Skip to content


  • Poster presentation
  • Open Access

A robust model of sensory tuning using dendritic non-linearities

BMC Neuroscience201516 (Suppl 1) :P223

  • Published:


  • Prefer Stimulus
  • Sensory Representation
  • Recent Experimental Evidence
  • Dendritic Compartment
  • Synaptic Integration
Dendrites, like neurons, can preferentially activate for certain stimuli, but recent experimental evidence suggests that dendritic tuning can differ from the neuronal tuning. For instance, in a L2/3 pyramidal neuron in the mouse visual cortex, dendritic calcium signals display a wide range of tuning profiles, some of which differ from the tuning of the neuronal output [1]. This puzzling observation was unanticipated by the standard Hubel and Wiesel model explaining the origin of visual tuning [2]. The standard model can survive this observation, but only with the addition of superfluous synapses. We propose here an alternative model where synapses responsible for neuronal tuning are dispersed over dendrites. This alternative model builds on previously published results [3]. It possesses non-linear dendritic compartments, and in each compartment the result of multiple excitatory inputs can be smaller than their arithmetic sum. These non-linear and independent sites of synaptic integration create neuronal tuning: groups of correlated presynaptic inputs encode the stimulus identity, and only the group that encodes the preferred stimulus targets different dendrites and leads to a response. Groups coding for non-preferred stimuli instead target the same dendrite, and explain the wide range of dendritic tunings observed experimentally. Moreover, we demonstrate that this implementation of neuronal tuning is robust to the loss of dendrites. Thus, our alternative model not only reproduces the experimental observations, but is also robust to dendritic reorganization. To confirm this result in silico we use a multi-compartmental model with a realistic L2/3 morphology [1] (see Figure 1). Our work implies that non-linear integration in dendrites can play a pivotal role in neuronal tuning even if dendritic and neuronal tuning differ. This implementation of neuronal tuning is also robust to dendritic loss, a property important to keep a stable sensory representation. Importantly, our theoretical framework predicts that a neuron is tuned to the input generating the most widespread synaptic activity on its dendrites and that neuronal tuning can resist the loss of a significant number of dendrites.
Figure 1
Figure 1

Representation of the biophysical model used in the simulation. Red dots indicate the 7 input sites. The black dot indicates the soma. 1B. Polar plot showing the tuning of the membrane voltage within two dendritic compartments of our model. 1C. Somatic voltage for three different stimuli (0, 45, 90 degrees). Red indicates the preferred stimulus, and blue traces non-preferred stimuli.



This work was supported by EU FP7 Marie Curie Initial Training Network 289146 'NETT' . SJ is supported by EU FP7 Marie Curie fellowship (PIEF-GA-2013-628086).

Authors’ Affiliations

Centre for Neurotechnology & Department of Bioengineering, Imperial College London, London, UK


  1. Jia H, Rochefort NL, Chen X, Konnerth A: Dendritic organization of sensory input to cortical neurons in vivo. Nature. 2010, 464: 1307-1312.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Hubel D, Wiesel T: Receptive fields, binocular interaction and functional architecture in the cat's visual cortex. J Physiol. 1961, 160 (1): 106-154.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Cazé RD, Humphries M, Gutkin B: Passive Dendrites Enable Single Neurons to Compute Linearly Non-separable Functions. PLoS Comput. Biol. 2013, 9: e1002867-PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar