Volume 16 Supplement 1

24th Annual Computational Neuroscience Meeting: CNS*2015

Open Access

Reconstructing dynamical models from optogenetic data

  • Sorinel A Oprisan1Email author,
  • Patrick E Lynn2,
  • Tamas Tompa3, 4 and
  • Antonieta Lavin3
BMC Neuroscience201516(Suppl 1):P143


Published: 18 December 2015

Optogenetics allows optical control of neuronal activity by using genetically altered neural cells and optical tools. Briefly, optogenetics uses a photosensitive element that, upon absorption of light, produces some change in the activity of the cells. Although the technique evolved, it involves inserting a light-sensitive channel from green algae, called channelrhodopsin-2 (ChR2), into neurons [1]. By precise spatial and temporal delivery of light pulses we can identify the local interconnections among neurons and investigate their dynamical response under different conditions.

Data were recorded with a custom made optrode made of a recording pipette glued to optic fiber inserted in the medial prefrontal cortex (PFC) of male PV-Cre mice injected with virus suspension AV2/5.EF1a.DIO.hChR2(H134R)-EYFP.WPRE.hGH [2]. A 473 nm laser generated light stimulation and stable single unit recordings were monitored before filtering to record field potentials (0.1-100 Hz). Optical stimulation consisted of 10 ms pulses followed by 15 ms pause (40 Hz). A train of 10 pulses that lasted 250 ms was applied every 4 seconds and local filed potentials were recorded with a sampling rate of 10 KHz (Figure 1A). We used delay-embedding method to reconstruct the phase space attractor [3]. We found that the minimum dimension that unfolds the attractors is three and the delay time is about 3600 data points (Figure 1B). Based on the phase space reconstruction, we were able to extract a low-dimensional mathematical model that describes the dynamics of the system. Although every single neuron in the mPFC is described by a large number of independent variables such as ionic channel activation/inactivation variables, the local neural network activated by light pulses can be modeled with only three variables. We hypothesize these three global variables could be the activity of excitatory, inhibitory interneurons, and light-sensitive neurons.
Figure 1

A. Average local filed potential (LFP) recordings that show the response of mPFC to 250 ms light stimuli. B. Phase space reconstruction of LFP using delayed embedding method in a three dimensional space and a delay time of 3600 data points (360 ms).



Oprisan acknowledges IOS CAREER grant 1054914 from the National Science Foundation.

Authors’ Affiliations

Department of Physics and Astronomy, College of Charleston
Department of Computer Science, College of Charleston
Department of Neuroscience, Medical University of South Charleston
Faculty of Healthcare, Department of Preventive Medicine, University of Miskolc


  1. Boyden Edward, Zhang Feng, Bamberg Ernst, Nagel Georg, Deisseroth Karl: Millisecond-timescale, genetically targeted optical control of neural activity. Nature Neuroscience. 2005, 8: 1263-1268.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Dilgen Jonathan, Saggu Shalini, Naselaris Thomas, Lavin Antonieta: Optogenetically evoked gamma oscillations are disturbed by cocaine administration. Frontiers in cellular neuroscience. 2013, 7: 1-9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Takens Floris: Detecting Strange Attractors in Turbulence in Dynamical Systems and Turbulence. Warwick 1980, Springer Lecture Notes in Mathematics. 1981, 898: 366-Google Scholar


© Oprisan et al. 2015

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.