Skip to main content
Fig. 4 | BMC Neuroscience

Fig. 4

From: ANDA: an open-source tool for automated image analysis of in vitro neuronal cells

Fig. 4

Comparison of analysis with ANDA and manual quantification of CGN and NT2N cells. A Comparison of output after analysis of CGN cell body counts with ANDA and manual quantification. B Comparison of output after analysis of CGN neurite lengths with ANDA, manual measurements and NeuroTrack. C Comparison of output after analysis of cell body count with ANDA and manual quantification three randomly selected areas of three differentiation time-points (0, 72 and 120 h) of NT2Ns. D Comparison of output after analysis of neurite lengths with ANDA and manual measurements of NT2Ns. Manual measurements for each time-point are presented as an average of two consensus counts of n = 2 randomly selected images at three stages of CGNs in vitro differentiation (DIV1, 2 and 3) and an average of two consensus counts of n = 3 randomly selected images per time-point (0, 72 and 120 h) of NT2N cell differentiation

Back to article page