- Poster presentation
- Open Access
Phase differences in local field potentials from macaque monkey area V4 predict attentional state in single trials with 99.6% accuracy
BMC Neurosciencevolume 10, Article number: P230 (2009)
Coherent oscillations and synchronous activity are suggested to play an important role in selective processing and dynamic routing of information across the primary visual cortical areas. In this contribution we show that phase coherency between distant recording sites allows to distinguish almost perfectly between two attentional states in a behavioral task, thus giving strong quantitative support for a functional role of oscillatory neural dynamics.
A macaque monkey was trained to perform a delayed-match-to-sample task, in which the animal had to direct attention to one of two sequences of morphing shapes (1 deg. diameter) presented on a computer screen and separated by a gap of less than one degree of visual angle. The task was to signal the re-occurrence of the initial shape of the attended morphing sequence. Recordings of local field potentials (LFPs) were performed with an array of chronically implanted intracortical microelectrodes, covering parts of areas V1 and V4.
The LFPs were split into their frequency components by applying a Morlet-wavelet transform. From the transformed signals, we computed the phase coherency (a complex-valued scalar with amplitude ≤ 1 and a phase) averaged over a time interval of 2500 ms, for every electrode pair. We then used a support vector machine (SVM) to classify the attended state (attention directed either to one or to the other sequence) from the phase differences. Strikingly, nearly perfect state identification (up to 99.6% correct) was possible from several pairs of electrodes in V4, mainly in the frequency bands of 48 Hz and 61 Hz. From V1–V4 electrode pairs, classification with up to 76% correct was possible.
Our results show that phase differences between signals from V4 can accurately inform about the direction of attention to different locations in visual space in every single trial. This effect is both, stable over time and robust against continuous changes of the shapes at the attended location. Our results give strong quantitative support for the hypothesis that coherent oscillations are a key mechanism underlying information processing under attention.
Support by BMBF Bernstein Group Bremen, DIP Metacomp, and the ZKW Bremen