Ziegler M. New perspectives on faking in personality assessment. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2012.
Google Scholar
Gucciardi DF, Jalleh G, Donovan RJ. Does social desirability influence the relationship between doping attitudes and doping susceptibility in athletes? Psychol Sport Exerc. 2010;11(6):479–86.
Article
Google Scholar
Greenwald AG, McGhee DE, Schwartz JLK. Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: the implicit association test. J Personal Soc Psychol. 1998;74(6):1464–80.
Article
CAS
Google Scholar
Fazio RH, Olson MA. Implicit measures in social cognition research: their meaning and use. Annu Rev Psychol. 2003;54:297–327.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Greenwald AG, Poehlman TA, Uhlmann EL, Banaji MR. Understanding and using the implicit association test: III. Meta-analysis of predictive validity. J Personal Soc Psychol. 2009;97(1):17–41.
Article
Google Scholar
Wolff W, Schindler S, Brand R. The effect of implicitly incentivized faking on explicit and implicit measures of doping attitude: when athletes want to pretend an even more negative attitude to doping. PLoS One. 2015;10(4):e0118507.
Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Brand R, Wolff W, Thieme D. Using response-time latencies to measure athletes’ doping attitudes: the brief implicit attitude test identifies substance abuse in bodybuilders. Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy. 2014;9(36):1–10.
Google Scholar
Fiedler K, Bluemke M. Faking the IAT: aided and unaided response control on the implicit association tests. Basic Appl Soc Psychol. 2005;27(4):307–16.
Article
Google Scholar
Kim DY. Voluntary controllability of the implicit association test (IAT). Soc Psychol Q. 2003;66(1):83–96.
Article
Google Scholar
Cvencek D, Greenwald AG, Brown AS, Gray NS, Snowden RJ. Faking of the implicit association test is statistically detectable and partly correctable. Basic Appl Soc Psychol. 2010;32(4):302–14.
Article
Google Scholar
Roehner J, Schroeder-Abe M, Schuetz A. Exaggeration is harder than understatement, but practice makes perfect! Faking success in the IAT. Exp Psychol. 2011;58(6):464–72.
Article
Google Scholar
Roehner J, Schroeder-Abe M, Schuetz A. What do fakers actually do to fake the IAT? An investigation of faking strategies under different faking conditions. J Res Pers. 2013;47(4):330–8.
Article
Google Scholar
Johnson RJ, Barnhardt J, Zhu J. Differential effects of practice on the executive processes used for truthful and deceptive responses: an event-related brain potential study. Brain Res Cogn Brain Res. 2005;24(3):386–404 (Epub 2005 Apr 2007).
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Johnson RJ, Henkell H, Simon E, Zhu J. The self in conflict: the role of executive processes during truthful and deceptive responses about attitudes. Neuroimage. 2008;39(1):469–82 (Epub 2007 Aug 2031).
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Johnson RJ, Simon EJ, Henkell H, Zhu J. The role of episodic memory in controlled evaluative judgments about attitudes: an event-related potential study. Neuropsychologia. 2011;49(5):945–60.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Hu X, Wu H, Fu G. Temporal course of executive control when lying about self- and other-referential information: an ERP study. Brain Res. 2011;1369:149–57.
Article
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
Schindler S, Wolff W, Kissler JM, Brand R. Cerebral correlates of faking: evidence from a brief implicit association test on doping attitudes. Front Behav Neurosci. 2015;9:1–13.
Article
Google Scholar
Crites SL Jr, Mojica AJ, Corral G, Taylor JH. An event-related potential paradigm for identifying (rare negative) attitude stimuli that people intentionally misreport. Psychophysiology. 2010;47(5):984–8.
PubMed
Google Scholar
Johnson RJ, Barnhardt J, Zhu J. The contribution of executive processes to deceptive responding. Neuropsychologia. 2004;42(7):878–901.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Lavric A, Pizzagalli DA, Forstmeier S. When ‘go’ and ‘nogo’ are equally frequent: ERP components and cortical tomography. Eur J Neurosci. 2004;20(9):2483–8.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Bellgrove MA, Hester R, Garavan H. The functional neuroanatomical correlates of response variability: evidence from a response inhibition task. Neuropsychologia. 2004;42(14):1910–6.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Wimber M, Baeuml K-H, Bergstroem Z, Markopoulos G, Heinze H-J, Richardson-Klavehn A. Neural markers of inhibition in human memory retrieval. J Neurosci. 2008;28(50):13419–27.
