Skip to main content

Table 2 Individual hold-out error rates (average %) and computational demands

From: Multivariate assessment of event-related potentials with the t-CWT method

\({\mathbf {S}}_{{\mathbf {c}}}\) (ms) \({{\mathbf {f}}}_{{\mathbf {c}}}\) (Hz) R (pps) PCA Average holdout error rates (%) Freq. Log Matrix ME ratio: Processing time
    \({{\mathbf {P}}}_{{\mathbf {v}}}\) (%) A priori: 50 % A priori: 13.6 % Dom. Grid Elements \(\underline{{\mathbf {N}}_{{\mathbf {F}}} {\mathbf {N}}_{{\mathbf {G}}} {\mathbf {S}}_{{\mathbf {c}}}^{{\mathbf {2}}}}\) Total (h:min) Per ME (ns)
     Std Dev Tot Std Dev Tot \({\mathbf {N}}_{{\mathbf {F}}}\) \({\mathbf {N}}_{{\mathbf {G}}}\) \({\mathbf {K}} {\mathbf {N}}_{{\mathbf {F}}}\) \({\mathbf {N}}_{{\mathbf {G}}}\) \({\mathbf {R}}^{{\mathbf {2}}}\) \({\mathbf {T}}^{{\mathbf {2}}}\)   
250 4 10 95 22.0 31.7 23.3 2.2 66.8 11.0 9 774 62,694 12.1 0:07 858
100 10 15 95 19.0 32.8 20.9 2.7 61.9 10.7 25 4,339 976,275 13.4 0:57 467
100 10 15 97 18.2 32.2 20.1 2.9 60.6 10.8 25 4,339 976,275 13.4 0:58 474
100 10 15 99 16.9 32.0 18.9 2.8 57.6 10.2 25 4,339 976,275 13.4 0:59 476
50 20 15 95 18.7 32.9 20.7 2.9 61.3 10.8 49 8,320 3,669,120 12.6 3:02 394
50 20 15 97 17.5 33.2 19.7 2.8 58.3 10.3 49 8,320 3,669,120 12.6 3:04 398
50 20 15 99 15.4 33.7 17.9 2.9 55.5 10.0 49 8,320 3,669,120 12.6 3:10 412
40 25 15 95 17.8 32.7 19.8 2.7 61.4 10.6 61 10,341 5,677,209 12.5 4:41 393
40 25 15 97 16.9 32.6 19.0 2.8 58.8 10.4 61 10,341 5,677,209 12.5 4:37 388
40 25 15 99 15.3 33.2 17.7 3.0 55.0 10.0 61 10,341 5,677,209 12.5 4:44 397
40 25 20 99 15.4 31.8 17.6 3.0 55.2 10.1 61 18,257 10,023,093 12.4 8:19 395
40 25 25 99 15.0 32.7 17.4 2.7 55.7 9.9 61 28,245 15,506,505 12.3 13:41 420
30 33 15 99 15.5 34.5 18.1 3.3 56.5 10.5 81 13,657 9,955,953 12.3 7:46 372