Regional and developmental brain expression patterns of SNAP25 splice variants
© Prescott and Chamberlain; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2011
Received: 2 February 2011
Accepted: 28 April 2011
Published: 28 April 2011
SNAP25 is an essential SNARE protein for regulated exocytosis in neuronal cells. Differential splicing of the SNAP25 gene results in the expression of two transcripts, SNAP25a and SNAP25b. These splice variants differ by only 9 amino acids, and studies of their expression to date have been limited to analysis of the corresponding mRNAs. Although these studies have been highly informative, it is possible that factors such as differential turnover of the SNAP25 proteins could complicate interpretations based entirely on mRNA expression profiles.
We report the generation and characterization of antibodies that distinguish between SNAP25a and SNAP25b isoforms, and their use to investigate the expression profile of these proteins in rat and human brain. In rat brain, SNAP25b protein expression increased dramatically during post-natal development, whereas the increase in SNAP25a expression was more modest and variable. The extent of this up-regulation in SNAP25b expression was similar across cortex, cerebellum and hippocampus. The SNAP25 isoforms also displayed distinct regional expression patterns, with SNAP25a very weakly expressed in both rat and human cerebellum. Quantitative analysis revealed that SNAP25b was the dominant isoform in all adult human brain regions examined.
SNAP25a and SNAP25b display distinct developmental and regional expression profiles in rat and human brain. These differences might reflect distinct functions of these highly conserved isoforms in membrane fusion pathways in the brain. The antibodies generated and characterized in this study represent important tools for future analyses of these essential SNARE protein isoforms.
Exocytosis, the fusion of intracellular secretory vesicles with the plasma membrane, is essential for protein targeting and for secretion of soluble vesicle components to the extracellular milieu. This pathway occurs constitutively in all cell types but can also be a highly regulated process, such as synaptic vesicle exocytosis in neurons. The exocytosis of synaptic vesicles is driven by interactions between the plasma membrane SNARE proteins syntaxin 1 and SNAP25 and the vesicle SNARE VAMP2 [1–3]. These neuronal SNARE proteins are specific targets of the potent botulinum and tetanus neurotoxins, emphasizing their essential functions in synaptic vesicle fusion events [4–9]. In contrast to syntaxin 1 and synaptobrevin, which are transmembrane proteins, SNAP25 is synthesized as a soluble protein and is anchored to membranes via the palmitoylation of a central cysteine-rich cluster [10, 11].
SNAP25 is expressed as alternatively spliced isoforms, SNAP25a and SNAP25b [12, 13]. These splice variants differ by only 9 out of 206 amino acids, a result of differential usage of two alternative exon 5 sequences (exon 5a/5b). Interestingly, three of the non-conserved residues occur within the cysteine-rich domain, altering the configuration of the palmitoylated cysteines. These differences in the cysteine-rich domains of SNAP25a and SNAP25b may affect their interaction with palmitoyl transferases , and the precise intracellular targeting of the proteins [15, 16].
Whereas SNAP25a/b expression is restricted to neuronal cells and a small number of cells outside the central nervous system (adrenal medullary chromaffin cells and pancreatic beta cells), SNAP23 is expressed ubiquitously [17, 18]. SNAP23 is ~ 60% identical to SNAP25, and has been proposed to function in both regulated exocytosis and constitutive membrane fusion events [19–21].
Elegant electrophysiological studies using adrenal medullary chromaffin cells from SNAP25 null mouse embryos revealed that over-expression of either SNAP25a or SNAP25b rescues exocytosis . Interestingly though, SNAP25b supports more exocytosis than SNAP25a in this system, clearly showing that the isoforms do not have directly interchangeable functions . Indeed, transgenic mice in which exon 5b is replaced with an extra copy of exon 5a (leading to the exclusive expression of the SNAP25a isoform) exhibit developmental defects, seizures and impairment of learning .
Despite the importance of the SNAP25 splice variants, there have been no comparative analyses of endogenous SNAP25a and SNAP25b protein expression; this is entirely due to a lack of suitable antibodies to distinguish between the splice variants. As a result, all characterization of endogenously expressed SNAP25a/b has been performed at the mRNA level. Interestingly, in mice, SNAP25a and SNAP25b transcript levels are broadly similar until around two weeks after birth, following which there is a dramatic up-regulation of SNAP25b levels . In contrast, levels of SNAP25a mRNA exhibit at best a marginal increase during post-natal development in the same samples . A similar post-natal increase in SNAP25b expression was reported for rat brain . The mRNA encoding SNAP25a and SNAP25b also exhibit differences in regional expression, for example, at P14 SNAP25a was enriched in layer IV of the cortex, whereas SNAP25b was more abundant in the outer and inner cortical layers . Whereas SNAP25b mRNA is the most abundant isoform expressed in many post-natal brain regions, SNAP25a mRNA is the major isoform in adrenal and pituitary glands and in neuroendocrine PC12 cells [15, 25].
Analysis of the mRNA expression profiles of SNAP25a and SNAP25b has provided important information on the relative expression of these SNAP25 splice variants. However there is not always a direct correlation between mRNA levels and protein expression . Here we describe the generation and characterization of antibodies that can distinguish between SNAP25a and SNAP25b, and their use to investigate developmental and regional patterns of expression of the splice variants in rat and human brain.
Generation and characterization of antibodies that selectively recognize either SNAP25a or SNAP25b
To test the specificity of the antibodies, lysates were prepared from HEK293T cells that had been transfected with EGFP-SNAP25a, EGFP-SNAP25b or EGFP-SNAP23. IgG 3067 specifically recognized SNAP25a, and IgG 3068 detected SNAP25b but not SNAP25a (Figure 1B). Figure 1A shows that the sequence of SNAP23 in the region used for peptide synthesis is very similar to SNAP25b; consistent with this, the 3068 antibody also displayed immunoreactivity against SNAP23 (Figure 1B).
To examine whether the 3067 and 3068 antibodies could distinguish between endogenously expressed SNAP25a and SNAP25b, lysates were prepared from cerebellum samples from wild-type mice and from mice in which exon 5b is replaced with an additional copy of exon 5a (SNAP25a/a) . As a result of this replacement, these transgenic mice exclusively express SNAP25a. The 3067 and 3068 antibodies exhibited very high selectivity towards endogenous SNAP25a and SNAP25b, respectively (Figure 1C). Total SNAP25 and SNAP23 levels were not noticeably different between the samples (Figure 1C), and the massive increase in SNAP25a levels in the SNAP25a/a cerebellum reflects the much higher expression of the SNAP25b isoform in this brain region of wild-type animals (see later). The very faint residual band detected by the 3068 antibody in the cerebellum of SNAP25a/a mice is presumably SNAP23, highlighting the vast excess of SNAP25b protein compared with SNAP23 in brain samples. This observation is important as it shows that cross-reactivity with SNAP23 has a negligible contribution to overall signal intensity of the 3068 antibody in brain. Collectively, the results displayed in Figure 1 demonstrate the specificity of the 3067 and 3068 antibodies towards SNAP25a and SNAP25b respectively, and show that these antibodies reliably report on the relative expression levels of the endogenously expressed protein isoforms.
Developmental expression of SNAP25a and SNAP25b in rat brain
We next examined if the developmental increase in SNAP25b levels was similar in different brain regions. The hippocampus, cerebellum and cortex were collected from rats at P2 and P20 (3 animals per age) and lysed. Figure 2C reveals that SNAP25b expression increased between P2 and P20 to a similar extent in each brain region tested.
