Skip to content

Advertisement

  • Poster presentation
  • Open Access

Modeling brain functional connectivity at rest

BMC Neuroscience201314 (Suppl 1) :P171

https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2202-14-S1-P171

  • Published:

Keywords

  • Functional Connectivity
  • Functional Network
  • Rest State fMRI
  • Rest State Functional Connectivity
  • Anatomical Connection

Well organized spatio-temporal low-frequency fluctuations (< 0.1 Hz), observed in blood-oxygen-level-dependent (BOLD) signal during rest, have been used to map several consistent resting state networks (RSNs) in the brain [13]. It has been hypothesized that these correlated fluctuations reflect synchronized variations in neural activity of particular brain areas, which are dynamically coupled to one another forming functional connections within networks of brain. Furthermore, it has been suggested that resting state functional connectivity (FC) is strongly shaped by underlying anatomical connectivity (AC). However, although RSNs reflect anatomical connections between brain areas comprising the networks in focus, FC cannot be understood in those terms alone [4]. Here, we combine experimental and modeling approach to investigate dynamics underlying correlated behavior of distant cortical regions and formation of the so called functional networks. We aim to address complicated interplay between network structure, dynamics of its components and emerging global behavior, as key ingredients of the networks complexity [5]. We study how functional connectivity arise from anatomical connections and compare obtained data with the networks simulated on the empirically derived FC networks from resting state fMRI data. We compare two distinctive networks: one with 90 brain regions defined using the Automated Anatomical Labeling (AAL) template [6], and another with 100 regions organized into seven distinctive resting state functional networks [7]. We choose to model local network dynamics by excitable FitzHugh-Nagumo oscillators subject to uncorrelated white Gaussian noise and time-delayed interactions to account for the finite speed of the signal propagation along the axons. We discuss FC between brain regions without apparent anatomical connections, exploring dynamics that underlie these correlations.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by BMBF (grant no. 01Q1001B) in the framework of BCCN Berlin (Project B7).

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Institute for Theoretical Physics, Technical University, Hardenbergstr. 36, 10623 Berlin, Germany
(2)
Bernstein Center for Computational Neuroscience, Humboldt University, Philippstr. 13, 10115 Berlin, Germany

References

  1. Biswal B, Yetkin FZ, Haughton VM, Hyde JS: Functional connectivity in the motor cortex of resting human brain using echo-planar MRI. Magnetic Res Med. 1995, 34: 537-541. 10.1002/mrm.1910340409.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Rombouts SARB, Barkof F, Scheltens P, Stam CJ, Smith SM, Beckmann CF: Consistent resting-state networks across healthy subjects. PNAS. 2006, 103: 13848-13853. 10.1073/pnas.0601417103.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Vincent JL, Patel GH, Fox MD, Snyder AZ, Baker JT, Van Essen DC, Zempel JM, Snyder LH, Corbetta M, Raichle ME: Intrinsic functional architecture in the anesthetized monkey brain. Nature. 2007, 447: 83-86. 10.1038/nature05758.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Deco G, Jirsa VK: Ongoing cortical activity at rest: criticality, multistability and ghost attractors. J Neurosci. 2012, 32: 3366-3375. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2523-11.2012.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Vuksanović V, Hövel P: Modelling functional connectivity. Proceedings of the International Symposium Self-organization in Complex systems: The Past, Present and Future of Synergetics; November 13-16. Edited by: Pelster A, Wunner G. 2012, Delmenhorst, Germany. Springer Series Understanding Complex systems, Springer, in preparationGoogle Scholar
  6. Tzourio-Mazoyer N, Landeau B, Papathanassiou D, Crivello F, Etard O, Delcrix N, Mazoyer B, Joliot M: Automated anatomical labeling of activations in SPM using a macroscopic anatomical parcelation of the MNI MRI single-subject brain. Neuroimage. 2002, 15: 273-289. 10.1006/nimg.2001.0978.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Allen EA, Erhardt EB, Damaraju E, Gruner W, Segall J, Silva RF, Havlicek M, Rachakonda S, Fries J, Kalyanam R, et al: A baseline for the multivariate comparisons of resting-state networks. Front Sys Neurosci. 2011, 5: 1-23.Google Scholar

Copyright

© Vuksanović and Hövel; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Advertisement