Volume 9 Supplement 1

Seventeenth Annual Computational Neuroscience Meeting: CNS*2008

Open Access

Responses of primary visual cortical neurons to natural movies in anesthetized cat

  • Shih-Cheng Yen1Email author,
  • Jonathan Baker2,
  • Jean-Philippe Lachaux3 and
  • Charles M Gray2
BMC Neuroscience20089(Suppl 1):P125

DOI: 10.1186/1471-2202-9-S1-P125

Published: 11 July 2008

We previously reported a high degree of response heterogeneity in neighboring primary visual cortical neurons of the anesthetized cat when presented with natural movies [1]. In this study, we investigated the response properties of those neurons.

First, we computed the inter-spike interval (ISI) histograms of the 88 cells in our database. Twenty-eight cells were excluded from further analysis due to sparse interval data. A large fraction of the remaining 60 cells exhibited a predominance of short ISIs. The maximum value in the histogram in 39 cells was below 2 ms, and was below 4 ms for all but 8 cells. In addition, by inspecting the joint interval histogram of each spike interval versus the subsequent interval, we found these short intervals to be mainly due to spike bursts rather than spike doublets.

Next, we characterized the firing rate distributions of each neuron by computing the average firing rate for each movie frame across 100 repetitions of the movie. The resulting distributions were fit with both exponential (y = a*exp(b*x)) and power (y = a*x^b) functions. Using goodness-of-fit to bootstrap the data (1000 resamples), we found 43 of the cells were significantly better characterized by a power function (p < 0.05 and R-square > 0.75) while 13 of the cells were best fit by an exponential function. The remaining cells were not well fit by either function.

Finally, we investigated the spike-count and spike-time variability across repetitions within each movie frame. In order to quantify the effect of the relative refractory period on response variability, we compared the variability of the cells to 1000 surrogates generated using the method described in a previous study [2]. The only modification was that after computing the free-firing rate at a resolution of 0.2 ms, we averaged the free-firing rate across different time windows to simulate Poisson processes with rates changing at different speeds. With the rate changing every 40 ms, we found that only 1.2% of the windows with an average of at least 1 spike per window exhibited Fano Factors that were lower than 95% of the surrogates. This percentage remained invariant with faster rate changes in the surrogates. Using an entropy measure to quantify spike-time variability, we found 49.3% of the aforementioned windows exhibiting lower variability than 95% of the surrogates with rates changing every 40 ms. This percentage decreased to 44.8%, 40.4%, and 37.28%, when the rates changed every 20, 10, and 5 ms respectively.

Our results indicate that when stimulated with natural movies, striate cortical neurons exhibit responses that are better described using power-law instead of exponential distributions [3]. In addition, we found spike-time variability that was substantially lower than that predicted from time-varying Poisson processes with relative refractory periods.



This work was supported by grants from the National Eye Institute and the Singapore Ministry of Education AcRF Tier 1 Fund (R263000355112, R263000355133).

Authors’ Affiliations

Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, National University of Singapore
Center for Computational Biology, Montana State University


  1. Yen S-C, Baker J, Gray CM: Heterogeneity in the responses of adjacent neurons to natural stimuli in cat striate cortex. J Neurophysiol. 2007, 97: 1326-1341. 10.1152/jn.00747.2006.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Berry MJ, Meister M: Refractoriness and neural precision. J Neurosci. 1998, 18 (6): 2200-2211.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Baddeley R, Abbott LF, Booth MC, Sengpiel F, Freeman T, Wakeman EA, Rolls ET: Responses of neurons in primary and inferior temporal visual cortices to natural scenes. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1997, 264 (1389): 1775-1783. 10.1098/rspb.1997.0246.View ArticleGoogle Scholar


© Yen et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2008

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd.