Skip to main content

Table 1 Characteristics of the included studies

From: The effect of early mobilisation (< 14 days) on pathophysiological and functional outcomes in animals with induced spinal cord injury: a systematic review with meta-analysis

Author & year

Country of study

Population

Intervention

Control

Time to mobilisation after SCI (days)

Outcome measure

  

Animal

Gender

Sample size

Type of injury

Injury level

Type

Duration* (minutes)

Frequency (per week)

Intensity (metres/min)

Duration of intervention period (to assessment)

  

Physiological

Functional

Asano 2022

Japan

Rat (W)

F

I = 6, C = 7

Transection

T10

Walking

(wire mesh)

10

5

NR

3 weeks

No training

2

Microglial

BBB

Brown 2011 (a)

(b)

USA

Rat (SD)

M

a) I = 6, C = 6

b) I = 6, C = 6

Contusion

T12

Exercise ball

NR

7

NR

2 weeks

No training

a) 1

b) 8

x

BBB

Cote 2011

USA

Rat (SD)

F

I = 22, C = 8

Transection

T12

Treadmill

15

5

NR

4 weeks

No training

5

BDNF

x

Davaa 2021

Korea

Rat (SD)

F

I = 14, C = 13

Contusion

T9

Treadmill

15

(× 2 day)

5

5–12

4 weeks

No training

7

x

BBB, Ladder

Han 2014

China

Rat (SD)

M

I = 18, C = 18

NR

T8-9

Rehabilitation training

30

3

NR

3 weeks

No training

3

x

BBB

Ilha 2011

Brazil

Rat (W)

M

I = 10, C = 10

Transection

T8-9

Treadmill (BWS)

20–30

5

6–7

4 weeks

No training

6

x

BBB

Li 2013 (a)

(b)

(c)

China

Rat (W)

M

a) I = 6, C = 6

b) I = 6, C = 6

c) I = 6, C = 6

Contusion

T10-11

Treadmill (BWS)

20

5

4.5

4 weeks

No training

a) 1

b) 2

c) 3

x

BBB

Loy 2018

Germany

Mice

F

I = 13, C = 13

Hemisection

T8

Exercise wheel

NR

NR

NR

4 weeks

No training

2

x

Ladder

Macias 2009

Poland

Rat (W)

M

I = 6, C = 6

Transection

T9-10

Treadmill

4

(× 4–6 day)

5

3

4 weeks

No training

7

BDNF

x

Marques 2018 (a)

(b)

Brazil

Rat (W)

M

a) I = 13, C = 38

b) I = 14, C = 38

Contusion

T10

Treadmill

20

5

6

4 weeks

No training

a) 7

b) 14

BDNF

BBB, Ladder

Miranda 2012

Brazil

Rat (W)

M

I = 29, C = 11

Contusion

T9-10

Walking (runway)

12

2

NR

4 weeks

No training

3

x

BBB

Multon 2003

Belgium

Rat (W)

F

I = 7, C = 6

Compression

T9

Treadmill

10

(× 3 day)

5

3.5

4 weeks

No training

2–4

x

BBB

Oh 2009

Korea

Rat (SD)

M

I = 7, C = 7

Contusion

T9-10

Treadmill (BWS)

30

5

8

4 weeks

No training

7

x

BBB, Ladder

Sandrow-Feinberg 2009

USA

Rat (SD)

F

I = 8, C = 6

Contusion

C4

Exercise wheel

20

5

3.5–14

4 weeks

No training

5

BDNF

BBB, Ladder

Wang 2015

USA

Rat (SD)

F

I = 12, C = 12

Contusion

T9

Treadmill

15

(× 2 day)

5

5–12

4 weeks

No training

7

BDNF

BBB

Zhan 2023 (a)

(b)

(c)

China

Mice

F

a) I = 5, C = 15

b) I = 5, C = 15

c) I = 5, C = 15

Crush

C5

Treadmill

30

5

Starting 9, progressed to:

a) ‘low’

b) ‘med’

c) ‘high’

(details NR)

4 weeks

No training

7

BDNF

Ladder

Zhao 2020 (a)

(b)

(c)

China

Rat (SD)

M

a) I = 10, C = 10

b) I = 10, C = 10

c) I = 10, C = 10

Contusion

T10

Treadmill (BWS)

30

5

4.2

3 weeks

No training

a) 3

b) 7

c) 14

x

BBB

  1. SD (Sprague–Dawley), W(Wistar), M (male), F (female), I (intervention), C (control), BWS (body weight support), NR (not reported), BDNF (Brain derived neurotrophic factor), BBB (Basso, Beattie and Bresnahan locomotor rating score), x (outcome not measured). *Once a day unless otherwise stated