Volume 16 Supplement 1

24th Annual Computational Neuroscience Meeting: CNS*2015

Open Access

Noise signature on interval timing

BMC Neuroscience201516(Suppl 1):P180


Published: 18 December 2015

Among other essential adaptations is the capability of organisms to estimate durations in the seconds-to-hours range (interval timing). Such capabilities are critical for fundamental cognitive processes like decision making, rate calculation, and planning of action [1]. In their seminal work on computational modeling of interval timing, Matell and Meck [2] revitalized the striatal beat frequency (SBF) model that utilizes the coincident activation of a series of oscillators to code for different durations. They showed through numerical simulations that the SBF model is capable of reproducing two of the interval timing signatures: (a) precise timing, i.e. the model output peaks at the training/criterion time and (b) scalar timing, i.e. the error in timing increases linearly with the criterion time. The SBF model was capable of producing scalar timing only when different types of biologically realistic variances (frequency, memory, etc.) were considered [3].

In this work, we investigated what effect each type of variance/noise has on the shape of the SBF model output. In particular, we noticed that the experimentally measured response rate is not quite Gaussian (see Figure 1A) and instead has a long tail. Mathematically, the output function of set of coincidental (sinusoidal) oscillators is given by [3]:
Figure 1

A. Normalized response for mice (squares - redrawn after [4]) versus normalized criterion time and the corresponding best Gaussian fit (continuous line). B. Theoretical output from SBF model with different frequency variances.

o u t ( t ) = c o s ( 2 π f i T ) c o s ( 2 π f i t ) ,

where T is the criterion time, f i are the frequencies of neural oscillators. The criterion time T is learned during the training phase and stored/retrieved from the long-term memory with some errors. The firing frequencies f i of all neural oscillators also fluctuate. We found that memory variance (s T ) preserves the Gaussian shape of the output function, whereas the frequency variance (s f ) skews and has a long tail similar to experimental observations (see Figure 1B).

In addition to the significantly difference contributions to the shape of output functions, we also found that memory and frequency noises shift the peak of the Gaussian. Memory noise affects the storage/retrieval of criterion T and shifts the peak of the output to the right, i.e. t T = T(1+ T ), where T is a number that depends on the range of stored values of T and the probability distribution function (pdf T ) of the noise. Frequency variance shifts the peak of the output to the left, i.e. t f = T/(1+ f ), where f is a number that depended on the range of frequencies and the pdf f of the noise.



This work was supported by the grant IOS CAREER 1054914 from the National Science Foundation.

Authors’ Affiliations

Department of Physics and Astronomy, College of Charleston


  1. Gallistel CR: The organization of behavior. 1990, Cambridge, MA: MIT PressGoogle Scholar
  2. Matell MS, Meck WH: Cortico-striatal circuits and interval timing: coincidence detection of oscillatory processes. Cognitive Brain Research. 2004, 21 (2): 139-170.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Oprisan SA, Buhusi CV: What is all the noise about in interval timing?. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences. 2014, 369 (1637): 20120459-PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Buhusi CV, Aziz D, Winslow D, Carter RE, Swearingen JE, Buhusi MC: Interval Timing Accuracy and Scalar Timing in C57BL/6 Mice. Behavioral Neuroscience. 2009, 123 (5): 1102-PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar


© Oprisan and Novo 2015

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.