Skip to content

Advertisement

  • Poster presentation
  • Open Access

Looking at the role of direct and indirect pathways in basal ganglia networks at different levels

BMC Neuroscience201516 (Suppl 1) :P225

https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2202-16-S1-P225

  • Published:

Keywords

  • Dopamine
  • Basal Ganglion
  • Computational Model
  • Motor Action
  • Simple Relation
The role of basal ganglia in motor action initiation and selection has been well studied and now it is evident that impairment in this structure causes not only causes movement disorders as Parkinson's disease, Huntington's disease but also behavioral dysfunctions as addiction, obsessive-compulsive disorder [14]. In order to understand the mechanisms giving rise to motor actions, cognitive processes related to these actions as decision making and the diseases occurring due to malfunctioning of these structures, various computational models of direct and indirect pathways have been proposed [59]. Here, in order to set a simple relation between models of basal ganglia at different levels, a simple mass model indicating the controversial role of direct and indirect pathways will be introduced first. While dopamine (DA) in direct pathway enhances the activity in Thalamus giving rise to inhibition of action, arise of DA in indirect pathway disinhibits Thalamus activity promoting the action to take place. This activity can be followed from Figure 1 for different DA levels. Based on the results of this simple mass model, spiking neural network (SNN) is built by point neurons and the relation between the local field potential of this SNN and simple mass model will be discussed. The aim is to build a simple relation between different levels of computational models which would help investigating the mechanisms behind the cognitive processes without engaging in detailed models initially. Thus, the simple mass model proposed would be primary model giving a chance to test the initial interpretation of the concepts formed and lead to setting up more detailed, realistic models.
Figure 1
Figure 1

DA level is normal, high and low at top, middle and bottom, respectively. THL activity is normal, high and low similar to STRD1 activity and contrary to STRD2 activity.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Electronics and Communication Engineering, Istanbul Technical University, Istanbul, Turkey

References

  1. Kropotov J, Etlinger S: Selection of actions in the basal ganglia-thalamacortical circuits: Review and model. International Journal of Psychophysiology. 1999, 31 (3): 197-217.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. DeLong MR, Wichmann T: Circuits and circuit disorders of the basal ganglia. Archives of Neurology. 2007, 64 (1): 20-24.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Nicola S: The nucleus accumbens as part of a basal ganglia action selection circuit. Psychopharmacology. 2007, 191 (3): 521-550.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Graybiel AM, Rauch SL: Toward a Neurobiology of Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder. Neuron. 2000, 28 (2): 343-347.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Terman D, Rubin JE, Yew AC, Wilson CJ: Activity patterns in a model for the subthalamopallidal network of the basal ganglia. The Journal of Neuroscience. 2002, 22 (7): 2963-2976.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Chersi F, Mirolli M, Pezzulo G, Baldassarre G: A spiking neuron model of the cortico-basal ganglia circuits for goal-directed and habitual action learning. Neural Networks. 2013, 41: 212-224.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. McCarthy MM, Moore-Kochlacs C, Gu X, Boyden ES, Han X, Kopell N: Striatal origin of the pathologic beta oscillations in Parkinson's disease. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2011, 108 (28): 11620-11625.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Marreiros AC, Cagnan H, Moran RJ, Friston KJ, Brown P: Basal ganglia cortical interactions in Parkinsonian patients. NeuroImage. 2013, 66: 301-310.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Yucelgen C, Denizdurduran B, Metin S, Elibol R, Sengor NS: A biophysical network model displaying the role of basal ganglia pathways in action selection. Artificial Neural Networks and Machine Learning ICANN. 2012, 7552: 177-184.Google Scholar

Copyright

Advertisement