Volume 14 Supplement 1

Abstracts from the Twenty Second Annual Computational Neuroscience Meeting: CNS*2013

Open Access

Encoding the Laplace transform of stimulus history using mechanisms for persistent firing

BMC Neuroscience201314(Suppl 1):P356

https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2202-14-S1-P356

Published: 8 July 2013

Persistent firing has been observed in slice preparations from a variety of brain regions believed to be important in memory [13]. Information about a transient stimulus can be reflected in persistently elevated firing rate over many minutes. What computation could persistent firing cells support? In particular the lack of forgetting observed in slice preparations seems difficult to reconcile with the finding that memory degrades over time.

A scale-invariant model for representing past stimuli has been proposed in [4]. This model utilizes two layers of nodes. The first layer is composed of leaky integrators and computes the Laplace transform of the input function. The first layer projects to the second through a linear operator which approximates the inverse Laplace transform so the activity of the second layer at any point of time gives a fuzzy representation of the input history leading up to the present moment. Comparison with behavioral results suggests that the history should be retained over at least a few thousand seconds.

If we assume that each node of the above model corresponds to an individual neuron, the neurons encoding the Laplace transform should respond to a particular stimulus with a firing rate that decays exponentially over time. Critically, in order to encode the Laplace transform we require different rates of decay for different neurons in this layer. Moreover, the longest time constant across neurons determines the longest time scale that can be maintained in representation of the history.

Persistent firing cells [5] are basically perfect integrators. We have been exploring the conditions under which persistently firing cells observed in the slice could be adapted to give rise to a set of leaky integrators whose rate constants are under external control. The basic idea is to modulate the channels responsible for persistent firing using divisive dendritic inhibition [6]. Under these circumstances, constructing a set of cells with different rate constants amounts to providing a set of identical cells with different levels of inhibitory input. We explore the potential of this mechanism using biophysical simulations centered on a calcium-dependent cationic current - Ican and hyperpolarization-activated, voltage and calcium-dependent cationic current - Ih. We also describe a simple integrate and fire model that yields an explicit analytical solution describing the conditions under which persistent firing can be modulated to yield exponential decay.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Center for Memory and Brain, Boston University

References

  1. Egorov AV, Hamam BN, Fransen E, Hasselmo ME, Alonso AA: Graded persistent activity in entorhinal cortex neurons. Nature. 2002, 420: 173-178. 10.1038/nature01171.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Yoshida M, Knauer B, Jochems A: Cholinergic modulation of the CAN current may adjust neural dynamics for active memory maintenance, spatial navigation and time-compressed replay. Front Neural Circuits. 2012, 6 (10):Google Scholar
  3. Navaroli VL, Zhao Y, Boguszewski P, Brown TH: Muscarinic receptor activation enables persistent firing in pyramidal neurons from superficial layers of dorsal perirhinal cortex. Hippocampus. 2011, 22 (6): 1392-1404.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Shankar KH, Howard MW: A scale-invariant internal representation of time. Neural Computation. 2012, 24: 134-193. 10.1162/NECO_a_00212.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Fransen E, Tahvildari B, Egorov AV, Hasselmo ME, Alonso AA: Mechanism of Graded Persistent Cellular Activity of Entorhinal Cortex Layer V Neurons. Neuron. 2006, 49: 735-746. 10.1016/j.neuron.2006.01.036.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Mehaffey WH, Doiron B, Maler L, Turner RW: Deterministic multiplicative gain control with active dendrites. J Neurosci. 2005, 25 (43): 9968-77. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2682-05.2005.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Tiganj et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Advertisement