Skip to content


  • Poster presentation
  • Open Access

Curvature of dendritic nonlinearities modulates higher-order spiking correlations

BMC Neuroscience201516 (Suppl 1) :P227

  • Published:


  • Firing Rate
  • Pyramidal Cell
  • Maximum Entropy
  • Model Neuron
  • Spike Activity
Characterizing neural spiking covariability is essential for understanding the collective activity of neural populations. Recent experiments have provided evidence of statistical dependencies among groups of neurons beyond that expected by the firing rates and pairwise correlations alone [13]. These "higher-order correlations" (HOCs) can be generated by common input [4] or motifs within the network architecture [5], yet a complete mechanistic understanding is lacking. We explore a novel mechanism through which higher-order correlations can be modulated: dendritic nonlinearities. We simulated the spiking activity of a simple exponential integrate-and-fire model neuron in response to two correlated presynaptic spike trains and background noise. The synaptic conductances were either summed linearly at the soma or were filtered through a nonlinear dendritic transfer function (see Figure 1), which was chosen to have a similar magnitude of effect on nonlinear EPSP summation as observed by active dendritic properties in pyramidal cells [6]. Using maximum entropy techniques, "triplet correlations" in the circuit were quantified as the probability of synchronous triplet spiking between the postsynaptic cell and its two presynaptic inputs beyond what could be captured by the firing rates and pairwise correlations alone, normalized by the product of the standard deviations. We found that superlinear dendrites significantly increased the level of triplet. On the other hand, saturating dendrites decorrelated triplets. These results reveal that HOCs in spiking activity are modulated by the curvature of the dendritic transfer function. Finally, this study demonstrates how intrinsic single-cell properties can tune spiking covariability in neural populations.
Figure 1
Figure 1

A. Transfer functions depicting the summation of synaptic inputs for linear dendrites. B. Transfer function for saturating dendritic nonlinearities (solid line), as well as the identity (dotted line). C. Same as B for superlinear dendrites. D-F. "Triplet correlations" (see text) between the postsynaptic cell and its presynaptic inputs, shown for D. linear, E. sublinear, and F. superlinear dendrites. Axes represent the varying statistics of the presynaptic spike trains, i.e., their firing rates and the correlations between them.

Authors’ Affiliations

Department of Neuroscience, Physiology & Pharmacology, University College London, London, UK
Department of Applied Mathematics, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA


  1. Ohiorhenuan IE, Mechler F, Purpura K, Schmid A, Hu Q, Victor JD: Sparse coding and high-order correlations in fine-scale cortical networks. Nature. 2010, 466: 617-621.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Ganmor E, Segev R, Schneidman E: Sparse low-order interaction network underlies a highly correlated and learnable neural population code. PNAS. 2011, 108: 9679-9684.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Koester U, Sohl-Dickstein J, Gray C, Olshausen B: Modeling higher-order correlations within cortical microcolumns. PLOS Comp Bio. 2014, 10: 1003684-View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Macke J, Opper M, Bethge M: Common input explains higher-order correlations and entropy in a simple model of neural population activity. Phys Rev Lett. 2011, 106:Google Scholar
  5. Hu Y, Trousdale J, Josic K, Shea-Brown E: Local paths to global coherence: Cutting networks down to size. Phys Rev E. 2014, 89: 032802-View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Polsky A, Mel B, Schiller J: Computational subunits in thin dendrites of pyramidal cells. Nature Neurosci. 2004, 7: 621-627.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar