Isoflurane depresses hippocampal CA1 glutamate nerve terminals without inhibiting fiber volleys
© Winegar and MacIver; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2006
Received: 28 June 2005
Accepted: 12 January 2006
Published: 12 January 2006
Anesthetic-induced CNS depression is thought to involve reduction of glutamate release from nerve terminals. Recent studies suggest that isoflurane reduces glutamate release by block of Na channels. To further investigate this question we examined the actions of isoflurane, TTX, extracellular Ca2+, CNQX and stimulus voltage (stim) on glutamate-mediated transmission at hippocampal excitatory synapses. EPSPs were recorded from CA1 neurons in rat hippocampal brain slices in response to Schaffer-collateral fiber stimulation.
Isoflurane (350 μM; 1 MAC) reversibly depressed EPSP amplitudes by ~60% while facilitation increased ~20%. Consistent with previous studies, these results indicate a presynaptic site of action that involves reduced excitation-release coupling. EPSPs were depressed to comparable levels by TTX (60 nM) or lowered stim, but facilitation was not changed, indicating a simple failure of axonal conduction. Similarly, partial antagonism of postsynaptic glutamate receptors with CNQX (10 μM) depressed EPSP amplitudes with no change in facilitation. However, EPSP depression by low external Ca2+ (0.8 mM) was accompanied by an increase in facilitation comparable to isoflurane. Isoflurane depression of EPSP amplitudes could also be partly reversed by high external Ca2+ (4 mM) that also decreased facilitation. Isoflurane or low Ca2+ markedly reduced the slopes of fiber volley (FV)-EPSP input-output curves, consistent with little or no effect on FVs. By contrast, TTX didn't alter the FV-EPSP curve slope, indicating that EPSP depression resulted from FV depression. FVs were remarkably resistant to isoflurane. Somatic spike currents were unaffected by 350 μM (1 MAC) isoflurane as well. The EC50 for isoflurane depression of FVs was ~2.8 mM (12 vol. %; 8 MAC).
Isoflurane appears to depress CA1 synapses at presynaptic sites downstream from Na channels, as evident by the increased facilitation that accompanies EPSP depression. Fiber volleys did not exhibit depression by isoflurane, as has been reported for other brain regions.
A longstanding controversy in the anesthesia literature concerns whether general anesthetics exert their actions primarily by depression of synaptic transmission or by blocking nerve conduction like local anesthetics. Thesleff  first proposed that general and local anesthetics share a common mechanism to block Na conductance [cf. [2–4]]. Alternatively, other early studies yielded evidence that volatile anesthetics preferentially depress synaptic potentials rather than axonal conduction [5, 6]. At present, most studies of volatile anesthetic molecular targets are directed toward synaptic ligand-gated ion channels, as these sites appear more sensitive to volatile anesthetics than voltage-gated channels . However, other studies have shown that volatile anesthetics depress axonal conduction or block voltage-gated Na channels. Berg-Johnsen and Langmoen  reported that 1 MAC isoflurane (1.5 vol. %) produced an 18% depression of fiber volley amplitudes recorded from small unmyelinated fibers in the hippocampal CA1 region. More recently, Mikulec et al.  reported that 1 MAC halothane depressed Schaffer-collateral axon fiber volleys by 18%. These findings and others support a presynaptic action of volatile anesthetics to depress axonal excitability.
Glutamatergic synapses are of particular interest with regard to anesthetic mechanisms. These excitatory synapses are distributed across the neural axis and are especially abundant in telencephalic structures such as hippocampus and cortex [10, 11]. Volatile anesthetics have long been recognized to depress glutamatergic neurotransmission, with evidence for both pre- and postsynaptic sites of action, including actions to depress excitability [12–14]. Some specialized glutamatergic synapses have enabled investigators to specifically look at anesthetic actions in electrically isolated presynaptic structures. Wu et al.  reported that isoflurane at clinical concentrations produced small reductions in spike amplitudes in the calyx of Held. The nonlinearities in coupling of excitability to Ca2+ influx and vesicle fusion produced a proportionally larger action of isoflurane to reduce transmitter release. Ouyang et al.  found that isoflurane inhibited Na channels in isolated neurohypophyseal nerve terminals. In addition, Sandstrom  reported that isoflurane reduced presynaptic excitability in the phylogenetically distant larval Drosophila glutamatergic neuromuscular junction – an effect that is also consistent with Na channel inhibition.
