Skip to content


  • Poster presentation
  • Open Access

Spatiotemporal structure of evoked gamma rhythms in a minimal multi-layer model of primary visual cortex

BMC Neuroscience200910 (Suppl 1) :P279

  • Published:


  • Tuning Curve
  • Harmonic Spectrum
  • Interlayer Coupling
  • Interlayer Interaction
  • Spatiotemporal Structure

The visually evoked activity of V1 neural populations displays a marked gamma-band component, which is modulated by stimulus orientation and contrast more than other frequency bands [1]. It has been proposed that synchronized oscillations in the gamma frequency range – affected by various local and global spatiotemporal aspects of the presented stimulus [2, 3] – might contribute to the observed gamma-band spectral modulations. It remains however unclear whether gamma-band peaks are present for all stimulus conditions. Contrast-dependent power enhancements can indeed occur over a broad frequency plateau (> 30 Hz) [1] and narrow spectral peaks may not arise at all, in contrast with the harmonic spectra generated by most models of fast cortical oscillations [4].

We introduce here a minimal model of a striate cortex hypercolumn, which embeds a simplified description of the multi-layered structure of the cortical tissue. Two coupled ring networks are used to model the two main thalamo-recipient layers, layer IV and layer VI. The presentation of an elongated visual stimulus elicits a localized bump of activity whose position along the ring is correlated with the orientation of the input. Delayed mutual inhibition induces coherent local oscillations for small levels of noise. These synchronous oscillations display however a highly irregular spatio-temporal structure, which leads to their fast temporal decorrelation. We show that this behavior is due to interlayer interactions, as predictable by a recent theory [5]. For stronger levels of noise, synchrony is considerably weakened. Remarkably, in both the explored regimes – strong noise/weak synchrony and weak noise/strong synchrony – the stimulus properties modulate the power spectrum of the population response over a broad gamma frequency range and narrow spectral peaks are not produced.

We analyze how tuning and contrast response properties are affected by the interlayer coupling. Our simulations reproduce qualitatively several effects observed in single layer inactivation experiments, like broadening and skewing of tuning curves and firing-rate enhancement [6] and predict also potential alterations of the LFP spectra.

We finally study the dynamics of two hypercolumns associated to partly overlapping receptive fields and coupled via long-range intra-striate excitation [7]. We predict that their simultaneous activation by a sufficiently extended stimulus should boost their gamma response at high contrast, an effect reminiscent of [8]. An opposite effect is expected at lower contrast when the net effect of the long-range coupling switches from disynaptically inhibitory to excitatory.



This work was supported by the ANR grant "LARSEN." The authors wish to thank Nicolas Brunel and Lionel Nowak for valuable discussions.

Authors’ Affiliations

Department of Nonlinear Dynamics, Max-Planck-Institute for Dynamics and Self-Organization, D37073 Göttingen, Germany
Bernstein Center for Computational Neuroscience, D37073 Göttingen, Germany
Laboratory of Neurophysics and Physiology, University Paris Descartes, CNRS UMR 8119 Paris, France


  1. Henrie JA, Shapley R: LFP power spectra in V1 cortex: the graded effect of stimulus contrast. J Neurophysiol. 2005, 94: 479-490. 10.1152/jn.00919.2004.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Maldonado PE, Friedman-Hill S, Gray CM: Dynamics of striate cortical activity in the alert macaque: II. Fast time scale synchronization. Cereb Cortex. 2000, 10: 1117-1131. 10.1093/cercor/10.11.1117.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Gail A, Brinksmeyer HJ, Eckhorn R: Contour decouples gamma activity across texture representation in monkey striate cortex. Cereb Cortex. 2000, 10: 840-850. 10.1093/cercor/10.9.840.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Brunel N, Hakim V: Sparsely synchronized neuronal oscillations. Chaos. 2008, 18: 015113-10.1063/1.2779858.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Battaglia D, Brunel N, Hansel D: Temporal decorrelation of collective oscillations in neural networks with local inhibition and long-range excitation. Phys Rev Lett. 2007, 99: 238106-10.1103/PhysRevLett.99.238106.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Allison JD, Bonds AB: Inactivation of the infragranular striate cortex broadens orientation tuning of supragranular visual neurons in the cat. Exp Brain Res. 1994, 101: 415-426. 10.1007/BF00227335.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Bosking WH, Zhang Y, Schofield B, Fitzpatrick D: Orientation Selectivity and the Arrangement of Horizontal Connections in Tree Shrew Striate Cortex. J Neurosci. 1997, 17: 2112-2127.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Xing D, Yeh CI, Williams PE, Henrie JA, Shapley R: LFP gamma-band activity in V1 is sensitive to image continuity. SFN. 2008, Poster abstract 366.Google Scholar


© Battaglia and Hansel; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2009

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd.