CLOCK expression identifies developing circadian oscillator neurons in the brains of Drosophila embryos
© Houl et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2008
Received: 04 August 2008
Accepted: 18 December 2008
Published: 18 December 2008
The Drosophila circadian oscillator is composed of transcriptional feedback loops in which CLOCK-CYCLE (CLK-CYC) heterodimers activate their feedback regulators period (per) and timeless (tim) via E-box mediated transcription. These feedback loop oscillators are present in distinct clusters of dorsal and lateral neurons in the adult brain, but how this pattern of expression is established during development is not known. Since CLK is required to initiate feedback loop function, defining the pattern of CLK expression in embryos and larvae will shed light on oscillator neuron development.
A novel CLK antiserum is used to show that CLK expression in the larval CNS and adult brain is limited to circadian oscillator cells. CLK is initially expressed in presumptive small ventral lateral neurons (s-LNvs), dorsal neurons 2 s (DN2s), and dorsal neuron 1 s (DN1s) at embryonic stage (ES) 16, and this CLK expression pattern persists through larval development. PER then accumulates in all CLK-expressing cells except presumptive DN2s during late ES 16 and ES 17, consistent with the delayed accumulation of PER in adult oscillator neurons and antiphase cycling of PER in larval DN2s. PER is also expressed in non-CLK-expressing cells in the embryonic CNS starting at ES 12. Although PER expression in CLK-negative cells continues in ClkJrk embryos, PER expression in cells that co-express PER and CLK is eliminated.
These data demonstrate that brain oscillator neurons begin development during embryogenesis, that PER expression in non-oscillator cells is CLK-independent, and that oscillator phase is an intrinsic characteristic of brain oscillator neurons. These results define the temporal and spatial coordinates of factors that initiate Clk expression, imply that circadian photoreceptors are not activated until the end of embryogenesis, and suggest that PER functions in a different capacity before oscillator cell development is initiated.
Most organisms exhibit daily rhythms in physiology, metabolism, and behavior that persist in the absence of environmental cues. In animals, these ~24 hr rhythms are controlled by circadian oscillators that reside in the central nervous system (CNS) and/or peripheral tissues. These oscillators are comprised of interlocked transcriptional feedback loops that regulate rhythmic gene expression within and downstream of the circadian timekeeping mechanism.
In Drosophila, the per/tim and Clk feedback loops control rhythmic transcription that peaks around dusk and dawn, respectively (reviewed in [1–3]). The per/tim feedback loop is initiated during mid-day, when CLK/CYC heterodimers bind E-box sequences to activate per and tim transcription [4, 5]. Although per and tim mRNAs peak around dusk, phosphorylation of PER and TIM delays their peak accumulation to the late evening and promotes their nuclear localization [6–10]. After entering the nucleus, PER or PER-TIM heterodimers bind CLK to inhibit CLK-CYC-dependent transcription [11–13]. In addition, clockwork orange (cwo) is also thought to inhibit per and tim transcription by competing for E-box binding with CLK-CYC [14–17]. PER and TIM are then degraded after dawn, thus relieving transcriptional inhibition. CLK-CYC initiates the Clk feedback loop by binding E-boxes to activate vri transcription . VRI accumulates in parallel with vri mRNA during early evening and binds to V/P-boxes to repress Clk transcription [19, 20]. Mutants that disrupt CLK-CYC transcriptional activity (e.g. ClkJrk, cyc01) exhibit constitutive high levels of Clk mRNA , indicating that Clk is activated independent of circadian oscillator function. Since CLK-CYC is required to initiate circadian feedback loop function, we hypothesize that the activation of Clk and cyc during development determines oscillator cell identity.
