Skip to main content

Advertisement

Sparse coding models demonstrate some non-classical receptive field effects

Article metrics

  • 1439 Accesses

  • 2 Citations

Non-classical receptive field (nCRF) effects include several response properties in V1 neurons not explained by a linear-nonlinear (LN) receptive field model, but instead requiring significant interactions between V1 neurons. Using a sparse coding model [1, 2] and bar and grating stimuli, simulated physiology experiments were carried out that replicated several nCRF phenomena reported previously in neurophysiology experiments. These include: end-stopping [3] (Fig. 1), contrast invariance of orientation tuning [4] (Fig. 2), radius, orientation, and contrast tunings of surround suppression [5, 6] (Fig. 3, 4, 5). The results suggest that a sparse coding model can explain many of the nonlinear effects in V1 cells, and is therefore a reasonable candidate for a functional model of striate cortex.

Figure 1
figure1

End-stopping. Comparison with a LN model.

Figure 2
figure2

Contrast invariance of orientation tuning.

Figure 3
figure3

Surround suppression at different contrasts.

Figure 4
figure4

Orientation tuning of surround suppression.

Figure 5
figure5

Surround orientation influences contrast tuning.

References

  1. 1.

    Rozell C, Johnson D, Baraniuk R, Olshausen B: Sparse coding via thresholding and local competition in neural circuits. Neural computation. 2008, 20: 2526-2563. 10.1162/neco.2008.03-07-486.

  2. 2.

    Olshausen B, Fteld D: Sparse coding with an overcomplete basis set: A strategy employed by V1?. Vision research. 1997, 37: 3311-3325. 10.1016/S0042-6989(97)00169-7.

  3. 3.

    Bolz J, Gilbert C: Generation of end-inhibition in the visual cortex via interlaminar connections. Nature. 1986

  4. 4.

    Skottun B, Bradley A, Sclar G, Ohzawa I, Freeman R: The effects of contrast on visual orientation and spatial frequency discrimination: a comparison of single cells and behavior. Journal of Neurophysiology. 1987, 57: 773.

  5. 5.

    Cavanaugh J, Bair W, Movshon J: Nature and interaction of signals from the receptive field center and surround in macaque V1 neurons. Journal of Neurophysiology. 2002, 88: 2530-10.1152/jn.00692.2001.

  6. 6.

    Cavanaugh J, Bair W, Movshon J: Selectivity and spatial distribution of signals from the receptive field surround in macaque V1 neurons. Journal of Neurophysiology. 2002, 88: 2547-10.1152/jn.00693.2001.

Download references

Author information

Correspondence to Mengchen Zhu.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 2.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zhu, M., Rozell, C.J. Sparse coding models demonstrate some non-classical receptive field effects. BMC Neurosci 11, O21 (2010) doi:10.1186/1471-2202-11-S1-O21

Download citation

Keywords

  • Receptive Field
  • Nonlinear Effect
  • Field Effect
  • Field Model
  • Functional Model