Article
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
Ye Z, Zhou X. Conflict control during sentence comprehension: fMRI evidence. Neuroimage. 2009;48(1):280–90.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Ganis G, Rosenfeld JP, Meixner J, Kievit RA, Schendan HE. Lying in the scanner: covert countermeasures disrupt deception detection by functional magnetic resonance imaging. Neuroimage. 2011;55(1):312–9.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Inzlicht M, Berkman E, Elkins-Brown N. The neuroscience of “ego depletion” or: how the brain can help us understand why self-control seems limited. In: Harmon-Jones E, Inzlicht M, editors. Social neuroscience: biological approaches to social psychology. New York: Psychology Press; 2016. p. 101–123.
Google Scholar
Baumeister RF, Bratslavsky E, Muraven M, Tice DM. Ego depletion: is the active self a limited resource? J Pers Soc Psychol. 1998;74(5):1252–65.
Article
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
Englert C, Bertrams A. The role of self-control strength in the development of state anxiety in test situations. Psychol Rep. 2013;112(3):976–91.
Article
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
Schmeichel BJ, Baumeister RF. Effortful attention control. In: Bruya B, editor. Effortless attention: a new perspective in the cognitive science of attention and action. Cambridge: MIT Press; 2010. p. 22–49.
Gordijn EH, Hindriks I, Koomen W, Dijksterhuis A, Van Knippenberg A. Consequences of stereotype suppression and internal suppression motivation: a self-regulation approach. Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2004;30(2):212–24.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Carter EC, McCullough ME. Publication bias and the limited strength model of self-control: has the evidence for ego depletion been overestimated? Front Psychol. 2014;5(823):1–11.
Google Scholar
Inzlicht M, Gutsell JN. Running on empty—neural signals for self-control failure. Psychol Sci. 2007;18(11):933–7.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Botvinick M, Braver T. Motivation and cognitive control: from behavior to neural mechanism. Annu Rev Psychol. 2015;66:83–113.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Friese M, Binder J, Luechinger R, Boesiger P, Rasch B. Suppressing emotions impairs subsequent stroop performance and reduces prefrontal brain activation. Plos One. 2013;8(4):1–11.
Article
Google Scholar
Govorun O, Payne BK. Ego-depletion and prejudice: separating automatic and controlled components. Soc Cogn. 2006;24(2):111–36.
Article
Google Scholar
Simmons JP, Nelson LD, and Simonsohn U. A 21 word solution. 2012. doi:10.2139/ssrn.2160588.
Hautzinger M, Keller F, Kühner C. BDI-II. Beck-depressions-inventar. Revision. 2. Auflage. Frankfurt: Pearson Assessment; 2009.
Spielberger CD, Sydeman SJ, Owen AE, Marsh BJ. Measuring anxiety and anger with the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) and the State-Trait Anger Expression Inventory (STAXI). In: Maruish ME, editor. The use of psychological testing for treatment planning and outcomes assessment. 2nd ed. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 1999. p. 993–1021.
Google Scholar
Sriram N, Greenwald AG. The Brief Implicit Association Test. Exp Psychol. 2009;56(4):283–94.
Article
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
Tyler JM, Burns KC. After depletion: the replenishment of the self’s regulatory resources. Self Ident. 2008;7(3):305–21.
Article
Google Scholar
Brand R, Heck P, Ziegler M. Illegal performance enhancing drugs and doping in sport: a picture-based brief implicit association test for measuring athletes’ attitudes. Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy. 2014;9(7):1–11.
Google Scholar
Greenwald AG, Nosek BA, Banaji MR. Understanding and using the implicit association test: I. An improved scoring algorithm. J Personal Soc Psychol. 2003;85(2):197–216.
Article
Google Scholar
Stroop JR. Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. J Exp Psychol. 1935;18:643–62.
Article
Google Scholar
Englert C, Wolff W. Ego depletion and persistent performance in a cycling task. Int J Sport Psychol. 2015;6(1425):137–51.
Google Scholar
Webb TL, Sheeran P. Can implementation intentions help to overcome ego-depletion? J Exp Soc Psychol. 2003;39(3):279–86.
Article
Google Scholar
Wolff W, Baumgarten F, Brand R. Reduced self-control leads to disregard of an unfamiliar behavioral option: an experimental approach to the study of neuroenhancement. Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy. 2013;8(41):41.
Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Krohne HW, Egloff B, Kohlmann CW, Tausch A. Untersuchungen mit einer deutschen Version der” Positive and Negative Affect Schedule”(PANAS). Diagnostica. 1996;42:139–56.
Google Scholar
Penny W, Henson R. “Hierarchical models”. In: Friston K, Ashburner J, Kiebel S, Nichols T, Penny W, editors. Statistical parametric mapping. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 2007. p. 149–55.
