Skip to main content

Effect of Alzheimer's disease on the dynamical and computational characteristics of recurrent neural networks

Recurrent circuits of simple model neurons can provide the substrate for cognitive functions such as perception, memory, association, classification or prediction of dynamical systems [13]. In Alzheimer's disease (AD), the impairment of such functions is clearly correlated to synapse loss [4]. So far, the mechanisms underlying this correlation are only poorly understood. Here, we investigate how the loss of excitatory synapses in sparsely connected random networks of spiking excitatory and inhibitory neurons [5] alters their dynamical and computational characteristics. By means of simulations, we study the network response to noisy variations of multidimensional spike-train patterns.

We find that the loss of excitatory synapses on excitatory neurons (decrease in excitatory-excitatory indegree; vertical arrow in Figure 1) lowers the network's sensitivity to small perturbations of time-varying inputs, reduces its ability to discriminate and improves its generalization capability [6].

Figure 1

Loss of excitatory-excitatory synapses (vertical arrow) impairs discrimination capability (gray coded). Recovery of discrimination capability by firing-rate homeostasis (scaling up remaining excitatory-excitatory synapses; horizontal arrow).

A full recovery of the network performance can be achieved by firing-rate homeostasis, implemented by scaling up the remaining excitatory-excitatory synapses (horizontal arrow in Figure 1). Homeostasis may therefore explain the absence of clinical symptoms in early AD, despite cortical damage. The onset of clinical symptoms may result from an exhaustion of homeostatic resources.


  1. 1.

    Hopfield JJ: PNAS. 1982, 79 (8): 2554-2558. 10.1073/pnas.79.8.2554.

    PubMed Central  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Jaeger H, Haas H: Science. 2004, 304: 78-80. 10.1126/science.1091277.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Maass W, Natschlaegel T, Markram H: Neural Comput. 2002, 14 (11): 2531-2560. 10.1162/089976602760407955.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Terry RD, Masliah E, Salmon DP, Butters N, DeTeresa R, Hill R, Hansen LA, Katzman R: Ann Neurol. 1991, 30 (4): 572-80. 10.1002/ana.410300410.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Brunel N: J Comput Neurosci. 2000, 8 (3): 183-208. 10.1023/A:1008925309027.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Legenstein R, Maass W: Neural Netw. 2007, 20 (3): 323-334. 10.1016/j.neunet.2007.04.017.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references


Supported by the Helmholtz Alliance on Systems Biology, the Helmholtz Association in the Portfolio theme "Supercomputing and Modeling for the Human Brain", the Jülich Aachen Research Alliance (JARA), EU Grant 269921 (BrainScaleS), the Junior Professor Program of Baden-Württemberg and the Initiative and Networking Fund of the Helmholtz Association.

Author information



Corresponding author

Correspondence to Claudia Bachmann.

Rights and permissions

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bachmann, C., Tetzlaff, T., Kunkel, S. et al. Effect of Alzheimer's disease on the dynamical and computational characteristics of recurrent neural networks. BMC Neurosci 14, P282 (2013).

Download citation


  • Computational Characteristic
  • Random Network
  • Model Neuron
  • Recurrent Neural Network
  • Inhibitory Neuron