Volume 13 Supplement 1

Twenty First Annual Computational Neuroscience Meeting: CNS*2012

Open Access

Modeling the dynamics of neural codes in the olfaction of the Manduca-sexta moth

BMC Neuroscience201213(Suppl 1):O18

DOI: 10.1186/1471-2202-13-S1-O18

Published: 16 July 2012

The Anntenal Lobe (AL) is the olfactory processing unit in insects, composed of projection neurons (PNs) and local neurons (LNs) [1]. It has been demonstrated that the AL reformats the sensory input information that it receives into spatiotemporal firing patterns exhibited by the PNs [2, 3]. In many insects the LNs are mainly inhibitory which suggests that the inhibition is responsible for shaping the input into a robust pattern [4]. The robustness of the pattern is expressed as follows: over several applications of the same odor the projection of the data recorded from the PNs onto a few dominant firing patterns results in a robust low dimensional trajectory. This trajectory appears to be similar to a trajectory that converges to a stable unique fixed point [5].

In this work, we resolve several open questions raised by [5, 6]. Specifically, we study how interactions between the LNs and PNs permit creation of robust and spatiotemporal codes. We further propose a simple model that mimics the dynamics of the AL and the dynamics of mixtures of odors. Our work is a combination of theoretical analysis and experimental studies.

Theoretically we consider a network of excitatory-inhibitory firing units that has a similar structure to the AL. By proposing to project the dynamical equations of the network onto given orthogonal spatial patterns, we derive the conditions on the interactions between the inhibitory and excitatory population such that the network will support a unique stable fixed point. The analysis is based on requiring that the inhibitory neurons will suppress inputs that are not associated to specific odors (noise and unknown patterns) but being neutral to the given spatial patterns. These conditions allow us to prescribe the connections between PNs and LNs and do not require specific symmetries (in contrast to Hopfield networks).

Experimentally we record the dynamics of PNs in the AL of the Manduca Sexta moth both for inputs that are single odor or mixtures of two odors. Extracting the spatial patterns (first PCA mode) obtained from experiments with single odor inputs we calibrate the network. We are able to establish similarity between the model dynamics and experimental projections and thus validate our theoretical construction. Once the model is calibrated we test it against experiments with inputs that are different ratios of two odors revealing similar dynamics. To test the importance of inhibition, conjectured to be responsible for existence of a stable fixed point, we repeat the experiments in which the inhibition is blocked by a drug. Results demonstrate that the robustness of the dynamics is destroyed.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Applied Mathematics, University of Washington
(2)
Department of Biology, University of Washington

References

  1. Galizia CG, Rössler W: Parallel olfactory systems in insects: anatomy and function. Ann. Rev. of Ent. 2010, 55: 399-420. 10.1146/annurev-ento-112408-085442.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Stopfer M, Jayaraman V, Laurent G: Intensity versus identity coding in an olfactory system. Neuron. 2003, 39: 991-1004. 10.1016/j.neuron.2003.08.011.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Riffell J, Lei H, Hildebrand J: Neural correlates of behavior in the moth Manduca sexta in response to complex odors. PNAS. 2009, 106: 19219-19226. 10.1073/pnas.0910592106.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Lei H, Christensen T, Hildebrand J: Local inhibition modulates odor-evoked synchronization of glomerulus-specific output neurons. Nature Neuroscience. 2002, 5: 557-565. 10.1038/nn0602-859.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Mazor O, Laurent G: Transient Dynamics versus Fixed Points in Odor Representations by Locust Antennal Lobe Projection Neurons. Neuron. 2005, 48: 661-673. 10.1016/j.neuron.2005.09.032.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Rabinovich M, Huerta R, Laurent G: Transient dynamics for neural processing. Science. 2008, 321: 48-50. 10.1126/science.1155564.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Shlizerman et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Advertisement