Locomotor activity rhythms in adults can be synchronized by light-dark cycles in L1 larvae, but not in embryos, which indicates that the circadian oscillator is only functional after hatching . Circadian oscillator cells are present in LNvs, DN1s and DN2s from L1 larval brains based on rhythmic expression of PER and TIM . Since entrainment of oscillators to light is TIM dependent, and TIM accumulates in concert with PER about 6–8 h after their respective mRNAs (reviewed in [1–3]), per and tim transcription are expected to be initiated during embryogenesis. Indeed, per mRNA is detected in the central nervous system (CNS) of embryos [24, 25], which implies that CLK and CYC accumulate in presumptive oscillator cells during embryonic development. To understand oscillator cell development in Drosophila, the spatial and temporal expression of CLK and PER was determined during embryogenesis.
In our previous studies, CLK GP47 antibody revealed CLK expression in circadian oscillator and non-oscillator cell nuclei from adult heads at all times of day . Using a newly generated CLK antibody we show here that CLK is expressed exclusively in circadian oscillator cells, and that detection of CLK in non-oscillator cells in a previous study was due to cross-reactivity with DACHSHUND (DAC). During embryonic development PER is first expressed in the ventral nerve chord (VNC) at ES 12 and then the brain at ES 14, whereas CLK is not detected until ES 16 in brain cells that lack PER expression. These CLK-expressing brain cells correspond to LNvs, DN1s and DN2s, and by the end of ES 16 or early ES 17 PER is detected in LNvs and DN1s but not DN2s. These results demonstrate that presumptive brain oscillator cells are present before functional oscillators are detected around the transition to larval life, suggest that the delayed appearance of PER accumulation in presumptive embryonic DN2s gives rise to the antiphase cycling of PER in larval DN2s compared to LNvs and DN1s, and imply that PER has a clock-independent function in the VNC and brain in non-oscillator cells of embryos.
CLK expression is detected only in oscillator neurons
PER is expressed before CLK during embryogenesis
CLK expression preceeds PER expression in presumptive brain oscillator cells during embryogenesis
Although PER is expressed in some CLK-positive dorsal brain neurons, two cells situated between the most dorsal and ventral CLK-expressing brain cells show little or no PER expression (Fig. 8I). Based on their location, these CLK positive/PER negative cells likely correspond to DN2s. In larvae, PER cycling in DN2s is antiphase compared to LNs and DN1s , which is consistent with the absence of PER expression in the presumptive DN2s of embryos during the late night and early morning. These results suggest that CLK is expressed in LNvs, DN1s, and DN2s starting at ES 16, followed by PER expression in DN1s and LNvs during late ES 16 and ES 17. The timeline for CLK and PER expression in embryos is the same whether they are collected at CT49 (1 hour after subjective dawn) or CT37 (1 hour after subjective dusk) (data not shown), indicating that CLK and PER expression are controlled developmentally and are not influenced by the time at which embryos were laid during the circadian cycle.
Discussion and conclusion
CLK is expressed exclusively in oscillator cells
CLK immunostaining was previously detected in all oscillator cells and many non-oscillator cells from adult brains . CLK expression in non-oscillator cells was coincident with that of DAC, which is structurally related to the winged helix/forked-head subfamily of helix-turn-helix DNA binding proteins . Here, we find that CLK IR in non-oscillator cells is due to cross-reactivity between CLK GP47 antiserum and DAC (Fig. 1A–F). We also characterized another CLK antiserum, GP50, and demonstrated that it does not cross-react with DAC on westerns (Fig. 4A). Immunostaining of adult brains with GP50 confirms that CLK is expressed only in oscillator neurons (Fig. 4B). The oscillator cell-specific expression of Clk implies that CLK is required for the development and/or function of these cells.
