Skip to content

Advertisement

You're viewing the new version of our site. Please leave us feedback.

Learn more

BMC Neuroscience

Open Access

Differential neural responses to naturally occurring envelopes in the electrosensory system

BMC Neuroscience201415(Suppl 1):P192

https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2202-15-S1-P192

Published: 21 July 2014

Natural sensory stimuli frequently consist of a fine structure whose amplitude (i.e. envelope) varies more slowly. Previous studies have demonstrated that envelope signals are found across sensory systems and are necessary for perception. For example, envelope signals in the auditory system carry information pertaining to the perception of pitch fluctuations in communication vocalizations [1], while envelopes in the visual system are responsible for object grouping and the perception of illusory contours [2, 3]. However, the neural mechanisms underlying the encoding of these envelope signals are poorly understood in general. Gymnotiform wave-type weakly electric fish constitute an attractive model system for studying envelope processing in the brain because of its well-characterized anatomy and physiology [4]. These fish generate around themselves a weak quasi-sinusoidal electric field through the electric organ discharge (EOD) [5]. Recent studies have shown that the beat amplitude (i.e. the envelope) can vary in time during different behavioral contexts and display differential frequency content: while envelopes caused by movement primarily contain low (<1 Hz) temporal frequencies [6], those caused by social interaction instead contain higher (>1 Hz) temporal frequencies [7]. While it is known that electrosensory neurons can respond to envelopes [7], whether these neurons respond differentially to envelopes arising from movement and social interaction is unknown in part because their tuning to envelope frequencies has not been characterized. Here we used well established techniques [8] to record from electrosensory pyramidal neurons across different maps of the body surface within the electrosensory lateral line lobe (ELL) in response to envelope stimuli with different frequency content spanning the behaviorally relevant range (0.05-10 Hz). Using standard measures of linear systems identification techniques as well as more quantitative methods of information theory, we found that pyramidal neurons in different maps displayed differential responses to envelopes arising from different behavioral contexts. Our results suggest that information about envelopes arising from different behavioral contexts begins to be segregated at the level of the ELL and provide new insights as to how these behaviorally relevant stimuli are encoded in early sensory pathways.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

This work was funded by CIHR and FQRNT.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Physiology, McGill University
(2)
Department of Physics, McGill University

References

  1. Burns EM, Viemeister NF: Played-again SAM: Further observations on the pitch of amplitude-modulated noise. Journal of Acoustical Society of America. 1981, 70: 1655-1660. 10.1121/1.387220.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Shapley R: Visual cortex: pushing the envelope. Nature neuroscience. 1998, 1 (2): 95-96. 10.1038/342.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Grosof DH, Shapley RM, Hawken MJ: Macaque V1 neurons can signal 'illusory' contours. Nature. 1993, 365 (6446): 550-552. 10.1038/365550a0.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Maler L: Receptive field organization across multiple electrosensory maps. I. Columnar organization and estimation of receptive field size. The Journal of comparative neurology. 2009, 516 (5): 376-393. 10.1002/cne.22124.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Bennett MV: Electrolocation in fish. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. 1971, 188: 242-269. 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1971.tb13102.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Fotowat H, Harrison RR, Krahe R: Statistics of the electrosensory input in the freely swimming weakly electric fish Apteronotus leptorhynchus. The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience. 2013, 33 (34): 13758-13772. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0998-13.2013.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Stamper SA, Fortune ES, Chacron MJ: Perception and coding of envelopes in weakly electric fishes. The Journal of experimental biology. 2013, 216 (Pt 13): 2393-2402.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Deemyad T, Metzen MG, Pan Y, Chacron MJ: Serotonin selectively enhances perception and sensory neural responses to stimuli generated by same-sex conspecifics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2013, 110 (48): 19609-19614. 10.1073/pnas.1314008110.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Huang and Chacron; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Advertisement