Skip to main content


We're creating a new version of this page. See preview

  • Poster presentation
  • Open Access

The influence of subthreshold membrane potential oscillations and GABAergic input on firing activity in striatal fast-spiking neurons

BMC Neuroscience200910 (Suppl 1) :P244

  • Published:


  • Synaptic Input
  • Subthreshold Oscillation
  • Membrane Potential Depolarization
  • Membrane Potential Oscillation
  • Basal Ganglion Function

Poster presentation

The striatum is the main input stage of the basal ganglia system, which is involved in executive functions of the forebrain, such as the planning and the selection of motor behavior. Feedforward inhibition of medium-sized spiny projection neurons in the striatum by fast-spiking interneurons is supposed to be an important determinant of controlling striatal output to later stages of the basal ganglia [1]. Striatal fast-spiking interneurons, which constitute approximately 1–2% of all striatal neurons, show many similarities to cortical fast-spiking cells. In response to somatic current injection, for example, some of these neurons exhibit spike bursts with a variable number of action potentials (so called stuttering) [24]. Interestingly, the membrane potential between such stuttering episodes oscillates in the range of 20–100 Hz [3, 5]. The first spike of each stuttering episode invariably occurs at a peak of the underlying subthreshold oscillation. In both cortex and striatum, fast-spiking cells are inter-connected by gap junctions [6, 7]. In vitro measurements as well as theoretical studies indicate that electrical coupling via gap junctions might be able to promote synchronous activity among these neurons [6, 8]. Here we investigate the possible role of subthreshold oscillations on the synchronization of sub- and suprathreshold activity in a model of electrically coupled fast-spiking neurons. We use the model of Golomb et al. [3], which we extended with a dendritic tree so as to be able to simulate distal synaptic input. We show that gap junctions are able to synchronize subthreshold membrane potential fluctuations in response to somatic current injection. However, the oscillations are only prevalent in the subthreshold range and therefore require enough membrane potential depolarization [5]. In response to synaptic input, our model neuron only enters the subthreshold oscillatory regime with AMPA and NMDA synapses located at distal dendrites. Proximal synaptic input leads to more random fluctuations of the membrane potential, reflecting a smaller extent of dendritic filtering of the Poisson-distributed postsynaptic potentials. We furthermore investigate the effect of GABAergic (i.e. inhibitory) input to the model of the fast-spiking neuron and predict that inhibitory input is able to induce a stuttering episode in these cells. We finally discuss our results in the context of the feedforward inhibitory network, which is likely to play an important role in striatal and basal ganglia function.



AK, JH and JHK acknowledge support from the Swedish Research Council and the Parkinson's Foundation. AK is in addition supported by the NIH-Karolinska Institute joint PhD program.

Authors’ Affiliations

Department of Neuroscience, Karolinska Institute, 17177 Stockholm, Sweden
School of Computer Science and Communication, Royal Institute of Technology, AlbaNova University Centre, 10691 Stockholm, Sweden
Stockholm Brain Institute, 17177 Stockholm, Sweden


  1. Tepper JM, Koós T, Wilson CJ: GABAergic microcircuits in the neostriatum. Trends in Neurosci. 2004, 27: 662-669. 10.1016/j.tins.2004.08.007.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Taverna S, Canciani B, Pennartz CM: Membrane properties and synaptic connectivity of fast-spiking interneurons in rat ventral striatum. Brain Res. 2007, 1152: 49-56. 10.1016/j.brainres.2007.03.053.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Golomb D, Donner K, Shacham L, Shlosberg D, Amitai Y, Hansel D: Mechanisms of firing patterns in fast-spiking cortical interneurons. PLoS Comput Biol. 2007, 3: e156-10.1371/journal.pcbi.0030156.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Druckmann S, Banitt Y, Gidon A, Schürmann F, Markram H, Segev I: A novel multiple objective optimization framework for constraining conductance-based neuron models by experimental data. Front Neurosci. 2007, 1: 7-18. 10.3389/neuro. CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Bracci E, Centonze D, Bernardi G, Calabresi P: Voltage-dependent membrane potential oscillations of rat striatal fast-spiking interneurons. J Physiol. 2003, 549: 121-130. 10.1113/jphysiol.2003.040857.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Galarreta M, Hestrin S: Electrical synapses between GABAreleasing interneurons. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2001, 2: 425-433. 10.1038/35077566.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Fukuda T: Network architecture of gap junction-coupled neuronal linkage in the striatum. J Neurosci. 2009, 29: 1235-1243. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4418-08.2009.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Mancilla JG, Lewis TJ, Pinto DJ, Rinzel J, Connors BW: Synchronization of electrically coupled pairs of inhibitory interneurons in neocortex. J Neurosci. 2007, 2: 2058-2073. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2715-06.2007.View ArticleGoogle Scholar


© Klaus et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2009

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd.