Volume 10 Supplement 1

Eighteenth Annual Computational Neuroscience Meeting: CNS*2009

Open Access

Estimating the contribution of assembly activity to cortical dynamics from spike and population measures

  • Michael Denker1Email author,
  • Sébastien Roux2,
  • Alexa Riehle3,
  • Markus Diesmann1, 4 and
  • Sonja Grün1
BMC Neuroscience200910(Suppl 1):P231

DOI: 10.1186/1471-2202-10-S1-P231

Published: 13 July 2009

An inspiring yet hotly debated hypothesis is that cortical networks employ the coordinated activity of groups of neurons, termed assemblies, as a means to code information. Despite recent advances in increasing the number of recorded neurons from cortical networks and new analysis tools to handle the complex data of such experiments, the massive undersampling of the system still deprives us of the possibility to directly observe assembly activity in the living brain. However, a growing body of experimental studies indirectly substantiates the assembly idea with findings of behavior-related significant synchronous spiking activity [1]. Independently thereof, a mesoscopic signal probing the neural population, like the local field potential (LFP), typically exhibits temporally structured oscillations commonly interpreted as correlated network activity. Likewise, the occurrence and strength of such oscillations have been linked to a variety of behavioral aspects. Recently, we demonstrated a direct link between coincident spike events and LFP beta oscillations in motor cortex of the awake-behaving monkey [2]. In particular, we showed that assembly activity detected by the Unitary Event (UE) analysis [3] as a significant surplus of spike synchrony exhibits an exceptionally strong phase locking to the LFP that cannot be explained by the locking of the individual neurons.

To understand how the observed levels of synchrony and phase locking quantitatively relate to the assembly hypothesis, we formulate a simplified model based on our experimental results. It assumes that part of the spiking activity is involved in assembly activations, whereas the other part is not. In the model, UEs explicitly express observed assembly activity. Combined with the results in [2], we conclude that assembly spikes are more strongly entrained by the LFP than non-assembly spikes. In this framework, we compute the minimal relative contribution of assembly spikes in UE periods following two conceptually different approaches. First, we show how to estimate the fraction of spikes involved in assembly activations by comparing the phase distributions between time periods that exhibit UEs and those that do not. Second, we estimate this fraction analytically as a function of the UE significance level independent of the LFP. In this approach we use a model of injected spike synchrony into otherwise independent firing [4], and exploit estimates of the expected and empirical coincidence distributions. Both methods are calibrated using simulated data before they are applied to the cortical data. A comparison finds the fractional contribution of assemblies to the neuronal dynamics estimated by the two independent methods in good agreement. Finally, an extension of the former approach enables us to infer an estimate of the percentage of spikes a neuron contributes to assemblies. The consistency of the results of both approaches provides encouraging support for the assembly hypothesis and furthermore suggests that a parallel coding scheme of rate and synchrony is a likely explanation of the experimental findings.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

Partially funded by the Helmholtz Alliance on Systems Biology, the French National Research Agency (ANR-05-NEUR-045-01), and EU grant 15879 (FACETS).

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Theoretical Neuroscience Group, RIKEN Brain Science Institute
(2)
Bernstein Center for Computational Neuroscience (BCCN), Albert-Ludwigs University
(3)
Mediterranean Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience (INCM), CNRS – Univ. Aix-Marseille 2
(4)
Brain and Neural Systems Team, RIKEN Computational Science Research Program

References

  1. Riehle A, Grün S, Diesmann M, Aertsen A: Spike synchronization and rate modulation differentially involved in motor cortical function. Science. 1997, 278: 1950-1953. 10.1126/science.278.5345.1950.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Denker M, Roux S, Lindén H, Diesmann M, Riehle A, Grün S: Reflections of synchronous spiking activity in local field potentials. Soc Neurosci Online Abstract Viewer/Itinerary Planner. 2007, Program No. 793.4.Google Scholar
  3. Grün S, Diesmann M, Aertsen A: Unitary events in multiple single-neuron spiking activity: II. Nonstationary data. Neural Comp. 2002, 14: 81-119. 10.1162/089976602753284464.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Grün S, Diesmann M, Grammont F, Riehle A, Aertsen A: Detecting unitary events without discretization of time. J Neurosci Meth. 1999, 94: 67-79. 10.1016/S0165-0270(99)00126-0.View ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Denker et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2009

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd.

Advertisement