Prepulse inhibition of auditory change-related cortical responses
© Inui et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012
Received: 31 July 2012
Accepted: 25 October 2012
Published: 31 October 2012
Prepulse inhibition (PPI) of the startle response is an important tool to investigate the biology of schizophrenia. PPI is usually observed by use of a startle reflex such as blinking following an intense sound. A similar phenomenon has not been reported for cortical responses.
In 12 healthy subjects, change-related cortical activity in response to an abrupt increase of sound pressure by 5 dB above the background of 65 dB SPL (test stimulus) was measured using magnetoencephalography. The test stimulus evoked a clear cortical response peaking at around 130 ms (Change-N1m). In Experiment 1, effects of the intensity of a prepulse (0.5 ~ 5 dB) on the test response were examined using a paired stimulation paradigm. In Experiment 2, effects of the interval between the prepulse and test stimulus were examined using interstimulus intervals (ISIs) of 50 ~ 350 ms. When the test stimulus was preceded by the prepulse, the Change-N1m was more strongly inhibited by a stronger prepulse (Experiment 1) and a shorter ISI prepulse (Experiment 2). In addition, the amplitude of the test Change-N1m correlated positively with both the amplitude of the prepulse-evoked response and the degree of inhibition, suggesting that subjects who are more sensitive to the auditory change are more strongly inhibited by the prepulse.
Since Change-N1m is easy to measure and control, it would be a valuable tool to investigate mechanisms of sensory gating or the biology of certain mental diseases such as schizophrenia.
Prepulse inhibition (PPI) is a phenomenon whereby a weak leading stimulus, or prepulse, inhibits startling reflexes evoked by a subsequent intense abrupt stimulus . PPI is commonly considered a preattentional inhibitory process called sensorimotor gating, by which sensory information is screened so that an individual can focus on the most salient aspects of the sensory environment [2, 3]. PPI is useful for investigating mechanisms of sensory filtering because it is common to all mammals, which enables findings to be compared between humans and animals . Clinically, PPI has been repeatedly shown to be impaired in patients with schizophrenia [4, 5] and unaffected first-degree relatives of probands [6, 7]. Therefore, PPI is an important tool to investigate the biology of schizophrenia. Usually, an intense sound is used to elicit auditory startle responses. The blink reflex is measured in humans by using electromyography and whole-body flinching is measured in rodents by using stabilimeter chambers.
Change-related cortical responses are a sensory-evoked cortical activation specific to a change of stimulus, and recorded very clearly with electroencephalography (EEG) or magnetoencephalography (MEG). The change-related response is elicited without any tasks and without the subject’s attention by any sensory changes including the onset and offset of a stimulus in the auditory [8–12], somatosensory [13, 14] and visual [15–17] systems. In addition to sensory-specific areas, multi-modal cortical regions that specifically respond to sensory changes are shown in functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) and MEG studies [18, 19]. Since the automatic change-detecting system is thought to play an important role in the quick detection of changes in the sensory environment and therefore in survival, it can be considered a subtype of defense reactions like the startle reflex is . As change-related responses are based on the comparison of a new sensory event with the preceding status, sensory memory and a comparison process are involved in generating them. In fact, the latency and magnitude of change-related responses depends on the duration [9–11, 14, 17, 19, 21, 22] and intensity [9, 12] of the preceding stimulus, in addition to the magnitude of the change itself [9, 23].
Based on the similarity between the startle reflex and change-related cortical response with respect to both physiological significance and experimental behavior, we hypothesized that the change-related cortical response is inhibited by a preceding weak stimulus in a similar manner to PPI. Given the defensive and attentional role of the change-related response, the processing of a leading weak change should be protected from being drowned out by a subsequent greater change. To test this, we recorded auditory change-related cortical responses using MEG, and examined effects of a preceding weak change (prepulse) in the present study.
The study was approved in advance by the Ethics Committee of the National Institute for Physiological Sciences, Okazaki, Japan, and written consent was obtained from all the subjects. The experiment was performed on twelve (four females and eight males) healthy volunteers, aged 25–53 (38.5 ± 7.4) years. They were asked to refrain from alcohol, caffeine and smoking for at least 12 hours prior to the experiment. There were two smokers. All subjects were without a history of mental or neurological disorders, or substance abuse in the last two years. They were free of medication at testing. All subjects underwent a psychiatric assessment using the Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview , and had a hearing threshold lower than 30 dB at 1000 Hz as assessed by an audiometer (AA-71, Rion, Tokyo, Japan).
