Volume 13 Supplement 1

Twenty First Annual Computational Neuroscience Meeting: CNS*2012

Open Access

Temperature-fastened sodium inactivation accounts for energy efficient cortical action potentials in mammalian brains

BMC Neuroscience201213(Suppl 1):P5

DOI: 10.1186/1471-2202-13-S1-P5

Published: 16 July 2012

Recent experimental evidencs showed that action potential (AP) generation in mammalian, versus invertebrate, axons is remarkably energy efficient [1]. Here we perform both computational (based on both traditional Hodgkin-Huxley model [2] and a cortical axon model [3] whose parameters are modified from experimental data) and experimental studies. Each supports that temperature is a major factor which directly modulates the level of energy cost of APs. Temperature increase results in a remarkable decrease in time constant of sodium channel closing and an increase in inactivation level of Na+ channel due to the Q10 effect (which quantifies the temperature dependent rate of biochemical reactions). This results in a marked reduction in overlap of the inward Na+, and outward K+ currents. As a consequence, the Na+ entry ratio gradually reaches to 1 (the theoretical optimal level, which requires only minimal Na+ charge for generating an AP) as temperature rises. Moreover, we also notice a remarkable exponential increase in firing rate and an exponential decrease in spike duration by both experimental and model studies. The total energy charge in response to a signal reaches a global minimum when temperature is around 37-42 oC. This suggests that warm body temperatures may help the mammalian brain to operate with minimal energy cost.

In addition, classic investigations by Hodgkin of squid giant axon revealed an excess entry of approximately 4 times as much Na+ as minimally required to generate an AP [4]. This value of 4 times excess Na+ entry has figured prominently in estimates of the distribution of the sources of energy consumption in the mammalian brain. Here we have to point out that this calculation is based on original Hodgkin-Huxley model with a temperature at 18 oC. It should not be used for calculation of mammalian brain energy budget since mammalian animals have a warm body temperature around 37 oC, around which the sodium entry ratio is close to 1.3.
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1471-2202-13-S1-P5/MediaObjects/12868_2012_Article_2542_Fig1_HTML.jpg
Figure 1

Energy efficiency of AP increases as temperature increases. A. Sodium entry ratio (SER, defined as ∫INa(t)dt/(Cm∆V), where INa(t) is Na+ current, Cm is capacitance, ∆V is the change in voltage during an AP) vs temperature. For both squid axon and cortical axon models, increasing temperature strongly decreases SER during AP. At 18o C, SER is approximately 4, while at 37o C, SER reaches 1.89 and 1.41. B. Cortical AP, INa and IK at 18 and 37o C, respectively. C. The inactivation level of Na+ channel increases as temperature increases, indicating a more closed state for a high temperature, decreasing the leaky Na+ through membrane. D. Decrease of Na+ activation time constant as temperature increases. E. Decrease of Na+ inactivation time constant as temperature increases.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Center for Computational Systems Biology, School of Life Sciences, Fudan University

References

  1. Alle H, Roth A, Geiger JR: Energy-efficient action potentials in hippocampal mossy fibers. Science. 2009, 325: 1405-1408. 10.1126/science.1174331.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Hodgkin AL, Huxley AF: A quantitative description of membrane current and its application to conduction and excitation in nerve. J Physiol. 1952, 117: 500-44.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Yu Y, Shu Y, McCormick DA: Cortical action potential backpropagation explains spike threshold variability and rapid-onset kinetics. J Neurosci. 2008, 28 (29): 7260-7272. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1613-08.2008.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Attwell D, Laughlin SB: An energy budget for signaling in the grey matter of the brain. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2001, 21 (10): 1133-1145.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Yu; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Advertisement