Skip to content

Advertisement

BMC Neuroscience

Open Access

Towards a computational model of Dyslexia

  • Sagi Jaffe-Dax1Email author,
  • Ofri Raviv1,
  • Nori Jacoby1,
  • Yonatan Loewenstein1 and
  • Merav Ahissar1
BMC Neuroscience201516(Suppl 1):O12

https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2202-16-S1-O12

Published: 4 December 2015

Dyslexics are diagnosed for their poor reading skills. Yet, they characteristically also suffer from poor verbal memory, and often from poor auditory skills. We now hypothesize that dyslexia can be understood computationally as a deficit in integrating prior information with noisy observations. To test this hypothesis we analyzed performance in two tones pitch discrimination task using a two-parameter computational model. One parameter captures the internal noise in representing the current event and the other captures the impact of recently acquired prior information [1]. We found that dyslexics' perceptual deficit can be accounted for by inadequate adjustment of these components: low weighting of their implicit memory in relation to their internal noise (Figure 1). Using ERP measurements we found evidence for dyslexics' deficient automatic integration of experiment's statistics (Figure 2). Taken together, these results suggest that dyslexia can be understood as a well-defined computational deficit.
Figure 1

Estimated parameters of the Implicit Memory Model. Estimated values of η (weighting of implicit memory) as a function of estimated values of σ (percentage of internal noise) of Controls (blue) and Dyslexics (red). The optimal weighting η* is plotted in green. Gray area depicts the confidence interval of 2.5% below the best performance. Inset. Median deviation from optimal weighting of previous trials. Dyslexics' deviation is larger than Controls' (Mann-Whitney test, Z = 2.5, P < 0.01). Error bars denote inter-quartile range.

Figure 2

Grand Average ERPs to the two-tone stimulation. A. Controls B. Dyslexics. Trials are sorted according to the trial type, Bias+ (where the impact of previous trials improves performance) and Bias- (where the impact of previous trials impairs performance). Controls' P2 after the first tone differs between the two trial types. Dyslexics' evoked responses did not differ between the two trial types. Filled areas denote cross-subject SEM. Small black rectangles under the plots denote the temporal location of the two tones in the trial. Middle insets. P2 region enlarged; Top right insets. Single subject P2 area in Bias- versus Bias+ trials. The difference between the trial types is significantly larger among Controls than among Dyslexics (Condition × Group interaction: Mann-Whitney test, z = 2.5, P < 0.05).

Declarations

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by Israel Science Foundation (grant no. 616/11).

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Edmond and Lily Safra Center for Brain Sciences, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel

References

  1. Raviv O, Ahissar M, Loewenstein Y: How recent history affects perception: the normative approach and its heuristic approximation. PLoS Comput Biol. 2012, 8: e1002731-PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Jaffe-Dax et al. 2015

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Advertisement