This cell type specificity is consistent with the induction of oscillator cell function, when Clk is expressed in ectopic locations . However, CLK expression cannot induce ectopic oscillators in any cell type, suggesting that other factors critical for oscillator function are not activated by CLK or the CLK-dependent developmental programs are incompatible with the development of many cell types. In the loss-of-function ClkJrk mutant, expression of direct CLK-CYC target genes, per, tim, vri, and Pdp1ε is abolished [4, 18, 19], making it difficult to positively identify oscillator cells. Though peripheral oscillator tissues (e.g. eye, Malpighian tubule, gut, antenna) apparently develop normally in ClkJrk flies, the loss of oscillator neuron markers in ClkJrk flies makes it difficult to determine whether these neurons are present. One exception to this is l-LNvs, which continue to express PDF in ClkJrk flies . Determining whether CLK contributes to oscillator cell development depends on the availability of oscillator cell markers that are expressed independent of CLK-CYC or rescue of a loss-of-function Clk mutant, upon CLK induction in adults.
Oscillator cell development
In adults, CLK-dependent activation of the feedback regulator per is required for oscillator function [4, 5], thus we expect that Clk would be expressed before per during development. However, per mRNA and protein are expressed in the VNC starting at ES 12 and in the brain at ES 14 (Fig. 7A–F), well before CLK is detected in the brain at ES 16. This early PER expression in the VNC and brain is independent of Clk because it persists in the ClkJrk mutant and does not overlap with CLK later in development. The role of PER in CLK negative cells during embryogenesis is unknown, but it is possible that PER modulates transcription by targeting other bHLH-PAS transcription factors (e.g. SINGLE-MINDED) expressed in these cells . Regardless of the role PER plays, the lack of obvious developmental defects in per01 flies suggests that per is not critical for embryonic development. In larvae, the intensity of PER IR in CLK-negative brain cells and the VNC decreases drastically (Figs. 3, 4, 9), consistent with previous results .
CLK can be detected in 2–4 cells in each brain hemisphere starting at early to mid ES 16, and expands during ES 17 to approximately eight CLK-positive cells in each brain hemisphere (Fig. 8). These cells are spatially segregated into three groups that correspond to larval LNvs, DN2s, and DN1s (Fig. 8D–I). PER can be detected in some CLK-positive brain cells starting as early as the end of ES 16 (Fig. 8D), or about 16 h post-fertilization. During ES 17, PER IR increases in intensity and encompasses all four LNvs and both DN1s (Fig. 8G–I). The 3–6 h delay between CLK detection and PER detection in embryonic brain cells is similar to the delay between the accumulation of per mRNA and protein in adults [42, 43], and suggests that once CLK-CYC initiates per transcription in embryos, PER accumulation is delayed by the same DBT-dependent PER degradation mechanism described in adults. The initiation of molecular oscillator function at ES 17 coincides with the existence of light-entrainable oscillators that mediate behavioral rhythms in adults; a 12 h light pulse ending 6 h before larval hatching didn't synchronize behavioral rhythms of adults, but a 12 h light pulse ending at the time of larval hatching did synchronize behavioral rhythms in adults . The initiation of oscillator function by CLK in embryos is also consistent with Clk's unique ability to initiate oscillator function when expressed in certain ectopic cells . When combined with these previous studies, our results support a model whereby CLK expression initiates circadian oscillator function in brain neurons at ES 16, and these brain neurons go on to control rhythms in locomotor activity in adults.
CLK is expressed in all three groups of oscillator neurons during ES 16 and ES 17, but PER is only detected in LNvs and DN1s during this time. The delayed onset of PER accumulation in DN2s is intriguing, considering that the DN2s oscillator is antiphase compared to those in larval LNvs and DN1s . The antiphase cycling of oscillator in DN2s can be brought into phase with oscillators in LNvs and DN1s by expressing CRY in DN2s , demonstrating that this antiphase cycling is CRY-dependent. Whether CRY also acts to control antiphase cycling in embryonic DN2s will be investigated. In any case, our results demonstrate that antiphase cycling of oscillators in DN2s is developmentally regulated and light independent.
The activation and maintenance of Clk transcription in developing and adult Drosophila is not well understood. The basic zipper protein PDP1ε is involved in maintaining Clk activation in adults , but does not appear to be the primary Clk activator . One approach to defining Clk activators in embryos is to first determine which cells within the Drosophila embryonic brain express CLK base on co-expression of marker genes [46, 47]. Once CLK-expressing cells have been identified, transcriptional activators expressed in these cells can be tested singly or in combination for their ability to activate Clk. Identifying factors that activate Clk in a cell-specific manner will ultimately reveal determinants of oscillator cell fate.