Regional expression of SNAP25a and SNAP25b in rat brain
Regional expression and semi-quantitative comparison of SNAP25a, SNAP25b, and SNAP23 in human brain
The generation of antibodies that distinguish between SNAP25 splice variants is an important development that will significantly advance the study of these protein isoforms. RNA analysis provides a measure of relative protein expression levels but this can be complicated by differential protein turnover and stability. Antibodies also offer scope to study the intracellular localization of the endogenously expressed proteins, and to determine if the distinct cysteine-rich domains of SNAP25a/b mediate different intracellular sorting patterns; these analyses are ongoing in our laboratory. Cross-reactivity of the SNAP25b antibody (3068) with SNAP23 was unavoidable. However, Figure 1C and Figure 4 demonstrate that SNAP25b is expressed at much higher levels than SNAP23 in brain, and that the contribution of SNAP23 to signal intensity with the 3068 antibody is negligible. However, cross-reactivity is likely to be more of an issue when using the 3068 antibody on samples other than brain, or in brain areas where SNAP25b is weakly expressed.
Previous work had shown that SNAP25b mRNA is selectively up-regulated during post-natal development [15, 24]. Our study is in broad agreement with these findings. However in some experiments we did also detect a marked increase in SNAP25a expression; we currently do not know the reason for this variability. Nevertheless, these observations suggest that mRNA analyses may not provide a complete picture of SNAP25a/b expression levels and indicates that the stability of SNAP25a protein may change during post-natal development. The increased post-natal expression of SNAP25b was similar in hippocampus, cerebellum and cortex, implying that changes in expression of this isoform are largely occurring at a global level.
SNAP25a and SNAP25b displayed differential patterns of expression in gross brain regions. In rat brain, a marked difference was found in cerebellum, where SNAP25b was highly expressed and SNAP25a was only present at low levels. The weak expression of SNAP25a in cerebellum was also observed in post-mortem samples from human brain. It is possible that SNAP25b is the more evolutionarily-ancient of the two SNAP25 isoforms given that SNAP25b shares higher sequence identity with SNAP23 (Figure 1A). These new antibodies offer scope to extend upon these observations, for example, by analyzing how the isoforms are distributed in more defined sub-regions of the brain or in specific neuronal populations.
The increased level of exocytosis supported by SNAP25b in mouse embryonic chromaffin cells was shown to be attributable to splicing differences that occur upstream of the palmitoylated cysteines [22, 26, 27]. These results might suggest that differential palmitoylation of SNAP25a and SNAP25b does not impact on the functionality of the isoforms. However functional outcomes attributable to differences within the palmitoylated cysteine-rich domains of SNAP25a/b will probably arise via changes in membrane interaction and/or lateral organization in the membrane [16, 28, 29]. These parameters are likely to be saturated by the high level over-expression (approximately 20-fold) achieved in these studies. Thus, there is some merit in studying the expression and localization of SNAP25a/b at high resolution. In particular, the use of specific antibodies against these proteins will be important to analyse patterning of the endogenous proteins and thus without any confounding effects of over-expression or fluorescent tags. Similarly, it will be interesting in the future to assess whether functional effects related to the different cysteine-rich domains of these SNAP25 isoforms are apparent when the proteins are expressed at endogenous levels.
At a similar time when this work was submitted for publication, a paper was published by the Takahashi group also describing the production of isoform-specific antibodies against the SNAP25 family and their use to analyse expression of the proteins in mouse brain . Similar to our study, this study reported relatively low expression levels of SNAP25a in cerebellum, and that SNAP25b is the major isoform expressed in brain (~10-fold higher than SNAP25a in hippocampus).
We have shown that SNAP25a and SNAP25b proteins display distinct regional and developmental profiles in rat and human brain. This analysis will be helpful in further delineating how the function of these isoforms overlaps and/or is distinct. The antibodies generated in the study will serve as useful tools for future work in this area.
Lipofectamine 2000 was purchased from Invitrogen (Paisley, UK). COMPLETE Protease inhibitor cocktail tablets were from Roche (Buckinghamshire, UK). NP40, acrylamide and all other reagents were of an analytical grade from Sigma (Poole, UK).
