Volume 11 Supplement 1

Nineteenth Annual Computational Neuroscience Meeting: CNS*2010

Open Access

A combined computational-experimental study of dynamic responses to olfactory input in a glomerular circuit

BMC Neuroscience201011(Suppl 1):P129

DOI: 10.1186/1471-2202-11-S1-P129

Published: 20 July 2010

Odorant-evoked input to and output from the mammalian olfactory bulb (OB) is temporally dynamic. Olfactory receptor neuron (ORN) inputs are tightly coupled to the respiratory cycle, and inhalation-evoked input bursts occur with durations, rise times, latencies, and strengths (amplitudes) that vary across glomeruli (for the same odorant) and also in individual glomeruli for different odorants [1]. The temporal spread of sensory input following a single inhalation (~100-300 ms) is comparable to the range of discrimination times for different olfactory tasks [2, 3], consistent with these dynamics being important in shaping odor perception. Similarly diverse temporal patterns of activity occur at the level of output from the OB, among mitral cells (MCs), whose firing patterns express strong temporal structure organized around the respiratory cycle and modulated by odorant presentation; significant odor information is carried in these temporal patterns across the MC population.

We investigate these temporal dynamics using a computational model of the ORN-MC circuit that uses a single-compartment, Hodgkin-Huxley-style MC model [4]. The input to the model MC is taken from recordings of odorant-evoked calcium influx into the presynaptic terminals of ORNs of awake, head-fixed rats engaged in an olfactory discrimination task [1, 5]. This calcium signal is converted to an excitatory synaptic input for the model MC having a temporal signature that presumably closely reproduces that of the signal received by real MCs. The response dynamics of the MC model are strongly shaped by the input signal (Figure 1). We explore how these dynamics vary for different odorants, synaptic strengths, and intrinsic MC parameters. We also investigate the response of a variant circuit that incorporates a mediating external tufted cell model between the ORN and MC [6].
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1471-2202-11-S1-P129/MediaObjects/12868_2010_Article_1835_Fig1_HTML.jpg
Figure 1

Sniffing and odor-evoked ORN input (top) imaged from an awake rat; ORN input is used to drive a model MC (bottom). Each sniff-evoked burst of ORN input elicits a burst of action potentials in the model MC.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Biomedical Engineering, Boston University
(2)
Center for BioDynamics, Boston University
(3)
Department of Biology, Boston University

References

  1. Carey RM, Verhagen JV, Wesson DW, Wachowiak M: Temporal Structure of Receptor Neuron Input to the Olfactory Bulb Imaged in Behaving Rats. J. Neurophysiol. 2009, 101: 1073-1088. 10.1152/jn.90902.2008.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Abraham NM, Spors H, Carleton A, Margrie TW, Kuner T, Schaefer AT: Maintaining accuracy at the expense of speed: stimulus similarity defines odor discrimination time in mice. Neuron. 2004, 44: 865-876.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Wesson DW, Donahou TN, Johnson MO, Wachowiak M: Sniffing behavior of mice during performance in odor-guided tasks. Chemical Senses. 2008, 33: 581-596. 10.1093/chemse/bjn029.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Bathellier B, Lagier S, Faure P, Lledo PM: Circuit properties generating gamma oscillations in a network model of the olfactory bulb. J Neurophysiol. 2006, 95: 2678-2691. 10.1152/jn.01141.2005.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Verhagen JV, Wesson DW, Netoff TI, White JA, Wachowiak M: Sniffing controls an adaptive filter of sensory input to the olfactory bulb. Nat Neurosci. 2007, 10: 631-639. 10.1038/nn1892.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. De Saint Jan D, Hirnet D, Westbrook GL, Chupak S: External Tufted Cells Drive the Output of Olfactory Bulb Glomeruli. J. Neurosci. 2009, 29 (7): 2043-2052. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5317-08.2009.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Carey et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2010

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd.

Advertisement