In vitro translation
The full-length dac open reading frame was removed from pUAS-dac  by digestion with EcoR1 and Xba1 and inserted into the EcoR1 and Xba1 sites of pBluescript KS(-). A plasmid containing the full-length Clk open reading frame was described previously (Lee'98). In vitro transcription/translation (IVTT) of plasmids containing the complete dac or Clk open reading frames was carried out using (Promega, L5010) as per manufacturer's instructions by combining the following: 25 μl TNT reticulocyte lysate; 2 μl TNT reaction buffer; 1 μl RNA polymerase; 1 μl complete amino acid mix; 1 μg DNA; to 50 μl with water. Samples were incubated at 30°C for 90 min.
Protein expression and purification
The complete dac open reading frame was removed from pBluescript KS(-) by digestion with EcoR1 and Xho1 and inserted into the EcoR1 and Xho1 sites of pET-28(b). The resulting pET-dac plasmid was transformed into BL21(DE3) pLysS cells for protein expression. Cell lysates were purified over a His Trap FF Column (GE, 17-5319-01), and eluants containing DAC were collected and concentrated using an Amicon 100 kDa Concentrator (Millipore, UFC9 100 08). DAC concentration was determined to be ~6.3 μg/μl by spectrophotometric analysis.
Flies having a normally functioning circadian clock (white1118) and ClkJrk flies were entrained for at least 3 days in 12 h light: 12 h dark cycles and collected at different Zeitgeber Times (ZTs), where ZT0 is lights-on and ZT12 is lights-off. Fly protein samples were prepared from heads via RBS extraction . Westerns blots were prepared by electrophorescing fly head extract and IVTT DAC and CLK on Criterion pre-cast gels (BioRad) and transferring the gel to Hybond-P membranes (Amersham). Antibodies were used at the following concentrations to probe western blots: GP47, 1:2,000; GP50, 1:5,000; anti-DAC, 1:300. For pre-absorption with DAC, GP47 was incubated with the indicated amount of DAC at 4°C overnight with shaking. Incubation with primary antibodies was done at RT for 1 h for both anti-CLK antibodies and anti-DAC at 4°C overnight. Incubation with secondary antibodies was done at RT for 1 hr at a concentration of 1:1,000 using anti-Guinea pig HRP (Sigma, A7289) or anti-mouse HRP (Sigma, A5278) for the anti-CLK and anti-DAC primary antibodies, respectively. Immnuoblots were visualized with ECL Plus (Amersham).
Embryo and Larva collection and staging
Wild-type (Canton S) flies were entrained to 12 h light: 12 h dark cycles at 25°C for at least 3 days in egg laying cages containing grape agar plates with yeast paste. Lights were turned off and embryos were collected on fresh plates starting at CT9 and ending at CT33 (9 h after subjective dawn). To determine if the circadian clock affected oscillator cell development or phase, embryos were collected on fresh plates from CT10 to CT37 (1 h after subjective dusk) or from CT22 to CT49 (1 h after subjective dawn). After collection, embryos were fixed and staged based on their morphology . L1 and L3 larvae were collected at different times during LD cycles. Different larval stages were identified based on morphology .
Wild-type (Canton S) embryos were collected and dechorionated as described . Embryos were fixed with 3.7% formaldehyde in PEM buffer with pH6.9 (0.1 M PIPES pH6.9, 1 mM MgCl2, 1 mM EGTA) while shaking, washed with methanol, and then re-hydrated with PBST (1 × PBS, 1% BSA, 0.05% Triton X-100). Primary antibody was diluted in PBST and incubated at 4°C overnight. The primary antibodies and dilutions used were: anti-Guinea pig polyclonal CLOCK GP50 antibody at a 1:200 dilution, and anti-rabbit polyclonal PER (gift from J. Hall) that was pre-absorbed against per01 embryos as described  at a 1:200 dilution. Following primary antibody incubation, embryos were washed with PBST for 30 minutes at least 6 times at room temperature. Embryos were then incubated with a fluorescently labeled secondary antibody at a 1:200 dilution at 4°C overnight. The following secondary antibodies were used: goat anti-guinea pig Cy3 (Jackson ImmunoResearch) for anti-CLOCK, and goat anti-rabbit Alexa 488 (Molecular Probes) for anti-PER. After secondary antibody incubation, the embryos were washed with PBST for 30 minutes at least 6 times at room temperature. Mounting was done using Vectashield (Vector Labs). Six or more embryos were examined at each stage. Each experiment was repeated at least 3 times with similar results. Each Z-series image is a projection of optical thickness at 2 μm per optical section.
Immunostaining larval CNSs and adult brains
Dissected adult brains were processed as previously described . CNSs from wild-type L3 larvae were dissected in 1 × PBS with pH7.4. Dissected larval CNSs were fixed with 3.7% formaldehyde, washed, and incubated in the following primary antibodies at 4°C overnight: mouse mAbdac2-3 (1:100 dilution), anti-Guinea pig polyclonal CLK GP50 (1:3,000 dilution), and pre-absorbed anti-rabbit polyclonal PER (1:30,000 dilution). More concentrated CLK GP50 antibody (1:1000 dilution) was used to detect CLK in ClkJrk larve. After primary antibody was removed, the samples were washed, then incubated with fluorescently labeled secondary antibodies (diluted 1:200) at 4°C overnight. The following secondary antibodies were used: goat anti-mouse Alexa 647 (Molecular Probes) for mAbdac2-3, goat anti-guinea pig Cy-3 (Jackson ImmunoResearch Laboratories, Inc.) for anti-CLOCK, and goat anti-rabbit Alexa 488 (Molecular Probes) for PER.
Embryos, larval CNSs, and adult brains were imaged using a Zeiss LSM310 or an Olympus FV1000 confocal microscope. Serial optical scans were obtained at 2 μm intervals and organized using FV1000 confocal software to generate Z-stack images. Images were processed using Adobe Photoshop.
in vitro transcription/translation
Central Nervous System
ventral nerve chord
3rd larval instar
1st larval instar
12 h light: 12 h dark
small ventral lateral neurons
large ventral lateral neurons
dorsal lateral neurons
dorsal neuron 2s
dorsal neuron 3s.
We thank Jeff Hall for providing anti-PER antibody and Graham Mardon for providing the dac03 null mutant and GFP balancer strains. We are indebted to Patrick Callaerts, Brigitte Dauwalder, Gregg Roman, and members of the Hardin lab for helpful discussions, the Texas A&M Microscopy and Imaging Center for access to the FV1000 confocal microscope, Michael Rea for use of his Zeiss LSM 310 confocal microscope, and to Lily Bartoszek for proofreading the manuscript. This work was supported by NIH grant NS051280 to PEH.
- Hardin PE: The circadian timekeeping system of Drosophila. Curr Biol. 2005, 15 (17): R714-722. 10.1016/j.cub.2005.08.019.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hardin PE: Essential and expendable features of the circadian timekeeping mechanism. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2006, 16 (6): 686-692. 10.1016/j.conb.2006.09.001.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Yu W, Hardin PE: Circadian oscillators of Drosophila and mammals. J Cell Sci. 2006, 119 (Pt 23): 4793-4795. 10.1242/jcs.03174.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Allada R, White NE, So WV, Hall JC, Rosbash M: A mutant Drosophila homolog of mammalian Clock disrupts circadian rhythms and transcription of period and timeless. Cell. 1998, 93 (5): 791-804. 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81440-3.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Darlington TK, Wager-Smith K, Ceriani MF, Staknis D, Gekakis N, Steeves TD, Weitz CJ, Takahashi JS, Kay SA: Closing the circadian loop: CLOCK-induced transcription of its own inhibitors per and tim. Science. 1998, 280 (5369): 1599-1603. 10.1126/science.280.5369.1599.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Akten B, Jauch E, Genova GK, Kim EY, Edery I, Raabe T, Jackson FR: A role for CK2 in the Drosophila circadian oscillator. Nat Neurosci. 2003, 6 (3): 251-257. 10.1038/nn1007.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kloss B, Price JL, Saez L, Blau J, Rothenfluh A, Wesley CS, Young MW: The Drosophila clock gene double-time encodes a protein closely related to human casein kinase Iepsilon. Cell. 1998, 94 (1): 97-107. 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81225-8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lin JM, Kilman VL, Keegan K, Paddock B, Emery-Le M, Rosbash M, Allada R: A role for casein kinase 2alpha in the Drosophila circadian clock. Nature. 2002, 420 (6917): 816-820. 10.1038/nature01235.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Price JL, Blau J, Rothenfluh A, Abodeely M, Kloss B, Young MW: double-time is a novel Drosophila clock gene that regulates PERIOD protein accumulation. Cell. 1998, 94 (1): 83-95. 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81224-6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Martinek S, Inonog S, Manoukian AS, Young MW: A role for the segment polarity gene shaggy/GSK-3 in the Drosophila circadian clock. Cell. 2001, 105 (6): 769-779. 10.1016/S0092-8674(01)00383-X.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lee C, Bae K, Edery I: The Drosophila CLOCK protein undergoes daily rhythms in abundance, phosphorylation, and interactions with the PER-TIM complex. Neuron. 1998, 21 (4): 857-867. 10.1016/S0896-6273(00)80601-7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lee C, Bae K, Edery I: PER and TIM inhibit the DNA binding activity of a Drosophila CLOCK-CYC/dBMAL1 heterodimer without disrupting formation of the heterodimer: a basis for circadian transcription. Mol Cell Biol. 1999, 19 (8): 5316-5325.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Yu W, Zheng H, Houl JH, Dauwalder B, Hardin PE: PER-dependent rhythms in CLK phosphorylation and E-box binding regulate circadian transcription. Genes Dev. 2006, 20 (6): 723-733. 10.1101/gad.1404406.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kadener S, Stoleru D, McDonald M, Nawathean P, Rosbash M: Clockwork Orange is a transcriptional repressor and a new Drosophila circadian pacemaker component. Genes Dev. 2007, 21 (13): 1675-1686. 10.1101/gad.1552607.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lim C, Chung BY, Pitman JL, McGill JJ, Pradhan S, Lee J, Keegan KP, Choe J, Allada R: Clockwork orange encodes a transcriptional repressor important for circadian-clock amplitude in Drosophila. Curr Biol. 2007, 17 (12): 1082-1089. 10.1016/j.cub.2007.05.039.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Matsumoto A, Ukai-Tadenuma M, Yamada RG, Houl J, Uno KD, Kasukawa T, Dauwalder B, Itoh TQ, Takahashi K, Ueda R, Hardin PE, Tanimura T, Ueda HR: A functional genomics strategy reveals clockwork orange as a transcriptional regulator in the Drosophila circadian clock. Genes Dev. 2007, 21 (13): 1687-1700. 10.1101/gad.1552207.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Richier B, Michard-Vanhee C, Lamouroux A, Papin C, Rouyer F: The clockwork orange Drosophila protein functions as both an activator and a repressor of clock gene expression. J Biol Rhythms. 