- Poster presentation
- Open Access
Going beyond Poisson processes: a new statistical framework in neuronal modeling and data analysis
© Deniz and Rotter; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013
- Published: 8 July 2013
- Poisson Process
- Spike Train
- Interspike Interval
- Population Response
- Continuous Time Markov Chain
Cortical spike trains in vivo often show a high irregularity, reflected by a coefficient of variation (CV) close to one . Such irregular single neuron spiking has consequently been associated with Poisson processes, and many models involving neuronal spike trains inherited this ideology. This viewpoint is further supported by the Palm-Khintchine theorem, which states that a superposition of a large number of renewal processes with very small intensity behaves like a Poisson process. It was demonstrated, however, that this theorem doesn't always apply to the superposition of neuronal spike trains [2–4]. Moreover, Poisson processes lack the temporal properties observed in population responses to input modulation either via a stimulus in vivo  or via electrical stimulation in vitro .
In this study, we report on new techniques to deal with non-Possonian aspects of stationary neuronal spike trains, as well as non-equilibrium population responses , based on Markov point processes (MPP), commonly known as continuous time Markov chains (CTMC). We compute the interspike interval (ISI) distribution by algebraically solving the first passage time problem for MPP neuron models, and compute the transient population responses with a similar technique. The same technique is used to compute exact cross-correlation functions for a shared input paradigm . We advertise MPPs as a new powerful framework in neural network modeling and neural data analysis with many possible applications.
This work is supported by the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF; grant 01GQ0420 to BCCN Freiburg and grant 01GQ0830 to BFNT Freiburg*Tubingen) and the German Research Foundation (DFG; grant EXC 1086 to the Cluster of Excellence BrainLinks-BrainTools).
- Shadlen MN, Newsome WT: The variable discharge of cortical neurons: implications for connectivity, computation and information coding. Journal of Neuroscience. 1998, 18: 3870-3896.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lindner B: Superposition of many independent spike trains is generally not a Poisson process. Physical Review E. 2006, 73: 022901-View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Câteau H, Reyes A: Relation between single neuron and population spiking statistics and effects on network activity. Physical Review Letters. 2006, 96 (5): 058101-View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Deger M, Helias M, Boucsein C, Rotter S: Statistical properties of superimposed stationary spike trains. Journal of Computational Neuroscience. 2012, 32 (3): 443-463. 10.1007/s10827-011-0362-8.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Mazor O, Laurent G: Transient dynamics versus fixed points in odor representations by locust antennal lobe projection neurons. Neuron. 2005, 661-673. 48Google Scholar
- Silberberg G, Bethge M, Markram H, Pawelzik K, Tsodyks M: Dynamics of population rate codes in ensembles of neocortical neurons. Journal of Neurophysiology. 2004, 91 (2): 704-709.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Deger M, Helias M, Cardanobile S, Atay FM, Rotter S: Nonequilibrium dynamics of stochastic point processes with refractoriness. Physical Review E. 2010, 82: 021129-View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- de la Rocha J, Doiron B, Shea-Brown E, Josic K, Reyes A: Correlation between neural spike trains increase with firing rate. Nature. 2007, 448: 802-806. 10.1038/nature06028.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.