Magnetic signals were recorded using a 306-channel whole-head type MEG system (Vector-view, ELEKTA Neuromag, Helsinki, Finland), which comprised 102 identical triple sensor elements. Each sensor element consisted of two orthogonal planar gradiometers and one magnetometer coupled to a multi-superconducting quantum interference device (SQUID) and thus provided 3 independent measurements of the magnetic fields. In this study, we analyzed MEG signals recorded from 204 planar-type gradiometers. These planar gradiometers are powerful enough to detect the largest signal just over local cerebral sources. The signals were recorded with a bandpass filter of 0.1-200 Hz and digitized at 1004 Hz. The analysis was conducted from 100 ms before to 700 ms after the onset of each stimulus. Epochs with MEG signals larger than 2.7 pT / cm were rejected from the averaging.
The experiments were conducted in a quiet, magnetically shielded room. The subjects sat in a chair and watched a silent movie on a screen 1.5 m in front of them throughout the experiments. Experiments 1 and 2 were carried out in this order on all subjects and separated by a 7 ~ 10-day interval. Two experiments were carried out at almost the same time of the day in each subject. An additional experiment was carried out on three subjects.
To assess effects of the intensity of the prepulse, prepulses of 65.5, 66.5, 68, and 70 dB SPL (0.5, 1.5, 3, and 5 dB above the Standard, respectively) were used as the conditioning (prepulse) stimulus. Therefore, there were ten stimuli: 1) Standard alone, 2) Test alone, 3) ~ 6) Prepulse alone, and 7) ~ 10) Prepulse + Test. In the 3) ~ 10) stimuli, the tenth pulse (225 ~ 250 ms) was the prepulse. Since the Test started at 400 ms, the interstimulus interval (ISI) between the offset of the prepulse and the onset of the test was 150 ms. In this study, the prepulse-test interval was expressed as the ISI. Ten stimuli were presented randomly at an even probability at a trial-trial interval of 900 ms. For each stimulus, 150 ~ 155 artifact-free epochs were averaged.
To assess effects of the interval between the prepulse and the Test, ISIs of 50, 100, 200, and 350 ms were used. The Test was the same as in Experiment 1. The prepulse was a 25-ms tone 67 dB in sound pressure (2 dB above the Standard). Similar to Experiment 1, there were ten stimuli that were presented randomly at an even probability at a trial-trial interval of 900 ms. For each stimulus, 150 ~ 155 artifact-free epochs were averaged.
To examine whether a subtle change other than the sound pressure increase affects the Test-evoked cortical responses, two 25-ms prepulses of a decrease of sound pressure (3 dB below the Standard) and a frequency change (from 800 to 816 Hz) were used as the conditioning stimulus. There were six stimuli that were presented randomly: 1) Standard alone; 2) Test alone; 3) and 4) Prepulse alone (sound pressure decrease and frequency change); and 5) and 6) Prepulse + Test. The ISI between the prepulse and the test stimulus was 75 ms. The trial-trial interval was 900 ms. For each stimulus, 150 ~ 155 artifact-free epochs were averaged.
The location of estimated dipoles was expressed in Talairach coordinates by using BESA and Brain Voyager (QX 1.4, Maastricht, The Netherlands). For both Experiment 1 and 2, statistical differences were evaluated using a one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA). When the sphericity assumption was violated, the Greenhouse-Geisser correction coefficient epsilon was used for correcting the degrees of freedom and then the F-value and significance probability were re-calculated. To compare the difference between conditions, post-hoc multiple comparisons were done with Bonferroni-adjusted t-tests. All statistical analyses were performed at the 0.05 level of significance. Data are expressed as the mean ± standard deviation (SD).