We sought to address the question of whether isoflurane inhibits voltage-gated Na channels to depress glutamatergic neurotransmission in the hippocampus. Earlier investigations found that isoflurane depressed glutamate release from synaptosomes by inhibiting voltage-gated Ca channels , although P/Q and N-type Ca channels don't appear to be directly targeted [19, 20]. Volatile anesthetics may directly act on presynaptic Na channels to depress neurotransmission. Studies in the hippocampus will help to ascertain whether volatile anesthetics generally inhibit Na+ conductance in the CNS or if this action is more specifically associated with the specialized synapses where it has been best documented [15, 16].
Tetrodotoxin depresses neurotransmission without effect on facilitation
Isoflurane produced a reversible depression of EPSP amplitudes, accompanied by an increase in facilitation as previously reported [12, 21, 22]. Figure 1B shows the time course of a typical experiment in which 350 μM isoflurane (1.5 vol %; 1 MAC) depressed EPSP amplitudes. The conditioning (1st) EPSP was depressed by ~60%. The test EPSP (2nd) was depressed by a smaller amount, which increased facilitation by ~20% (n = 5). The actions of isoflurane on glutamatergic neurotransmission follow the same pattern as when extracellular Ca2+ is reduced from 2 mM to 0.8 mM (Fig. 1C). Low external Ca2+ depressed both conditioning and test EPSPs while facilitation increased. By contrast, TTX (60 nM; Fig. 1D) depressed EPSPs to about the same level as isoflurane or low Ca2+, however TTX did not change facilitation.
Isoflurane significantly increased paired-pulse facilitation (p < 0.001) as did low Ca2+ (p < 0.001) when compared with TTX (ANOVA, Fig. 3, lower panel). By comparison, facilitation was largely unaffected by 10 μM CNQX or reduced stimulus voltage. Isoflurane (350 μM) depressed the first EPSP by about the same amount as when external Ca2+ was reduced to 0.8 mM (Fig. 3, top panel, no significant difference, ANOVA, n = 6). However, in the same experiments (Fig. 3, lower panel), isoflurane's action to enhance facilitation was significantly less than low Ca2+ (p < 0.001, ANOVA, n = 6). Because facilitation is increased when synaptic release probability is reduced [23, 24], the actions of isoflurane appear to involve additional sites besides those related to excitation-release coupling or Ca2+ ion influx.
Partial reversal of isoflurane depression of EPSPs by high external calcium
Minimal fiber volley and somatic Na spike depression by isoflurane
Volatile anesthetics are known to depress glutamatergic synaptic transmission, although the molecular mechanisms are unclear. Wu et al.  reported that isoflurane inhibited presynaptic action potentials in the calyx of Held to reduce glutamatergic neurotransmission. We were interested in further study of the presynaptic action of isoflurane, as Wu et al.  did not compare isoflurane and TTX effects, nor did they look at effects on facilitation. To test the generality of isoflurane depression of action potentials, we studied the effects of isoflurane in comparison with TTX on EPSPs in the CA1 region of the rat hippocampus and on FVs recorded from presynaptic Schaffer-collateral fibers. TTX blocks all brain Na channels, including those in the calyx of Held [26, 27]. We found that clinical concentrations of isoflurane had little to no inhibitory action on FV amplitudes, although EPSPs were strongly depressed and facilitation was increased. Somatic Na currents were also unaffected by 350 μM isoflurane. On the other hand, TTX reduced FV amplitudes and EPSP amplitudes but had no effect on facilitation. TTX also had no effect on the slope of the FV-EPSP relation. The actions of TTX likely resulted in part from nerve fiber conduction block. Fewer conducting fibers would reduce responsiveness to the stimulating electrode and account for the similar actions of TTX and reduced stimulus voltage on paired-pulse facilitation and the FV-EPSP relation (Fig. 3). TTX could also reduce Na spike amplitudes and decrease fiber conduction velocity  (Fig. 6B).
Unlike TTX, isoflurane at clinical concentrations doesn't appear to inhibit Na channel activity in hippocampal Schaffer-collateral fibers. Depression of EPSPs and enhancement of facilitation by isoflurane likely results from actions downstream from Na channels at sites that contribute more directly to excitation-release coupling, as supported by the insensitivity of the FV-EPSP slope to TTX (Fig. 2).
Fiber volleys in Schaffer collateral fibers represent a summation of closely-timed multiple action potentials. Their close temporal coordination is reflected by the short duration of the fiber volley, which is typically about 5–8 ms. FV-EPSP relations typically show an asymptotic decrease at higher FV amplitudes (Fig. 2, right panels), which contrasts to the accelerating relation of the action potential – EPSC relation in the calyx of Held . However, Wu et al  obtained their EPSC data by use of a scaled action potential as a voltage command while we obtained EPSP data by changing the stimulus voltage. Our methodology reflects an experimental focus on the properties of a population of synapses, with results that show a broad insensitivity of terminal fiber Na channels to isoflurane. Further study is needed at individual CA1 synapses to determine whether a subpopulation may be more sensitive to conduction block by isoflurane.
Elevated external Ca2+ reversed isoflurane depression of the first EPSP. This is likely related to the enhanced release of transmitter by increased Ca2+ influx during nerve terminal depolarization. Elevated external Ca2+ may also enhance NMDA receptor currents. However, this contribution to the EPSP is likely to be small, as the proportion of the NMDA receptor current carried by Ca2+ is fractional, e.g. 17% of the total NR1/NR2A current .
Voltage-gated P/Q type Ca channels are localized at synaptic terminals in many central neurons , including the mature calyx of Held where they closely associate with synaptic vesicles  and appear to have an important role in paired-pulse facilitation . High external [Ca2+] will increase Ca2+ influx when Ca channels open in response to depolarization. The result would likely increase the synaptic release probability  and tend to reduce facilitation, as we observed (Fig. 4). While P/Q Ca channels are not strongly inhibited by volatile anesthetics  there remains the possibility that volatile anesthetics may reduce calcium-induced calcium release from internal stores, as described in dendrites of hippocampal pyramidal cells  and suggested as an anesthetic mechanism for pentobarbitone .
Another possible site includes the N-ethylmaleimide-sensitive factor attachment protein receptor (SNARE) complex. The SNARE complex is involved in vesicle docking and fusion at most synapses. Disruption of SNARE proteins with Botulinum toxins A and F can each reduce the initial release probability. However, Botox F doesn't produce facilitation unless external [Ca2+] is lowered . Our results showing partial reversal of isoflurane effects on neurotransmission with high external [Ca2+] suggest the SNARE complex may warrant further study as targets of volatile anesthetics. In fact, isoflurane and halothane have recently been reported to bind to syntaxin and the SNARE complex at clinical concentrations , although the binding sites on the SNARE proteins have not yet been characterized.
It is important to note that not all volatile anesthetics may target the same molecular sites. Our results with isoflurane differ from the reported actions of halothane on synaptic transmission. Like isoflurane, halothane depresses EPSP amplitudes in rat hippocampal slices at clinical concentrations . However, halothane also depresses Schaffer-collateral axon fiber volley amplitudes . Unlike TTX, halothane has no effect on conduction velocity but does increase facilitation of EPSPs . While the dissimilar pharmacological profiles for halothane and isoflurane are inconsistent with a unitary model of anesthesia, both can be understood within a multi-site model of volatile anesthetic action [38–40].
