Skip to content

Advertisement

  • Poster presentation
  • Open Access

Noise-induced anti-correlated slow fluctuations in networks of neural populations

BMC Neuroscience201314 (Suppl 1) :P214

https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2202-14-S1-P214

  • Published:

Keywords

  • Stable State
  • Human Brain
  • Brain Area
  • Functional Connectivity
  • Neural Activity

Coherent spontaneous fluctuations (< 0.1Hz) in fMRI blood-oxygen-level-dependent (BOLD) signal have been observed for a resting state of the human brain [14]. Functional connectivity analysis has identified clusters of brain areas exhibiting correlated fluctuations [14] and anti-correlation relationship between task-positive and task-negative areas [24]. In this study, we propose a model explaining the generation of slow fluctuations and the organization of the clusters. Based on the slowness and the anti-correlation relationship, we describe the brain as a network of neural populations which act as brain areas and prefer one of the two states, UP (active) state and DOWN (quiescent) state [5], and consider excitation-inducing or inhibition-inducing connections between brain areas. Without noise, this system can have multiple stable states in which each area can be in UP, DOWN, or intermediate state. Presence of noise can make the system slowly move from one stable state to other and this is manifested as organized slow fluctuations. We implement this mechanism using a Wilson-Cowan model [6, 7] with excitatory and inhibitory neurons constituting the neural populations. The neural activity is translated into BOLD signal through the Balloon-Windkessel hemodynamic model [8, 9]. With various networks with 2, 3, and 4 nodes, we show that the system without noise can have multiple stable states which are fixed points, and observe slow fluctuations and various organization including anti-correlated clusters. Similar behaviors are observed in the cases with random networks and modular networks. We analyze the functional connectivity in connection with the underlying networks.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

DL and SK were supported by the Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Education, Science and Technology (No. 2012R1A1A2043674).

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Physics, Pohang University of Science and Technology, Pohang, 790-784, Republic of Korea
(2)
Institute for Edge of Theoretical Science, Pohang University of Science and Technology, Pohang, 790-784, Republic of Korea
(3)
National Institute for Mathematical Sciences, Daejeon, 305-811, Republic of Korea

References

  1. Biswal B, Yetkin FZ, Haughton VM, Hyhe JS: Functional Connectivity in the Motor Cortex of Resting Human Brain Using Echo-Planar MRI. Magn Reson Med. 1995, 34: 537-541. 10.1002/mrm.1910340409.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Fox MD, Snyder AZ, Vincent JL, Corbetta M, Van Essen DC, Raichle ME: The human brain is intrinsically organized into dynamic, anticorrelated functional networks. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2005, 102: 9673-9678. 10.1073/pnas.0504136102.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Fox MD, Raichle ME: Spontaneous fluctuations in brain activity observed with functional magnetic resonance imaging. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2007, 8: 700-711. 10.1038/nrn2201.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Deco G, Jirsa VK, McIntosh AR: Emerging concepts for the dynamical organization of resting-state activity in the brain. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2011, 12: 43-56.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Steriade M: Impact of Network Activities on Neuronal Properties in Corticothalamic Systems. J Neurophysiol. 2001, 86: 1-39.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Wilson HR, Cowan JD: Excitatory and inhibitory interactions in localized populations of model neurons. Biophys J. 1972, 12: 1-24.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Ermentrout GB, Terman DH: Mathematical Foundations of Neuroscience. 2010, New York: SpringerView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Friston KJ, Mechelli A, Turner R, Price CJ: Nonlinear responses in fMRI: the Balloon model, Volterra Kernels, and Other Hemodynamics. Neuroimage. 2000, 12: 466-477. 10.1006/nimg.2000.0630.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Friston KJ, Harrison L, Penny W: Dynamic causal modelling. Neuroimage. 2003, 19: 1273-1302. 10.1016/S1053-8119(03)00202-7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Lee et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Advertisement