In all the 12 subjects, the Test, an abrupt increase of sound pressure by 5 dB, evoked a clear Change-N1m. The dipole for the Change-N1m was estimated to be located in the supratemporal plane around the superior temporal gyrus (STG) as described previously [8, 10, 11, 23]. The mean x, y, and z Talairach coordinates of the dipole were −51, -23, and 5 for the left hemisphere, and 54, -17, and 4 for the right hemisphere in Experiment 1. Respective values of Experiment 2 were −53, -22, and 4 for the left hemisphere, and 54, -17, and 4 for the right.
The peak latency and amplitude of Change-N1m
Peak Latency (ms)
Peak amplitude (nAm)
Peak Latency (ms)
Peak amplitude (nAm)
A significant response (> baseline + 3SD) to the prepulse itself (Figure 3B) was elicited by the 0.5, 1.5, 3, and 5-dB prepulse in 0, 1, 5, and 9 subjects, respectively in the left hemisphere, and 0, 1, 7, and 10 subjects in the right hemisphere. The amplitude of the Prepulse-evoked response in both the 3-dB and 5-dB prepulse conditions correlated linearly with the amplitude of the Test-evoked response for the Test-alone stimulus (r2 = 0.79 and 0.81).
Test-retest reliability, and correlation between the degree of PPI and change-N1m amplitude
Similar analyses were conducted for the relationship between the amplitude of the Prepulse-evoked response and %PPI in Experiment 1. Among the 12 hemispheres with a significant Prepulse-evoked response in the 3-dB condition, the %PPI correlated significantly with the amplitude of the Prepulse-evoked response (r2 = 0.46, p = 0.014)(Figure 6D). However, when %PPI was compared between the 12 hemispheres with a significant Prepulse-evoked response and 12 hemispheres without a significant response, %PPI was not different (31.3 ± 28 and 32.9 ± 10.3%). Among 19 hemispheres with a significant Prepulse-evoked response in the 5-dB prepulse condition, %PPI correlated significantly with the amplitude of the Prepulse-evoked response (r2 = 0.39, p = 0.004).
The present study demonstrated that auditory change-related cortical responses to an abrupt increase of sound pressure are attenuated by a preceding weaker and briefer change stimulus (prepulse) in a similar manner to the PPI of startle responses. That is, the degree of inhibition depends on the intensity of the prepulse and the time between the prepulse and test stimulus. The inhibition occurs even when the prepulse itself does not evoke a significant response, and the degree of inhibition appears to reflect the subject’s inherent sensitivity to a sensory change. Although further studies are necessary to determine whether the present phenomenon and PPI of the startle reflex have common physiological significance or mechanisms, prepulse inhibition of the cerebral response would advance our understanding of the mechanisms underlying sensory gating or its deficits in certain disease such as schizophrenia.
The findings in Experiment 1 that %PPI increases with an increase in the prepulse intensity is consistent with PPI of startle reflexes, in which stronger or more salient prepulses induce greater inhibition in general [28–31]. Similar to PPI of startle reflexes in humans  and mice , %PPI was positively correlated with the amplitude of the Prepulse-evoked response (Figure 6D). We consider that the prepulse and test stimulus activate a similar, or even identical, group of neurons reflected by Change-N1m, that greater Prepulse-evoked responses inhibit the test response more strongly, and, therefore, that subjects who are more sensitive to an abrupt sensory change are more strongly inhibited by the prepulse, which is in line with the protective hypothesis of PPI . However, results of Experiment 1 in which %PPI was not influenced by the presence of the significant Prepulse-evoked response suggest that PPI can happen when the Prepulse-alone response is under the detection threshold as in PPI of the startle reflex , and that absence of the Prepulse-alone response in such a case does not mean an absence of brain responses to shape Change-N1m or to inhibit the Test response.
Results of Experiment 2 showed that %PPI depends on the interval between the Prepulse and Test similar to PPI of the startle response in which an ISI of 30 ~ 240 ms is used for eliciting PPI . In the present study (Experiment 2), a shorter ISI produced greater PPI. However, as shown in Figure 6C, %PPI of the 50-ms ISI distributed widely from −31 to 77%. In 10 of 24 hemispheres, %PPI was smaller for the 50-ms than 100-ms ISI, which might be due to prepulse facilitation at a short ISI . It seems possible in non-sensitive subjects that a prepulse at a short ISI serves as a part of the Test stimulus and enhances the response. From the viewpoint that PPI can be used as a powerful endophenotype in studies of schizophrenia , such a broad distribution may be of benefit.