The weak depressant action of isoflurane on Schaffer-collateral FVs indicates that presynaptic actions of isoflurane are not homogeneous in the brain – especially when contrasted to the results reported by Ouyang et al.  and Wu et al. . Furthermore, Baudoux et al , who studied Ca2+ transients in CA1 pyramidal cell axons, concluded that general anesthetics are unlikely to interfere with action potential propagation even in fine axon collaterals. Factors that could affect regional variability in action potential depression include the degree of terminal fiber myelination [cf. ; although see ] as well as the diversity of voltage-gated Na channel expression and subcellular distribution . Five TTX-sensitive Na channel α-subunits have been reported to be expressed in hippocampal neurons: NaV1.1, NaV1.2, NaV1.3, NaV1.6 and NaV1.7 , with complex patterns of expression even between different neurons. On the other hand, Leão et al.  reported that Na channels are absent from the calyx of Held. Their immunocytochemical data show NaV1.6 but not NaV1.2 was expressed at the axonal heminodes from which action potentials passively invade the calyx [27, 43]. These data taken together suggest that the expression pattern of Na channel α-subunits in neurons can influence anesthetic sensitivity. In addition, α-subunits are frequently associated with a β1 subunit that can modulate Na channel gating . So it appears that there are numerous possible isoforms of Na channels that are expressed heterogeneously in the CNS. The degree to which these isoforms differ with respect to volatile anesthetic sensitivity is presently unknown.
We conclude that for glutamatergic hippocampal neurons, isoflurane depresses transmission downstream from Na channels. Unlike TTX, isoflurane simultaneously increased facilitation and depressed EPSPs with only a minimal reduction of fiber volley amplitudes. Consistent with previous studies, a likely mechanism of isoflurane action is to reduce presynaptic Ca2+ levels following nerve terminal depolarization and/or to disrupt the vesicle release process.
The experimental protocols were approved by the Institutional Animal Care Committee at Stanford University and adhered to the published guidelines of the NIH, the Society for Neuroscience and The American Physiological Society. Male Sprague-Dawley rats were anesthetized with diethyl ether (22 vol. % in air). The animals were killed by decapitation. Brains were rapidly removed and placed in ice-cold (5°C) artificial cerebrospinal fluid (ACSF) that was pre-gassed with carbogen (95%-O2/5%-CO2). The ACSF had the following composition (in mM): 124 NaCl, 3.5 KCl, 1.25 NaH2PO4, 26 NaHCO3, 2 CaCl2, 2 MgSO4, and 10 D-glucose. Whole brain coronal slices (400 μm) were cut with a Vibratome Model 1500 (Technical Products International, Inc., O'Fallon, MO). The brain slices were equilibrated for at least one hour at room temperature (22°C) in a humidified chamber partially filled with ACSF and continually bubbled with carbogen. Individual slices were transferred to a recording chamber, submerged in ACSF and equilibrated for an additional 10 minutes prior to electrophysiological recording. All experiments were conducted at room temperature. Brain slices were continuously perfused with oxygenated ACSF at a flow rate of ~1.5 ml/min.
The inhalation anesthetic isoflurane was mixed with carrier gas (95%-O2/5%-CO2) in a calibrated commercial vaporizer (Fluotec 3, Fraser Harlake, Orchard Park, NY) and bubbled into the ACSF reservoir that perfused the brain slices. This system has been previously calibrated for delivery of volatile anesthetics . In some experiments the perfusion solution included 2-amino-5-phosphonovaleric acid (APV; NMDA receptor blocker, 125 μM) and 6-cyano-7-nitroquinoxaline-2,3-dione (CNQX; AMPA/Kainate receptor blocker, 8.6 μM) to block EPSPs.
Bipolar tungsten microelectrodes were placed on Schaffer-collateral fibers to electrically stimulate inputs to hippocampal CA1 pyramidal neurons. Glass micropipettes (Garner Glass, Claremont, CA) were pulled with a resistance of 2–5 MΩ, filled with ACSF and placed in stratum radiatum to record stimulus-evoked fiber volleys and excitatory postsynaptic potentials. Paired stimulus pulses (3–6 V, 300 μs duration; 80 ms interpulse interval) were delivered by a Grass stimulation isolation unit from a two-channel stimulator at a stimulus rate of 0.05 Hz. The field potentials were amplified, low-pass filtered at 20 kHz and sampled at 25 μs.
