Skip to content

Advertisement

  • Poster presentation
  • Open Access

Are rich club regions masters or slaves of brain network dynamics?

  • 1Email author,
  • 2, 3,
  • 4,
  • 5 and
  • 1
BMC Neuroscience201516 (Suppl 1) :P18

https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2202-16-S1-P18

  • Published:

Keywords

  • Neuronal Dynamic
  • Neural Mass Model
  • Primate Cortex
  • Rich Club
  • Anatomical Network

Anatomical networks of brain systems emphasize their inherent hierarchical structure, in which the rich club (most inner core of the brain) is highlighted because it promotes topological efficiency and integrates communication between regions [1]. The hierarchical structure is fundamental and also observed in the neuronal dynamics: Cortical anatomy is thought to recapitulate the temporal hierarchy that is inherent in the dynamics of environmental states and human behavior [2]. According to this classical view the caudal-rostral arrangement maps the fast-slow gradient of neuronal time scales [3]. Here we ask whether the topological arrangement of the networks can provide a scaffold on which a hierarchy of time scales including slow and stable dynamics emerges. We modeled neuronal dynamics unfolding on an anatomical network reconstructed from primate cortex that has a set of rich-club regions at the core of the network that are surrounded by their feeders and peripheral areas [4]. We utilized a conductance-based neural mass model [5], which gives rise to node dynamics with two time scales. The system synchronizes at the fast time scale and exhibits rich phase relations at the slow rhythm (~10Hz). We then characterized and compared the oscillatory dynamics of nodes and the synchronization between pairs of nodes. Our results show that highly connected regions, such as rich-club members, exhibit a more regular dynamics, and larger stability of phase relation with respective to other regions [6]. Owing to the dynamics of the local connectivity and network-motif structure [7, 8], central nodes also catalyze better local zero-lag synchronization between their neighbors. Together our results show how the topology of this constellation of brain regions supports stable, slowly fluctuating patterns of synchronization. In contrast, the topology of the surrounding "feeder" cortical regions shows unstable, rapidly fluctuating dynamics. Hence, assuming the interaction of identical dynamical elements coupled via the structural connectome of primate cortex [4], we already find an emerging hierarchy of time scales due to the network structure. We thus propose that the network properties of central cortical regions are the structural determinants of slow neuronal fluctuations in these brain regions. Although the traditional caudal-rostral hierarchical cortical mapping exhibited an unprecedented success, our dynamic-based study aligned with recent observations indicates that the cortical organizing principle may be best described by a periphery-core axis. Intriguingly, as a metaphor to social networks, rich-club members could be seen to be "slaves" of their own power. The richness of these brain regions comes from their large in-degree. However, for this very reason, their dynamics are consequently more regular because larger in-degree guarantees larger regularity. In other words, the autonomous dynamics of connectome hubs are largely enslaved to the strong, rhythmic output of the entire connectome. Therefore, rich-club regions cannot behave very differently from what is "expected" in contrast to the peripheral nodes, which have the most freedom to explore the dynamical landscape.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Systems Neuroscience Group, QIMR Berghofer, Brisbane, Queensland, QLD, 4006, Australia
(2)
Melbourne Neuropsychiatry Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
(3)
Melbourne Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
(4)
Center for Brain Science, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA
(5)
Brain Center Rudolf Magnus, University Medical Center, Utrecht, the Netherlands

References

  1. van den Heuvel MP, Sporns O: Network hubs in the human brain. Trends Cogn Sci. 2013, 17 (12): 683-696.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Kiebel SJ, Daunizeau J, Friston KJ: A hierarchy of time-scales and the brain. PLoS CB. 2008, 4 (11): e1000209-Google Scholar
  3. Fuster JM: The prefrontal cortex-an update: time is of the essence. Neuron. 2001, 30 (2): 319-333.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Harriger L, Van Den Heuvel MP, Sporns O: Rich club organization of macaque cerebral cortex and its role in network communication. PloS One. 2012, 7 (9): e46497-PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Breakspear M, Terry JR, Friston KJ: Modulation of excitatory synaptic coupling facilitates synchronization and complex dynamics in a biophysical model of neuronal dynamics. Network. 2003, 14 (4): 703-732.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Gollo LL, Zalesky A, Hutchison RM, van den Heuvel M, Breakspear M: Dwelling quietly in the rich club: brain network determinants of slow cortical fluctuations. Phil Trans R Soc B. 2015, 370: 1668-View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Gollo LL, Mirasso C, Sporns O, Breakspear M: Mechanisms of zero-lag synchronization in cortical motifs. PLoS Comput Biol. 2014, 10: e1003548-PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Gollo LL, Breakspear M: The frustrated brain: from dynamics on motifs to communities and networks. Phil Trans R Soc B. 2014, 369 (1653): 20130532-PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

Advertisement