Skip to main content


We're creating a new version of this page. See preview

  • Poster presentation
  • Open Access

Computational modeling of temporal and sequential dynamics of foraging decisions

  • 1, 2,
  • 1,
  • 2 and
  • 1
BMC Neuroscience201415 (Suppl 1) :P137

  • Published:


  • Circadian Rhythm
  • Sequential Pattern
  • Inactive State
  • Preferential Attachment
  • Heavy Tail


A fundamental understanding of behavior requires predicting when and what an individual will choose. However, the actual temporal and sequential dynamics of successive choices made among multiple alternatives remain unclear.


In the current study, we tested the hypothesis that there is a general bursting property in both the timing and sequential patterns of foraging decisions. We conducted a foraging experiment in which rats chose among four different foods over a continuous two-week time period. Regarding when choices were made, we found bursts of rapidly occurring actions separated by time-varying inactive periods, partially based on a circadian rhythm.


Regarding what was chosen, we found sequential dynamics in affective choices characterized by two key features: (a) a highly biased choice distribution; and (b) preferential attachment, in which the animals were more likely to choose what they had previously chosen. To capture the temporal dynamics, we propose a dual-state model consisting of active and inactive states. We also introduce a satiation-attainment process for bursty activity, and a non-homogeneous Poisson process for longer inactivity between bursts. For the sequential dynamics, we propose a dual-control model consisting of goal-directed and habit systems, based on outcome valuation and choice history, respectively.
Figure 1
Figure 1

An example of the empirical choice patterns and the mean choice percentage of consumed pellets by food location, flavor, and rank.

Figure 2
Figure 2

Temporal features of the foraging behavior.

Figure 3
Figure 3

Comparison of a choice sequence generated from the dual-control model with the empirical data from two representative rats.


This study provides insights into how the bursty nature of behavior emerges from the interaction of different underlying systems, leading to heavy tails in the distribution of behavior over time and choices.

Authors’ Affiliations

Department of Bio and Brain Engineering, Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology (KAIST), Daejeon, 305-701, Korea
Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH 03755, USA


  1. Barabási A-L: The origin of bursts and heavy tails in human dynamics. Nature. 2005, 435: 207-211. 10.1038/nature03459.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Kable JW, Glimcher PW: The neurobiology of decision: consensus and controversy. Neuron. 2009, 63: 733-745. 10.1016/j.neuron.2009.09.003.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Dayan P, Balleine BW: Reward, motivation, and reinforcement learning. Neuron. 2002, 36: 285-298. 10.1016/S0896-6273(02)00963-7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar


© Jung et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.