All responses were measured with DataWave or PClamp software and analyzed with IGOR Pro (WaveMetrics, Lake Oswego, OR). Fiber volley and EPSP amplitudes were measured from peak negative voltage to baseline (minimum-to-baseline) or alternatively, their initial slopes were measured between 20% and 80% of minimum. All responses were normalized as a percent of control, based on average amplitudes from a 20 min recording immediately before drug perfusion. We used InStat 3 (GraphPad Software, Inc.) to compare anesthetic effects between groups of time-matched experiments (two-way analysis of variance; ANOVA).
Perforated patch recordings
Whole cell currents were recorded from patches in the pyramidal cell body layer of the CA1 region of hippocampal slices. Slices were perfused with ACSF as described above. Patch electrodes were pulled from Garner KG-33 glass. The recording micropipette resistances ranged from 4–6 MΩ and seal resistances ranged from 1–5 GΩ. The patch electrode-filling solution contained (in mM) 140 potassium gluconate, 10 HEPES, 0.2 EGTA, 2 MgCl2, 0.10 CaCl2, 2 Na2-ATP, 0.3 Na-GTP (pH 7.4; free Ca2+ ~100 nM). To obtain perforated patches, a stock solution of 100 mM amphotericin B (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO) was prepared in DMSO and stored at -20°C. The stock solution was diluted (1/1000) into the pipette solution and sonicated for ~30 s to obtain a final amphotericin B concentration of 100 μM. Before seal formation, the voltage offset between the patch electrode and the bath solution was adjusted to produce zero current. Whole cell currents were recorded with an Axon Instruments MultiClamp 700A amplifier and PClamp software (Molecular Devices, Union City, CA). All experiments were performed at room temperature (~21–23°C).
Thanks to Michael Sceniak for his comments on the manuscript. This research was supported by NIH GM054767.
- Thesleff S: The effect of anesthetic agents on skeletal muscle membrane. Acta Physiol Scand. 1956, 37: 335-349.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Eccles JC: Synaptic potentials of motoneurons. J Neurophysiol. 1946, 9: 87-120.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Inoue F, Frank GB: Action of procaine on frog skeletal muscle. J Pharmacol Exp Therap. 1962, 136: 190-196.Google Scholar
- Frank GB, Sanders HD: A proposed common mechanism of action for general and local anaesthetics in the central nervous system. Brit J Pharmacol. 1963, 21: 1-9.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Larrabee MG, Posternak JM: Selective action of anesthetics on synapses and axons in mammalian sympathetic ganglia. J Neurophysiol. 1952, 15: 91-114.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Somjen GG, Gill MB: The mechanism of the blockade of synaptic transmission in the mammalian spinal cord by diethyl ether and by thiopental. J Pharmacol Exp Therap. 1963, 140: 19-30.Google Scholar
- Franks NP, Lieb WR: Molecular and cellular mechanisms of general anesthesia. Nature. 1994, 367: 607-614. 10.1038/367607a0.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Berg-Johnsen J, Langmoen IA: The effect of isoflurane on unmyelinated and myelinated fibres in the rat brain. Acta Physiol Scand. 1986, 127: 87-93.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Mikulec AA, Pittson S, Amagasu SM, Monroe FA, MacIver MB: Halothane depresses action potential conduction in hippocampal axons. Brain Res. 1998, 796: 231-238. 10.1016/S0006-8993(98)00348-5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Danbolt NC: Glutamate uptake. Prog Neurobiol. 2001, 65: 1-105. 10.1016/S0301-0082(00)00067-8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lugan R, Shigemoto R, Lopez-Bendito G: Glutamate and GABA receptor signalling in the developing brain. Neurosci. 2005, 130: 567-580. 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2004.09.042.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- MacIver MB, Mikulec AA, Amagasu SM, Monroe FA: Volatile anesthetics depress glutamate transmission via presynaptic actions. Anesthesiol. 1996, 85: 823-834. 10.1097/00000542-199610000-00018.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Nishikawa K, MacIver MB: Membrane and synaptic actions of halothane on rat hippocampal pyramidal neurons and inhibitory interneurons. J Neurosci. 2000, 20: 5915-5923.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kitamura A, Marszalec W, Yeh JZ, Narahashi T: Effects of halothane and propofol on excitatory and inhibitory synaptic transmission in rat cortical neurons. J Pharmacol Exp Therap. 2003, 304: 162-171. 10.1124/jpet.102.043273.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Wu X-S, Sun J-Y, Evers AS, Crowder M, Wu L-G: Isoflurane inhibits transmitter release and the presynaptic action potential. Anesthesiol. 2004, 100: 663-670. 10.1097/00000542-200403000-00029.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ouyang W, Wang G, Hemmings HC: Isoflurane and Propofol Inhbibit Voltage-Gated Sodium Channels in Isolated Rat Neurohypophysial Nerve Terminals. Mol Pharmacol. 2003, 64: 373-381. 10.1124/mol.64.2.373.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sandstrom DJ: Isoflurane depresses glutamate release by reducing neuronal excitability at the Drosophila neuromuscular junction. J Physiol. 2004, 558.2: 489-502. 10.1113/jphysiol.2004.065748.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Miao N, Frazer MJ, Lynch C: Volatile anesthetics depress Ca2+ transients and glutamate release in isolated cerebral synaptosomes. Anesthesiol. 1995, 83: 593-603. 10.1097/00000542-199509000-00019.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Hall AC, Lieb WR, Franks NP: Insensitivity of P-type calcium channels to inhalational and intravenous general anesthetics. Anesthesiology. 1994, 81: 117-123.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- White IL, Franks NP, Dickinson R: Effects of isoflurane and xenon on Ba2+ currents mediated by N-type calcium channels. Br J Anaesth. 2005, 94: 784-790. 10.1093/bja/aei126.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kirson ED, Yaari Y, Perouansky M: Presynaptic and postsynaptic actions of halothane at glutamatergic synapses in the mouse hippocampus. Brit J Pharmacol. 1998, 124: 1607-1614. 10.1038/sj.bjp.0701996.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Nishikawa K, MacIver MB: Excitatory synaptic transmission mediated by NMDA receptors is more sensitive to isoflurane than are non-NMDA receptor-mediated responses. Anesthesiol. 2000, 92: 228-236. 10.1097/00000542-200001000-00035.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Dobrunz LE, Stevens CF: Heterogeneity of release probability, facilitation, and depletion at central synapses. Neuron. 1997, 18: 995-1008. 10.1016/S0896-6273(00)80338-4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Zucker RS, Regehr WG: Short-term Synaptic Plasticity. Ann Rev Physiol. 2002, 64: 355-405. 10.1146/annurev.physiol.64.092501.114547.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Stuart G: Patch-pipet recording in brain slices. Curr Protocol Neurosci. 1998, 6.7: 1-10.Google Scholar
- Goldin AL, Barchi RL, Caldwell JH, Hofmann F, Howe JR, Hunter JC, Kallen RG, Mandel G, Meisler MH, Netter YB, Noda M, Tamkun MM, Waxman SG, Wood JN, Catterall WA: Nomenclature of voltage-gated sodium channels. Neuron. 2000, 28: 365-368. 10.1016/S0896-6273(00)00116-1.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Leão RM, Kushmerick C, Pinaud R, Renden R, Li GL, Taschenberger H, Spirou G, Levinson SR, von Gersdorff H: Presynaptic Na+ channels: locus, development, and recovery from inactivation at a high-fidelity synapse. J Neurosci. 2005, 25: 3724-38. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3983-04.2005.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Mikulec AA, Pittson S, Amagasu SM, Monroe FA, MacIver MB: Halothane depresses action potential conduction in hippocampal axons. Brain Res. 1998, 796: 231-238. 10.1016/S0006-8993(98)00348-5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Dingledine R, Borges K, Bowie D, Traynelis SF: The glutamate receptor ion channels. Pharmacol Rev. 1999, 51: 7-61.