- Poster presentation
- Open Access
Dynamical sensory representations establish a rapid odor code in a spiking model of the insect olfactory system
BMC Neuroscience volume 16, Article number: P174 (2015)
In their natural environment, animals sense and evaluate olfactory cues of time-varying composition and concentration. Their olfactory pathways are adapted to the natural stimulus statistics, thus it is not surprising that odor processing is fast . Honey bees, for example, learn to discriminate odors presented as short as 200 ms . The neural odor code in these animals emerges within 50ms after stimulus onset and neural representation changes dynamically during and after an odorant is present [1, 3]. How is the insect olfactory system optimized to reliably estimate spatial and temporal aspects of the olfactory environment and what are the mechanisms behind rapid odor processing?
To investigate odor encoding at the Antennal Lobe (AL) and the Mushroom Body (MB) level, we employ a simple phenomenological spiking network model of the honeybee olfactory system. The model implements a transformation from a low dimensional dense odorant representation in the AL to a high dimensional sparse representation in the MB. We demonstrate how information about the stimulus is present in both encoding schemes, by time resolved classification of neural activity.
Our model displays sparse and robust odor representation in the Mushroom Body . Typically, less than 10% of the Kenyon Cell population is activated by an odor, with only 2-3 spikes at the odor onset (Figure 1A). KC spikes establish a rapid odor identity code at stimulus onset, while intrinsic adaptation currents provide a persistent and prolonged odor trace (Figure 1B). Our approach allows us to investigate dynamical changes in odor representations and predict odor after images.
Nawrot MP: Dynamics of sensory processing in the dual olfactory pathway of the honeybee. Apidologie. 2012, 43: 269-291.
Wright GA, Carlton M, Smith BH: A honeybee's ability to learn, recognize, and discriminate odors depends upon odor sampling time and concentration. Behavioral Neuroscience. 2009, 123 (1): 36-43.
Strube-Bloss M, Herrera-Valdez M, Smith B: Ensemble response in mushroom body output neurons of the honey bee outpaces spatiotemporal odor processing two synapses earlier in the antennal lobe. PLoS One. 2012, 7 (11): e50322-
Farkhooi F, Froese A, Muller E, Menzel R, Nawrot MP: Cellular Adaptation Facilitates Sparse and Reliable Coding in Sensory Pathways. PLoS Computational Biology. 2013, 9 (10): e1003251-
BMBF grant 01GQ0941 Insect Inspired Robots within the Bernstein Focus Learning and Memory (BFNL). Research Training Group Sensory Computation in Neural Systems (GRK 1589) funded by the German DFG.
Rights and permissions
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
About this article
Cite this article
Betkiewicz, R., Farkhooi, F. & Nawrot, M.P. Dynamical sensory representations establish a rapid odor code in a spiking model of the insect olfactory system. BMC Neurosci 16 (Suppl 1), P174 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2202-16-S1-P174
- Stimulus Onset
- Sparse Representation
- Mushroom Body
- Antennal Lobe
- Olfactory Pathway