Volume 11 Supplement 1
Characterizing the temporal dynamics of cortical microcircuits: first and second order kernels for a cortical microcircuit
© Ulinski; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2010
Published: 20 July 2010
The summation is over the N populations of neurons. The time-dependent coefficients give the time course of synaptic interactions of all neurons in the ith population by all of the neurons in the jth population. The coefficients were determined by fitting the solutions of the equations (1) to the results of simulations using the large-scale model. In this study, we characterized the dynamics of the system (1) to pulses and pairs of pulses in order to determine the impulse response function (or first order kernel) and the higher order kernels of the system. The kernels are important because they describe the underlying temporal dynamics of the system. The first order kernel consists of two peaks, one at about 100 ms and one at about 600 ms after a pulse input. Blocking recurrent excitation between pyramidal cells shows that the recurrent excitation is responsible for a large gain in the system. Blocking specific populations of inhibitory interneurons with recurrent excitation intact shows that both feedforward and feedback inhibition control the magnitude of the pyramidal cell response. It also shows that specific populations of inhibitory interneurons interact with each other. The second order (first non-linear) kernel changes it shape as a function of the separation between the two pulses, and becomes zero with interpulse intervals of more than 50 ms. Blocking recurrent excitation between pyramidal cells or all inhibition in the system shows that both recurrent excitation and inhibition make major contributions to the non-linearity in the system. Specific types of inhibitory interneurons contribute to specific temporal phases of the second order kernel. The study suggests that cortical microcircuits have several general features. First, it confirms the concept that recurrent excitation plays a significant role in amplifying cortical inputs. Second, it suggests that the various populations of inhibitory interneurons interact with each other in a complex fashion so that an individual type of interneuron should not be assigned a unique function. Third, it suggests that the structure of the network is not static. It, rather, evolves with time depending on the temporal dynamics of the system.
- Douglas RJ, Martin KAC: A functional microcircuit for cat visual cortex. J. Physiol. 1991, 440: 735-769.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Colombe JB, Ulinski PS: Temporal dispersion windows in cortical neurons. J. Comput. Neurosci. 1999, 7 (1): 71-87. 10.1023/A:1008971628011.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Colombe JB, Sylvester J, Block J, Ulinski PS: Subpial and stellate cells. Two populations of interneurons in turtle visual cortex. J. Comp. Neurol. 2004, 471 (3): 333-351. 10.1002/cne.20037.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Wang W, Campaigne C, Ghosh BK, Ulinski PS: Two cortical circuits control propagating waves in visual cortex. J Comput Neurosci. 2005, 19: 263-289. 10.1007/s10827-005-2288-5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd.