Skip to content

Advertisement

  • Poster presentation
  • Open Access

Self-organization of information processing in developing neuronal networks

  • 1, 2Email author,
  • 3,
  • 4,
  • 5, 6, 7,
  • 8,
  • 8 and
  • 5
BMC Neuroscience201516 (Suppl 1) :P221

https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2202-16-S1-P221

  • Published:

Keywords

  • Animal Model
  • Information Processing
  • Time Processing
  • Human Brain
  • Critical State

Human brains possess sophisticated information processing capabilities, which rely on the coordinated interplay of billions of neurons. Despite recent advances in characterizing the collective neuronal dynamics, however, it remains a major challenge to understand the principles of how functional neuronal networks develop and maintain these processing capabilities. A popular hypothesis is that neuronal networks self-organize to a critical state [13], because in models, criticality maximizes information processing capacities [46]. This predicts that biological networks should develop towards a critical state during maturation, and at the same time processing capabilities should increase. We tested this hypothesis using multi-electrode spike recordings in mouse hippocampal and cortical neurons over the first four weeks in vitro. We showed that developing neuronal networks indeed increased their information processing capacities, as quantified by transfer entropy and active information storage [68]. The increase in processing capacity was tightly linked to decreasing the distance to criticality (correlation r = 0.68, p < 10-9; r = 0.55, p < 10-6 for transfer and storage, respectively). Thereby our results for the first time demonstrate experimentally that approaching criticality with maturation goes in hand with increasing processing capabilities.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Nonlinear Dynamics, Max Planck Institute for Dynamics and Self-Organization, Göttingen, Germany
(2)
Bernstein Center for Computational Neuroscience, Göttingen, Germany
(3)
School of Civil Engineering, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
(4)
MEG Unit, Brain Imaging Center, Goethe University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
(5)
Behavioural & Clinical Neuroscience Institute, Department of Psychiatry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 3EB, UK
(6)
Cambridgeshire and Peterborough NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, CB21 5HH, UK
(7)
GlaxoSmithKline, Immuno Psychiatry, Alternative Discovery and Development, Stevenage, SG1 2NY, UK
(8)
Department of Physiology, Development and Neuroscience, University of Cambridge, Physiological Laboratory, Downing Street, Cambridge, CB2 3EG, UK

References

  1. Beggs JM, Plenz D: Neuronal avalanches in neocortical circuits. J Neurosci. 2003, 23 (35): 11167-11177.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Priesemann V, Valderrama M, Wibral M, Le Van Quyen M: Neuronal avalanches differ from wakefulness to deep sleep-evidence from intracranial depth recordings in humans. PLoS Comput Biol. 2013, 9 (3): e1002985-PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Priesemann V, Wibral M, Valderrama M, Proepper R, Le Van Quyen M, Geisel T, Triesch J, Nikolic D, Munk MHJ: Spike avalanches in vivo suggest a driven, slightly subcritical brain state. Front Syst Neurosci. 2014, 8: 108-PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Bertschinger N, Natschläger T: Real-time computation at the edge of chaos in recurrent neural networks. Neural Comput. 2004, 16 (7): 1413-1436.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Boedecker J, Obst O, Lizier JT, Mayer NM, Asada M: Information processing in echo state networks at the edge of chaos. Theory Biosci. 2012, 131 (3): 205-213.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Wibral M, Lizier J, Priesemann V: Bits from Brains for Biologically-Inspired Computing. Computational Intelligence. 2015, 2: 5-Google Scholar
  7. Lizier JT, Prokopenko M, Zomaya AY: The Information Dynamics of Phase Transitions in Random Boolean Networks. ALIFE. 2008, 374-381.Google Scholar
  8. Schreiber T: Measuring Information Transfer. Phys Rev Lett. 2000, 85: 461-464.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Priesemann et al. 2015

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Advertisement