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Westenbroek RE, Sakurai T, Elliott EM, Hell JW, Starr TVB, Snutch TP, Catterall WA: Immunochemical identification and subcellular distribution of the alpha 1A subunits of brain calcium channels. J Neurosci. 1995, 15: 6403-6418.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Fedchyshyn MJ, Wang L: Developmental Transformation of the Release Modality at the Calyx of Held Synapse. J Neurosci. 2005, 25: 4131-4140. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0350-05.2005.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Inchauspe CG, Martini FJ, Forsythe ID, Uchitel OD: Functional compensation of P/Q by N-Type Channels Blocks Short-Term Plasticity at the Calyx of Held Presynaptic Terminal. J Neurosci. 2004, 24: 10979-10383. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2104-04.2004.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Zucker RS, Regehr WG: Short-term synaptic plasticity. Annu Rev Physiol. 2002, 64: 355-405. 10.1146/annurev.physiol.64.092501.114547.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Emptage N, Bliss TVP, Fine A: Single synaptic events evoke NMDA receptor-mediated release of calcium from internal stores in hippocampal dendritic spines. Neuron. 1999, 22: 115-124. 10.1016/S0896-6273(00)80683-2.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Baudoux S, Empson RM, Richards CD: Pentobarbitone modulates calcium transients in axons and synaptic boutons of hippocampal CA1 neurons. Br J Pharmacol. 2003, 140: 971-979. 10.1038/sj.bjp.0705519.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Young M: Proteolysis of SNARE proteins alters facilitation and depression in a specific way. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2005, 102: 2614-2619. 10.1073/pnas.0409656102.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Nagele P, Mendel JB, Placzek WJ, Scott BA, D'avignon DA, Crowder CM: Volatile Anesthetics Bind Rat Synaptic Snare Proteins. Anesththesiol. 2005, 103: 768-778. 10.1097/00000542-200510000-00015.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kennedy RD, Galindo AD: Comparative site of action of various anaesthetic agents at the mammalian myoneural junction. Br J Anaesth. 1975, 47: 533-540.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- MacIver MB, Roth SH: Anesthetics produce differential actions on membrane responses of the crayfish stretch receptor neuron. Eur J Pharmacol. 1987, 141: 67-77. 10.1016/0014-2999(87)90411-0.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Pittson S, Himmel AM, MacIver MB: Multiple synaptic and membrane sites of anesthetic action in the CA1 region of rat hippocampal slices. BMC Neurosci. 2004, 5: 52-62. 10.1186/1471-2202-5-52.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Whitaker WR, Faull RL, Waldvogel HJ, Plumpton CJ, Emson PC, Clare JJ: Comparative distribution of voltage-gated sodium channel proteins in human brain. Molec Brain Res. 2001, 88: 37-53. 10.1016/S0169-328X(00)00289-8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Mechaly I, Scamps F, Chabbert C, Sans A, Valmier J: Molecular diversity of voltage-gated sodium channel alpha subunits expressed in neuronal and non-neuronal excitable cells. Neurosci. 2005, 130: 389-96. 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2004.09.034.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Engel D, Jonas P: Presynaptic Action Potential Amplification by Voltage-Gated Na+ Channels in Hippocampal Mossy Fiber Boutons. Neuron. 2005, 45: 405-417. 10.1016/j.neuron.2004.12.048.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Johnson D, Montpetit ML, Stocker PJ, Bennett ES: The sialic acid component of the β1 subunit modulates voltage-gated sodium channel function. J Biol Chem. 2004, 279: 44303-44310. 10.1074/jbc.M408900200.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hagan CE, Pearce RA, Trudell JR, MacIver MB: Concentration measures of volatile anesthetics in the aqueous phase using calcium sensitive electrodes. J Neurosci Meth. 1998, 81: 177-84. 10.1016/S0165-0270(98)00029-6.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.