- Research article
- Open Access
Calponin is expressed by subpopulations of connective tissue cells but not olfactory ensheathing cells in the neonatal olfactory mucosa
© Tomé et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2007
- Received: 31 January 2007
- Accepted: 18 September 2007
- Published: 18 September 2007
Debate has been ongoing on the relative merits of olfactory ensheathing cells (OECs) and Schwann cells as candidates for transplant-mediate repair of CNS lesions. Both glial cells exhibit similar molecular and cellular properties and to date there has been no antigenic marker identified that can clearly distinguish the two cell types. This inability to distinguish between the two cells types prevents confirmation of a controversial statement that cultures of OECs are contaminated with Schwann cells. Recently, proteomic analysis of foetal OECs and adult Schwann cells identified an actin-binding protein, calponin, as a specific marker for OECs. However, at the same time a recent report suggested that adult OECs do not express calponin. It was not clear if this discrepancy was due to methodology, as cells had to be treated with proteinase K to maximize calponin staining or developmental differences with only foetal/neonatal OECs expressing calponin. For this reason we have examined calponin expression in the peripheral olfactory system of embryonic and neonatal rats in vivo and from cells in vitro to assess if calponin is expressed in a developmental manner.
In this study we show that: i) proteinase K pretreatment had no effect on calponin staining in both OECs and Schwann cells. ii) calponin immunoreactivity was not expressed by embryonic or neonatal OECs in vitro and in vivo although connective tissue from the olfactory mucosa was strongly positive in neonatal rats but not embryonic rats, iii) calponin expression in the olfactory mucosa was heterogeneous, defining subpopulations of connective tissue cells iv) using functional confrontation assays between OECs or Schwann cells with astrocytes, calponin was expressed heterogeneously by astrocytes.
It is concluded that calponin is heterogeneously expressed by neonatal mucosal connective tissue but not expressed by neonatal OECs, embryonic OECs, and neonatal Schwann cells. Furthermore, we propose that calponin is not a specific marker for OECs generated from any developmental age.
- Schwann Cell
- Olfactory Bulb
- Lamina Propria
- Olfactory Epithelium
- Connective Tissue Cell
Olfactory ensheathing cells (OECs) are the glial cells of the primary olfactory system . The olfactory system is comprised of both PNS and CNS tissue and known for its ability to support neurogenesis throughout life [2, 3]. It is believed that the role of OECs in the olfactory system is to direct the newly generated axons to their correct position in the CNS environment of the olfactory bulb . OECs have become cells of interest due to their potential as candidates for transplant-mediated repair of CNS pathologies, such as spinal cord injury and multiple sclerosis [4–7]. Several studies have demonstrated that transplanted OECs can in the right environment, myelinate experimentally created demyelinated axons [8–10]. However, it has been suggested that myelination seen after transplantation of OECs is due to contaminating Schwann cells  or by host Schwann cells invading the lesion site [12–14].
It has been extremely difficult to confirm if OECs can indeed myelinate axons in vivo due to the inability to distinguish OECs from Schwann cells using cell markers. This is because they share many characteristics in common including antigenic and morphological phenotype . Even more striking is the similarity in their myelinating phenotype after transplantation into a CNS lesion where the myelin formed is typical of PNS type myelin [8, 9]. Furthermore the transcriptional regulation of these cells during myelination is very similar . However, although these cells share many antigenic characteristics, they do not have identical biological properties. For example, this is seen in the different way they interact with astrocytes either in vitro  using "confrontation assays" or after transplantation in vivo [17–19]. In these confrontation assays Schwann cells form a boundary with astrocytes and induce characteristics of the stress response. These include an increase in astrocytic size and GFAP expression levels. OECs do not form this cellular boundary with astrocytes nor induce this stress response in astrocytes [17, 20]. Recent data suggest that Schwann cells secrete a different heparin sulphate proteoglycan profile to OECs and it is this factor(s) that mediates this astrocytic response . These studies indicate that OECs may be more favorable than Schwann cells in transplant-mediated repair strategies. However, it is the lack of a specific OEC or Schwann cell marker that has lead to problems in identifying the cells after transplantation and has caused discrepancy in deciding which glial cell is optimal for promoting CNS repair [5, 22, 23].