Results of Experiment 3 demonstrated that the test response evoke by an abrupt increase of sound pressure can be inhibited by a prepulse with a change in different auditory features. We consider that this also supports the protective hypothesis since any detectable changes activate the change-detecting system, and once the system is activated, its activity should be protected for a certain period to complete the processing from being interfered with by succeeding events. The results may be useful to design the best protocol to use PPI of cortical responses, that is, Change-N1m can be elicited by any auditory change including frequency, intensity, and sound location , and a brief preceding sound with any feature change from the background can be a prepulse.
Like in our previous studies (e.g. ), the change-related response tended to be larger in amplitude in the right hemisphere (t(11) = 3.87, p = 0.003) for Experiment 1, t(11) = 2.13, p = 0.006 for Experiment 2) implying right hemisphere dominance for change detection. However, neither the main effect of the hemisphere nor the interaction with the experimental conditions was significant (ANOVA) for PPI. Since the present study used a fixed sound pressure level for both ears, a small difference in the hearing threshold between the ears might result in differences observed for the hemispheres. For evaluation of the hemispheric differences for the change-related response and its PPI, careful adjustment of the sound pressure level and detailed information of the handedness appear to be necessary.
Here, we demonstrated that auditory change-related cortical responses are inhibited by a prepulse in a similar manner to PPI of startle reflexes. Since auditory Change-N1m is 1) easily recorded using EEG within a few minutes [9, 12], 2) evoked by a small deviance of a sound feature without using an intense stimulus, and 3) stable like the blink reflex and its PPI are [35–37], it would be a valuable tool for understanding mechanisms of sensory gating or its deficits in a disease such as schizophrenia. In future studies, PPI should be compared directly between the startle reflexes and cortical responses to find similarities and dissimilarities. Comparisons with other experimental measures of inhibitory control, such as P50 gating  or PPI of perceived intensity , are also necessary. Another potential future study is a genetic [40, 41] or pharmacological study. For example, nicotine is known to augment PPI of the startle reflex  as well as the generation of Change-N1m .
Magnetoencephalography, PPI, Prepulse inhibition.
This study was supported by a grant from the Smoking Research Foundation. The authors are grateful to Yasuyuki Takeshima for his technical support.
- Graham FK: Presidential Address: The more or less startling effects of weak prestimulation. Psychophysiology. 1975, 12: 238-248. 10.1111/j.1469-8986.1975.tb01284.x.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Braff DL, Geyer MA, Swerdlow NR: Human studies of prepulse inhibition of startle: normal subjects, patient groups, and pharmacological studies. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2001, 156: 234-258. 10.1007/s002130100810.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Swerdlow NR, Geyer MA, Braff DL: Neural circuit regulation of prepulse inhibition of startle in the rat: current knowledge and future challenges. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2001, 156: 194-215. 10.1007/s002130100799.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Swerdlow NR, Weber M, Qu Y, Light GA, Braff DL: Realistic expectations of prepulse inhibition in translational models for schizophrenia research. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2008, 199: 331-388. 10.1007/s00213-008-1072-4.PubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Braff DL: Prepulse inhibition of the startle reflex: a window on the brain in schizophrenia. Curr Top Behav Neurosci. 2010, 4: 349-471. 10.1007/7854_2010_61.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kumari V, Das M, Zachariah E, Ettinger U, Sharma T: Reduced prepulse inhibition in unaffected siblings of schizophrenia patients. Psychophysiology. 2005, 42: 588-594. 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2005.00346.x.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Cadenhead KS, Swerdlow NR, Shafer KM, Diaz M, Braff DL: Modulation of the startle response and startle laterality in relatives of schizophrenic patients and in subjects with schizotypal personality disorder: evidence of inhibitory deficits. Am J Psychiatry. 