Skip to main content

Advertisement

Neural coding strategies for extracting motion estimates from electrosensory contrast

Article metrics

  • 567 Accesses

Object saliency is based on the relative local-to-background contrast in the physical signals that underlie perceptual experience. Extracting meaningful stimulus representations from these contrast patterns constitutes a serious inverse problem for neural coding, where many different stimulus features map into a scalar firing rate. This decoding problem is even more acute for neurons whose dynamics are characterized by fixed timescales, which produce distinct firing rate responses to different temporal parameterizations of a stimulus [1]. By studying how looming object distance is extracted from electrosensory contrast, we demonstrate that power law adaptation in the primary electroreceptor afferents of A. leptorhynchus transforms the firing rate, yielding a code for stimulus intensity (distance) that is invariant to the rate of change of intensity with respect to time (speed). As such, estimates of both object distance and approach speed are effectively parsed into distinct measures of an electroreceptor afferent’s firing rate [1].

Despite its important role in neural coding, adaptation suffers a serious caveat for encoding natural inputs: it generates skewed responses when signal intensity changes from increasing to decreasing (or vice versa). As predicted by generic models of spike-frequency adaptation, we report a skew in the electroreceptor afferent firing rate upon motion reversal, introducing further ambiguity into the estimation of object distance from electrosensory contrast [2]. The electrosense compensates for the skewed firing rate by combining the activity of downstream ON and OFF cells into a population rate code characterized by paradoxical responses to local contrast. Under both positive and negative contrast conditions, motion reversal induces a coding switch between ON and OFF cells, whose combined instantaneous firing rates cooperatively produce a symmetric representation of object motion. Whereas the firing rates of the individual ON and OFF cells convey scalar information, such as object distance, their sequential activation over longer timescales encode changes in motion direction.

References

  1. 1.

    Clarke SE, Naud R, Longtin A, Maler L: Speed-invariant encoding of looming object distance requires power law spike rate adaptation. P.N.A.S USA. 2013, 110 (33): 13624-13629.

  2. 2.

    Clarke SE, Longtin A, Maler L: A neural code for looming and receding motion is distributed over a population of electrosensory ON and OFF contrast cells. J. Neurosci. 2014, 34 (16): 5582-5594. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4988-13.2014.

Download references

Author information

Correspondence to Stephen E Clarke.

Rights and permissions

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Clarke, S.E., Naud, R., Longtin, A. et al. Neural coding strategies for extracting motion estimates from electrosensory contrast. BMC Neurosci 15, P185 (2014) doi:10.1186/1471-2202-15-S1-P185

Download citation

Keywords

  • Firing Rate
  • Object Distance
  • Motion Reversal
  • Neural Code
  • Signal Intensity Change