Skip to content

Advertisement

  • Poster presentation
  • Open Access

Slow sodium-channel inactivation underlies spike threshold variability

BMC Neuroscience201314 (Suppl 1) :P322

https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2202-14-S1-P322

  • Published:

Keywords

  • Slow Inactivation
  • Fast Inactivation
  • Spike Threshold
  • Synaptic Drive
  • Decay Threshold

Action potentials are triggered once a neuron has received sufficient synaptic input to be depolarised above threshold; however, this threshold is dynamic and strongly correlated to the recent voltage history and time since the last spike. Previous experimental measurements from cortical layer-5 pyramidal neurons have shown that after an action potential the threshold can jump up to 10 mV and subsequently decays exponentially back to its baseline value over a period of tens of milliseconds [1, 2]. Our recent experimental data indicate that this behaviour is a common feature of neocortical excitatory cells in different cortical layers.

One mechanism that modulates the spike threshold is the degree and duration of sodium-channel inactivation. In the standard Hodgkin-Huxley formulation of the action potential only fast inactivation is present, with a return to the baseline state within a few milliseconds post-spike. However, a slow component of sodium inactivation is also known to be present in neocortical cells [3] with a time constant - of the order of tens of milliseconds - that is similar to the experimentally measured threshold decay.

To model the influence this mechanism has on spike threshold we added a slow sodium inactivation variable to the sodium current of an existing conductance-based model [4]. We found that the augmented model now exhibited a decaying threshold that was not present in the original model, with similar properties to that observed experimentally. An analysis of the spike-triggered slow-inactivation variable dynamics demonstrated that it could be accurately described by two parameters: the post-spike level of inactivation and the time constant of its decay back to an activated state. These gating variable parameters could in turn be directly related to the corresponding magnitude of the post-spike increase of the threshold and the time constant of its decay to baseline.

We next added this mechanism to the Exponential Integrate-and-Fire model [5] to better quantitatively understand the role of slow inactivation in modifying spike behaviour under conditions of stochastic synaptic drive at both the neuronal and network levels. Though in general this is a two variable system comprising of voltage and the post-spike threshold dynamics, we show that if the membrane and threshold-relaxation time constants are the same the system can be reduced to an effective one-dimensional model amenable to standard Fokker-Planck methods [6]. Finally, a perturbative approach is introduced that allows for the calculation of experimentally relevant quantities like the first-passage-time density and spike-train spectra for the general case where the two time constants differ.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

We gratefully acknowledge funding for a studentship from the Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council through the MOAC Doctoral Training Centre at the University of Warwick.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
MOAC DTC, University of Warwick, Coventry, CV4 7AL, UK
(2)
School of Life Sciences, University of Warwick, Coventry, CV4 7AL, UK
(3)
Warwick Systems Biology Centre, University of Warwick, Coventry, CV4 7AL, UK

References

  1. Badel L, Lefort S, Brette R, Petersen CCH, Gerstner W, Richardson MJE: Dynamic I-V Curves Are Reliable Predictors of Naturalistic Pyramidal-Neuron Voltage Traces. Neurophysiol. 2008, 99: 656-666. 10.1152/jn.01107.2007.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Badel L, Lefort S, Berger TK, Petersen CCH, Gerstner W, Richardson MJE: Extracting Non-Linear Integrate-and-Fire Models from Experimental Data Using Dynamic I-V Curves. Biol Cybern. 2008, 99: 361-370. 10.1007/s00422-008-0259-4.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Fleidervish IA, Friedman A, Gutnick MJ: Slow Inactivation of Na+ Current and Slow Cumulative Spike Adaptation in Mouse and Guinea-Pig Neocortical Neurones in Slices. J Physiol. 1996, 83-97. 493Google Scholar
  4. Wang X, Buzsáki G: Gamma Oscillation by Synaptic Inhibition in a Hippocampal Interneuronal Network Model. J Neurosci. 1996, 16 (20): 6402-6413.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Fourcaud-Trocmé N, Hansel D, van Vreeswijk C, Brunel N: How Spike Generation Mechanisms Determine the Neuronal Response to Fluctuating Inputs. J Neurosci. 23 (37): 11628-11640.Google Scholar
  6. Richardson MJE: Firing-rate response of linear and nonlinear integrate-and-fire neurons to modulated current-based and conductance-based synaptic drive. Phys Rev E. 2007, 76: 021919View ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

Advertisement