Recently, proteomic analysis of foetal OECs and adult Schwann cells has identified calponin, an actin-binding protein, as a specific marker for OECs . This has led to some conflicting reports regarding the expression of calponin in the adult peripheral olfactory system [11, 25]. In the study from Boyd et al.,  it was suggested that OECs were the only glial cell to express calponin. In a later study by Ibanez et al.,  it was demonstrated a lack of calponin expression in cultured OECs and in vivo within the adult rat peripheral system. However, it was not clear if this discrepancy was due to methodology in calponin staining as it has been reported that cells had to be treated with proteinase K to maximize staining . Discrepancy could also be due to the different developmental age of rats used in both studies. In our study we show that in the presence and absence of proteinase K pretreatment punctate, nuclear calponin immunoreactivity could be detected in both neonatal OECs and neonatal Schwann cells suggesting non-specific attachment of the secondary antibody in both cell types. Interestingly, using confrontation assays, which have been the only way to identify differences between OECs and Schwann cells in vitro, we observed intense, fibrillar calponin immunoreactivity associated only with astrocytes. This intense staining was similar to that seen for fibroblasts. Calponin immunoreactivity was also detected in astrocytes generated from P1 neurosphere cultures. As demonstrated for in vivo immunohistochemistry of the rat adult peripheral olfactory system, calponin immunoreactivity was not observed in neonatal OECs but heterogeneously colocalised with markers of connective tissue in the lamina propria (LP) defining discrete areas. Furthermore embryonic tissue was generally devoid of any calponin staining suggesting developmental changes in expression of calponin in connective tissue in the olfactory system. These data suggest that the actin-binding protein calponin may be a marker for subpopulations of olfactory mucosa connective tissue cells but is not a specific marker for embryonic or neonatal OECs.
Neonatal OECs do not express calponin in the olfactory mucosa in vivo
Calponin is expressed by cells of the neonatal connective tissue in the lamina propria in vivo
Calponin is not expressed in the embryonic olfactory mucosa in vivo
Calponin is not expressed by purified OECs and Schwann cells in vitro
Calponin is expressed by fibroblast-like cells purified from olfactory tissue and sciatic nerve
Calponin expression in confrontation assays is associated with astrocytes
To confirm cultured astrocytes express calponin, we generated two types of astrocytes, cortical astrocytes (CAs) and astrocytes differentiated from neurospheres (NsAs). Cortical astrocytes were over 98% pure as assessed by GFAP expression and these astrocytes express calponin heterogeneously (Figure 6E–F). The calponin was fibrillar and similar to that seen for fibroblasts. Astrocytes generated from P1 neurospheres by incubation in DMEM containing 10% FBS also expressed fibrillar calponin in a heterogeneous manner (Figure 6G). Control cultures without primary antibody were negative although a weak background staining was also detected as seen for OECs and Schwann cells (Figure 6H).
OECs and Schwann cells have been proposed as candidates for transplant mediated repair strategies of spinal cord injury. Previous studies have shown that they share a number of remarkably similar phenotypes, and growth factor responses [15, 22, 23, 27]. It is only recently that molecular studies have identified differences between these two cell types specifically in their interaction with astrocytes [17–19, 21, 28]. Furthermore, evidence suggests that other cell types, eg. fibroblast-like cells, previously rejected as contaminating cells, may have a role in enhancing repair. Indeed, studies are coming to light that suggest that the extracellular matrix produced by these contaminating fibroblast-like cells may also have an important role in mediating repair [29–31]. For this reason it is quite important to identify the individual cells used in transplant-mediate repair to assess their contribution to resulting regeneration. To date there has been no markers identified that specifically labels OECs or distinguishes them from Schwann cells. Recently it has been proposed that calponin is a specific marker which is able to distinguish OECs from Schwann cells [11, 24]. Using this marker to immunolabel cultures of OECs, a mixture of p75NTR positive/calponin positive and p75NTR positive/calponin negative cells were seen and it was proposed that cells lacking calponin immunoreactivity was attributed to contaminating Schwann cells. For this reason the authors suggest that any myelination seen in vivo after OEC transplantation was solely due to contaminating Schwann cells . This hypothesis has been challenged with evidence demonstrating a lack of calponin staining in the adult rat olfactory system . In this report only adult tissue was examined as it was suggested autologous transplantation is likely to be the basis of clinical translation studies, but an ongoing clinical trial in China is using embryonic olfactory tissue as their source of tissue . Furthermore, it is necessary to examine calponin expression in neonatal OECs and embryonic tissue to allow comparison with the many cell transplantation studies in the literature that has used neonatal OECs and with the original proteomic analysis which used foetal OECs . A study on neonatal and embryonic tissue allows comparison to be made of calponin expression during development and any possible age-related expression in OECs.
In our study we demonstrate that calponin immunoreactivity may be detected in both OECs and Schwann cells in culture although the expression is not typical of calponin immunoreactivity reported in the literature. The calponin immunoreactivity for the glial cells was punctate and nuclear and not fibrillar as seen in muscle cells  or in fibroblast as demonstrated in this study (Figure 5) and by others . However, omitting the primary antibody reduced but did not remove this punctate staining around the nucleus. On the other hand, we found similar nuclear, punctate immunoreactivity in strongly positive fibroblasts which suggests the punctate staining seen in Schwann cells and OECs is more likely to be background non-specific staining. We initially hypothesized that the nuclear staining detected in the OECs and Schwann cells may be due to proteinase K treatments (recommended for tissue immunocytochemistry by the antibody supplier) but we had identical staining in the presence and absence of proteinase K with methanol fixation. In support of this, all of our immunohistochemistry of tissue sections was carried out with proteinase K pretreatment, but still did not reveal calponin staining in OECs. Thus, our data using neonatal and embryonic tissue support the results from adult olfactory tissue that calponin is not a marker for OECs .
Our in vivo studies identified strong calponin immunoreactivity in the connective tissue of the LP of neonatal rats. Heterogeneous antigenic expression was detected in tissue sections and purified cultured cells of the classical connective tissue markers, eg. antibodies to fibronectin, α-SMA, [34–36] and Thy1.1  (for fibroblasts and muscle cells), together with the calponin antibody. Section of neonatal mucosa showed regional differences in connective tissue markers suggesting that subpopulations of fibroblasts exist in the LP. The middle section of the LP contained α-SMA immunoreactivity while the area adjacent to the OE expressed mainly fibronectin and Thy1.1. A proportion of this α-SMA immunoreactivity could be attributed to smooth muscle cells lining blood vessels but the distribution of α-SMA immunoreactivity was too large to be due to these cells alone. In cell cultures prepared from the olfactory bulb and sciatic nerve these markers identified heterogeneously labeled fibroblast-like cells. This is consistent with reports that α-SMA, calponin and Thy1.1 characterize subpopulations of fibroblasts [34, 36, 37]. Thus, our data suggest that connective tissue from the olfactory mucosa is comprised of several subclasses of fibroblasts. Although fibronectin labels connective tissue we have seen coexpression with p75NTR confirming reports that OECs express fibronectin  and that fibronectin expressed in the olfactory nerve layer of the olfactory bulb is likely to be due to OECs . However, it has been suggested that neural crest precursor cells can generate Schwann cells and endoneurial fibroblasts raising the possibility that this type of cell may exist in the developing olfactory mucosa which transiently coexpress p75NTR and fibroblast markers . Interestingly, the expression of calponin in the connective tissue of neonatal LP may reflect developmental changes, since the olfactory system of embryonic rats lacked calponin immunoreactivity. This finding may have relevance for CNS repair as mixed olfactory tissue is being proposed as a more potent reparative cell mix for transplant-mediated repair of spinal cord injury [29–31]. To be able to identify and work with these different cells types may lead to a better understanding of their role in CNS repair.
It has also been suggested that preparations of cultured OECs are contaminated with Schwann cells . OECs used in this study are prepared from neonatal olfactory bulbs using the O4 antibody and fluorescence activated cell sorting  and are over 98% p75NTR pure. Although we have seen lack of calponin staining in either of our Schwann cells or OECs preparations, we believe that our OEC preparations are devoid of Schwann cells due to their inability to form any boundary in confrontation assays [17, 20]. To support this data we carried out confrontation assays with OECs/astrocytes and Schwann cells/astrocytes and immunolabeled the cells with calponin and GFAP. Once more we saw the differential migratory behavior of OECs and Schwann cells when in contact with astrocytes and unexpectedly calponin immunoreactivity was associated with astrocytes. Immunolabeling pure cultures of astrocytes from two different sources supported the finding that astrocytes express calponin. Other reports have demonstrated calponin expression in the brain associated with hippocampal and cerebellar neurons as well as radial glia, Bergman glia, glia limitans and mature astrocytes [41, 42]. However these studies used an antibody to the acidic isoform of calponin. Calponin is developmentally expressed as 3 isoforms; α,β and γ. The basic α and β isoforms have molecular weights of 34 kD and 29 kD respectively. An acidic isoform of calponin has also been reported with a molecular weight of 36 kD . It is this acidic isoform that has been reported to be expressed in a range of tissue and not just muscle cells [35, 42]. The antibody we used in this study is the same antibody described by Rizek and Kawaja  and the same clone (different supplier) as described by Ibanez et al.,  which recognizes the basic calponin isoform. This suggests the basic calponin isoform can be expressed by astrocytes in vitro. Calponin expression in these astrocytes was heterogeneous and may reflect subsets of astrocytes or a differential expression during the cell cycle [44, 45].