2008, 23 (2): 103-116. 10.1177/0748730407313817.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Blau J, Young MW: Cycling vrille expression is required for a functional Drosophila clock. Cell. 1999, 99 (6): 661-671. 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81554-8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Cyran SA, Buchsbaum AM, Reddy KL, Lin MC, Glossop NR, Hardin PE, Young MW, Storti RV, Blau J: vrille, Pdp1, and dClock form a second feedback loop in the Drosophila circadian clock. Cell. 2003, 112 (3): 329-341. 10.1016/S0092-8674(03)00074-6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Glossop NR, Houl JH, Zheng H, Ng FS, Dudek SM, Hardin PE: VRILLE feeds back to control circadian transcription of Clock in the Drosophila circadian oscillator. Neuron. 2003, 37 (2): 249-261. 10.1016/S0896-6273(03)00002-3.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Glossop NR, Lyons LC, Hardin PE: Interlocked feedback loops within the Drosophila circadian oscillator. Science. 1999, 286 (5440): 766-768. 10.1126/science.286.5440.766.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sehgal A, Price J, Young MW: Ontogeny of a biological clock in Drosophila melanogaster. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1992, 89 (4): 1423-1427. 10.1073/pnas.89.4.1423.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kaneko M, Helfrich-Forster C, Hall JC: Spatial and temporal expression of the period and timeless genes in the developing nervous system of Drosophila: newly identified pacemaker candidates and novel features of clock gene product cycling. J Neurosci. 1997, 17 (17): 6745-6760.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- James AA, Ewer J, Reddy P, Hall JC, Rosbash M: Embryonic expression of the period clock gene in the central nervous system of Drosophila melanogaster. Embo J. 1986, 5 (9): 2313-2320.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Liu X, Lorenz L, Yu QN, Hall JC, Rosbash M: Spatial and temporal expression of the period gene in Drosophila melanogaster. Genes Dev. 1988, 2 (2): 228-238. 10.1101/gad.2.2.228.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Houl JH, Yu W, Dudek SM, Hardin PE: Drosophila CLOCK Is Constitutively Expressed in Circadian Oscillator and Non-Oscillator Cells. J Biol Rhythms. 2006, 21 (2): 93-103. 10.1177/0748730405283697.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Davis RL: Olfactory memory formation in Drosophila: from molecular to systems neuroscience. Annu Rev Neurosci. 2005, 28: 275-302. 10.1146/annurev.neuro.28.061604.135651.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kurusu M, Nagao T, Walldorf U, Flister S, Gehring WJ, Furukubo-Tokunaga K: Genetic control of development of the mushroom bodies, the associative learning centers in the Drosophila brain, by the eyeless, twin of eyeless, and Dachshund genes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2000, 97 (5): 2140-2144. 10.1073/pnas.040564497.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Martini SR, Roman G, Meuser S, Mardon G, Davis RL: The retinal determination gene, dachshund, is required for mushroom body cell differentiation. Development. 2000, 127 (12): 2663-2672.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Noveen A, Daniel A, Hartenstein V: Early development of the Drosophila mushroom body: the roles of eyeless and dachshund. Development. 2000, 127 (16): 3475-3488.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Chen R, Amoui M, Zhang Z, Mardon G: Dachshund and eyes absent proteins form a complex and function synergistically to induce ectopic eye development in Drosophila. Cell. 1997, 91 (7): 893-903. 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80481-X.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kaneko M, Hall JC: Neuroanatomy of cells expressing clock genes in Drosophila: transgenic manipulation of the period and timeless genes to mark the perikarya of circadian pacemaker neurons and their projections. J Comp Neurol. 2000, 422 (1): 66-94. 10.1002/(SICI)1096-9861(20000619)422:1<66::AID-CNE5>3.0.CO;2-2.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Mardon G, Solomon NM, Rubin GM: dachshund encodes a nuclear protein required for normal eye and leg development in Drosophila. Development. 1994, 120 (12): 3473-3486.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Helfrich-Forster C, Shafer OT, Wulbeck C, Grieshaber E, Rieger D, Taghert P: Development and morphology of the clock-gene-expressing lateral neurons of Drosophila melanogaster. J Comp Neurol. 2007, 500 (1): 47-70. 10.1002/cne.21146.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Shafer OT, Helfrich-Forster C, Renn SC, Taghert PH: Reevaluation of Drosophila melanogaster's neuronal circadian pacemakers reveals new neuronal classes. J Comp Neurol. 2006, 498 (2): 180-193. 10.1002/cne.21021.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Beaver LM, Rush BL, Gvakharia BO, Giebultowicz JM: Noncircadian regulation and function of clock genes period and timeless in oogenesis of Drosophila melanogaster. J Biol Rhythms. 2003, 18 (6): 463-472. 10.1177/0748730403259108.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Helfrich-Forster C: The neuroarchitecture of the circadian clock in the brain of Drosophila melanogaster. Microsc Res Tech. 2003, 62 (2): 94-102. 10.1002/jemt.10357.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Silver SJ, Rebay I: Signaling circuitries in development: insights from the retinal determination gene network. Development. 2005, 132 (1): 3-13. 10.1242/dev.01539.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Zhao J, Kilman VL, Keegan KP, Peng Y, Emery P, Rosbash M, Allada R: Drosophila Clock Can Generate Ectopic Circadian Clocks. Cell. 2003, 113: 755-766. 10.1016/S0092-8674(03)00400-8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Park JH, Helfrich-Forster C, Lee G, Liu L, Rosbash M, Hall JC: Differential regulation of circadian pacemaker output by separate clock genes in Drosophila. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2000, 97 (7): 3608-3613. 10.1073/pnas.070036197.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Crews ST, Thomas JB, Goodman CS: The Drosophila single-minded gene encodes a nuclear protein with sequence similarity to the per gene product. Cell. 1988, 52 (1): 143-151. 10.1016/0092-8674(88)90538-7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hardin PE, Hall JC, Rosbash M: Feedback of the Drosophila period gene product on circadian cycling of its messenger RNA levels. Nature. 1990, 343 (6258): 536-540. 10.1038/343536a0.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Zerr DM, Hall JC, Rosbash M, Siwicki KK: Circadian fluctuations of period protein immunoreactivity in the CNS and the visual system of Drosophila. J Neurosci. 1990, 10 (8): 2749-2762.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Klarsfeld A, Malpel S, Michard-Vanhee C, Picot M, Chelot E, Rouyer F: Novel features of cryptochrome-mediated photoreception in the brain circadian clock of Drosophila. J Neurosci. 2004, 24 (6): 1468-1477. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3661-03.2004.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Benito J, Zheng H, Hardin PE: PDP1epsilon functions downstream of the circadian oscillator to mediate behavioral rhythms. J Neurosci. 2007, 27 (10): 2539-2547. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4870-06.2007.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sprecher SG, Reichert H, Hartenstein V: Gene expression patterns in primary neuronal clusters of the Drosophila embryonic brain. Gene Expr Patterns. 2007, 7 (5): 584-595. 10.1016/j.modgep.2007.01.004.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Younossi-Hartenstein A, Nguyen B, Shy D, Hartenstein V: Embryonic origin of the Drosophila brain neuropile. J Comp Neurol. 2006, 497 (6): 981-998. 10.1002/cne.20884.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Tavsanli BC, Ostrin EJ, Burgess HK, Middlebrooks BW, Pham TA, Mardon G: Structure-function analysis of the Drosophila retinal determination protein Dachshund. Dev Biol. 2004, 272 (1): 231-247. 10.1016/j.ydbio.2004.05.005.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Campos-Ortega JA, Hartenstein V: The Embryonic Development of Drosophila melanogaster. 1997, Berlin: Springer-VerlagView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Roberts DB: Drosophila: A Practical Approach. 1998, Oxford: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
- Sullivan W, Ashburner M, Hawley RS: Drosophila Protocols. 2000, Cold Spring Harbor: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory PressGoogle Scholar
- Cheng Y, Hardin PE: Drosophila photoreceptors contain an autonomous circadian oscillator that can function without period mRNA cycling. J Neurosci. 1998, 18 (2): 741-750.PubMedGoogle Scholar