2000, 157: 1660-1668. 10.1176/appi.ajp.157.10.1660.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Yamashiro K, Inui K, Otsuru N, Kida T, Kakigi R: Automatic auditory off-response in humans: an MEG study. Eur J Neurosci. 2009, 30: 125-131. 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2009.06790.x.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Inui K, Urakawa T, Yamashiro K, Otsuru N, Nishihara M, Takeshima Y, Kakigi R: Non-linear laws of echoic memory and auditory change detection in humans. BMC Neurosci. 2010, 11: 80-10.1186/1471-2202-11-80.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Yamashiro K, Inui K, Otsuru N, Kakigi R: Change-related responses in the human auditory cortex: an MEG study. Psychophysiology. 2011, 48: 23-30. 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2010.01038.x.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Akiyama LF, Yamashiro K, Inui K, Kakigi R: Automatic cortical responses to sound movement: a magnetoencephalography study. Neurosci Lett. 2011, 488: 183-187. 10.1016/j.neulet.2010.11.025.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Nishihara M, Inui K, Motomura E, Otsuru N, Ushida T, Kakigi R: Auditory N1 as a change-related automatic response. Neurosci Res. 2011, 71: 145-148. 10.1016/j.neures.2011.07.004.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Yamashiro K, Inui K, Otsuru N, Kida T, Kakigi R: Somatosensory off-response in humans: an MEG study. NeuroImage. 2009, 44: 1363-1368. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.11.003.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Otsuru N, Inui K, Yamashiro K, Urakawa T, Keceli S, Kakigi R: Effects of prior sustained tactile stimulation on the somatosensory response to the sudden change of intensity in humans: an magnetoencephalography study. Neuroscience. 2011, 182: 115-124.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Tanaka E, Inui K, Kida T, Kakigi R: Common cortical responses evoked by appearance, disappearance and change of the human face. BMC Neurosci. 2010, 10: 38-10.1186/1471-2377-10-38.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Urakawa T, Inui K, Yamashiro K, Kakigi R: Cortical dynamics of the visual change detection process. Psychophysiology. 2010, 47: 905-912.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Urakawa T, Inui K, Yamashiro K, Tanaka E, Kakigi R: Cortical dynamics of visual change detection based on sensory memory. NeuroImage. 2010, 52: 302-308. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.03.071.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Downar J, Crawley AP, Mikulis DJ, Davis KD: A multimodal cortical network for the detection of changes in the sensory environment. Nat Neurosci. 2000, 3: 277-283. 10.1038/72991.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Tanaka E, Kida T, Inui K, Kakigi R: Change-driven cortical activation in multisensory environments: an MEG study. NeuroImage. 2009, 48: 464-474. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.06.037.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Turpin G: Effects of stimulus intensity on autonomic responding: the problem of differentiating orienting and defense reflexes. Psychophysiology. 1986, 23: 1-14. 10.1111/j.1469-8986.1986.tb00583.x.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ohoyama K, Motomura E, Inui K, Nishihara M, Otsuru N, Oi M, Kakigi R, Okada M: Memory-based pre-attentive auditory N1 elicited by sound movement. Neurosci Res. 2012, 73: 248-251. 10.1016/j.neures.2012.04.003.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Yamashiro K, Inui K, Otsuru N, Urakawa T, Kakigi R: Temporal window of integration in the somatosensory modality: an MEG study. Clin Neurophysiol. 2011, 122: 2276-2281. 10.1016/j.clinph.2011.03.028.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Inui K, Urakawa T, Yamashiro K, Otsuru N, Takeshima Y, Nishihara M, Motomura E, Kida T, Kakigi R: Echoic memory of a single pure tone indexed by change-related brain activity. BMC Neurosci. 2010, 11: 135-10.1186/1471-2202-11-135.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Sheehan DV, Lecrubier Y, Sheehan KH, Amorim P, Janavs J, Weiller E, Hergueta T, Baker R, Dunbar C: The Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview (M.I.N.I.): the development and validation of a structured diagnostic psychiatric interview for DSM-IV and ICD-10. J Clin Psychiatry. 1998, 59 (20): 22-33.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Jones SJ, Longe O, Vaz Pato M: Auditory evoked potentials to abrupt pitch and timbre change of complex tones: electrophysiological evidence of 'streaming. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1998, 108: 131-142. 10.1016/S0168-5597(97)00077-4.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Otsuru N, Tsuruhara A, Motomura E, Tanii H, Nishihara M, Inui K, Kakigi R: Effects of acute nicotine on auditory change-related cortical responses. Psychopharmacology. in press
