Skip to main content

Sparse coding models demonstrate some non-classical receptive field effects

Non-classical receptive field (nCRF) effects include several response properties in V1 neurons not explained by a linear-nonlinear (LN) receptive field model, but instead requiring significant interactions between V1 neurons. Using a sparse coding model [1, 2] and bar and grating stimuli, simulated physiology experiments were carried out that replicated several nCRF phenomena reported previously in neurophysiology experiments. These include: end-stopping [3] (Fig. 1), contrast invariance of orientation tuning [4] (Fig. 2), radius, orientation, and contrast tunings of surround suppression [5, 6] (Fig. 3, 4, 5). The results suggest that a sparse coding model can explain many of the nonlinear effects in V1 cells, and is therefore a reasonable candidate for a functional model of striate cortex.

Figure 1

End-stopping. Comparison with a LN model.

Figure 2

Contrast invariance of orientation tuning.

Figure 3

Surround suppression at different contrasts.

Figure 4

Orientation tuning of surround suppression.

Figure 5

Surround orientation influences contrast tuning.


  1. 1.

    Rozell C, Johnson D, Baraniuk R, Olshausen B: Sparse coding via thresholding and local competition in neural circuits. Neural computation. 2008, 20: 2526-2563. 10.1162/neco.2008.03-07-486.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Olshausen B, Fteld D: Sparse coding with an overcomplete basis set: A strategy employed by V1?. Vision research. 1997, 37: 3311-3325. 10.1016/S0042-6989(97)00169-7.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Bolz J, Gilbert C: Generation of end-inhibition in the visual cortex via interlaminar connections. Nature. 1986

    Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Skottun B, Bradley A, Sclar G, Ohzawa I, Freeman R: The effects of contrast on visual orientation and spatial frequency discrimination: a comparison of single cells and behavior. Journal of Neurophysiology. 1987, 57: 773.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Cavanaugh J, Bair W, Movshon J: Nature and interaction of signals from the receptive field center and surround in macaque V1 neurons. Journal of Neurophysiology. 2002, 88: 2530-10.1152/jn.00692.2001.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Cavanaugh J, Bair W, Movshon J: Selectivity and spatial distribution of signals from the receptive field surround in macaque V1 neurons. Journal of Neurophysiology. 2002, 88: 2547-10.1152/jn.00693.2001.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information



Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mengchen Zhu.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 2.0 International License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zhu, M., Rozell, C.J. Sparse coding models demonstrate some non-classical receptive field effects. BMC Neurosci 11, O21 (2010).

Download citation


  • Receptive Field
  • Nonlinear Effect
  • Field Effect
  • Field Model
  • Functional Model