Skip to content

Advertisement

  • Poster presentation
  • Open Access

Interplay of intrinsic and network heterogeneity in strongly recurrent spiking networks

BMC Neuroscience201516 (Suppl 1) :P150

https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2202-16-S1-P150

  • Published:

Keywords

  • Network Heterogeneity
  • Inhibitory Neuron
  • Cortical Network
  • Excitatory Neuron
  • Response Heterogeneity

Heterogeneity has recently gained a lot of attention and it is becoming more apparent that it is a crucial feature in neural processing [15]. Despite its importance, this realistic physiological feature has traditionally been neglected in theoretical studies of cortical neural networks. A common reason is that mean-field descriptions of noisy cortical networks are high dimensional and generally intractable. Although heterogeneous spiking neural networks have recently been studied theoretically [58], there is still a lot unknown. In particular, combining network heterogeneity [9] and intrinsic heterogeneity [10] have yet to be considered simultaneously despite the fact that both are known to exist and likely have significant roles in neural network dynamics.

To this end, we study a recurrently coupled spiking network of leaky integrate-and-fire (LIF) neurons consisting of excitatory and inhibitory neurons. The intrinsic heterogeneity is modeled by varying the voltage threshold for spiking [5], and the network heterogeneity is modeled by different conductance strengths (partially motivated by recent results [11], both excitatory and inhibitory conductances are scaled so each neuron has a different level of balanced input). Unsurprisingly, we find that when either intrinsic or network heterogeneity is increased, the response heterogeneity also increases (i.e., the range of the average firing rate of the excitatory neurons also increases). However, for a fixed level of both forms of heterogeneity, the network robustly exhibits a wide range of response heterogeneity that strongly depends on the relationship between intrinsic and network heterogeneity. This coupled network is difficult to analyze because it is stochastic, heterogeneous, and high dimensional with alpha function synapses and colored external noisy input. With combination of Monte Carlo simulations and augmented mean-field theory based partially on methods in [1215], we provide analytic explanations to account for the observed phenomena. Our work gives insight for how these two forms of heterogeneity interact in a generic recurrent spiking network that may be applicable to many areas of the cortex.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Statistical Sciences and Operations Research, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA 23284, USA

References

  1. Shamir M, Sompolinsky H: Implications of neuronal diversity on population coding. Neural Computation. 2006, 18: 1951-1986.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Chelaru MI, Dragoi V: Efficient coding in heterogeneous neuronal populations. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2008, 105: 16344-16349.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Padmanabhan K, Urban NN: Intrinsic biophysical diversity decorrelates neuronal firing while increasing information content. Nature neuroscience. 2010, 13: 1276-1282.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Tripathy SJ, Padmanabhan K, Gerkin RC, Urban NN: Intermediate intrinsic diversity enhances neural population coding. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2013, 110: 8248-8253.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Mejias JF, Longtin A: Optimal heterogeneity for coding in spiking neural networks. Physical Review Letters. 2012, 108: 228102-PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Ly C: Dynamics of Coupled Noisy Neural Oscillators with Heterogeneous Phase Resetting Curves. SIAM Journal on Applied Dynamical Systems. 2014, 14: 1733-1755.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Nicola W, Campbell SA: Mean-field models for heterogeneous networks of two-dimensional integrate and fire neurons. Frontiers in computational neuroscience. 2013, 7: 184-PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Zhou P, Burton SD, Urban NN, Ermentrout GB: Impact of neuronal heterogeneity on correlated colored noise-induced synchronization. Frontiers in computational neuroscience. 2013, 7: 113-PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Perin R, Berger TK, Markram H: A synaptic organizing principle for cortical neuronal groups. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2011, 108: 5419-5424.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Marder E: Variability, compensation, and modulation in neurons and circuits. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2011, 108: 15542-15548.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Xue M, Atallah BV, Scanziani M: Equalizing excitation-inhibition ratios across visual cortical neurons. Nature. 2014, 511: 596-600.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Moreno-Bote R, Parga N: Auto- and crosscorrelograms for the spike response of leaky integrate-and-fire neurons with slow synapses. Physical Review Letters. 2006, 96: 028101-PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Nesse WH, Borisyuk A, Bressloff PC: Fluctuation-driven rhythmogenesis in an excitatory neuronal network with slow adaptation. Journal of Computational Neuroscience. 2008, 25: 317-333.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Ly C: A Principled Dimension-Reduction Method for the Population Density Approach to Modeling Networks of Neurons with Synaptic Dynamics. Neural Computation. 2013, 25: 2682-2708.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Nicola W, Ly C, Campbell SA: One-dimensional Population Density Approaches to Recurrently Coupled Networks of Neurons with Noise. Submitted, [http://arxiv.org/abs/1411.2273]

Copyright

Advertisement