Our data suggest that: i) calponin expression in the olfactory mucosa was heterogeneous defining subpopulations of connective tissue cells; ii) calponin did not label OECs in embryonic and neonatal tissue; iii) neonatal OECs and Schwann cells express weak, punctate, nuclear calponin immunoreactivity in vitro, which correlates with a non-specific staining also seen in astrocytes and fibroblasts; iv) strong fibrillar basic calponin was expressed heterogeneously by astrocytes in vitro. These data demonstrate that calponin is not a specific marker for rat OECs generated from any developmental age.
Primary neural cells were purified and cultured as previously described. Neonatal OECs were purified from the olfactory bulb of 7-day-old Sprague-Dawley rat pups using the O4 antibody, anti-galactocerebroside and the fluorescent activated cell sorter (FACSVantage Becton Dickenson, . OECs were cultured in defined medium DMEM (DMEM-BS, ) with 5% FBS on poly-L-lysine (PLL, 13 μg/ml; Sigma) coated 25 cm2 flasks, and further supplemented with fibroblast growth factor 2 (FGF2, 500 ng/ml; Peprotech, London, UK), heregulin (hrgβ1, 50 ng/ml; R&D Systems Europe Ltd., Abingdon, UK), forskolin (10-6M; Sigma) and astrocyte conditioned medium (ACM, ) which has been shown to be a potent mitogen for promoting prolonged growth of p75 neurotrophin receptor (p75NTR) expressing OECs .
Schwann cells were obtained from sciatic nerves of 7-day-old Sprague-Dawley rat pups and purified using a modification of the method described by Brockes and colleagues . The modification involved an initial flick of the flask after one day in culture to preferentially select for Schwann cells, followed by incubation with Thy1.1 antibody (1:50 supernatant; Sigma, Dorst, UK) and rabbit complement (1:6; Harlan Sera-lab Ltd, Loughborough, UK) to reduce contamination by fibroblasts. Cells were plated on PLL (13 μg/ml, Sigma) coated flasks and maintained in DMEM-10% FBS supplemented with forskolin (10-6 M; Sigma) and hrgβ1, (20 ng/ml; R&D Systems Europe Ltd, Oxon, UK).
Astrocytes were purified from the cortex as previously described [18, 47]. The cells were maintained in DMEM containing 10% FBS on PLL coated flasks. ACM was collected from confluent flasks of astrocytes by incubating the cells in 10 mls of serum free DMEM  as described in Lakatos et al.,  for 48 hrs before collecting, spinning and filtering . Neurospheres were generated as described by Reynolds and Weiss  from P1 striatum, plated in neurobasal medium containing B27 supplements (Invitrogen, Paisley, UK). Neurosphere astrocytes were established by plating neurospheres onto PLL coated coverslips and incubating them in DMEM containing 10% FBS for a week.