- Inui K, Okamoto H, Miki K, Gunji A, Kakigi R: Serial and parallel processing in the human auditory cortex: a magnetoencephalographic study. Cereb Cortex. 2006, 16: 18-30. 10.1093/cercor/bhk026.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Hoffman HS, Wible BL: Role of weak signals in acoustic startle. J Acoust Soc Am. 1970, 47: 489-497. 10.1121/1.1911919.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Graham FK, Murray GM: Discordant effects of weak prestimulation on magnitude an latency of the reflex blink. Physiol Psychol. 1977, 5: 108-114.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Grillon C, Ameli R, Charney DS, Krystal J, Braff D: Startle gating deficits occur across prepulse intensities in schizophrenic patients. Biol Psychiatry. 1992, 32: 939-943. 10.1016/0006-3223(92)90183-Z.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Blumenthal TD: Prepulse inhibition of the startle eyeblink as an indicator of temporal summation. Percept Psychophys. 1995, 57: 487-494. 10.3758/BF03213074.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Csomor PA, Vollenweider FX, Feldon J, Yee BK: On the feasibility to detect and to quantify prepulse-elicited reaction in prepulse inhibition of the acoustic startle reflex in humans. Behav Brain Res. 2005, 162: 256-263. 10.1016/j.bbr.2005.03.020.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Yee BK, Russig H, Feldon J: Apomorphine-induced prepulse inhibition disruption is associated with a paradoxical enhancement of prepulse stimulus reactivity. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2004, 29: 240-248. 10.1038/sj.npp.1300323.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Swerdlow NR, Talledo J, Shoemaker JM, Codon K, Goins J, Auerbach PP: Weak prepulses inhibit but do not elicit startle in rats and humans. Biol Psychiatry. 2004, 55: 1195-1198. 10.1016/j.biopsych.2004.02.030.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Abel K, Waikar M, Pedro B, Hemsley D, Geyer M: Repeated testing of prepulse inhibition and habituation of the startle reflex: a study in healthy human controls. J Psychopharmacol. 1998, 12: 330-337. 10.1177/026988119801200402.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Swerdlow NR, Eastvold A, Uyan KM, Ploum Y, Cadenhead K: Matching strategies for drug studies of prepulse inhibition in humans. Behav Pharmacol. 2001, 12: 45-52. 10.1097/00008877-200102000-00005.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Flaten MA: Test-retest reliability of the somatosensory blink reflex and its inhibition. Int J Psychophysiol. 2002, 45: 261-265. 10.1016/S0167-8760(02)00034-X.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Braff DL, Light GA, Swerdlow NR: Prepulse inhibition and P50 suppression are both deficient but not correlated in schizophrenia patients. Biol Psychiatry. 2007, 61: 1204-1207. 10.1016/j.biopsych.2006.08.015.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Swerdlow NR, Blumenthal TD, Sutherland AN, Weber E, Talledo JA: Effects of prepulse intensity, duration, and bandwidth on perceived intensity of startling acoustic stimuli. Biol Psychol. 2007, 74: 389-395. 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2006.10.001.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Roussos P, Giakoumaki SG, Rogdaki M, Pavlakis S, Frangou S, Bitsios P: Prepulse inhibition of the startle reflex depends on the catechol O-methyltransferase Val158Met gene polymorphism. Psychol Med. 2008, 38: 1651-1658. 10.1017/S0033291708002912.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Quednow BB, Schmechtig A, Ettinger U, Petrovsky N, Collier DA, Vollenweider FX, Wagner M, Kumari V: Sensorimotor gating depends on polymorphisms of the serotonin-2A receptor and catechol-O-methyltransferase, but not on neuregulin-1 Arg38Gln genotype: a replication study. Biol Psychiatry. 2009, 66: 614-620. 10.1016/j.biopsych.2009.05.007.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kumari V, Cotter PA, Checkley SA, Gray JA: Effect of acute subcutaneous nicotine on prepulse inhibition of the acoustic startle reflex in healthy male non-smokers. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 1997, 132: 389-395. 10.1007/s002130050360.View ArticleGoogle Scholar