- Poster presentation
- Open access
- Published:
Identifying excitatory and inhibitory synapses in neuronal networks from dynamics using Transfer Entropy
BMC Neuroscience volume 16, Article number: P30 (2015)
Measuring the effective connectivity between the elements of a neuronal system promises to give conclusions about brain function and the principles of information processing in the brain. Transfer Entropy [1] (TE) and its extensions have recently become more and more popular for this task and have been applied to various types of neuronal data, such as from EEG, Calcium Imaging and Multi-electrode Array measurements [2]. Being based on information theory, TE can be interpreted as the predictive information transfer between two time series. TE is a model free measurement and quantifies even non-linear interactions and very importantly the directionality.
However, due to its information-theoretic nature, TE doesn't distinguish between different types of interactions, for example whether a pre-synaptic neuron drives a post-synaptic neuron via an excitatory or an inhibitory synapse [3]. This distinction is crucial for the understanding of the network dynamics and the exact interplay of excitation and inhibition in neuronal networks plays an important role for network bursts and synchronization. The balance of excitation and inhibition is believed to play a role for the occurrence of epileptic seizures [4].
We propose a method complementary to the TE measurement, to not only measure the effective connectivity from neuronal network dynamics, but also to classify, whether the interactions are excitatory or inhibitory. We achieve this by introducing a new quantity, which is a linear combination of the individual terms that sum up to the Transfer Entropy. This quantity can be computed by applying a Principal Component Analysis (PCA) to the Transfer Entropy terms across different measurements. It assumes positive values for excitatory connections and negative values for inhibitory connections.
To verify this method we apply it to the spike trains of noise-driven recurrent neuronal network motifs, simulated with an extended Fitzhugh-Nagumo model. We analyze all possible combinations of three neurons being coupled with either excitatory or inhibitory synapses, which add up to a total of 132 network motifs. The best performance of our reconstruction of these motifs, being measured by the area under the Receiver Operating Characteristic curve, exceeds values of 0.99. Together with the PCA analysis, we are not only able to reconstruct the motif topologies from the neuronal dynamics, but we are also able to distinguish between excitatory and inhibitory synapses.
References
Schreiber T: Measuring information transfer. Physical Review Letters. 2000, 85: 461-
Wibral M, Vicente R, Lizier JT: Directed Information Measures in Neuroscience. 2014
Orlandi JG, Stetter O, Soriano J, Geisel T, Battaglia D, Garcia-Ojalvo J: Transfer Entropy Reconstruction and Labeling of Neuronal Connections from Simulated Calcium Imaging. PLoS One. 2014, 9 (6): e98842-
McCormick DA, Contreras D: On the Cellular and Network Bases of Epileptic Seizures. Annual Review of Physiology. 2001, 63: 815-846.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
About this article
Cite this article
Goetze, F., Lai, PY. & Chan, C. Identifying excitatory and inhibitory synapses in neuronal networks from dynamics using Transfer Entropy. BMC Neurosci 16 (Suppl 1), P30 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2202-16-S1-P30
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2202-16-S1-P30