Cell purity was assessed by labeling the cells with GFAP (glial fibrillary acid protein) antibody for astrocytes, and p75NTR antibody for OECs and Schwann cells . All cultures were greater than 98% pure. The cells were maintained in culture at 37°C in 7% CO2 for no longer than 1 month and were refed twice a week. For immunofluorescence the cells were passaged onto PLL coated 13 mm coverslips. To study cell surface antigen, cells were incubated with the primary antibody for 30–40 min at room temperature (RT) followed by the class specific antibody for 30 min at RT. Intracellular antibodies were incubated on cells permeabilised using 100% ice cold methanol and placed in the freezer for 15 min followed by their class specific antibody as described above. Calponin staining was carried out using the method and the same calponin antibody as described by Rizek and Kawaja . Cells were prefixed in 4% paraformaldehyde for 10 min followed by incubation with the cell surface marker p75NTR and its class specific fluorochrome-conjugated antibody as described above. Cells were then fixed in 100% ice cold methanol for 10 min followed by pretreatment with 20 μg/ml of proteinase K for 7 min and lastly incubated with calponin for 1 hr and its class specific antibody for 30 min. Hank's solution (Gibco) containing 5% calf serum and Hepes buffer was used to dilute the antibodies and for washing between incubations. In some experiments preincubation with proteinase K was omitted. Primary antibodies include monoclonal mouse anti-human Calponin (1:50; IgG1, Dako, Ely, UK). To identify OECs we used monoclonal mouse anti- and polyclonal rabbit anti-p75NTR (hybridoma, 1:1; IgG1, , anti-rabbit, 1:800; Abcam, Cambridge, UK) respectively; and rabbit polyclonal anti-S100β  (1: 200; Dako). For identifying ORNs we used monoclonal mouse anti-βIII tubulin (TUJ1, 1:100; IgG1, Sigma). Connective tissue was identified by polyclonal rabbit anti-human fibronectin (1:100, Dako); mouse monoclonal anti-alpha smooth muscle actin (α-SMA, 1:400; IgG1, Chemicon, Hampshire, UK;  and mouse monoclonal Thy1.1/CD90 (1:100; IgG1, Serotec). Visualization of the primary antibodies was carried out using the class specific antibodies conjugated with fluorescein (green, FITC) or rhodamine (red, TRITC) (Southern Biotechnique, 1:100). Coverslips were mounted with VectorShield (Vector laboratories, Peterborough, UK) containing 4'6-diamidine-2-phenylindole-dihydrochloride (DAPI) to visualize the nuclei. Images were examined either by confocal microscopy (Olympus FV-1000) or by fluorescence microscopy (Zeiss Axioskop) using MetaMorph image analysis from Molecular Devices.
Tissue preparation and immunohistochemistry
The olfactory mucosa and olfactory bulbs were dissected from the heads of postnatal day 7 Sprague-Dawley rat pups. The tissue from the P7 rats and the heads from embryonic E17-E20 pups were immersed in 4% paraformaldehyde for 1–3 days and then cryopreserved in 30% sucrose solution until equilibration. Sections of 10–20 μm were cut using a Bright cryostat onto Vectabond (Vector Lab) coated slides. For immunohistochemistry, the slides were washed 3 times for 5 min in PBS then treated with proteinase K 20 μg/ml for 7 min, washed and incubated in a blocking solution containing 10% goat serum and 0.3% triton-X 100 (Sigma) in PBS for 1 hr at RT. Sections were then incubated in the primary antibodies described above diluted in PBS-4%BSA for 2 hr at RT. After 3 washes of 5 min with PBS the sections were incubated with the appropriate FITC/TRITC conjugated anti-mouse or anti-rabbit secondary 1:100 (Southern Biotechnique, Cambridge Bioscience, Cambridge, UK) for 1 hr. After the incubation the sections were washed 3 times for 5 min with PBS and then mounted with VectorShield containing DAPI.
Confrontation assays between OECs and astrocytes and Schwann cells and astrocytes were set up as previously described [17, 18]. Briefly, 10-μl strips containing 10,000 cells of either OECs or Schwann cells were set up opposing a parallel 10-μl strip containing 10,000 astrocytes on a PLL-coated coverslip. Cells were allowed to attach for 1 hr before washing in DMEM-FBS to remove non-attached cells. Cultures were then maintained in DMEM-FBS, and allowed to grow towards each other over a period of 10 days, giving time for cells to make contact and interact. Cultures were then immunolabeled using antibodies to GFAP and p75NTR or GFAP and calponin and mounted with VectorShield containing DAPI to visualize nuclei. Images were examined using fluorescence microscopy (Zeiss Axioskop) using MetaMorph image analysis from Molecular Devices. Because we can induce i) OECs to form boundaries with astrocytes or ii) Schwann cells to mingle with astrocytes by modifying the FGF/heparin sulphate proteoglycan signaling cascade; it is unlikely that the different, initial, long-term culture conditions for OECs and Schwann cells mediate the differential behavior in the confrontation assays . Furthermore, similar differences in the way OECs and Schwann cells form boundaries with astrocytes have been demonstrated in vivo .
This work was supported by the Multiple Sclerosis Society (SCB) the Wellcome Trust (AS-S) and the MRC (MT, ES). We thank Margaret O'Prey and Tom Gilbey for confocal microscopy assistance.
- Barber PC, Lindsey RM: Schwann cells of the olfactory neves contain glial fibrillary acidic protein and resemble astrocytes. Neuroscience. 1982, 7 (12): 3077-3090. 10.1016/0306-4522(82)90231-7.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Doucette R: Glial influences on axonal growth in the primary olfactory system. Glia. 1990, 3: 433-449. 10.1002/glia.440030602.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Graziadei PP, Monti Graziadei AG: Regeneration in the olfactory system of vertebrates. Am J Otolaryngol. 1983, 4: 228-233.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Barnett SC, Riddell JS: Cell transplantation strategies for spinal cord repair: What can be achieved?. Nature Clin Pract Neurol. 2007, 3: 152-161. 10.1038/ncpneuro0447.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Franklin RJ, Barnett SC: Olfactory ensheathing cells and CNS regeneration: the sweet smell of success?. Neuron. 2000, 2: 15-18. 10.1016/S0896-6273(00)00080-5.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Raisman G: Olfactory ensheathing cells – another miracle cure for spinal cord injury?. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2001, 2: 369-375. 10.1038/35072576.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Reier P: Cellular transplantation strategies for spinal cord injury and translational neurobiology. NeuroRx. 2004, 1: 424-451. 10.1602/neurorx.1.4.424.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Franklin RJ, Gilson JM, Franceschini IA, Barnett SC: Schwann cell-like myelination following transplantation of an olfactory bulb-ensheathing cell line into areas of demyelination in the adult CNS. Glia. 1996, 17: 217-224. 10.1002/(SICI)1098-1136(199607)17:3<217::AID-GLIA4>3.0.CO;2-Y.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Imaizumi T, Lankford KL, Waxman SG, Greer CA, Kocsis JD: Transplanted olfactory ensheathing cells remyelinate and enhance axonal conduction in the demyelinated dorsal columns of the rat spinal cord. J Neurosci. 1998, 18: 6176-6185.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Sasaki M, Lankford KL, Zemedkun M, Kocsis JD: Identified olfactory ensheathing cells transplanted into the transected dorsal funiculus bridge the lesion and form myelin. J Neurosci. 2004, 24: 8485-8493. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1998-04.2004.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Rizek PN, Kawaja MD: Cultures of rat olfactory ensheathing cells are contaminated with Schwann cells. Neuroreport. 2006, 17: 459-462. 10.1097/01.wnr.0000209000.32857.1b.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Boyd JG, Doucette R, Kawaja MD: Defining the role of olfactory ensheathing cells in facilitating axon remyelination following damage to the spinal cord. FASEB. 2005, 19: 694-703. 10.1096/fj.04-2833rev.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Bruce JH, Norenberg MD, Kraydieh S, Puckett W, Marcillo A, Dietrich D: Schwannosis: role of gliosis and proteogylcan in human spinal cord injury. J Neurotrauma. 2000, 17: 781-788.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Franklin RJM, Blakemore WF: Requirements for Schwann cell migration within CNS environments a viewpoint. Int J Dev Neurosci. 1993, 11: 641-649. 10.1016/0736-5748(93)90052-F.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Barnett SC, Hutchins AM, Noble M: Purification of olfactory nerve ensheathing cells from the olfactory bulb. Dev Biol. 1993, 155: 337-350. 10.1006/dbio.1993.1033.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Smith PM, Sim FJ, Barnett SC, Franklin RJM: SCIP/Oct-6, Krox-20 and desert hedgehog mRNA expression during CNS remyelination by transplanted olfactory ensheathing cells. Glia. 2001, 36: 342-353. 10.1002/glia.1121.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Lakatos A, Barnett SC, Franklin RJM: Olfactory ensheathing cells induce less host astrocyte response and chondroitin sulphate proteoglycan expression than Schwann cells following transplantation into adult CNS white matter. Exp Neurol. 2003, 184: 237-246. 10.1016/S0014-4886(03)00270-X.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Lakatos A, Franklin RJM, Barnett SC: Olfactory ensheathing cells and Schwann cells differ in their in vitro interactions with astrocytes. Glia. 2000, 32: 214-225. 