Skip to content


You're viewing the new version of our site. Please leave us feedback.

Learn more

BMC Neuroscience

Open Access

Modeling dose-dependent temperature responses to methamphetamine

  • Yaroslav Molkov1Email author,
  • Dmitry Zaretsky2,
  • Maria Zaretskaia2 and
  • Dan Rusyniak2
BMC Neuroscience201213(Suppl 1):P50

Published: 16 July 2012

Amphetamine derivatives are among the most abused drugs in the world. Long-term use can lead to cognitive, neurophysiological, and neuroanatomical deficits. These problems are enhanced by hyperthermia, which itself is a major mortality factor in drug abusers. Temperature responses to amphetamine injections are multiphasic including both hypothermic and hyperthermic phases. These responses are highly dependent on ambient temperature, previous exposure to the drug, and the involvement of various brain areas. It is therefore not surprising that most amphetamine research is performed with only one dose and/or only at one ambient temperature – neither of which may adequately predict real-life situations.

In this study we have attempted to mathematically describe temperature responses to several doses of methamphetamine (METH); drugs were intraperitoneally injected in freely moving rats (N=3-4 per dose) at room temperature. Our experimental data are consistent with earlier published data [1]: intermediate dose of METH (5 mg/kg) causes less hyperthermia than both low (1 mg/kg) and high (10 mg/kg) doses of the drug. Also, maxima of all responses have different latency: responses to low and high doses are virtually immediate, while response to an intermediate dose is delayed. Based on the presumed neurocircuitry (Fig.1A), we have devised a mathematical model in the form of an artificial neural network with first order pharmacokinetics. Each population was described as a three layer perceptron. All model parameters (weights of connections, sensitivity to the drug, pharmacokinetics and temperature response time constants) were subject to fitting three time-series (temperature responses to 1, 5, and 10 mg/kg of METH obtained in the experiment, Fig.1B). This model appeared to be sufficient to explain such complex phenomenon as dose-dependence of the temperature response (see Fig.1B), and reasonably predicted the effect of an additional dose METH not used in constructing the model (D=3 mg/kg on Fig.1B).
Figure 1

A. Neurocircuitry involved in neural control of temperature: DMH – Dorsomedial Hypothalamus; RP – Raphe Pallidus; RVLM – Rostral Ventrolateral Medulla; SC – spinal cord; HD – “high dose” activator; Temp – body temperature. Arrows show sites affected by methamphetamine (METH). B. Dose-dependent temperature responses to a single injection of METH: gray dots – experiment, black solid lines – as produced by the model.

Our results are a promising start to constructing a comprehensive and physiologically relevant model of temperature responses to derivatives of amphetamine. Future will experimentally confirm the identity of the specific brain areas of the interconnected nodes. The power of mathematically modeling is that along with predicting responses to amphetamines in laboratory conditions it may predict scenarios in which life-threatening hyperthermia can occur.



This study was supported by NIH grant DA026867; iM2CS-GEIRE.

Authors’ Affiliations

Department of Mathematical Sciences, Indiana University – Purdue University
Department of Emergency Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine


  1. Myles BJ, Jarrett LA, Broom SL, Speaker HA, Sabol KE: The effects of methamphetamine on core body temperature in the rat – part 1: chronic treatment and ambient temperature. Psychopharmacology. 2008, 198 (3): 301-11. 10.1007/s00213-007-1061-z.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar


© Molkov et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.