Peptide synthesis and antibody production was performed by Eurogentec; the sequences of peptides used for immunization are shown in Figure 1A. IgG fractions from recovered antisera were purified on protein A agarose and dialyzed against phosphate buffered saline (PBS). Purified IgGs were aliquoted and stored at -80°C. For immunoblotting, the purified IgGs were used at a final concentration of 1 μg/ml in PBS supplemented with 0.05% Tween-20. Antibody incubations were performed as standard for 60 min at room temperature with gentle shaking.
Rabbit SNAP23 antibody and mouse monoclonal SNAP25 antibody were from Synaptic Systems (Gottingen, Germany). Monoclonal actin antibody was purchased from Abcam (Cambridge, UK). Monoclonal anti-GFP (JL8) was from Roche (Buckinghamshire, UK).
Plasmids encoding SNAP25a, SNAP25b and SNAP23 tagged N-terminally with EGFP have been previously described .
Cell culture and transfection
HEK293T cells were obtained from ATCC and cultured in DMEM with 10% fetal bovine serum in a humidified atmosphere containing 5% CO2. Cells were transfected using Lipofectamine 2000 (Invitrogen, Paisley, UK) according to the manufacturer's instructions.
Unless otherwise stated, all samples used were collected from in-house bred Sprague Dawley rats, following internationally recognise guidelines. The rat brain region lysates that were analyzed in Figure 3 were obtained from Zyagen (San Diego, USA). These samples represent pooled fractions from at least 3 different Sprague Dawley rats, approximate age 10 weeks old. Zyagen also supplied the developmental samples that were analyzed in Figure 2A. These samples are whole brain lysates from one Sprague Dawley rat of each age. The cerebellum samples from wild-type and SNAP25a/a mice were kindly supplied by Dr Christina Bark (Karolinska Institute, Sweden).
Preparation of tissue lysates and SDS-PAGE
Brain lysates were prepared by homogenization of samples in ice-cold buffer A [20 mM HEPES, 1 mM MgCl2, 250 mM sucrose, 2 mM EDTA, 1% NP-40 and protease inhibitor cocktail (Roche), pH 7.4] using a Dounce homogenizer. Insoluble material was removed by centrifugation 4,000 xg for 2 min. The protein content of recovered lysates was determined, and equal amounts of the various lysates were resolved by SDS-PAGE and transferred to nitrocellulose for immunoblotting analysis.
Human post-mortem brain samples
Frozen samples from histologically characterised normal brain tissues authorised for ethically approved scientific research (Lothian Research Ethical Committee; ref. 2003/8/37) were gratefully provided by Robert Walker at the Medical Research Council Sudden Death Brain and Tissue Bank, University of Edinburgh , and studied in collaboration with Douglas Blackwood and Donald McIntyre, Division of Psychiatry, University of Edinburgh (ethical approval reference MREC/99/0/12). Tissue samples from 6 post-mortem brains were dissected from the cortex, hippocampus, cerebellum and thalamus. Lysates were prepared as described for the rat brain samples.
synaptosomal-associated protein of 25 kDa
SNAP25 homologue of 23 kDa.
Acknowledgements and funding
We are very grateful to Christina Bark for generously providing cerebellum samples from wild-type and SNAP25a/a mice. Work in the authors' laboratory is supported by a Medical Research Council senior fellowship award to LHC.
- Sollner T, Whiteheart SW, Brunner M, Erdjument-Bromage H, Geromanos S, Tempst P, Rothman JE: SNAP receptors implicated in vesicle targeting and fusion. Nature. 1993, 362: 318-324. 10.1038/362318a0.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Weber T, Zemelman BV, McNew JA, Westermann B, Gmachl M, Parlati F, Sollner TH, Rothman JE: SNAREpins: Minimal Machinery for Membrane Fusion. Cell. 1998, 92: 759-772. 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81404-X.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Jahn R, Scheller RH: SNAREs- engines for membrane fusion. Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology. 2006, 7: 631-643. 10.1038/nrm2002.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Schiavo G, Rossetto O, Catsicas S, Polverino de Laureto P, DasGupta BR, Benfenati F, Montecucco C: Identification of the nerve terminal targets of botulinum neurotoxin serotypes A, D, and E. J Biol Chem. 1993, 268: 23784-23787.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Binz T, Blasi J, Yamasaki S, Baumeister A, Link E, Sudhof TC, Jahn R, Niemann H: Proteolysis of SNAP-25 by types E and A botulinal neurotoxins. J Biol Chem. 1994, 269: 1617-1620.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Blasi J, Chapman ER, Link E, Binz T, Yamasaki S, Camilli PD, Sudhof TC, Niemann H, Jahn R: Botulinum neurotoxin A selectively cleaves the synaptic protein SNAP-25. Nature. 1993, 365: 160-163. 10.1038/365160a0.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Schiavo GG, Benfenati F, Poulain B, Rossetto O, de Laureto PP, DasGupta BR, Montecucco C: Tetanus and botulinum-B neurotoxins block neurotransmitter release by proteolytic cleavage of synaptobrevin. Nature. 1992, 359: 832-835. 10.1038/359832a0.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Schiavo G, Shone CC, Rossetto O, Alexander FC, Montecucco C: Botulinum neurotoxin serotype F is a zinc endopeptidase specific for VAMP/synaptobrevin. J Biol Chem. 1993, 268: 11516-11519.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Blasi J, Chapman ER, Yamasaki S, Binz T, Niemann H, Jahn R: Botulinum neurotoxin C1 blocks neurotransmitter release by means of cleaving HPC-1/syntaxin. EMBO J. 1993, 12: 4821-4828.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Veit M, Söllner TH, Rothman JE: Multiple palmitoylation of synaptotagmin and the t-SNARE SNAP-25. FEBS Letts. 1996, 385: 119-123. 10.1016/0014-5793(96)00362-6.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Hess DT, Slater TM, Wilson MC, Skene JH: The 25 kDa synaptosomal-associated protein SNAP-25 is the major methionine-rich polypeptide in rapid axonal transport and a major substrate for palmitoylation in adult CNS. J Neurosci. 1992, 12: 4634-4641.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bark IC, Wilson MC: Human cDNA clones encoding two different isoforms of the nerve terminal protein SNAP-25. Gene. 1994, 139: 291-292. 10.1016/0378-1119(94)90773-0.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bark IC: Structure of the Chicken Gene for SNAP-25 Reveals Duplicated Exons Encoding Distinct Isoforms of the Protein. J Mol Biol. 1993, 233: 67-76. 10.1006/jmbi.1993.1485.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Greaves J, Gorleku OA, Salaun C, Chamberlain LH: Palmitoylation of the SNAP25 protein family: specificity and regulation by DHHC palmitoyl transferases. J Biol Chem. 2010, 285: 24629-24638. 10.1074/jbc.M110.119289.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bark IC, Hahn KM, Ryabinin AE, Wilson MC: Differential expression of SNAP-25 protein isoforms during divergent vesicle fusion events of neural development. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1995, 92: 1510-1514. 10.1073/pnas.92.5.1510.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Andersson J, Fried G, Lilja L, Meister B, Bark IC: Differential sorting of SNAP-25a and SNAP-25b proteins in neuroblastoma cells. Eur J Cell Biol. 2000, 79: 781-789. 