10.1002/1098-1136(200012)32:3<214::AID-GLIA20>3.0.CO;2-7.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Plant GW, Bates ML, Bunge MB: Inhibitory proteoglycan immunoreactivity is higher at the caudal than the rostral Schwann cell graft-transected spinal cord interface. Mol Cell Neurosci. 2001, 17: 471-487. 10.1006/mcne.2000.0948.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Fairless R, Frame MC, Barnett SC: N-cadherin differentially determines Schwann cell and olfactory ensheathing cell adhesion and migration upon contact with astrocytes. Molecular Cell Neurosci. 2005, 28: 253-263. 10.1016/j.mcn.2004.09.009.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Santos-Silva A, Fairless F, Toft A, Riddell JS, Frame M, Barnett SC: OECs lack a heparin sulphate proteoglycan that Schwann cells use to induce the astrocyte stress response mediated via FGFR1 activation. J Neurosci. 2007, 27: 7154-7167. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1184-07.2007.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Vincent AJ, West AK, Chuah MI: Morphological and functional plasticity of olfactory ensheathing cells. J Neurocytol. 2005, 34: 65-80. 10.1007/s11068-005-5048-6.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Wewetzer K, Verdu E, Angelov DN, Navarro X: Olfactory ensheathing cells and Schwann cells; two a kind. Cell Tissue Res. 2002, 309: 337-345. 10.1007/s00441-002-0607-y.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Boyd JG, Jahed A, Mcdonald TG, Krol KM, Can Eyk JE, Doucette R, Kawaja MD: Proteomic evaluation reveals that olfactory ensheathing cells but not Schwann cells express calponin. Glia. 2006, 53: 434-400. 10.1002/glia.20299.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ibanez C, Ito D, Zawadzka M, Jeffery N, Franklin RJM: Calponin is expressed by fibroblasts and meningeal cells but not olfactory ensheathing cells in the adult peripheral olfactory system. Glia. 2007, 55: 144-151. 10.1002/glia.20443.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Jahed A, Rowland JW, McDonald T, Boyd JG, Doucette R, Kawaja MD: Olfactory ensheathing cells express smooth muscle alpha-actin in vitro and in vivo. J Comp Neurol. 2007, 503: 209-223. 10.1002/cne.21385.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ramon-Cueto A, Avila J: Olfactory ensheathing glia: properties and function. Brain Res Bull. 1998, 46: 175-187. 10.1016/S0361-9230(97)00463-2.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ruitenberg MJ, Vukovic J, Sarich J, Busfield SJ, Plant GW: Olfactory ensheathing cells: characteristics, genetic engineering, and therapeutic potential. J Neurotrauma. 2006, 23: 468-478. 10.1089/neu.2006.23.468.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Barnett SC, Chang L: Olfactory ensheathing cells and CNS repair: going solo or in need of a friend?. Trends Neurosci. 2004, 27: 54-60. 10.1016/j.tins.2003.10.011.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Grimpe B, Dong S, Doller C, Temple K, Malouf AT, Silver J: The critical role of basement membrane-independent laminin gamma 1 chain during axon regeneration in the CNS. J Neurosci. 2002, 22: 3144-3160.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Li Y, Field PM, Raisman G: Olfactory ensheathing cells and olfactory nerve fibroblasts maintain continuous open channels for regrowth of olfactory nerve fibres. Glia. 2005, 52: 245-251. 10.1002/glia.20241.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Guest J, Herrera LP, Qian T: Rapid recovery of segmental neurological function in a tetraplegic patient following transplantation of fetal olfactory bulb-derived cells. Spinal cord. 2003, 44: 135-142. 10.1038/sj.sc.3101820.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Takeuchi K, Takahashi K, Abe M, Nishida W, Hiwada K, Nabeya T, Maruyama K: Co-localization of immunoreactive forms of calponin with actin cytoskeleton in platelets, fibroblasts, and vascular smooth muscle. J Biochem Tokyo. 1991, 109: 311-316.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Dugina V, Alexandrova A, Chaponnier C, Vasiliev J, Gabbiani G: Rat fibroblasts cultured from various organs exhibit differences in α-smooth muscle actin expression, cytoskeletal pattern and adhesive structure organization. Exp Cell Res. 1998, 238: 481-490. 10.1006/excr.1997.3868.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Rønnov-Jessen L, Petersen OW: A filamentous α-smooth muscle actin: retardation of motility in fibroblasts. J Cell Biol. 1996, 134: 67-80. 10.1083/jcb.134.1.67.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Desmouliere A, Rubbia-Brandt L, Abdiu A, Walz T, Macieira-Coelho A, Gabbiani G: Alpha-smooth muscle actin is expressed in a subpopulation of cultured and cloned fibroblasts and is modulated by gamma-interferon. Exp Cell Res. 1992, 201: 64-73. 10.1016/0014-4827(92)90348-C.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- McIntosh JC, Hagood JS, Richardson TL, Simecka JW: Thy1(+) and (-) lung fibrosis subpopulations in LEW and F344 rats. Eur Respir J. 1994, 7: 2131-2138. 10.1183/09031936.94.07122131.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Jani HR, Raisman G: Ensheathing cell cultures from the olfactory bulb and mucosa. Glia. 2004, 47: 130-137. 10.1002/glia.20038.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Doucette R: Immunohistochemical localization of laminin, fibronectin and collagen type IV in the nerve fiber layer of the olfactory bulb. Int J Dev Neurosci. 1996, 14: 945-959. 10.1016/S0736-5748(96)00042-1.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Joseph NM, Mukouyama YS, Mosher JT, Jaegle M, Crone SA, Dormand EL, Lee KF, Meijer D, Anderson DJ, Morrison SJ: Neural crest stem cells undergo multilineage differentiation in developing peripheral nerves to generate endoneurial fibroblasts in addition to Schwann cells. Development. 2004, 131: 5599-612. 10.1242/dev.01429.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Agassandian C, Plantier M, Fattoum A, Represa A, der Terrossian E: Subcellular distribution of calponin and caldesmon in rat hippocampus. Brain Res. 2000, 887: 444-449. 10.1016/S0006-8993(00)03030-4.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Plantier M, Fattoum A, Menn B, Ben-Ari Y, Der Terrossian E, Represa A: Acidic calponin immunoreactivity in postnatal rat brain and cultures: subcellular localization in growth cones, under the plasma membrane and along actin and glial filaments. Eur J Neurosci. 1999, 11 (8): 2801-2812. 10.1046/j.1460-9568.1999.00702.x.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- El-Mezgueldi M: Molecules in focus; calponin. Int J Biochem Cell Biol. 1996, 28: 1185-1189. 10.1016/S1357-2725(96)00085-4.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Miller RH, Zhang H, Fok-Seang J: Glial cell heterogeneity in the mammalian spinal cord. Perspect Dev Neurobiol. 1994, 2: 225-231.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Cavalcante LA, Garcia-Abreu J, Moura Neto V, Silva LC, Barradas PC: Heterogeneity of median and lateral midbrain radial glia and astrocytes. Rev Bras Biol. 1996, 56: 33-52.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bottenstein J, Hayashi I, Hutchings S, Masui H, Mather J, McClure DB, Ohasa S, Rizzino A, Sato G, Serrero G, Wolfe R, Wu R: The growth of cells in serum-free hormone supplemented media. Method Enzymol. 1979, 58: 94-109.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Noble M, Murray K: Purified astrocytes promote the in vitro division of a bipotential glial progenitor cell. Embo J. 1984, 3: 2243-3247.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Alexander CL, FitzGerald UF, Barnett SC: Identification of growth factors that promote long-term proliferation of olfactory ensheathing cells and modulate their antigenic phenotype. Glia. 2002, 37: 349-364. 10.1002/glia.10044.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Brockes JP, Field KL, Raff MC: Studies on cultured rat Schwann cells. I. Establishment of purified populations from cultures of peripheral nerve. Brain Res. 1979, 165: 105-118. 10.1016/0006-8993(79)90048-9.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Reynolds BA, Weiss S: Generation of neurons and astrocytes from isolated cells of the adult mammalian central nervous system. Science. 1992, 255: 1707-1710. 10.1126/science.1553558.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Yan Q, Johnson EM Jr: An immunohistochemical study of the nerve growth factor receptor in developing rats. J Neurosci. 1988, 8: 3481-3498.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Au WW, Trloar HB, Greer CA: Sublaminar organization of the mouse olfactory bulb nerve layer. J Comp Neurol. 2002, 446: 68-80. 10.1002/cne.10182.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.