labeling system for subdividing the human cerebral cortex on MRI scans into gyral based regions of interest. Neuroimage. 2006;31(3):968–80.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Thank Star South for her continuingly lovely songs every day. And thank my roommates, Peng Wang, Zhiming Liu, Xiaojie Li, Bowei Xiao and Big brother for their help and supports on my work.

Funding

None.

Author information

Author notes

  1. Ziqi Liu and Shihao He contributed equally to this work

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Neurosurgery, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100070, China

    Ziqi Liu, Shihao He, Yanchang Wei, Ning Ma, Rong Wang & Xiaoyuan Liu

  2. Center of Stroke, Beijing Institute for Brain Disorders, Beijing, 10069, China

    Rong Wang

  3. Department of Neurosurgery, Peking University International Hospital, Beijing, 102206, China

    Ran Duan & Rong Wang

  4. Collaborative Innovation Center of Assessment for Basic Education Quality, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, 100875, China

    Cai Zhang & Tian Li

  5. Department of Radiology, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China

    Xin Lou

Authors
  1. Ziqi Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Shihao He
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Yanchang Wei
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Ran Duan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Cai Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Tian Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Ning Ma
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Xin Lou
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Rong Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Xiaoyuan Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

RW, ZL, SH had full access to all data in the study and take responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis. Study concept and design were performed by RW, ZL and SH. Acquisition of MRI and clinical data performed by ZL, ZX, RD and XY. The neuropsychological cognitive test was carried out by ZL, SH, TL and LY. Analysis and interpretation of data performed by ZL, SH, RD. Drafting of the manuscript performed SH, RD, ZL, ZX, NM and XL. Critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content performed by RW, ZL, SH, and RD. Statistical analysis performed by ZL, SH, NM and XL. The study supervision performed by RD, XY and RW. All authors have read and approved the manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Rong Wang or Xiaoyuan Liu.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This prospective study was performed in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the research ethics committee of Beijing Tiantan Hospital affiliated to Capital Medical University (KYSQ2019-058-01). Written informed consent was obtained from all participants.

Consent for publication

Written informed consent for publication was obtained from all participants.

Competing interests

There are no conflicts of interest to declare.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1.

Neuropsychological assessments.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Liu, Z., He, S., Wei, Y. et al. Changes of cerebral cortical structure and cognitive dysfunction in “healthy hemisphere” after stroke: a study about cortical complexity and sulcus patterns in bilateral ischemic adult moyamoya disease. BMC Neurosci 22, 66 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12868-021-00672-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12868-021-00672-x

Keywords

BMC Neuroscience

ISSN: 1471-2202

Contact us