10.1078/0171-9335-00106.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ravichandran V, Chawla A, Roche PA: Identification of a Novel Syntaxin- and Synaptobrevin/VAMP-binding Protein, SNAP-23, Expressed in Non-neuronal Tissues. J Biol Chem. 1996, 271: 13300-13303. 10.1074/jbc.271.23.13300.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Wang G, Witkin JW, Hao G, Bankaitis VA, Scherer PE, Baldini G: Syndet is a novel SNAP-25 related protein expressed in many tissues. J Cell Sci. 1997, 110: 505-513.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Leung S-M, Chen D, DasGupta BR, Whiteheart SW, Apodaca G: SNAP-23 Requirement for Transferrin Recycling in StreptolysinO-permeabilized Madin-Darby Canine Kidney Cells. J Biol Chem. 1998, 273: 17732-17741. 10.1074/jbc.273.28.17732.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Guo Z, Turner C, Castle D: Relocation of the t-SNARE SNAP-23 from Lamellipodia-like Cell Surface Projections Regulates Compound Exocytosis in Mast Cells. Cell. 1998, 94: 537-548. 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81594-9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Rea S, Martin LB, McIntosh S, Macaulay SL, Ramsdale T, Baldini G, James DE: Syndet, an Adipocyte Target SNARE Involved in the Insulin-induced Translocation of GLUT4 to the Cell Surface. J Biol Chem. 1998, 273: 18784-18792. 10.1074/jbc.273.30.18784.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sørensen JB, Nagy G, Varoqueaux F, Nehring RB, Brose N, Wilson MC, Neher E: Differential Control of the Releasable Vesicle Pools by SNAP-25 Splice Variants and SNAP-23. Cell. 2003, 114: 75-86. 10.1016/S0092-8674(03)00477-X.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Johansson JU, Ericsson J, Janson J, Beraki S, Stanić D, Mandic SA, Wikström MA, Hökfelt T, Ögren SO, Rozell B, Berggren PO, Bark C: An Ancient Duplication of Exon 5 in the Snap25 Gene Is Required for Complex Neuronal Development/Function. PLOS Genetics. 2008, 4: e1000278-10.1371/journal.pgen.1000278.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Boschert U, O'Shaughnessy C, Dickinson R, Tessari M, Bendotti C, Catsicas S, Pich EM: Developmental and plasticity-related differential expression of two SNAP-25 isoforms in the rat brain. J Comp Neurol. 1996, 367: 177-193. 10.1002/(SICI)1096-9861(19960401)367:2<177::AID-CNE2>3.0.CO;2-2.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Grant NJ, Hepp R, Krause W, Aunis D, Oehme P, Langley K: Differential Expression of SNAP-25 Isoforms and SNAP-23 in the Adrenal Gland. J Neurochem. 1999, 72: 363-372.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Millar T, Walker R, Arango JC, Ironside J, Harrison D, MacIntyre D, Blackwood D, Smith C, Bell J: Tissue and organ donation for research in forensic pathology: the MRC Sudden Death Brain and Tissue Bank. J Pathol. 2007, 213: 369-375. 10.1002/path.2247.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Nagy G, Milosevic I, Fasshauer D, Muller EM, de Groot BL, Lang T, Wilson MC, Sorensen JB: Alternative Splicing of SNAP-25 Regulates Secretion through Nonconservative Substitutions in the SNARE Domain. Mol Biol Cell. 2005, 16: 5675-5685. 10.1091/mbc.E05-07-0595.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Salaun C, Gould GW, Chamberlain LH: Lipid raft association of SNARE proteins regulates exocytosis in PC12 cells. J Biol Chem. 2005, 280: 19449-19453. 10.1074/jbc.M501923200.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Salaun C, Gould GW, Chamberlain LH: The SNARE proteins SNAP-25 and SNAP-23 display different affinities for lipid rafts in PC12 cells. Regulation by distinct cysteine-rich domains. J Biol Chem. 2005, 280: 1236-1240.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Yamamori S, Itakura M, Sugaya D, Katsumata O, Sakagami H, Takahashi M: Differential expression of SNAP-25 family proteins in the mouse brain. J Comp Neurol. 2011, 519: 916-932. 10.1002/cne.22558.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.