Litvak V, Mattout J, Kiebel S, Phillips C, Henson R, Kilner J, Barnes G, Oostenveld R, Daunizeau J, Flandin G, et al. EEG and MEG data analysis in SPM8. Comput Intell Neurosci. 2011;6:(852961):1–32.
Perrin F, Pernier J, Bertrand O, Echallier JF. Spherical splines for scalp potential and current density mapping. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1989;72(2):184–7.
Article
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
Perrin F, Pernier J, Bertrand O, Echallier JF. Corrigenda: EEG 02274. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1990;76:565.
Article
Google Scholar
Litvak V, Friston K. Electromagnetic source reconstruction for group studies. Neuroimage. 2008;42(4):1490–8.
Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Michel CM, Murray MM, Lantz G, Gonzalez S, Spinelli L, de Peralta RG. EEG source imaging. Clin Neurophysiol. 2004;115(10):2195–222.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Peyk P, De Cesarei A, Junghöfer M. Electro Magneto Encephalograhy Software: overview and integration with other EEG/MEG toolboxes. Comput Intell Neurosci. 2011, vol. 2011, Article ID 861705.
Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. 2nd ed. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.; 1988.
Google Scholar
Campo P, Poch C, Toledano R, Igoa JM, Belinchon M, Garcia-Morales I, Gil-Nagel A. Anterobasal temporal lobe lesions alter recurrent functional connectivity within the ventral pathway during naming. J Neurosci. 2013;33(31):12679–88.
Article
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
Schindler S, Wegrzyn M, Steppacher I, Kissler JM. Perceived communicative context and emotional content amplify visual word processing in the fusiform gyrus. J Neurosci. 2015;35(15):6010–9.
Article
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
Schindler S, Kissler J. People matter: perceived sender identity modulates cerebral processing of socio-emotional language feedback. NeuroImage. 2016;134:160–9. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.03.052.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Tzourio-Mazoyer N, Landeau B, Papathanassiou D, Crivello F, Etard O, Delcroix N, Mazoyer B, Joliot M. Automated anatomical labeling of activations in SPM using a macroscopic anatomical parcellation of the MNI MRI single-subject brain. Neuroimage. 2002;15(1):273–89.
Article
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
Schindler S, Wolff W. Cerebral correlates of automatic associations towards performance enhancing substances. Front Psychol. 1923;2015:6.
Google Scholar
Wascher E, Verleger R, Jaskowski P, Wauschkuhn B. Preparation for action: an ERP study about two tasks provoking variability in response speed. Psychophysiology. 1996;33(3):262–72.
Article
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
Miller GA, Chapman JP. Misunderstanding analysis of covariance. J Abnorm Psychol. 2001;110(1):40–8.
Article
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
Pessoa L, Rossi A, Japee S, Desimone R, Ungerleider LG. Attentional control during the transient updating of cue information. Brain Res 2009;1247:149–158. doi:10.1016/j.brainres.2008.1010.1010.
Saxe R, Xiao DK, Kovacs G, Perrett DI, Kanwisher N. A region of right posterior superior temporal sulcus responds to observed intentional actions. Neuropsychologia. 2004;42(11):1435–46.
Article
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
den Ouden HE, Frith U, Frith C, Blakemore SJ. Thinking about intentions. Neuroimage. 2005;28(4):787–96 (Epub 2005 Jun 2017).
Article
Google Scholar
Schurz M, Radua J, Aichhorn M, Richlan F, Perner J. Fractionating theory of mind: a meta-analysis of functional brain imaging studies. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2014;42:9–34.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Saxe R, Kanwisher N. People thinking about thinking people—the role of the temporo-parietal junction in “theory of mind.”. Neuroimage. 2003;19(4):1835–42.
Article
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
Morishima Y, Schunk D, Bruhin A, Ruff CC, Fehr E. Linking brain structure and activation in temporoparietal junction to explain the neurobiology of human altruism. Neuron. 2012;75(1):73–9.
Article
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
Carter R, Huettel S. A nexus model of the temporal-parietal junction. Trends Cogn Sci. 2013;17(7):328–36.
Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Persson J, Larsson A, Reuter-Lorenz PA. Imaging fatigue of interference control reveals the neural basis of executive resource depletion. J Cogn Neurosci. 2013;25(3):338–51.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Wagner DD, Altman M, Boswell RG, Kelley WM, Heatherton TF. Self-regulatory depletion enhances neural responses to rewards and impairs top-down control. Psychol Sci. 2013;24(11):2262–71.
Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Hu X, Wu H, Fu G. Temporal course of executive control when lying about self- and other-referential information: an ERP study. Brain Res. 2011;1369:149–57.
Article
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar